Skip to main content
Log in

Closed reduction techniques for acute anterior shoulder dislocation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Review Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Anterior shoulder dislocations are the most common type of joint dislocation with the majority treated with closed reduction. Reduction methods can be grouped into their principle mode of action: traction–countertraction, leverage and scapular manipulation. The best method has yet to be identified and our aim was to find the most effective, safe and least painful method of closed reduction for acute anterior shoulder dislocations.

Methods

A search of the online databases of CENTRAL, MEDLINE and Embase was performed to identify randomised control trials (RCTs) comparing closed reduction methods for anterior shoulder dislocations. A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines.

Results

Twelve eligible RCTs were included with a total of 1055 patients. Our meta-analysis showed traction–countertraction methods are marginally less painful than leverage methods by 0.86 points on the VAS scale but leverage methods are quicker by 20 s. Amongst traction–countertraction methods, the Spaso technique was the least painful and quickest, albeit with no difference in overall success rate. A meta-analysis was not possible for comparisons involving scapular manipulation due to the paucity of studies, but within two studies, scapular manipulation was significantly less painful than both leverage and traction–countertraction methods by 1.5 and 2.3 points (VAS), respectively.

Conclusion

Traction–countertraction methods are less painful but slower than leverage methods with no difference in complication rates. However, there was no difference in overall reduction success rate between any of the groups.

Level of evidence

I.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Reference

  1. Kazar B, Relovszky E. Prognosis of primary dislocation of the shoulder. Acta Orthop Scand. 1969;40:216–24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Nordqvist A, Petersson CJ. Incidence and causes of shoulder girdle injuries in an urban population. J. Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1995;4:107–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Owens BD, Duffey ML, Nelson BJ, et al. The incidence and characteristics of shoulder instability at the United States Military Academy. Am. J. Sports Med. 2007;35:1168–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Simonet WT, Melton LJ 3rd, Cofield RH, Ilstrup DM. Incidence of anterior shoulder dislocation in Olmsted County, Minnesota. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1984;186:186–91.

    Google Scholar 

  5. DePalma AF, Flannery GF. Acute anterior dislocation of the shoulder. J Sports Med. 1973;1:6–15.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Robinson CM, Howes J, Murdoch H, et al. Functional outcome and risk of recurrent instability after primary traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation in young patients. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 2006;88:2326–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Rowe CR. Anterior dislocations of the shoulder: prognosis and treatment. Surg Clin North Am. 1963;43:1609–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kroner K, Lind T, Jensen J. The epidemiology of shoulder dislocations. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1989;108:288–90.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Randelli P, Cucchi D, Butt U. History of shoulder instability surgery. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016;24:305–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mattick A, Wyatt JP. From Hippocrates to the Eskimo–a history of techniques used to reduce anterior dislocation of the shoulder. J. R. Coll. Surg. Edinb. 2000;45:312–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Stimson LA. An easy method of reducing dislocations of the shoulder and hip. Med Rec. 1900;57:356–7.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rezende Bda R, de Almeida JIS, de Sousa UJ, et al. Glenoumeral dislocation: a prospective randomized study comparing spazo and kocher maneuvers. Acta Ortop Bras. 2015;23:192–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Sayegh FE, Kenanidis EI, Papavasiliou KA, et al. Reduction of acute anterior dislocations: a prospective randomized study comparing a new technique with the Hippocratic and Kocher methods. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 2009;91:2775–822.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Marcano-Fernandez FA, Balaguer-Castro M, Fillat-Goma F, et al. Teaching patients how to reduce a shoulder dislocation: a randomized clinical trial comparing the Boss-Holzach-Matter Self-Assisted Technique and the Spaso Method. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 2018;100:375–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kocher T. Eine neue reductionsmethode fur schultetrverrenkung. Berliner Klin Wehnschr. 1870;7:101–5.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Milch H. Treatment of dislocation of the shoulder. Surgery. 1938;3:732–40.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Eachempati KK, Dua A, Malhotra R, et al. The external rotation method for reduction of acute anterior dislocations and fracture-dislocations of the shoulder. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 2004;86:2431–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Sahin N, Ozturk A, Ozkan Y, et al. A comparison of the scapular manipulation and Kocher's technique for acute anterior dislocation of the shoulder. Eklem Hastalik Cerrahisi. 2011;22:28–322.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Higgins JPT, Green S. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. 1st ed. USA: Wiley-Blackwell; 2008.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  20. The Nordic Cochrane Centre (2014). The Cochrane Collaboration. Review Manager (RevMan). 5.3

  21. Fang J, Zhang FQ, Wu SF, et al. Manipulation of superduct, adduction, rotation for the treatment of shoulder dislocation. China J Orthop Trauma. 2013;26:16–8.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Chang SH, Lin JH, Hung LW, Chang CH (2014) Comparing FARES method with SPASO method for reduction of anterior shoulder dislocation: a prospective randomized trial. Unpublished material

  23. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. Open Med. 2009;3:e123–e130130.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Almeida FIA, de Leitao ICDS, Castro L, de Pires NPJ. Acute anterior glenohumeral dislocation: comparative study between methods of bloodless reduction. Rev Bras Orthop. 2006;41:455–60.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ghane MR, Hoseini SH, Javadzadeh HR, et al. Comparison between traction–countertraction and modified scapular manipulation for reduction of shoulder dislocation. Chin J Traumatol. 2014;17:93–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Amar E, Maman E, Khashan M, et al. Milch versus Stimson technique for nonsedated reduction of anterior shoulder dislocation: a prospective randomized trial and analysis of factors affecting success. J. Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2012;21:1443–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Beattie TF, Steedman DJ, McGowan A, Robertson CE. A comparison of the Milch and Kocher techniques for acute anterior dislocation of the shoulder. Injury. 1986;17:349–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Sapkota K, Shrestha B, Onta PR, Thapa P. Comparison between external rotation method and milch method for reduction of acute anterior dislocation of shoulder. J. Clin. Diagn. Res. 2015;9:RC01–3.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Maity A, Roy DS, Mondal BC. A prospective randomised clinical trial comparing FARES method with the Eachempati external rotation method for reduction of acute anterior dislocation of shoulder. Injury. 2012;43:1066–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Alkaduhimi H, van der Linde JA, Willigenburg NW, et al. A systematic comparison of the closed shoulder reduction techniques. Arch. Orthop. Trauma. Surg. 2017;137:589–99.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Olsen MF, Bjerre E, Hansen MD, et al. Pain relief that matters to patients: systematic review of empirical studies assessing the minimum clinically important difference in acute pain. BMC Med. 2017;15:35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Noorani A, Goldring M, Jaggi A, et al. BESS/BOA patient care pathways: atraumatic shoulder instability. Shoulder Elbow. 2019;11:60–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Puha B, Gheorghevici TS, Veliceasa B, et al. Clasic versus novel in reduction of acute anterior dislocation of the shoulder: a comparison of four reduction techniques. Rev. Med. Chir. Soc. Med. Nat. Iasi. 2016;120:311–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Mr Subodh Deshmukh and Mr Raj Thakrar for help with the review protocol and screening of studies.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Huan Dong.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. The authors can confirm that, to the best of our knowledge, there has been no prior or duplicate submission or publication elsewhere of any part of the work. The manuscript has been read and approved by all authors, and each author believes that the manuscript represents honest work.

Ethical approval

No institutional review board (IRB) or Ethical Committee approval was undertaken as this was not applicable.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOC 30 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dong, H., Jenner, E.A. & Theivendran, K. Closed reduction techniques for acute anterior shoulder dislocation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 47, 407–421 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-020-01427-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-020-01427-9

Keywords

Navigation