Abstract
Sediment and soil samples from the Beitang River (BR) and the Haihe River (HR) in Tianjin were analyzed to investigate the extent of mercury contamination. The results show that total mercury (THg) contents in the BR and HR sediments were 2241 ± 1024 and 653 ± 450 ng g−1, and THg in rice paddy soils were 907 ± 345 and 328 ± 286 ng g−1, respectively. Industrial and domestic sewage were regarded as the main sources of mercury in the two river basins. Sediment-bound mercury in the BR and the HR were found to be predominantly associated with the organic-bound fraction (55 %) and residual fraction and (54 %), while soil-bound mercury was mainly in organic-bound fraction in paddy soils (61 % and 57 %, respectively). The availability of this element (soluble and exchangeable and specifically sorbed fraction) seemed restricted, but significantly higher in the paddy soils than in sediments. Higher soluble and exchangeable, specifically sorbed fraction and organic-bound fraction may promote the higher toxic methylmercury and bioavailable fraction formation in the soils during the rice cultivation.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ambrose JL, Gratz LE, Jaffe DA, Campos T, Flocke FM, Knapp DJ, Stechman DM, Stell M, Weinheimer AJ, Cantrell CA (2015) Mercury emission ratios from coal-fired power plants in the southeastern US during NOMADSS. Environ Sci Techol 49(17):10389–10397
Bhattacharyya P, Tripathy S, Chakrabarti K, Chakraborty A, Banik P (2008) Fractionation and bioavailability of metals and their impacts on microbial properties in sewage irrigated soil. Chemosphere 72:543–550
Chen JS, Zhou JY (1992) Study of heavy metals in water environment of China. China Environmental Sciences Press, Beijing, p 209
Chen Y, Wang R, Shen H, Li W, Chen H, Huang Y, Zhang Y, Chen Y, Su S, Lin N, Liu J, Li B, Wang X, Liu W, Coveney RM, Tao S (2014) Global mercury emissions from combustion in light of international fuel trading. Environ Sci Technol 48:1727–1735
Crockett AB, Kinnison RR (1979) Mercury residues in soil around a large coal-fired power plant. Environ Sci Technol 13(6):712–715
Demers JD, Sherman LS, Blum JD, Marsik FJ, Timothy DJ (2015) Coupling atmospheric mercury isotope ratios and meteorology to identify sources of mercury impacting a coastal urban–industrial region near Pensacola, Florida, USA. Glob Biogeochem Cycles 29(10):1689–1705
Giang A, Stokes LC, Streets DG, Corbitt ES, Selin NE (2015) Impacts of the minamata convention on mercury emissions and global deposition from coal-fired power generation in Asia. Environ Sci Techol 49(9):5326–5335
Gupta N, Khan DK, Santra SC (2008) An assessment of heavy metal contamination in vegetables grown in wastewater-irrigated areas of Titagarh, West Bengal, India. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 80:115–118
Hojdová M, Rohovec J, Chrastný V, Penížek V, Navrátil T (2015) The influence of sample drying procedures on mercury concentrations analyzed in soils. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 94(5):570–576
Issaro N, Abi-Ghanem C, Bermond A (2009) Fractionation studies of mercury in soils and sediments: a review of the chemical reagents used for mercury extraction. Anal Chim Acta 631(1):1–12
Jiang B, Zheng HL, Huang GQ, Hui D, Li XG, Suo HT, Li R (2007) Characterization and distribution of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon in sediments of Haihe river, Tianjin, China. J Environ Sci 19(3):306–311
Li GF, Liu XB, Liu ZG, Guo WH (2012) Water quality assessment of main rivers in Tianjin based on principal component analysis and water quality identification index. J Ecol Rural Environ 27(4):27–31 (in Chinese with English abstract)
Lin Y, Larssen T, Vogt RD, Feng X (2010) Identification of fractions of mercury in water, soil and sediment from a typical mercury mining area in Wanshan, Guizhou province, China. Appl Geochem 25(1):60–68
Liu C, Wang ZY, He Y, Cheng DS (2007) Evaluation of water and sediment qualities at river mouths in the Haihe river system. Int J Sediment Res 22(4):318–326
López-Blanco C, Collahuazo L, Torres S, Chinchay L, Ayala D, Benítez P (2015) Mercury pollution in soils from the Yacuambi river (Ecuadorian Amazon) as a result of gold placer mining. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 95:1–6
Maćkiewicz D, Falandysz J (2012) Total mercury in Yellow Knights (Tricholoma equestre) mushrooms and beneath soils. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 89:755–758
Molina JA, Oyarzun R, Esbrí JM, Higueras P (2006) Mercury accumulation in soils and plants in the Almadén mining district, Spain: one of the most contaminated sites on Earth. Environ Geochem Health 28(5):487–498
Peng C, Ouyang Z, Wang M, Chen W, Jiao W (2012) Vegetative cover and PAHs accumulation in soils of urban green space. Environ Pollut 161:36–42
Pirrone N, Cinnirella S, Feng X, Finkelman RB (2010) Global mercury emissions to the atmosphere from anthropogenic and natural sources. Atmos Chem Phys 10(13):5951–5964
Raghunath R, Tripathi RM, Kumar AV, Sathe AP, Khandekar RN, Nambi KSV (1999) Assessment of Pb, Cd, Cu, and Zn exposures of 6 to 10-year-old children in Mumbai. Environ Res 80:215–221
Reash RJ, Brown L, Merritt K (2015) Mercury and other trace elements in Ohio River fish collected near coal-fired power plants: interspecific patterns and consideration of consumption risks. Integr Environ Assess Manag 11:474–480
Seigneur C, Vijayaraghavan K, Lohman K, Karamchandani P, Scott C (2004) Modeling the atmospheric fate and transport of mercury over North America: power plant emission scenarios. Fuel Process Technol 85:441–450
Tan Y, Mortazavi R, Dureau B, Douglas MA (2004) An investigation of mercury distribution and speciation during coal combustion. Fuel 83(16):2229–2236
US EPA (1999) Method 1631. Revision B: mercury in water by oxidation, purge and trap, and cold vapor atomic fluorescence spectrometry. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, pp 1–33
Wang X, Sato T, Xing B, Tao S (2005) Health risks of heavy metals to the general public in Tianjin, China via consumption of vegetables and fish. Sci Total Environ 350:28–37
Wang J, Feng X, Anderson CWN, Qiu G, Li P, Bao Z (2011) Ammonium thiosulphate enhanced phytoextraction from mercury contaminated soil-results from a greenhouse study. J Hazard Mater 186:119–127
Wang K, Orndorff W, Yan C, Pan W (2013) Mercury transportation in soil via using gypsum from flue gas desulfurization unit in coal-fired power plant. J Environ Sci 25(09):1858–1864
Wu GH, Cao SS (2010) Mercury and cadmium contamination of irrigation water, sediment, soil and shallow groundwater in a wastewater-irrigated field in Tianjin, China. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 84(3):336–341
Wu G, Wei Z, Su R (2011) Distribution, accumulation and mobility of mercury in superficial sediment samples from Tianjin, Northern China. J Environ Monit 13(9):2488–2495
Yang X, Wang L (2008) Spatial analysis and hazard assessment of mercury in soil around the coal-fired power plant: a case study from the city of Baoji, China. Environ Geol 53(7):1381–1388
Zhou J, Feng X, Liu H, Zhang H, Fu X, Bao Z, Wang X, Zhang Y (2013) Examination of total mercury inputs by precipitation and litterfall in a remote upland forest of southwestern China. Atmos Environ 81:364–372
Zhou J, Liu H, Du B, Shang L, Yang J, Wang Y (2015) Influence of soil mercury concentration and fraction on bioaccumulation process of inorganic mercury and methylmercury in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Environ Sci Pollut Res 22:6144–6154
Zhou J, Wang Z, Sun T, Zhang H, Zhang X (2016) Mercury in terrestrial forested systems with highly elevated mercury deposition in southwestern China: the risk to insects and potential release from wildfires. Environ Pollut 212:188–196
Acknowledgments
This research was financially supported by special funds for environmental protection industry research for public welfare program of China’s Ministry of Environmental Protection (No. 201309004).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wu, C., Zhang, Z., Fei, Y. et al. Mercury Fractionation in Superficial Sediment and Paddy Soil Samples from Tianjin, Northern China. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 97, 225–231 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00128-016-1847-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00128-016-1847-y