Skip to main content
Log in

Hirndruckmonitoring beim Polytraumatisierten mit Schädel-Hirn-Trauma

Intracranial pressure monitoring in polytrauma patients with traumatic brain injury

  • Leitthema
  • Published:
Der Unfallchirurg Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Hintergrund

Die Messung des intrakraniellen Drucks stellt einen Grundpfeiler bei der Intensivtherapie Schädel-Hirn-Verletzter dar. Mehrere Systeme werden zur Messung angeboten. Als ultima ratio kann bei konservativ nicht beherrschbarer Drucksteigerung die dekomprimierende Kraniektomie erwogen werden.

Fragestellung

Pathophysiologie des intrazerebralen Drucks, Polytraumamanagement und Schädel-Hirn-Trauma (SHT), Vergleich der Messsysteme und ihrer Komplikationen; Indikation zur Entlastungskraniektomie bei malignem Hirnödem.

Material und Methode

Retrospektive Auswertung des eigenen Krankenbestandes in den Jahren 2010 bis 2016. Diskussion relevanter Publikationen, insbesondere der Indikation zur Überwachung des „intracranial pressure“ (ICP) und dessen Einfluss auf das Polytraumamanagement.

Ergebnisse

Von 2010 bis 2016 wurden bei 106 Patienten mit einem Durchschnittsalter von 65,9 Jahren bei geschlossenem SHT insgesamt 120 Hirndrucksonden implantiert. Es handelte sich überwiegend um Parenchymsonden (111/120), gefolgt von Ventrikelsonden (8/120) und einer Kombinationssonde (1/120). 29/106 Patienten (27,4 %) wiesen ein Polytrauma auf und 35/106 (33,0 %) nahmen gerinnungsaktive Substanzen ein. Die Liegedauer der Sonden betrug im Durchschnitt 8,51 Tage, der Intensivaufenthalt 20 Tage. Bei 74/106 Patienten (69,8 %) erfolgte die Sondenimplantation nicht isoliert, sondern im Rahmen einer Trepanation. Bei 7/106 (6,6 %) Patienten traten sondenspezifische Komplikationen auf, wobei Fehlfunktionen am häufigsten zu finden waren. Die Liegedauer der Sonden war signifikant mit dem Vorliegen eines Polytraumas (p = <0,001) und zum Alter (>60; p = 0,03) korreliert. Die Intensivdauer war ebenfalls signifikant korreliert zum Vorliegen eines Polytraumas (p = 0,02) wie auch zu Sondenkomplikationen (p ≤ 0,001). Die Mortalität war zur Einnahme gerinnungsaktiver Medikamente (p = 0,01) und zum Alter (>60; p = 0,03) korreliert.

Schlussfolgerungen

Die Messung des ICP ist eines der wichtigsten Mittel in der Behandlung von SHT. Für den Verlauf spielen v. a. das Vorliegen eines Polytraumas, das Alter und die Einnahme gerinnungsaktiver Substanzen eine Rolle.

Abstract

Background

The monitoring of intracranial pressure (ICP) represents a cornerstone in the intensive care of patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) and the industry provides various technical solutions to this end. Decompressive craniectomy can be an option if conservative measures fail to reduce excessive ICP.

Objective

To examine the pathophysiology of ICP in trauma, the management of polytrauma involving TBI, and the indications for decompressive craniectomy; and to compare the different monitoring systems and their complications.

Material and methods

A retrospective analysis of TBI patients between 2010 and 2016 was performed. Relevant publications are discussed, particularly those relating to the indications for monitoring and its influence on polytrauma management.

Results

Between 2010 and 2016, 106 patients with closed TBI and a mean age of 65.9 years received a total of 120 ICP monitors, most of which were parenchyma devices (111/120), followed by intraventricular catheters (8/120), and one combined system (1/120). Of these patients, 27.4% had sustained polytrauma, whilst 33% regularly used anticoagulants. ICP monitors were removed after 8.5 days on an average and the mean ICU stay was 20 days. Probe insertion was combined with craniectomy in 69.8% patients. Probe-related complications, most commonly involving malfunction, were seen in 6.6%. The duration of monitoring was significantly related to polytrauma (p ≤ 0.001) and age <60 (p = 0.03). ICU stay was also significantly related to polytrauma (p = 0.02) and monitoring complications (p ≤ 0.001). Mortality was related to anticoagulant medication (p = 0.01) and age <60 (p = 0.03).

Conclusions

ICP monitoring is one of the most important tools in TBI treatment. The course and outcome of these severe injuries is affected by polytrauma, age, and the use of anticoagulants.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abb. 3

Literatur

  1. Brain Trauma F, American Association of Neurological S, Congress of Neurological S, Joint Section on N, Critical Care A C, Bratton SL, Chestnut RM, Ghajar J, McConnell Hammond FF, Harris OA, Hartl R, Manley GT, Nemecek A, Newell DW, Rosenthal G, Schouten J, Shutter L, Timmons SD, Ullman JS, Videtta W, Wilberger JE, Wright DW (2007) Guidelines for the management of severe traumatic brain injury. VII. Intracranial pressure monitoring technology. J Neurotrauma 24(Suppl 1):S45–S54. doi:10.1089/neu.2007.9989

    Google Scholar 

  2. Farahvar A, Gerber LM, Chiu YL, Carney N, Hartl R, Ghajar J (2012) Increased mortality in patients with severe traumatic brain injury treated without intracranial pressure monitoring. J Neurosurg 117(4):729–734. doi:10.3171/2012.7.JNS111816

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Talving P, Karamanos E, Teixeira PG, Skiada D, Lam L, Belzberg H, Inaba K, Demetriades D (2013) Intracranial pressure monitoring in severe head injury: compliance with Brain Trauma Foundation guidelines and effect on outcomes: a prospective study. J Neurosurg 119(5):1248–1254. doi:10.3171/2013.7.JNS122255

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Stein SC, Georgoff P, Meghan S, Mirza KL, El Falaky OM (2010) Relationship of aggressive monitoring and treatment to improved outcomes in severe traumatic brain injury. J Neurosurg 112(5):1105–1112. doi:10.3171/2009.8.JNS09738

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Chesnut R, Videtta W, Vespa P, Le Roux P, Participants in the International Multidisciplinary Consensus Conference on Multimodality M (2014) Intracranial pressure monitoring: fundamental considerations and rationale for monitoring. Neurocrit Care 21(Suppl 2):S64–S84. doi:10.1007/s12028-014-0048-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Whitmore RG, Thawani JP, Grady MS, Levine JM, Sanborn MR, Stein SC (2012) Is aggressive treatment of traumatic brain injury cost-effective? J Neurosurg 116(5):1106–1113. doi:10.3171/2012.1.JNS11962

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ekeh AP, Ilyas S, Saxe JM, Whitmill M, Parikh P, Schweitzer JS, McCarthy MC (2014) Successful placement of intracranial pressure monitors by trauma surgeons. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 76(2):286–290. doi:10.1097/TA.0000000000000092

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Barber MA, Helmer SD, Morgan JT, Haan JM (2012) Placement of intracranial pressure monitors by non-neurosurgeons: excellent outcomes can be achieved. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 73(3):558–563. doi:10.1097/TA.0b013e318265cb75

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Buchinger W (2002) Hirndrucksonde – Indikation und Technik. EurSurg 34(Sppl. 182):1–3

    Google Scholar 

  10. Le Roux P (2016) Intracranial pressure monitoring and management. In: Laskowitz DG (Hrsg) Translational research in traumatic brain injury. Taylor & Francis, London

    Google Scholar 

  11. Rickels E (2009) Monitoring intracranial pressure. Indication, limits, practice. Anaesthesist 58(4):398–404. doi:10.1007/s00101-009-1523-2

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Brain Trauma F, American Association of Neurological S, Congress of Neurological S, Joint Section on N, Critical Care AC, Bratton SL, Chestnut RM, Ghajar J, McConnell Hammond FF, Harris OA, Hartl R, Manley GT, Nemecek A, Newell DW, Rosenthal G, Schouten J, Shutter L, Timmons SD, Ullman JS, Videtta W, Wilberger JE, Wright DW (2007) Guidelines for the management of severe traumatic brain injury. VIII. Intracranial pressure thresholds. J Neurotrauma 24(Suppl 1):S55–S58. doi:10.1089/neu.2007.9988

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gobiet W (1984) Intensivtherapie nach Schädel-Hirn-Trauma, 3. Aufl. Kliniktaschenbücher. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. Badri S, Chen J, Barber J, Temkin NR, Dikmen SS, Chesnut RM, Deem S, Yanez ND, Treggiari MM (2012) Mortality and long-term functional outcome associated with intracranial pressure after traumatic brain injury. Intensive Care Med 38(11):1800–1809. doi:10.1007/s00134-012-2655-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Balestreri M, Czosnyka M, Hutchinson P, Steiner LA, Hiler M, Smielewski P, Pickard JD (2006) Impact of intracranial pressure and cerebral perfusion pressure on severe disability and mortality after head injury. Neurocrit Care 4(1):8–13. doi:10.1385/NCC:4:1:008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Brain Trauma F, American Association of Neurological S, Congress of Neurological S, Joint Section on N, Critical Care AC, Bratton SL, Chestnut RM, Ghajar J, McConnell Hammond FF, Harris OA, Hartl R, Manley GT, Nemecek A, Newell DW, Rosenthal G, Schouten J, Shutter L, Timmons SD, Ullman JS, Videtta W, Wilberger JE, Wright DW (2007) Guidelines for the management of severe traumatic brain injury. VI. Indications for intracranial pressure monitoring. J Neurotrauma 24(Suppl 1):S37–S44. doi:10.1089/neu.2007.9990

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kishore PR, Lipper MH, Becker DP, Domingues da Silva AA, Narayan RK (1981) Significance of CT in head injury: correlation with intracranial pressure. AJR Am J Roentgenol 137(4):829–833. doi:10.2214/ajr.137.4.829

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Stocchetti N, Picetti E, Berardino M, Buki A, Chesnut RM, Fountas KN, Horn P, Hutchinson PJ, Iaccarino C, Kolias AG, Koskinen LO, Latronico N, Maas AI, Payen JF, Rosenthal G, Sahuquillo J, Signoretti S, Soustiel JF, Servadei F (2014) Clinical applications of intracranial pressure monitoring in traumatic brain injury: report of the Milan consensus conference. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 156(8):1615–1622. doi:10.1007/s00701-014-2127-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Bauer DF, McGwin G Jr., Melton SM, George RL, Markert JM (2010) The relationship between INR and development of hemorrhage with placement of ventriculostomy. J Trauma 70(5):1112–1117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Davis JW, Davis IC, Bennink LD, Hysell SE, Curtis BV, Kaups KL, Bilello JF (2004) Placement of intracranial pressure monitors: are „normal“ coagulation parameters necessary? J Trauma 57(6):1173–1177

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lundberg N, Troupp H, Lorin H (1965) Continuous recording of the ventricular-fluid pressure in patients with severe acute traumatic brain injury. A preliminary report. J Neurosurg 22(6):581–590. doi:10.3171/jns.1965.22.6.0581

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Bekar A, Dogan S, Abas F, Caner B, Korfali G, Kocaeli H, Yilmazlar S, Korfali E (2009) Risk factors and complications of intracranial pressure monitoring with a fiberoptic device. J Clin Neurosci 16(2):236–240. doi:10.1016/j.jocn.2008.02.008

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kasotakis G, Michailidou M, Bramos A, Chang Y, Velmahos G, Alam H, King D, de Moya MA (2012) Intraparenchymal vs extracranial ventricular drain intracranial pressure monitors in traumatic brain injury: less is more? J Am Coll Surg 214(6):950–957. doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.03.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Scheithauer S, Burgel U, Ryang YM, Haase G, Schiefer J, Koch S, Hafner H, Lemmen S (2009) Prospective surveillance of drain associated meningitis/ventriculitis in a neurosurgery and neurological intensive care unit. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatr 80(12):1381–1385. doi:10.1136/jnnp.2008.165357

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Cooper DJ, Rosenfeld JV, Murray L, Arabi YM, Davies AR, D’Urso P, Kossmann T, Ponsford J, Seppelt I, Reilly P, Wolfe R, Investigators DT, Australian, New Zealand Intensive Care Society Clinical Trials G (2011) Decompressive craniectomy in diffuse traumatic brain injury. N Engl J Med 364(16):1493–1502. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1102077

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kolias AG, Adams H, Timofeev I, Czosnyka M, Corteen EA, Pickard JD, Turner C, Gregson BA, Kirkpatrick PJ, Murray GD, Menon DK, Hutchinson PJ (2016) Decompressive craniectomy following traumatic brain injury: developing the evidence base. Br J Neurosurg 30(2):246–250. doi:10.3109/02688697.2016.1159655

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Hutchinson PJ, Kolias AG, Timofeev IS, Corteen EA, Czosnyka M, Timothy J, Anderson I, Bulters DO, Belli A, Eynon CA, Wadley J, Mendelow AD, Mitchell PM, Wilson MH, Critchley G, Sahuquillo J, Unterberg A, Servadei F, Teasdale GM, Pickard JD, Menon DK, Murray GD, Kirkpatrick PJ, Collaborators RET (2016) Trial of decompressive craniectomy for traumatic intracranial hypertension. N Engl J Med 375(12):1119–1130. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1605215

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. Neubauer.

Ethics declarations

Interessenkonflikt

T. Neubauer, W. Buchinger, E. Höflinger und J. Brand geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Für die im Manuskript beschriebene retrospektive Studie ist nach Angabe der Autoren kein Votum der lokalen Ethikkommission notwendig.

Additional information

Redaktion

T. Neubauer, Horn

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Neubauer, T., Buchinger, W., Höflinger, E. et al. Hirndruckmonitoring beim Polytraumatisierten mit Schädel-Hirn-Trauma. Unfallchirurg 120, 745–752 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00113-017-0355-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00113-017-0355-9

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation