Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Clinical Outcomes On Tubridge Flow Diverter in Treatmenting Intracranial Aneurysms: a Retrospective Multicenter Registry Study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Clinical Neuroradiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

In China, the application of nitinol Tubridge flow diverter (TFD) has become popular for treating intracranial aneurysms (IAs). In this study, we investigated the safety outcomes of the application of TFD for treating IAs in real-world scenarios.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed aneurysms treated with TFD in 235 centers throughout China between April 2018 and April 2020. The primary endpoint was the event-free survival rate at 12 months, defined as the occurrence of morbidity (spontaneous rupture, intraparenchymal hemorrhage (IPH), ischemic stroke, and permanent cranial neuropathy) or death. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to assess the risk factors. A good outcome was defined as a modified Rankin Score (mRS) of 0–2.

Results

We included 1281 unruptured aneurysms treated with TFD. The overall neurological morbidity and death rates after 12 months were 5.4 and 2.8%, respectively. Ischemic strokes were the most common complication (4.2%, P < 0.001). Cranial neuropathy, IPH, and spontaneous rupture occurred in 0.3%, 0.3%, and 0.5% of aneurysms, respectively. Univariate and multivariate analyses indicated that the male gender, older age, larger aneurysm diameter, and aneurysm located on BA were the independent risk factors for neurologic events. Aneurysm located on BA was the independent risk factor for ischemic strokes. Most patients (1222) had access to the mRS, and 93.2% of them achieved good outcomes.

Conclusion

Treatment of IAs with TFD was associated with low morbidity and mortality, most of which were ischemic events. Large posterior aneurysms might be associated with a higher complication rate.

Trial Registration

Retrospectively registered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability Statement

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this article.

Abbreviations

CEC:

Clinical events committee

IA:

Intracranial aneurysms

IPH:

Intraparenchymal hemorrhage

mRS:

Modified Rankin Scored

SAE:

Serious adverse events

TFD:

Tubridge flow diverter

References

  1. Wu Q, Li L, Shao Q, Xu T, Chang K, Li T, et al. Intracranial aneurysms managed by parent artery reconstruction using Tubridge: Study protocol for a prospective, multicenter, post-market clinical trial. Interv Neuroradiol. 2021;27(4):490–6. https://doi.org/10.1177/1591019920976233.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Radaelli AG, Augsburger L, Cebral JR, Ohta M, Rüfenacht DA, Balossino R, et al. Reproducibility of haemodynamical simulations in a subject-specific stented aneurysm model—a report on the Virtual Intracranial Stenting Challenge 2007. J Biomech. 2008;41(10):2069–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.04.035.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Zhang XJ, Gao BL, Hao WL, Wu SS, Zhang DH. Presence of Anterior Communicating Artery Aneurysm Is Associated With Age, Bifurcation Angle, and Vessel Diameter. Stroke. 2018;49(2):341–7. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.019701.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Feigin VL, Lawes CM, Bennett DA, Barker-Collo SL, Parag V. Worldwide stroke incidence and early case fatality reported in 56 population-based studies: a systematic review. Lancet Neurol. 2009;8(4):355–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70025-0.

  5. Arrese I, Sarabia R, Pintado R, Delgado-Rodriguez M. Flow-diverter devices for intracranial aneurysms: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurosurgery. 2013;73(2):193–200. https://doi.org/10.1227/01.neu.0000430297.17961.f1.

  6. Briganti F, Napoli M, Tortora F, Solari D, Bergui M, Boccardi E, et al. Italian multicenter experience with flow-diverter devices for intracranial unruptured aneurysm treatment with periprocedural complications—a retrospective data analysis. Neuroradiology. 2012;54(10):1145–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-012-1047-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Brinjikji W, Murad MH, Lanzino G, Cloft HJ, Kallmes DF. Endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms with flow diverters: a meta-analysis. Stroke. 2013;44(2):442–7. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.678151.

  8. Yu SC, Kwok CK, Cheng PW, Chan KY, Lau SS, Lui WM, et al. Intracranial aneurysms: midterm outcome of pipeline embolization device—a prospective study in 143 patients with 178 aneurysms. Radiology. 2012;265(3):893–901. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.12120422.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kallmes DF, Brinjikji W, Cekirge S, Fiorella D, Hanel RA, Jabbour P, et al. Safety and efficacy of the Pipeline embolization device for treatment of intracranial aneurysms: a pooled analysis of 3 large studies. J Neurosurg. 2017;127(4):775–80. https://doi.org/10.3171/2016.8.JNS16467.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Liu JM, Zhou Y, Li Y, Li T, Leng B, Zhang P, et al. Parent Artery Reconstruction for Large or Giant Cerebral Aneurysms Using the Tubridge Flow Diverter: A Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial (PARAT). AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2018;39(5):807–16. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A5619.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhou Y, Yang PF, Fang YB, Xu Y, Hong B, Zhao WY, et al. Parent artery reconstruction for large or giant cerebral aneurysms using a Tubridge flow diverter (PARAT): study protocol for a multicenter, randomized, controlled clinical trial. BMC Neurol. 2014;14:97. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2377-14-97.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Fang YB, Wen WL, Yang PF, Zhou Y, Wu YN, Hong B, et al. Long-Term Outcome of Tubridge Flow Diverter(S) in Treating Large Vertebral Artery Dissecting Aneurysms—A Pilot Study. Clin Neuroradiol. 2017;27(3):345–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00062-015-0494-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Foa Torres G, Roca F, Noguera A, Godes J, Petrocelli S, Aznar I, et al. Silk flow-diverter stent for the treatment of complex intracranial aneurysms: A one-year follow-up multicenter study. Interv Neuroradiol. 2018;24(4):357–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/1591019918771340.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Liang F, Yang Y, Luo L, Liao B, Zhang G, Ou S, et al. Endovascular treatment of complex middle cerebral artery aneurysms using TuBridge flow diverters. Interv Neuroradiol. 2020;26(5):539–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/1591019920946216.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Kallmes DF, Hanel R, Lopes D, Boccardi E, Bonafe A, Cekirge S, et al. International retrospective study of the pipeline embolization device: a multicenter aneurysm treatment study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2015;36(1):108–15. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A4111.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Kang H, Zhou Y, Luo B, Lv N, Zhang H, Li T, et al. Pipeline Embolization Device for Intracranial Aneurysms in a Large Chinese Cohort: Complication Risk Factor Analysis. Neurotherapeutics. 2021;18(2):1198–206. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13311-020-00990-8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Gory B, Berge J, Bonafe A, Pierot L, Spelle L, Piotin M, et al. Flow Diverters for Intracranial Aneurysms: The DIVERSION National Prospective Cohort Study. Stroke. 2019;50(12):3471–80. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.024722.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Berge J, Biondi A, Machi P, Brunel H, Pierot L, Gabrillargues J, et al. Flow-diverter silk stent for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: 1‑year follow-up in a multicenter study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2012;33(6):1150–5. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A2907.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Leonardi M, Cirillo L, Toni F, Dall’olio M, Princiotta C, Stafa A, et al. Treatment of intracranial aneurysms using flow-diverting silk stents (BALT): a single centre experience. Interv Neuroradiol. 2011;17(3):306–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/159101991101700305.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Velioglu M, Kizilkilic O, Selcuk H, Kocak B, Tureci E, Islak C, et al. Early and midterm results of complex cerebral aneurysms treated with Silk stent. Neuroradiology. 2012;54(12):1355–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-012-1051-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Pierot L. Flow diverter stents in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: Where are we? J Neuroradiol. 2011;38(1):40–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurad.2010.12.002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Wong GK, Kwan MC, Ng RY, Yu SC, Poon WS. Flow diverters for treatment of intracranial aneurysms: current status and ongoing clinical trials. J Clin Neurosci. 2011;18(6):737–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2010.10.011.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Fiorella D, Woo HH, Albuquerque FC, Nelson PK. Definitive reconstruction of circumferential, fusiform intracranial aneurysms with the pipeline embolization device. Neurosurgery. 2008;62(5):1115–20. https://doi.org/10.1227/01.neu.0000325873.44881.6e. discussion 20–1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Szikora I, Berentei Z, Kulcsar Z, Marosfoi M, Vajda ZS, Lee W, et al. Treatment of intracranial aneurysms by functional reconstruction of the parent artery: the Budapest experience with the pipeline embolization device. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2010;31(6):1139–47. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A2023.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Park MS, Kilburg C, Taussky P, Albuquerque FC, Kallmes DF, Levy EI, et al. Pipeline Embolization Device with or without Adjunctive Coil Embolization: Analysis of Complications from the IntrePED Registry. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2016;37(6):1127–31. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A4678.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Wang C, Zhu D, Xu X, Zhou Y, Zhao R, Li Q, et al. Use of flow diverter device in basilar artery for aneurysm treatment: Case series and literature review. Front Neurol. 2022;13:990308. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2022.990308.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Kiyofuji S, Graffeo CS, Perry A, Murad MH, Flemming KD, Lanzino G, et al. Meta-analysis of treatment outcomes of posterior circulation non-saccular aneurysms by flow diverters. J Neurointerv Surg. 2018;10(5):493–9. https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2017-013312.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Griessenauer CJ, Enriquez-Marulanda A, Taussky P, Biswas A, Grandhi R, Xiang S, et al. Experience With the Pipeline Embolization Device for Posterior Circulations Aneurysms: A Multicenter Cohort Study. Neurosurgery. 2020;87(6):1252–61. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuros/nyaa277.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Ge H, Chen X, Liu K, Zhao Y, Zhang L, Liu P, et al. Endovascular Treatment of Large or Giant Basilar Artery Aneurysms Using the Pipeline Embolization Device: Complications and Outcomes. Front Neurol. 2022;13:843839. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2022.843839.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Wallace AN, Madaelil TP, Kamran M, Miller TR, Delgado Almandoz JE, Grossberg JA, et al. Pipeline Embolization of Vertebrobasilar Aneurysms—A Multicenter Case Series. World Neurosurg. 2019; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2018.12.116.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Adeeb N, Griessenauer CJ, Dmytriw AA, Shallwani H, Gupta R, Foreman PM, et al. Risk of Branch Occlusion and Ischemic Complications with the Pipeline Embolization Device in the Treatment of Posterior Circulation Aneurysms. Ajnr Am J Neuroradiol. 2018;39(7):1303–9. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A5696.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Bender MT, Colby GP, Jiang B, Lin LM, Campos JK, Xu R, et al. Flow Diversion of Posterior Circulation Cerebral Aneurysms: A Single-Institution Series of 59 Cases. Neurosurgery. 2019;84(1):206–16. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuros/nyy076.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Kulcsar Z, Houdart E, Bonafe A, Parker G, Millar J, Goddard AJ, et al. Intra-aneurysmal thrombosis as a possible cause of delayed aneurysm rupture after flow-diversion treatment. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2011;32(1):20–5. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A2370.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. de Korte AM, Aquarius R, Meijer FJA, Boogaarts HD, de Vries J. Intracranial Aneurysm Expansion Might Cause Neurological Deterioration After Flow Diverter Treatment. World Neurosurg. 2018;120:e802–e10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2018.08.169.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge Professor Xiao yan Yan (Department of Medical Statistics, Peking University, Bei Jing, China) for providing guidance on the various statistical methods used in this study. We are grateful to all principal investigators and delegated physicians who enrolled the required participants in all the participating centers. We also thank the participants, their medical caretakers, and the families who consented to participate in the trial.

Funding

This work was supported by the Project of the Shanghai Science and Technology Commission [grant number 19DZ1930300] and the Training Program for Excellent Young Clinical Medical Talents in Hongkou District [grant number HKLCYQ2024-05]; and was sponsored by unrestricted grants from the MicroPort NeuroTech (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. (N/A).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Q. Li: Data curation, Writing—Original draft preparation, Supervision; D. Zhu: Data curation, Writing—Original draft preparation; N. Lv: Data curation, Writing—Original draft preparation; P. Yang: Supervision; Y. Zhou: Supervision; R. Zhao: Supervision; W. Yang: Supervision; M. Lv: Visualization, Investigation; T. Li: Visualization, Investigation; W. Zhao: Visualization, Investigation; T. Qi: Visualization, Investigation; W. Jiang: Visualization, Investigation; C. Duan: Visualization, Investigation; G. Zhao: Visualization, Investigation; G. Duan: Software, Validation; Y. Wu: Software, Validation; Q. Zheng: Software, Validation; Z. Li: Software, Validation; Q. Zuo: Software, Validation; D. Dai: Software, Validation; Y. Fang: Software, Validation; Q. Huang: Visualization, Investigation; B. Hong: Writing—Reviewing and Editing; Y. Xu: Writing—Reviewing and Editing; Y. Gu: Conceptualization, Methodology, Software, Writing—Reviewing and Editing; S. Guan: Conceptualization, Methodology, Software, Writing—Reviewing and Editing; J. Liu: Conceptualization, Methodology, Software, Writing—Reviewing and Editing. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jianmin Liu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Q. Li, D. Zhu, N. Lv, P. Yang, Y. Zhou, R. Zhao, W. Yang, M. Lv, T. Li, W. Zhao, T. Qi, W. Jiang, C. Duan, G. Zhao, G. Duan, Y. Wu, Q. Zheng, Z. Li, Q. Zuo, D. Dai, Y. Fang, Q. Huang, B. Hong, Y. Xu, Y. Gu, S. Guan and J. Liu declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethical standards

For this article no studies with human participants or animals were performed by any of the authors. All studies mentioned were in accordance with the ethical standards indicated in each case. This research obtained ethics approval from Shanghai Changhai Hospital Ethics Committee (Approval ID CHEC2022-229). Local institutional review boards or ethics committees authorized the study and retrospective data collection from patients. A waiver of informed consent by an institutional review board or ethics committee. If necessary, written informed consent was obtained from each patient.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The authors Qiang Li, Deyuan Zhu and Nan Lv contributed equally to the manuscript.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, Q., Zhu, D., Lv, N. et al. Clinical Outcomes On Tubridge Flow Diverter in Treatmenting Intracranial Aneurysms: a Retrospective Multicenter Registry Study. Clin Neuroradiol (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00062-024-01393-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00062-024-01393-4

Keywords

Navigation