Abstract
Introduction
The spleen is one of the most commonly injured abdominal solid organs during blunt trauma. Modern management of splenic trauma has evolved to include non-operative therapies, including observation and angioembolization to preclude splenectomy in most cases of blunt splenic injury. Despite the shift in management strategies, relatively little is known about the hematologic changes associated with these various modalities. The aim of this study was to determine if there are significant differences in hematologic characteristics over time based on the treatment modality employed following splenic trauma. We hypothesized that alterations seen in hematologic parameters would vary between observation (OBS), embolization (EMB), and splenectomy (SPL) in the setting of splenic injury.
Methods
An institutional review board-approved, retrospective study of routine hematologic indices examined data between March 2000 and December 2014 at three academic trauma centers. A convenience sample of patients with splenic trauma and admission lengths of stay >96 h was selected for inclusion, resulting in a representative sample of each sub-group (OBS, EMB, and SPL). Basic demographics and injury severity data (ISS) were abstracted. Platelet count, red blood cell (RBC) count and RBC indices, and white blood cell (WBC) count with differential were analyzed between the time of admission and a maximum of 1080 h (45 days) post-injury. Comparisons between OBS, EMB, and SPL groups were then performed using non-parametric statistical testing, with statistical significance set at p < 0.05.
Results
Data from 130 patients (40 SPL, 40 EMB, and 50 OBS) were analyzed. The median age was 40 years, with 67 % males. Median ISS was 21.5 (21 for SPL, 19 for EMB, and 22 for OBS, p = n/s) and median Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) was 15. Median splenic injury grade varied by interventional modality (grade 4 for SPL, 3 for EMB, and 2 for OBS, p < 0.05). Inter-group comparisons demonstrated no significant differences in RBC counts. However, mean corpuscular volume (MCV) and RBC distribution width (RDW) were elevated in the SPL and EMB groups (p < 0.01). Similarly, EMB and SPL groups had higher platelet counts than the OBS group (p < 0.01). In aggregate, WBC counts were highest following SPL, followed by EMB and OBS (p < 0.01). Similar trends were noted in neutrophil and monocyte counts (p < 0.01), but not in lymphocyte counts (p = n/s).
Conclusion
This study describes important trends and patterns among fundamental hematologic parameters following traumatic splenic injuries managed with SPL, EMB, or OBS. As expected, observed WBC counts were highest following SPL, then EMB, and finally OBS. No differences were noted in RBC count between the three groups, but RDW was significantly greater following SPL compared to EMB and OBS. We also found that MCV was highest following OBS, when compared to EMB or SPL. Finally, our data indicate that platelet counts are similarly elevated for both SPL and EMB, when compared to the OBS group. These results provide an important foundation for further research in this still relatively unexplored area.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Stassen NA, et al. Selective nonoperative management of blunt splenic injury: an Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma practice management guideline. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012;73(5 Suppl 4):S294–300.
Goljan RR. Hematology USMLE. 2015. https://quizlet.com/34394630/goljan-rr-hematology-usmle-flash-cards/. Accessed 4 Nov 2015.
William BM, et al. Hyposplenism: a comprehensive review. Part II: clinical manifestations, diagnosis, and management. Hematology. 2007;12(2):89–98.
Tominaga GT, et al. Immunologic function after splenic embolization, is there a difference? J Trauma. 2009;67(2):289–95.
Mayglothling JA, Haan JM, Scalea TM. Blunt splenic injuries in the adolescent trauma population: the role of angiography and embolization. J Emerg Med. 2011;41(1):21–8.
Miller PR, et al. Prospective trial of angiography and embolization for all grade III to V blunt splenic injuries: nonoperative management success rate is significantly improved. J Am Coll Surg. 2014;218(4):644–8.
Morris DH, Bullock FD. The importance of the spleen in resistance to infection. Ann Surg. 1919;70(5):513–21.
Kumpe DA, et al. Partial splenic embolization in children with hypersplenism. Radiology. 1985;155(2):357–62.
Madoff DC, et al. Splenic arterial interventions: anatomy, indications, technical considerations, and potential complications. Radiographics. 2005;25(Suppl 1):S191–211.
Khan PN, et al. Postsplenectomy reactive thrombocytosis. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2009;22(1):9–12.
Lee CM, et al. Evaluation of the effect of partial splenic embolization on platelet values for liver cirrhosis patients with thrombocytopenia. World J Gastroenterol. 2007;13(4):619–22.
Miyazaki M, et al. Partial splenic embolization for the treatment of chronic idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1994;163(1):123–6.
Stein DM, Scalea TM. Nonoperative management of spleen and liver injuries. J Intensive Care Med. 2005;21(5):296–304.
Skattum J, et al. Preserved splenic function after angioembolisation of high grade injury. Injury. 2012;43(1):62–6.
Andersson R, et al. Nonoperative treatment of blunt trauma to liver and spleen. Acta Chir Scand. 1986;152:739–41.
Chen IC, et al. Spleen artery embolization increases the success of nonoperative management following blunt splenic injury. J Chin Med Assoc. 2011;74(8):341–4.
Dent D, et al. Blunt splenic injuries: high nonoperative management rate can be achieved with selective embolization. J Trauma. 2004;56(5):1063–7.
Falimirski M, Syed A, Prybilla D. Immunocompetence of the severely injured spleen verified by differential interference contrast microscopy: the red blood cell pit test. J Trauma. 2007;63(5):1087–91 (discussion 1091–2).
Smith J, et al. Blunt splenic injuries: have we watched long enough? J Trauma. 2008;64(3):656–63 (discussion 663–5).
Kimura F, et al. Partial splenic embolization for the treatment of hereditary spherocytosis. Am J Roentgenol. 2003;181(4):1021–4.
Tanrıöver MD, et al. Splenic artery embolization: an alternative approach in a critically ill patient with autoimmune hemolytic anemia. Turk J Hematol. 2011;28:135–8.
Haan J, et al. Protocol-driven nonoperative management in patients with blunt splenic trauma and minimal associated injury decreases length of stay. J Trauma. 2003;55(2):317–21 (discussion 321–2).
Bessman J, Gilmer P Jr, Gardner FH. Improved classification of anemias by MCV and RDW. Am J Clin Pathol. 1983;80(3):322–6.
Tefferi A, Hanson CA, Inwards DJ. How to interpret and pursue an abnormal complete blood cell count in adults. In: Mayo Clinic Proceedings. Elsevier; 2005.
Papa A, et al. Predictive value of elevated neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio on cardiac mortality in patients with stable coronary artery disease. Clin Chim Acta. 2008;395(1):27–31.
Yetter EM, et al. Estimating splenic volume: sonographic measurements correlated with helical CT determination. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003;181(6):1615–20.
Nakae H, et al. Does splenic preservation treatment (embolization, splenorrhaphy, and partial splenectomy) improve immunologic function and long-term prognosis after splenic injury? J Trauma. 2009;67(3):557–63 (discussion 563–4).
Corazza GR, et al. Changes in peripheral blood lymphocytes and immune complexes in splenectomized patients: lack of correlation with residual splenic function. J Clin Lab Immunol. 1990;31(1):33–8.
Karakantza M, et al. In vitro study of the long-term effects of post-traumatic splenectomy on cellular immunity. Scand J Immunol. 2004;59(2):209–19.
Theodorou GL, et al. Effect of non-operative management (NOM) of splenic rupture versus splenectomy on the distribution of peripheral blood lymphocyte populations and cytokine production by T cells. Clin Exp Immunol. 2007;150(3):429–36.
Chernecky CC, Berger BJ, Laboratory tests and diagnostic procedures. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2007.
Pratl B, et al. Partial splenic embolization in children with hereditary spherocytosis. Eur J Haematol. 2008;80(1):76–80.
Aslan D, et al. Importance of RDW value in differential diagnosis of hypochrome anemias. Am J Hematol. 2002;69(1):31–3.
Monzon CM, Beaver BD, Dillon TD. Evaluation of erythrocyte disorders with mean corpuscular volume (MCV) and red cell distribution width (RDW). Clin Pediatr (Phila). 1987;26(12):632–8.
Penny R, Rozenberg MC, Firkin BG. The splenic platelet pool. Blood. 1966;27(1):1–16.
Laufer N, et al. The influence fo traumatic splenectomy on the volume of human platelets. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1978;146(6):889–92.
Kojouri K, et al. Splenectomy for adult patients with idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura: a systematic review to assess long-term platelet count responses, prediction of response, and surgical complications. Blood. 2004;104(9):2623–34.
Watters JM, et al. Splenectomy leads to a persistent hypercoagulable state after trauma. Am J Surg. 2010;199(5):646–51.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
B. Wernick, A. Cipriano, S. R. Odom, U. MacBean, R. N. Mubang, T. R. Wojda, S. Liu, S. Serres, David C. Evans, P. G. Thomas, C. H. Cook, and S. P. Stawicki declare that they have no conflict(s) of interest related to this project.
Ethical conduct of research statement
The current project has been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wernick, B., Cipriano, A., Odom, S.R. et al. Temporal changes in hematologic markers after splenectomy, splenic embolization, and observation for trauma. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 43, 399–409 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-016-0679-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-016-0679-0