Abstract
Purpose
In pertrochanteric and intertrochanteric femoral fractures, the avulsion of the lesser trochanter by the pull of the iliopsoas muscle is not uncommon. This fragment is not commonly fixed because the avulsion of the lesser is tough to not influence the clinical outcome but up to date there is no evidence to support this statement. The aim of this study is to evaluate if lesser trochanter implication affects psoas muscle strength in proximal femur fracture.
Materials and methods
Patients with a consolidated intertrochanteric or pertrochanteric fracture associated or not with lesser trochanter fracture were enrolled, respectively, in group A and group B. Criteria of inclusion were the achievement of an anatomic reduction with gamma nail and a complete consolidation of the fracture. Criteria of exclusion were a follow-up shorter than 6 months and age over 65 years old at surgery. Patients were retrospectively reviewed for the purpose of this study. Range of motion, modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), flexion strength with hip in neutral position, at 90° of flexion and in “figure four” position were evaluated on injured and healthy side. On the pre-operative X-rays, the vertical displacement of the lesser trochanter was calculated.
Results
Groups A and B showed no significant difference in age and follow-up. No statistical difference between the two groups was found in range of motion, mean mHHS, hip flexion strength at 90° of hip flexion. Lesser trochanter fracture group showed a significantly reduced strength in flexion with hip in neutral flexion (mean difference between two groups was 18.5 kgf). Lesser trochanter displacement showed a significant correlation with strength at 90° of flexion.
Conclusions
Our results showed that lesser trochanter implication may result in decreased hip flexion strength. Lesser trochanter displacement is directly correlated with flexion strength. Further studies will be necessary to understand if lesser trochanter fixation may be a good solution for those patients.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Kokoroghiannis C, Aktselis I, Deligeorgis A, Fragkomichalos E, Papadimas D, Pappadas I. Evolving concepts of stability and intramedullary fixation of intertrochanteric fractures—a review. Int J Care Inj. 2012;43:686–93.
Chapman MW. Fractures of the hip and proximal femur. In: Chapman’s orthopaedic surgery. 3rd edition. Lippincott Williams &Wilkins; 2001.
Norcross KN, Pearson JR. Movement of the lesser trochanter in pertrochanteric fracture postgrad. Med J. 1966;42:16–9.
Ellis P. The essential guide to effect sizes: statistical power, meta-analysis, and the interpretation of research results. Cambridge University Press; 2010. p. 52.
Thorborg K, Petersen J, Magnusson SP, Hölmich P. Clinical assessment of hip strength using a hand-held dynamometer is reliable. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2010;20(3):493–501.
Byrd JW, Jones KS. Prospective analysis of hip arthroscopy with 2-year follow-up. Arthroscopy. 2000;16:578–87.
Constant CR. Assessment of the shoulder. In: Watson M, editor. Surgical disorders of the shoulder. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1991. p. 39–45.
Constant CR, Murley AHG. A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1987;214:160–4.
Hébert LJ, Maltais DB, Lepage C, Saulnier J, Crête M, Perron M. Isometric muscle strength in youth assessed by hand-held dynamometry: a feasibility, reliability, and validity study. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2011;23(3):289–99.
Bloom N, Cornbleet SL2. Hip rotator strength in healthy young adults measured in hip flexion and extension by using a hand-held dynamometer. PM R. 2014. doi:10.1016/j.pmrj.2014.06.002.
Stratford PW, Balsor BE. A comparison of make and break tests using a hand-held dynamometer and the Kin-Com. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1994;19(1):28–32.
Sherrington C, Lord SR. Reliability of simple portable tests of physical performance in older people after hip fracture. Clin Rehabil. 2005;19(5):496–504.
Bogduk N, Pearcy M, Hadfield G. Anatomy and biomechanics of psoas major. Clin Biomech. 1992;7:109–19.
Wamper KE, Sierevelt IN, Poolman RW, Bhandari M, Haverkamp D. The Harris hip score: do ceiling effects limit its usefulness in orthopedics? Acta Orthop. 2010;81(6):703–7.
Aprato A, Jayasekera N, Villar RN. Does the modified Harris hip score reflect patient satisfaction after hip arthroscopy? Am J Sports Med. 2012;40(11):2557–60.
Neptune RR, Zajac FE, Kautz SA. Muscle force redistributes segmental power for body progression during walking. Gait Posture. 2004;19(2):194–205.
Neptune RR, Sasaki K, Kautz SA. The effect of walking speed on muscle function and mechanical energetics. Gait Posture. 2008;28(1):135–43.
Yoshio M, Murakami G, Sato T, Sato S, Noriyasu S. The function of the psoas major muscle: passive kinetics and morphological studies using donated cadavers. J Orthop Sci. 2002;7(2):199–207.
Van der Krogt MM, Doorenbosch CAM, Harlaar J. Muscle length and lengthening velocity in voluntary crouch gait. Gait Posture. 2007;26:532–8.
Acknowledgments
We acknowledge the important assistance of Claudia Savoca, IT administrator, for technology support.
Conflict of interest
Alessandro Aprato, Roberto Lo Baido, Alessandro Crosio, Renato Matteotti, Elena Grosso and Alessandro Masse’ declare that they have no conflict of interest. The author also specifies neither contracts nor agreements they might have signed with commercial interests supporting any portion of the work.
Compliance with ethical requirements
The study has been approved by the local ethics committee and has, therefore, been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments. All patients gave their informed consent prior to their inclusion in the study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Aprato, A., Lo Baido, R., Crosio, A. et al. Does lesser trochanter implication affect hip flexion strength in proximal femur fracture?. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 41, 523–529 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-014-0476-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-014-0476-6