Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Comparison of upper limb amputees and lower limb amputees: a psychosocial perspective

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Amputation of limb is essential in certain conditions; however, it may have significant impact on the patient’s psychological condition. The present study investigates psychological responses of upper limb (UL) amputees versus lower limb (LL) amputees regarding prosthetic adjustment, social discomfort, depression, and body image anxiety.

Methods

Traumatic major amputations of 20 upper and 38 lower extremities of 58 patients who were currently using prosthesis were included. 12 of UL amputations were of dominantly used limb. Seven of the UL amputations, and nine of the LL amputations were female. The Trinity Amputation and Prosthesis Experience Scales was used for adjustment, restriction, and satisfaction. Anxiety and depression levels were assessed using Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Body image disturbance and social discomfort were assessed with Amputation Body Image Scale-Revised (ABIS-R) and Social Discomfort Score, respectively.

Results

58 individuals with 20 UL and 38 LL amputations were included. Mean age of UL amputees was 44.76 ± 12.26 and 49.1 ± 14.3 years for LL amputees. Mean time of daily prosthesis use was 11.35 ± 4.8 and 11.52 ± 4.7 h, respectively. Mean time since amputation was 35.4 ± 14.3 and 36.05 ± 13.6 months; length of prosthesis use time was 24.8 ± 13.4 and 23.9 ± 15.12 months, respectively. Social adjustment and adjustment to limitation subscales had significantly higher scores in LL amputees (p < 0.001). There was statistically significant difference between mean HADS depression and anxiety scores (p < 0.001). Mean total ABIS-R score indicated significantly greater body image disturbance for UL amputees (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Well-adjusted LL prosthesis probably has better cosmetic appearance compared to that of UL prosthesis and perception of cosmetic appearance may be the key factor that leads to increased levels of body image anxiety and social discomfort.

Level of evidence

Epidemiologic and prognostic study, level III.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cansever A, Uzun O, Yildiz C, Ates A, Atesalp AS. Depression in men with traumatic lower part amputation: a comparison to men with surgical lower part amputation. Mil Med. 2003;168(2):106–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Frank RG, Kashani JH, Kashani SR, Wonderlich SA, Umlauf RL, Ashkanazi GS. Psychological response to amputation as a function of age and time since amputation. Br J Psychiatry. 1984;144:493–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Frierson RL, Lippmann SB. Psychiatric consultation for acute amputees. Psychosomatics. 1987;28:183–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Shula GD, Sahu SC, Tripathi RP, Gupta DK. A psychiatric study of amputees. Br J Psychiatry. 1982;141:50–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Horgan O, MacLahlan M. Psychosocial adjustment to lower-limb amputation: a review. Disabil Rehabil. 2004;26:837–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Singh R, Hunter J, Philip A. Rapid resolution of depression and anxiety after lower limb amputation. Clin Rehabil. 2007;21:754–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Fisher K, Hanspal R. Body image and patients with amputation: does the prosthesis maintain the balance? Int J Rehabil Res. 1998;21:355–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Fisher K, Hanspal RS. Phantom pain, anxiety, depression and their relation in consecutive patients with amputated limbs:case reports. BMJ. 1998;316:903–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Livneh H, Antonak RF, Gerhardt J. Psychosocial adaptation to amputation: the role of sociodemographic variables, disability related factors and coping strategies. Int J Rehabil Res. 1999;22:21–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Feinglass J, Brown JL, LoSasso A, Sohn MW, Manheim LM, Shah SJ, Pearce WH. Rates of lower-extremity amputation and arterial reconstruction in the United States, 1979–1996. Am J Public Health. 1999;89:1222–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gallagher P, MacLahlan M. Development and psychometric evaluation of the Trinity Amputation and Prosthesis Experience Scales (TAPES). Rehabil Psychol. 2000;44:130–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Zigmund AS, Snaith RP. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatry Scand. 1983;67:361–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Crawford JR, Henry JD, Crombie C, Taylor EP. Normative data for the HADS from a large non-clinical sample. Br J Clin Psychology. 2001;40:429–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Gallagher P, Horgan O, Franchignoni F, Giordano A, Maclahlan M. Body image in people with lower-limb amputation: a Rasch analysis of the Amputee Body Image Scale. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;86:205–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Rybarczyk BD, Nyenhuis DL, Nicholas JJ, Schulz R, Alioto RJ, Blair C. Social discomfort and depression in a sample of adults with leg amputations. Arch Phys Med Rehab. 1992;73(12):11691173.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Friedmann LW. The psychological rehabilitation of the amputee. Springfield: C.C.Thomas; 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bryce L, Seeman TE, Merrill SS, Blazer DG. The impact of depressive symptomatology on physical disability: MacArthur studies of successful aging. Am J Public Health. 1994;84:1796–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Penninx BWJH, Leveille S, Ferrucci L, van Eijk JTM, Guralnik JM. Exploring the effect of depression on physical disability: longitudinal evidence from the established populations for epidemiologic studies of the elderly. Am J Public Health. 1999;89:1346–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Wittkower E. Rehabilitation of the limbless: joint surgical and psychological study. Occup Med. 1947;3:20.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Murray CD, Fox J. Body image and prosthesis satisfaction in the lower-limb amputee. Disab Rehab. 2002;24:925–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Whyte A, Niven C. Psychological distress in amputees with phantom limb pain. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2001;22:938–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Breakey JW. Body image: the lower amputee. J Prosthet Orthotics. 1997;9:58–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Jones L, Hall M, Schuld W. Ability or disability? A study of the functional outcome of 65 consecutive lower limb amputees treated at the Royal South Sydney Hospital in 1988–1989. Disab Rehab. 1993;15:184–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Williamson GM, Schulz R, Bridges MW, Behan AM. Social and psychological factors in adjustment to limb amputation. J Social Behav Personality. 1994;9:249–68.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Rybarczyk B, Nyenhuis DL, Nicholas JJ, Cash SM, Kaiser J. Body image, perceived social stigma, and the prediction of psychosocial adjustment to leg amputation. Rehab Psychol. 1995;49:95–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Taleperos G, McCabe MP. Body image and physical disability-personal perspectives. Soc Sci Med. 2002;54:971–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Furst L, Humphrey M. Coping with the loss of a leg. Prosthet Orthotics Int. 1983;7:152–6.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Peters EJG, Childs MR, Wunderlich RP, Harkless LB, Armstrong DG, Lavery LA. Functional status of persons with diabetes-related lower-extremity amputations. Diabetes Care. 2001;24:1799–804.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Smith DG, Horn P, Malchow D, Boone DA, Reiber GE, Hansen ST Jr. Prosthetic history, prosthetic charges, and functional outcome of the isolated, traumatic below-knee amputee. J Trauma. 1995;38:44–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Schoppen T, Boonstra A, Groothoff JW, de Vries J, Goecken LNH, Eisma WH. Employment status, job characteristics, and work-related health experience of people with a lower limb amputation. Arch Phys Med Rehab. 2001;82:239–45.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Pezzin LE, Dillingham TR, Mackenzie EJ. Rehabilitation and long-term outcome of persons with trauma-related amputations. Arch Phys Med Rehab. 2000;81:292–300.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Williamson GM. Restriction of normal activities among older adult amputees: the role of public self-consciousness. J Clin Geropsychol. 1995;1:229–42.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

E. E. Desteli, Y. İmren, M. Erdoğan, G. Sarısoy and S. Coşgun certify that he or she or a member of his or her immediate family, has no funding or commercial associations (e.g., consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent licensing arrangements, etc.) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article.

Ethical standard

This study has been approved by the appropriate ethics committee and has therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments. Specific national laws have been observed, too.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Üsküdar State Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey

    E. E. Desteli & Y. İmren

  2. Ondokuzmayis University Hospital, Samsun, Turkey

    M. Erdoğan, G. Sarısoy & S. Coşgun

Authors
  1. E. E. Desteli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Y. İmren
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. M. Erdoğan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. G. Sarısoy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. S. Coşgun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Y. İmren.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Desteli, E.E., İmren, Y., Erdoğan, M. et al. Comparison of upper limb amputees and lower limb amputees: a psychosocial perspective. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 40, 735–739 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-014-0418-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-014-0418-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation