Abstract
Key message
By deploying a multi-omics approach, we unraveled the mechanisms that might help rice to combat Yellow Stem Borer infestation, thus providing insights and scope for developing YSB resistant rice varieties.
Abstract
Yellow Stem Borer (YSB), Scirpophaga incertulas (Walker) (Lepidoptera: Crambidae), is a major pest of rice, that can lead to 20–60% loss in rice production. Effective management of YSB infestation is challenged by the non-availability of adequate sources of resistance and poor understanding of resistance mechanisms, thus necessitating studies for generating resources to breed YSB resistant rice and to understand rice-YSB interaction. In this study, by using bulk-segregant analysis in combination with next-generation sequencing, Quantitative Trait Loci (QTL) intervals in five rice chromosomes were mapped that could be associated with YSB resistance at the vegetative phase in a resistant rice line named SM92. Further, multiple SNP markers that showed significant association with YSB resistance in rice chromosomes 1, 5, 10, and 12 were developed. RNA-sequencing of the susceptible and resistant lines revealed several genes present in the candidate QTL intervals to be differentially regulated upon YSB infestation. Comparative transcriptome analysis revealed a putative candidate gene that was predicted to encode an alpha-amylase inhibitor. Analysis of the transcriptome and metabolite profiles further revealed a possible link between phenylpropanoid metabolism and YSB resistance. Taken together, our study provides deeper insights into rice-YSB interaction and enhances the understanding of YSB resistance mechanism. Importantly, a promising breeding line and markers for YSB resistance have been developed that can potentially aid in marker-assisted breeding of YSB resistance among elite rice cultivars.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
SM and SM92 parent whole genome sequences are deposited in NCBI-SRA under the accession PRJNA658718. The F2 bulk DNA data are deposited under the accession PRJNA972670. The transcriptome data are deposited in NCBI-Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) under the accession GSE245213.
References
Bentur J, Padmakumari AP, Jhansilakshmi V, et al (2011) Insect resistance in Rice (2000–2009) Tech Bull No. 51. Directorate of Rice Research, rajendranagar, Hyderabad-500 030-AP. India pp 86
Da L-L (2018) The amylases of insects. Int J Insect Sci 10:117954331880478. https://doi.org/10.1177/1179543318804783
Dobin A, Davis CA, Schlesinger F et al (2013) STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics 29:15–21. https://doi.org/10.1093/BIOINFORMATICS/BTS635
Dong NQ, Lin HX (2021) Contribution of phenylpropanoid metabolism to plant development and plant–environment interactions. J Integr Plant Biol 63:180–209. https://doi.org/10.1111/JIPB.13054
Fauth M, Schweizer P, Buchala A et al (1998) Cutin monomers and surface wax constituents elicit H2O2 in conditioned cucumber hypocotyl segments and enhance the activity of other H2O2 elicitors. Plant Physiol 117:1373. https://doi.org/10.1104/PP.117.4.1373
Franco OL, Rigden DJ, Melo FR, Grossi-de-Sá MF (2002) Plant α-amylase inhibitors and their interaction with insect α-amylases. Eur J Biochem 269:397–412. https://doi.org/10.1046/J.0014-2956.2001.02656.X
Gangwar SK, Chakraborty S, Dasgupta MK, Huda AKS (1986) Modelling yield loss in indica rice in farmers’ fields due to multiple pests. Ecosyst Environ 17:165–171
Gao H, Ma K, Ji G et al (2022) Lipid transfer proteins involved in plant–pathogen interactions and their molecular mechanisms. Mol Plant Pathol. https://doi.org/10.1111/MPP.13264
Gesteiro N, Butrón A, Estévez S, Santiago R (2021) Unraveling the role of maize (Zea mays L.) cell-wall phenylpropanoids in stem-borer resistance. Phytochemistry 185:112683. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PHYTOCHEM.2021.112683
Goujon M, McWilliam H, Li W et al (2010) A new bioinformatics analysis tools framework at EMBL–EBI. Nucleic Acids Res 38:W695–W699. https://doi.org/10.1093/NAR/GKQ313
Heinrichs E, Medrano FG, Rapusas HR (1985) Genetic Evaluation for Insect Resistance in Rice., 1st edn. International Rice Research Institute. ISBN 971-104-110-3. pp 356. http://books.irri.org/9711041103_content.pdf
Holm L (2022) Dali server: structural unification of protein families. Nucleic Acids Res 50:W210–W215. https://doi.org/10.1093/NAR/GKAC387
Horgan FG (2017) Integrated pest management for sustainable rice cultivation: a holistic approach. 309–342. https://doi.org/10.19103/AS.2016.0003.23
Horgan FG, Crisol-Martínez E, Almazan MLP et al (2016) Susceptibility and tolerance in hybrid and pure-line rice varieties to herbivore attack: biomass partitioning and resource-based compensation in response to damage. Ann Appl Biol 169:200–213. https://doi.org/10.1111/AAB.12296
Horgan FG, Romena AM, Bernal CC et al (2021) Stem borers revisited: Host resistance, tolerance, and vulnerability determine levels of field damage from a complex of Asian rice stemborers. Crop Prot 142:105513. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CROPRO.2020.105513
IRRI (2014) Standard evaluation system for rice. International Rice Research Institute
Jena KK, Jeung JU, Lee JH et al (2006) High-resolution mapping of a new brown planthopper (BPH) resistance gene, Bph18(t), and marker-assisted selection for BPH resistance in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Theor Appl Genet 112:288–297. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00122-005-0127-8/
Jumper J, Evans R, Pritzel A, et al (2021) Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. Nat 2021 5967873 596:583–589. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2
Katti G, Shanker C, A.P. P, I.C. P (2011) Rice stem borers in India-species composition and distribution. Tech Bull No59 Dir Rice Res Rajendranagar, Hyderabad-500 030- AP India 29
Kawahara Y, de la Bastide M, Hamilton JP et al (2013) Improvement of the oryza sativa nipponbare reference genome using next generation sequence and optical map data. Rice 6:3–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/1939-8433-6-4/
Kim TH, Park JH, Kim MC, Cho SH (2008) Cutin monomer induces expression of the rice OsLTP5 lipid transfer protein gene. J Plant Physiol 165:345–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2007.06.004
Kolattukudy PE, Rogers LM, Li D et al (1995) Surface signaling in pathogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92:4080. https://doi.org/10.1073/PNAS.92.10.4080
Krueger F (2019) TrimGalore: a wrapper around cutadapt and FastQC to consistently apply adapter and quality trimming to FastQ files, with extra functionality for RRBS data. https://github.com/FelixKrueger/TrimGalore. Accessed 23 Apr 2023
Lee M-H, Jeon HS, Kim SH, et al (2019) Lignin-based barrier restricts pathogens to the infection site and confers resistance in plants. EMBO J 38:e101948. https://doi.org/10.15252/EMBJ.2019101948
Letunic I, Bork P (2021) Interactive Tree of Life (iTOL) v5: an online tool for phylogenetic tree display and annotation. Nucleic Acids Res 49:W293–W296. https://doi.org/10.1093/NAR/GKAB301
Liao Y, Smyth GK, Shi W (2014) featureCounts: an efficient general purpose program for assigning sequence reads to genomic features. Bioinformatics 30:923–930. https://doi.org/10.1093/BIOINFORMATICS/BTT656
Love MI, Huber W, Anders S (2014) Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol 15:1–21. https://doi.org/10.1186/S13059-014-0550-8/
Pathak MD, Khan ZR (1994) Insect Pests of Rice. International Rice Research Institute, Manila, Philippines and International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology. ISBN 971-22-0028-0. pp 89
Magwene PM, Willis JH, Kelly JK (2011) The statistics of bulk segregant analysis using next generation sequencing. PLOS Comput Biol 7:e1002255. https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PCBI.1002255
Malvar RA, Butrón A, Ordás B, Santiago R (2008) Causes of natural resistance to stem borers in maize. Crop Prot Res Adv 313
Mansfeld BN, Grumet R (2018) QTLseqr: an R Package for bulk segregant analysis with next-generation sequencing. Plant Genome 11:180006. https://doi.org/10.3835/plantgenome2018.01.0006
Mirdita M, Schütze K, Moriwaki Y et al (2022) ColabFold: making protein folding accessible to all. Nat Methods 196(19):679–682. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-022-01488-1
Moin M, Bakshi A, Saha A et al (2016) Rice ribosomal protein large subunit genes and their spatio-temporal and stress regulation. Front Plant Sci 7:1284. https://doi.org/10.3389/FPLS.2016.01284/
Muralidharan K, Pasalu IC (2006) Assessments of crop losses in rice ecosystems due to stem borer damage (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Crop Prot 25:409417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2005.06.007
Nagaraj S, Senthil-Kumar M, Ramu VS et al (2016) Plant ribosomal proteins, RPL12 and RPL19, play a role in nonhost disease resistance against bacterial pathogens. Front Plant Sci 6:1192. https://doi.org/10.3389/FPLS.2015.01192/
Oliveros JC (2007) Venny. An interactive tool for comparing lists with Venn’s diagrams. https://bioinfogp.cnb.csic.es/tools/venny/index.html
Oneda H, Lee S, Inouye K (2004) Inhibitory effect of 0.19 α-amylase inhibitor from wheat kernel on the activity of porcine pancreas α-amylase and its thermal stability. J Biochem 135:421–427. https://doi.org/10.1093/JB/MVH050
Padmakumari A, Maganti SM, Bangale UK, et al (2017) EMS mutants as a novel source of tolerance to yellow stem borer. IIRR Newsletter 15(2&3):10–11. ICAR- IIRR. Hyderabad India
Padmakumari AP and Katti G (2018) Designing insect bioassays for studying components of insect pest management-rice yellow stem borer—as a case study. In: Abstract Book: National Symposium Entomology2018:Advances and Challenges. Hyderabad, p 117
Pang Z, Chong J, Zhou G et al (2021) MetaboAnalyst 5.0: narrowing the gap between raw spectra and functional insights. Nucleic Acids Res 49:W388–W396. https://doi.org/10.1093/NAR/GKAB382
Pathak MD (1968) Ecology of common insect pests of rice. Annu Rev Entomol 13:257–294. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.en.13.010168.001353
Pathak MD (1977) defense of the rice crop against insect pests. Ann N Y Acad Sci 287:287–295. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1749-6632.1977.TB34247.X
Peltier AJ, Hatfield RD, Grau CR (2009) Soybean stem lignin concentration relates to resistance to sclerotinia sclerotiorum. Plant Dis 93:149–154. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-93-2-0149
Potupureddi G, Balija V, Ballichatla S et al (2021) Mutation resource of Samba Mahsuri revealed the presence of high extent of variations among key traits for rice improvement. PLoS ONE 16:e0258816. https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0258816
Quinlan AR, Hall IM (2010) BEDTools: a flexible suite of utilities for comparing genomic features. Bioinformatics 26:841–842. https://doi.org/10.1093/BIOINFORMATICS/BTQ033
Ramesh S, Nagadhara D, Pasalu IC et al (2004) Development of stem borer resistant transgenic parental lines involved in the production of hybrid rice. J Biotechnol 111:131–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2004.04.004
Ramu VS, Dawane A, Lee S et al (2020) Ribosomal protein QM/RPL10 positively regulates defence and protein translation mechanisms during nonhost disease resistance. Mol Plant Pathol 21:1481–1494. https://doi.org/10.1111/MPP.12991
Rubia EG, Heong KL, Zalucki M et al (1996) Mechanisms of compensation of rice plants to yellow stem borer Scirpophaga incertulas (Walker) injury. Crop Prot 15:335–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/0261-2194(95)00102-6
Sakai H, Lee SS, Tanaka T, et al (2013) Rice Annotation Project Database (RAP-DB): an integrative and interactive database for rice genomics. Plant Cell Physiol 54. https://doi.org/10.1093/PCP/PCS183
Salminen TA, Blomqvist K, Edqvist J (2016) Lipid transfer proteins: classification, nomenclature, structure, and function. Planta 244:971–997. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00425-016-2585-4
Santiago R, Barros-Rios J, Malvar RA (2013) Impact of cell wall composition on maize resistance to pests and diseases. Int J Mol Sci 2013, Vol 14, Pages 6960–6980 14:6960–6980. https://doi.org/10.3390/IJMS14046960
Santos RB, Nascimento R, Coelho A V., Figueiredo A (2020) Grapevine–Downy Mildew Rendezvous: proteome analysis of the first hours of an incompatible interaction. Plants 2020, Vol 9, Page 1498 9:1498. https://doi.org/10.3390/PLANTS9111498
Savary S, Willocquet L, Pethybridge SJ et al (2019) The global burden of pathogens and pests on major food crops. Nat Ecol Evol 3:430–439. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-018-0793-y
Schweizer P, Jeanguenat A, Whitacre D et al (1996) Induction of resistance in barley againstErysiphe graminisf.sp.hordeiby free cutin monomers. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol 49:103–120. https://doi.org/10.1006/PMPP.1996.0043
Selvaraju K, Shanmugasundaram P, Mohankumar S et al (2007) Detection of quantitative trait locus for leaffolder (Cnaphalocrocis medinalis (Guenée)) resistance in rice on linkage group 1 based on damage score and flag leaf width. Euphytica 157:35–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10681-007-9394-6/FIGURES/2
Sievers F, Wilm A, Dineen D et al (2011) Fast, scalable generation of high-quality protein multiple sequence alignments using Clustal Omega. Mol Syst Biol 7:539. https://doi.org/10.1038/MSB.2011.75
Su J, Zhang Z, Wu M, Gao C (2014) Geographic susceptibility of Chilo suppressalis Walker (Lepidoptera: Crambidae), to chlorantraniliprole in China. Pest Manag Sci 70:989–995. https://doi.org/10.1002/PS.3640
Sun L, Su C, Wang C et al (2005) Mapping of a major resistance gene to the brown planthopper in the rice cultivar Rathu Heenati. Breed Sci 55:391–396. https://doi.org/10.1270/JSBBS.55.391
Takagi H, Abe A, Yoshida K et al (2013) QTL-seq: rapid mapping of quantitative trait loci in rice by whole genome resequencing of DNA from two bulked populations. Plant J 74:174–183. https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.12105
Thimm O, Bläsing O, Gibon Y et al (2004) MAPMAN: a user-driven tool to display genomics data sets onto diagrams of metabolic pathways and other biological processes. Plant J 37:914–939. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1365-313X.2004.02016.X
Trautmann HS, Ramsey KM (2022) A ribosomal protein homolog governs gene expression and virulence in a bacterial pathogen. J Bacteriol. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.00268-22
Wang Y, Ju D, Yang X et al (2018) Comparative transcriptome analysis between resistant and susceptible rice cultivars responding to striped stem borer (SSB), Chilo suppressalis (Walker) infestation. Front Physiol 9:1717. https://doi.org/10.3389/FPHYS.2018.01717/BIBTEX
Warner JR, McIntosh KB (2009) How common are extraribosomal functions of ribosomal proteins? Mol Cell 34:3–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MOLCEL.2009.03.006
Weisberg RA (2008) Transcription by moonlight: structural basis of an extraribosomal activity of ribosomal protein S10. Mol Cell 32:747–748. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MOLCEL.2008.12.010
Wool IG (1996) Extraribosomal functions of ribosomal proteins. Trends Biochem Sci 21:164–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0968-0004(96)20011-8
Yu Y, Xing Y, Liu F, et al (2021) The laccase gene family mediate multi-perspective trade-offs during tea plant (Camellia sinensis) development and defense processes. Int J Mol Sci 2021, Vol 22, Page 12554 22:12554. https://doi.org/10.3390/IJMS222212554
Zhao Q, Nakashima J, Chen F et al (2013) LACCASE Is Necessary and Nonredundant with PEROXIDASE for lignin polymerization during vascular development in arabidopsis. Plant Cell 25:3976. https://doi.org/10.1105/TPC.113.117770
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by grants to MSM, HKP, and RVS from the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), Government of India (MLP0121 Phase-I and Phase-II) and the JC Bose Fellowship of RVS granted by the Science and Engineering Research Board (SERB), Department of Science and Technology, Government of India (SB/S2/JCB-12/2014). We thank Dr. Rajkanwar Nathawat (Current address: Yale University) for her guidance and suggestions on protein structure prediction analysis. We thank the skilled workers at ICAR-IIRR and CSIR-CCMB for their support in field activities and maintenance.
Funding
This study was funded by Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), Government of India, New Delhi and the Science and Engineering Research Board (SERB), Department of Science and Technology, Government of India, New Delhi.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualization—RVS, MSM, HKP, and PAP. Investigation—GCG (QTL-seq, RNA-seq, metabolomics analyses and KASP genotyping); UB, VB, SB, PAP (studies with YSB larvae, F2 population generation, and screening of rice plants); DR (QTLseq data analysis); PV, NM, KJ, SM, PAP (screening of plants and phenotyping). Assessment and supervision of the work—GSL, SRLV, KMB, MSR, PAP, HKP, MSM, and RVS. Writing of original draft – GCG. Manuscript review and editing—PAP, KMB, HKP, MSM, and RVS. Funding acquisition – MSM, HKP, and RVS.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that no conflict of interest exists.
Ethics approval
Not applicable.
Consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent to publish
Not applicable.
Additional information
Communicated by Matthias Wissuwa.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Gokulan, C.G., Bangale, U., Balija, V. et al. Multiomics-assisted characterization of rice-Yellow Stem Borer interaction provides genomic and mechanistic insights into stem borer resistance in rice. Theor Appl Genet 137, 122 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-024-04628-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-024-04628-7