Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Ecology of Pheidole oxyops Forel, 1908, a dominant ant in neotropical savannas

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Insectes Sociaux Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Pheidole oxyops is a common and widely spread species in the central region of South America. Despite its ecological importance, relatively little is known about its habitat preferences, population dynamics and natural history. Here we provide information about the diet, daily foraging schedule, nest size and densities, and on the influence of habitat on the dynamics of P. oxyops colonies in southeastern Brazil. We found that P. oxyops is a habitat generalist, occurring in grasslands, savannas and forests. Although mean nest densities did not differ between the habitats we surveyed, the greatest densities were detected in the savanna plots, where up to 175 nests ha−1 were found. Pheidole oxyops presented an essentially predatory/scavenger habit, feeding on arthropod prey and especially on termites. Ant workers foraged during the day and the night at temperatures ranging from 14 to 28 °C. Nest mortality over a period of 1 year was positively related to initial nest densities, indicating a density-dependent regulation of the population. Nest growth rates were higher for small-sized—and thus presumably younger—nests than for large-sized nests. Overall, these life-history data reinforce the view that P. oxyops is a species typical of the Cerrado savannas, and a numerically and behaviourally dominant ant.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Benard MF, McCauley SJ (2008) Integrating across life-history stages: consequences of natal habitat effects on dispersal. Am Nat 171:553–567. https://doi.org/10.1086/587072

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • de Biase VL (1986) Atividade forrageira, dieta alimentar, densidade e distribuição espacial das colônias de Pheidole oxyops Forel, 1908 (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) na região Botucatu. Universidade Estadual Paulista, SP

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolton B (2020) An online catalog of the ants of the world

  • Bowler DE, Benton TG (2005) Causes and consequences of animal dispersal strategies: relating individual behaviour to spatial dynamics. Biol Rev 80:205–225. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1464793104006645

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bucher EH (1974) Observaciones ecológicas sobre los artrópodos del bosque chaqueño de Tucumán. Rev Fac Ciencias Exactas y Nat 1:22–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Camargo RX, Oliveira PS (2012) Natural history of the neotropical arboreal ant, Odontomachus hastatus: nest sites, foraging schedule, and diet. J Insect Sci 12:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1673/031.012.4801

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campos RI, Vasconcelos HL, Andersen AN et al (2011) Multi-scale ant diversity in savanna woodlands: an intercontinental comparison. Austral Ecol 36:983–992. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-9993.2011.02255.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cardoso E, Moreno MIC, Bruna EM, Vasconcelos HL (2009) Changes in Cerrado vegetation physiognomies: 18 years of ecological succession at Estação Ecológica do Panga, Uberlândia-MG. Caminhos da Geogr 10:254–268

    Google Scholar 

  • Clobert J, Le Galliard JF, Cote J et al (2009) Informed dispersal, heterogeneity in animal dispersal syndromes and the dynamics of spatially structured populations. Ecol Lett 12:197–209. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01267.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Constantino R (2005) Padrões de diversidade e endemismo de térmitas no bioma Cerrado. In: Scariot A, Sousa-Silva JC, Felfili JM (eds) Cerrado: ecologia, biodiversidade e conservação. Ministério do Meio Ambiente, Brasília, pp 319–333

    Google Scholar 

  • Czaczkes TJ, Nouvellet P, Ratnieks FLW (2011) Cooperative food transport in the neotropical ant, Pheidole oxyops. Insectes Soc 58:153–161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00040-010-0130-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deligne JA, Quenneday A, Blum MS (1981) The enemies and defense mechanisms of termites. In: Hermann HR (ed) Social insects, 2nd edn. Academic Press, New York, pp 1–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandes WD, Oliveira PS, Carvalho SL, Habib MEM (1994) Pheidole ants as potential biological control agents of the boll weevil, Anthonomus grandis (Col., Curculionidae), in Southeast Brazil. J Appl Entomol 118:437–441. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0418.1994.tb00822.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernández-Escudero I, Tinaut A (1999) Factors determining nest distribution in the high- mountain ant Proformica longiseta (Hymenoptera Formicidae). Ethol Ecol Evol 11:325–338. https://doi.org/10.1080/08927014.1999.9522817

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forti LC, Camargo RS, Fujihara RT, Lopes JFS (2007) The nest architecture of the ant, Pheidole oxyops Forel, 1908 (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Insect Sci 14:437–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fourcassié V, Oliveira PS (2002) Foraging ecology of the giant Amazonian ant Dinoponera gigantea (Hymenoptera, Formicidae, Ponerinae): activity schedule, diet and spatial foraging patterns. J Nat Hist 36:2211–2227. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222930110097149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fowler HG (1984) Recruitment, group retrieval and major worker behavior in Pheidole oxyops Forel (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Rev Bras Biol 44:21–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler HG (1987) The nest of Pheidole oxyops as a tipfall-trap (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Pedobiologia (Jena) 30:373–376

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler HG (1979) Notes on the ecology of Pheidole oxyops FOREL in Paraguay (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Dtsch Entomol Zeitschrift 308:305–308

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomes IJMT, Santiago DF, Campos RI, Vasconcelos HL (2019) Why do Pheidole oxyops (Forel, 1908) ants place feathers around their nests? Ecol Entomol 44:451–456. https://doi.org/10.1111/een.12722

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon DM (1995) The development of an ant colony’s foraging range. Anim Behav 49:649–659

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hölldobler B, Wilson EO (2008) The superorganism: the beauty, elegance, and strangeness of insect societies, 1st edn. W. W. Norton & Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hölldobler B, Wilson EO (1990) The ants. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kaspari M (2000) A primer on ant ecology. In: Agosti D, Majer JD, Alonso LE, Schultz TR (eds) Ants: standard methods for measuring and monitoring biodiversity. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, pp 9–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Lach L, Parr CL, Abbott KL (2010) Ant ecology, 1st edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Laskis KO, Tschinkel WR (2009) The seasonal natural history of the ant, Dolichoderus mariae, in Northern Florida. J Insect Sci 9:1–26. https://doi.org/10.1673/031.009.0201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Longino JT (2019) Pheidole (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) of middle American wet forest. Magnolia Press, Auckland

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mathews AGA (1977) Studies on termites from the Mato Grosso State Brazil. Academia Brasileira de Ciências, Rio de Janeiro

    Google Scholar 

  • Mcglynn TP, Hoover JR, Jasper GS et al (2002) Resource heterogeneity affects demography of the Costa Rican ant Aphaenogaster araneoides. J Trop Ecol 18:231–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mertl AL, Sorenson MD, Traniello JFA (2010) Community-level interactions and functional ecology of major workers in the hyperdiverse ground-foraging Pheidole (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) of Amazonian Ecuador. Insectes Soc 57:441–452. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00040-010-0102-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mill AE (1982) Faunal studies on termites (Isoptera) and observations on their ant predators (Hymenoptera:Formicidae) in the Amazon basin. Rev Bras Entomol 26:253–260

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison LW (1998) The spatiotemporal dynamics of insular ant metapopulations. Ecology 79:1135–1146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira-Filho AT, Ratter JA (2002) Vegetation physiognomies and woody flora of the cerrado biome. In: Oliveira PS, Marquis RJ (eds) The cerrados of Brazil: ecology and natural history of a neotropical savanna. Columbia University Press, New York, pp 91–120

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Parr CL, Gibb H (2010) Competition and the role of dominant ants. In: Lach L, Parr CL, Abbott KL (eds) Ant ecology, 1st edn. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 77–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Price N (2010) Habitat selection, facilitation, and biotic settlement cues affect distribution and performance of coral recruits in French Polynesia. Oecologia 163:747–758. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-010-1578-4

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Quinet Y, Tekule N, De Biseau JC (2005) Behavioural interactions between Crematogaster brevispinosa rochai Forel (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) and two Nasutitermes species (Isoptera: Termitidae). J Insect Behav 18:1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10905-005-9343-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R-Core-Team (2016) R: A landuage and environment for statistical computing. http://www.r-project.org/

  • Rodríguez-Planes LI, Farji-Brener AG (2019) Extended phenotypes and foraging restrictions: ant nest entrances and resource ingress in leaf-cutting ants. Biotropica 51:178–185. https://doi.org/10.1111/btp.12630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ronce O (2007) How does it feel to be like a rolling stone? Ten questions about dispersal evolution. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 38:231–253. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.38.091206.095611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosumek FB (2017) Natural history of ants: What we (do not) know about trophic and temporal niches of neotropical species. Sociobiology 64:244–255. https://doi.org/10.13102/sociobiology.v64i3.1623

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarnat EM, Fischer G, Guénard B, Economo EP (2015) Introduced Pheidole of the world: taxonomy, biology and distribution. Zookeys 543:1–109. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.543.6050

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tschá MK, Pie MR (2019) Correlates of ecological dominance within Pheidole ants (Hymenoptera : Formicidae). Ecol Entomol 44:163–171. https://doi.org/10.1111/een.12685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tschinkel WR (1991) Insect sociometry, a field in search of data. Insectes Soc 38:77–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01242715

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tschinkel WR, Wilson EO (2014) Scientific natural history: telling the epics of nature. Bioscience 64:438–443. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biu033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vasconcelos HL, Maravalhas JB, Feitosa RM et al (2018) Neotropical savanna ants show a reversed latitudinal gradient of species richness, with climatic drivers reflecting the forest origin of the fauna. J Biogeogr 45:248–258. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbi.13113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler WM (1910) Ants: their structure, development and behavior. Columbia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson EO (1987) The little things that run the world (The importance and conservation of invertebrates). Conserv Biol 1:344–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson EO (2003) Pheidole in the New World. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the Federal University of Uberlândia by the logistical support provided. We also thank Izadora Vidigal and Antonio Souza for valuable field assistance. Financial support was provided by Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES undergraduate fellowship to IJMTG), Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais and Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq Grants 457407/2012-3 and 441225/2016-0 to HLV). All parts of this work comply with the current research laws of Brazil. The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Funding

Financial support was provided by Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES undergraduate fellowship to IJMTG), Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais and Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq Grants 457407/2012-3 and 441225/2016-0 to HLV).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Programa de Pós-Graduação Em Ecologia, Departamento de Biologia Geral, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, MG, Brazil

    I. J. M. T. Gomes & R. I. Campos

  2. Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, Uberlândia, MG, Brazil

    H. L. Vasconcelos

  3. Prédio da Biologia, Laboratório de Ecologia, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Campus Universitário, Viçosa, MG, 36570-000, Brazil

    I. J. M. T. Gomes

Authors
  1. I. J. M. T. Gomes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. R. I. Campos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. H. L. Vasconcelos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by IJMTG. The first draft of the manuscript was written by IJMTG and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to I. J. M. T. Gomes.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 13 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gomes, I.J.M.T., Campos, R.I. & Vasconcelos, H.L. Ecology of Pheidole oxyops Forel, 1908, a dominant ant in neotropical savannas. Insect. Soc. 68, 69–75 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00040-021-00807-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00040-021-00807-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation