Skip to main content
Log in

Charring rates of timbers from Chinese species and comparison with various charring rate models

  • Original
  • Published:
European Journal of Wood and Wood Products Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The charring rate is the most important property of wood with respect to its fire resistance and fire integrity. It is necessary to predict the charring rate of wood through a charring rate model due to the difference of various test methods and the variety of wood species. A power integral charring rate model, the CAF model, has been developed based on Chinese species using the cone calorimeter. Theoretical charring rate results of CAF model, EC5 model, Australian code AS 1720.4 and Ulg model were calculated from experimental details by Njankouo et al. (Constr Build Mater 19(5):376–386, 2005) and Cachim and Franssen (Fire Mater 33(3):129–143, 2009), respectively. Then, these theoretical charring rate results were again compared with tested charring rate results from Njankouo et al. (Constr Build Mater 19(5):376–386, 2005) and Cachim and Franssen (Fire Mater 33(3):129–143, 2009). The results showed that the cone calorimeter can be equal to the furnace for studying wood charring when the heat flux is considered. The precision of the power integral model is higher with the increase in burning time. The EC5 model, Australian code AS 1720.4, Ulg model and White’s model are not entirely satisfactory. The power integral model is acceptable for medium density as well as high density, while unsafe at a density of less than 290 kg/m3.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AS 1720.4 (2006) Timber structures. Part 4. Fire resistance for structural adequacy of timber members, Standards Australia, North Sydney, Australia

  • Cachim PB, Franssen JM (2009) Comparison between the charring rate model and the conductive model of Eurocode 5. Fire Mater 33(3):129–143

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Collier PCR (1992) Charring rates of timber. Building Research Association of New Zealand, Hamilton

    Google Scholar 

  • EC5 (2004) Design of timber structures, Part 1–2: general structural fire design, CEN Central Secretariat, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • Frangi A, König J (2011) Effect of increased charring on the narrow side of rectangular timber cross-sections exposed to fire on three or four sides. Fire Mater 35(8):593–605

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner WD (1991) Charring of glued-laminate beams of eight Australian-grown timber species and the effect of 13 mm gypsum plaster board protection on their charring. NSW Timber 118 Advisory Council, Sydney

    Google Scholar 

  • Hugi E, Wuersch M, Risi W, Ghazi Wakili K (2007) Correlation between charring rate and oxygen permeability for 12 different wood species. J Wood Sci 53(1):71–75

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • ISO5660-1 (2015) Reaction-to-fire tests—heat release, smoke production and mass loss rate—part 1. Heat release rate (cone calorimeter method), The British standards Institution, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Koenig J, Walleij L (1999) One-dimensional charring of timber exposed to standard and parametric fires in initially unprotected and postprotection situations. Rapport-Traetek (Sweden) No. 9908029

  • Kučera P, Lokaj A, Vlček V (2014) Behavior of the spruce and birch wood from the fire safety point of view. Adv Mater Res 842:725–728

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loehrmann J (2013) Wood handbook: wood as an engineering material. Agriculture handbook, No. 72. United States Department of Agriculture, USA

  • Njankouo JM, Dotreppe JC, Franssen JM (2005) Fire resistance of timbers from tropical countries and comparison of experimental charring rates with various models. Constr Build Mater 19(5):376–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pun CY, Seng HK, Midon MS, Abdul Rashid AM (1997) Timber design handbook. FRIM. Malayan Forest Records 42

  • Schaffer EL (1967) Charring rate of selected woods transverse to grain, Research paper FPL 69. Forest Products Laboratory, Madison

    Google Scholar 

  • Spearpoint MJ, Quintiere JG (2000) Predicting the burning of wood using an integral model. Combust Flame 123(3):308–325

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wen L, Han L, Zhou H (2015) Factors influencing the charring rate of Chinese wood by using the cone calorimeter. BioResources 10(4):7263–7272

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • White RH (1988) Charring rates of different wood species. PhD dissertation, Madison University of Wisconsin, Madison

  • White RH (2000) Charring rate of composite timber products. In: Proceedings of wood and fire safety 4th international conference, The High Tatras, Slovakia

  • White RH, Nordheim EV (1992) Charring rate of wood for ASTM El19 exposure. Fire Technol 28(1):5–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Funding was provided by CAF Research under Grant (Grant no. CAFINT2012C01).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Haibin Zhou.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wen, L., Han, L. & Zhou, H. Charring rates of timbers from Chinese species and comparison with various charring rate models. Eur. J. Wood Prod. 76, 1347–1351 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00107-017-1276-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00107-017-1276-6

Navigation