Skip to main content
Log in

The p64 Flow Diverter—Mid-term and Long-term Results from a Single Center

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Clinical Neuroradiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background and Purpose

The p64 is a flow modulation device designed to be used in endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms. There is limited data on the long-term effectiveness of the device. This study sought to determine the safety and long-term efficacy of this device.

Methods

A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database was performed to identify all patients treated with a p64 between March 2015 and November 2018 at University Hospital St. Ivan Rilski. Anatomical features, intraprocedural complications, clinical, and angiographic outcomes were also taken into account and reviewed.

Results

A total of 72 patients with 72 aneurysms who met the inclusion criteria were identified. Device placement was successful in all patients. Follow-up angiographic imaging at 6 months showed complete occlusion (O’Kelly–Marotta scale [OKM] D) in 55 (76.3%) patients, subtotal aneurysmal filling (OKM B) in 10 (13.8%) patients, and neck remnant (OKM C) in 7 (9.7%) patients. Catheter angiography at 12 months was available for 70 patients (97.2%) and of these patients 91.4% of the aneurysms were completely occluded (OKM D) (64/72). Delayed angiography at 24 months was available for 68 patients (94.4%) and of these 98.5% (67/68) had completely occluded aneurysms. A 36-month angiography was available for 61 patients (84.4%) by which point all aneurysms had been completely occluded (100%). Permanent morbidity due to delayed aneurysmal rupture occurred in one patient (1.38%). The mortality rate was 0%. Self-limiting mild intimal hyperplasia was seen in 2 patients (2.72%).

Conclusion

Treatment of intracranial aneurysms with a p64 flow modulation device is safe and effective with a high success rate and only infrequent complications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Arrese I, Sarabia R, Pintado R, Delgado-Rodriguez M. Flow-diverter devices for intracranial aneurysms: systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurosurgery. 2013;73:193–9. discussion 199–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ye G, Zhang M, Deng L, Chen X, Wang Y. Meta-analysis of the efficiency and prognosis of Intracranial aneurysm treated with flow diverter devices. J Mol Neurosci. 2016;59:158–67.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Walcott BP, Stapleton CJ, Choudhri O, Patel AB. Flow diversion for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. JAMA Neurol. 2016;73:1002–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lylyk P, Miranda C, Ceratto R, Ferrario A, Scrivano E, Luna HR, Berez AL, Tran Q, Nelson PK, Fiorella D. Curative endovascular reconstruction of cerebral aneurysms with the pipeline embolization device: the Buenos Aires experience. Neurosurgery. 2009;64:632–42. discussion 642–3; quiz N6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lubicz B, Collignon L, Raphaeli G, Pruvo JP, Bruneau M, De Witte O, Leclerc X. Flow-diverter stent for the endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms: a prospective study in 29 patients with 34 aneurysms. Stroke. 2010;41:2247–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Becske T, Kallmes DF, Saatci I, McDougall CG, Szikora I, Lanzino G, Moran CJ, Woo HH, Lopes DK, Berez AL, Cher DJ, Siddiqui AH, Levy EI, Albuquerque FC, Fiorella DJ, Berentei Z, Marosfoi M, Cekirge SH, Nelson PK. Pipeline for uncoilable or failed aneurysms: results from a multicenter clinical trial. Radiology. 2013;267:858–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Becske T, Brinjikji W, Potts MB, Kallmes DF, Shapiro M, Moran CJ, Levy EI, McDougall CG, Szikora I, Lanzino G, Woo HH, Lopes DK, Siddiqui AH, Albuquerque FC, Fiorella DJ, Saatci I, Cekirge SH, Berez AL, Cher DJ, Berentei Z, Marosfoi M, Nelson PK. Long-term clinical and angiographic outcomes following pipeline embolization device treatment of complex internal carotid artery aneurysms: five-year results of the pipeline for uncoilable or failed aneurysms trial. Neurosurgery. 2017;80:40–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Briganti F, Leone G, Marseglia M, Cicala D, Caranci F, Maiuri F. p64 flow modulation device in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: initial experience and technical aspects. J Neurointerv Surg. 2016;8:173–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fischer S, Aguilar-Pérez M, Henkes E, Kurre W, Ganslandt O, Bäzner H, Henkes H. Initial experience with p64: a novel mechanically detachable flow diverter for the treatment of Intracranial Saccular sidewall aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2015;36:2082–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Morais R, Mine B, Bruyère PJ, Naeije G, Lubicz B. Endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms with the p64 flow diverter stent: mid-term results in 35 patients with 41 intracranial aneurysms. Neuroradiology. 2017;59:263–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Briganti F, Leone G, Ugga L, Marseglia M, Macera A, Manto A, Delehaye L, Resta M, Resta M, Burdi N, Nuzzi NP, Divenuto I, Caranci F, Muto M, Solari D, Cappabianca P, Maiuri F. Mid-term and long-term follow-up of intracranial aneurysms treated by the p64 flow modulation device: a multicenter experience. J Neurointerv Surg. 2017;9:70–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. O’Kelly CJ, Krings T, Fiorella D, Marotta TR. A novel grading scale for the angiographic assessment of intracranial aneurysms treated using flow diverting stents. Interv Neuroradiol. 2010;16:133–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Nelson PK, Lylyk P, Szikora I, Wetzel SG, Wanke I, Fiorella D. The pipeline embolization device for the intracranial treatment of aneurysms trial. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2011;32:34–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Pierot L, Spelle L, Berge J, Januel AC, Herbreteau D, Aggour M, Piotin M, Biondi A, Barreau X, Mounayer C, Papagiannaki C, Lejeune JP, Gauvrit JY, Derelle AL, Chabert E, Costalat V. SAFE study (Safety and efficacy analysis of FRED embolic device in aneurysm treatment): 1‑year clinical and anatomical results. J Neurointerv Surg. 2019;11:184–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Berge J, Biondi A, Machi P, Brunel H, Pierot L, Gabrillargues J, Kadziolka K, Barreau X, Dousset V, Bonafé A. Flow-diverter silk stent for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: 1‑year follow-up in a multicenter study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2012;33:1150–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Shankar JJ, Tampieri D, Iancu D, Cortes M, Agid R, Krings T, Wong J, Lavoie P, Ghostine J, Shettar B, Ritchie K, Weill A. SILK flow diverter for complex intracranial aneurysms: a Canadian registry. J Neurointerv Surg. 2016;8:273–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. De Vries J, Boogaarts J, Van Norden A, Wakhloo AK. New generation of flow diverter (surpass) for unruptured intracranial aneurysms: a prospective single-center study in 37 patients. Stroke. 2013;44:1567–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Wakhloo AK, Lylyk P, de Vries J, Taschner C, Lundquist J, Biondi A, Hartmann M, Szikora I, Pierot L, Sakai N, Imamura H, Sourour N, Rennie I, Skalej M, Beuing O, Bonafé A, Mery F, Turjman F, Brouwer P, Boccardi E, Valvassori L, Derakhshani S, Litzenberg MW, Gounis MJ; Surpass Study Group. Surpass flow diverter in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: a prospective multicenter study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2015;36:98–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Dholakia R, Sadasivan C, Fiorella DJ, Woo HH, Lieber BB. Hemodynamics of flow diverters. J Biomech Eng. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4034932.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kadirvel R, Ding YH, Dai D, Rezek I, Lewis DA, Kallmes DF. Cellular mechanisms of aneurysm occlusion after treatment with a flow diverter. Radiology. 2014;270:394–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Puffer RC, Piano M, Lanzino G, Valvassori L, Kallmes DF, Quilici L, Cloft HJ, Boccardi E. Treatment of cavernous sinus aneurysms with flow diversion: results in 44 patients. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2014;35:948–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Bhogal P, Ganslandt O, Bäzner H, Henkes H, Pérez MA. The fate of side branches covered by flow diverters-results from 140 patients. World Neurosurg. 2017;103:789–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Cebral JR, Raschi M, Mut F, Ding YH, Dai D, Kadirvel R, Kallmes D. Analysis of flow changes in side branches jailed by flow diverters in rabbit models. Int J Numer Methods Biomed Eng. 2014;30:988–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Rangel-Castilla L, Munich SA, Jaleel N, Cress MC, Krishna C, Sonig A, Snyder KV, Siddiqui AH, Levy EI. Patency of anterior circulation branch vessels after pipeline embolization: longer-term results from 82 aneurysm cases. J Neurosurg. 2017;126:1064–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Brinjikji W, Kallmes DF, Cloft HJ, Lanzino G. Patency of the anterior choroidal artery after flow-diversion treatment of internal carotid artery aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2015;36:537–41.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Neki H, Caroff J, Jittapiromsak P, Benachour N, Mihalea C, Ikka L, Moret J, Spelle L. Patency of the anterior choroidal artery covered with a flow-diverter stent. J Neurosurg. 2015;123:1540–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Raz E, Shapiro M, Becske T, Zumofen DW, Tanweer O, Potts MB, Riina HA, Nelson PK. Anterior choroidal artery patency and clinical follow-up after coverage with the pipeline embolization device. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2015;36:937–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Bhogal P, Ganslandt O, Bäzner H, Henkes H, Aguilar Perez M. Treatment of unruptured, saccular, anterior choroidal artery aneurysms with flow diversion: a single centre experience. Clin Neuroradiol. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00062-018-0677-1. [Epub ahead of print]

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Aguilar Pérez M, Bhogal P, Henkes E, Ganslandt O, Bäzner H, Henkes H. In-stent stenosis after p64 flow diverter treatment. Clin Neuroradiol. 2018;28:563–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Rouchaud A, Brinjikji W, Lanzino G, Cloft HJ, Kadirvel R, Kallmes DF. Delayed hemorrhagic complications after flow diversion for intracranial aneurysms: a literature overview. Neuroradiology. 2016;58:171–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Goertz L, Dorn F, Kraus B, Borggrefe J, Forbrig R, Schlamann M, Liebig T, Turowski B, Kabbasch C. Improved occlusion rate of Intracranial aneurysms treated with the Derivo embolization device: one-year clinical and Angiographic follow-up in a Multicenter study. World Neurosurg. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2019.03.137. [Epub ahead of print]

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Goertz L, Dorn F, Kraus B, Borggrefe J, Schlamann M, Forbrig R, Turowski B, Kabbasch C. Safety and efficacy of the Derivo embolization device for the treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms. J Neurointerv Surg. 2019;11:290-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Kraus B, Goertz L, Turowski B, Borggrefe J, Schlamann M, Dorn F, Kabbasch C. Safety and efficacy of the Derivo embolization device for the treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms: a multicentric study. J Neurointerv Surg. 2019;11:68–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Sirakov.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

S. Sirakov, A. Sirakov, P. Bhogal, M. Penkov, K. Minkin, K. Ninov, H. Hristov, V. Karakostov and R. Raychev declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethical standards

All procedures performed in the studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sirakov, S., Sirakov, A., Bhogal, P. et al. The p64 Flow Diverter—Mid-term and Long-term Results from a Single Center. Clin Neuroradiol 30, 471–480 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00062-019-00823-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00062-019-00823-y

Keywords

Navigation