Skip to main content
Log in

Kaufman and Falconer Estimates for Radial Projections and a Continuum Version of Beck’s Theorem

  • Published:
Geometric and Functional Analysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We provide several new answers on the question: how do radial projections distort the dimension of planar sets? Let \(X,Y \subset \mathbb{R}^{2}\) be non-empty Borel sets. If X is not contained in any line, we prove that

$$ \sup _{x \in X} \dim _{\mathrm {H}}\pi _{x}(Y \, \setminus \, \{x\}) \geq \min \{ \dim _{\mathrm {H}}X,\dim _{\mathrm {H}}Y,1\}. $$

If dimHY>1, we have the following improved lower bound:

$$ \sup _{x \in X} \dim _{\mathrm {H}}\pi _{x}(Y \, \setminus \, \{x\}) \geq \min \{ \dim _{\mathrm {H}}X + \dim _{\mathrm {H}}Y - 1,1\}. $$

Our results solve conjectures of Lund-Thang-Huong, Liu, and the first author. Another corollary is the following continuum version of Beck’s theorem in combinatorial geometry: if \(X \subset \mathbb{R}^{2}\) is a Borel set with the property that dimH(X ∖ )=dimHX for all lines \(\ell \subset \mathbb{R}^{2}\), then the line set spanned by X has Hausdorff dimension at least min{2dimHX,2}.

While the results above concern \(\mathbb{R}^{2}\), we also derive some counterparts in \(\mathbb{R}^{d}\) by means of integralgeometric considerations. The proofs are based on an ϵ-improvement in the Furstenberg set problem, due to the two first authors, a bootstrapping scheme introduced by the second and third author, and a new planar incidence estimate due to Fu and Ren.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The upper bound for “K1” in Lemma 3.18 also depends on the lower bound for ϵ>0, so the argument here does not show that (μ,ν) has (t−1+η,K1,1)-thin tubes. This would indeed be false in general.

References

  1. Beck, J.: On the lattice property of the plane and some problems of Dirac, Motzkin and Erdős in combinatorial geometry. Combinatorica 3(3–4), 281–297 (1983)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Bond, M., Łaba, I., Zahl, J.: Quantitative visibility estimates for unrectifiable sets in the plane. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 368(8), 5475–5513 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Csörnyei, M.: On the visibility of invisible sets. Ann. Acad. Sci. Fenn., Math. 25(2), 417–421 (2000)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Dąbrowski, D., Orponen, T., Villa, M.: Integrability of orthogonal projections, and applications to Furstenberg sets. Adv. Math. 407, Paper No. 108567, 34 (2022)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Dote, P., Gan, S.: Exceptional set estimates for orthogonal and radial projections in \(\mathbb{R}^{n}\). arXiv e-prints, (2022). arXiv:2208.03597

  6. Du, X., Iosevich, A., Ou, Y., Wang, H., Zhang, R.: An improved result for Falconer’s distance set problem in even dimensions. Math. Ann. 380(3–4), 1215–1231 (2021)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Falconer, K.J.: Hausdorff dimension and the exceptional set of projections. Mathematika 29(1), 109–115 (1982)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Fässler, K., Orponen, T.: On restricted families of projections in \(\mathbb{R}^{3}\). Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. (3) 109(2), 353–381 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Fu, Y., Ren, K.: Incidence estimates for α-dimensional tubes and β-dimensional balls in \(\mathbb{R}^{2}\). J. Fractal Geom. (2022, to appear). arXiv:2111.05093v2

  10. Guth, L., Iosevich, A., Ou, Y., Wang, H.: On Falconer’s distance set problem in the plane. Invent. Math. 219(3), 779–830 (2020)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Guth, L., Solomon, N., Wang, H.: Incidence estimates for well spaced tubes. Geom. Funct. Anal. 29(6), 1844–1863 (2019)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Héra, K., Shmerkin, P., Yavicoli, A.: An improved bound for the dimension of (α,2α)-Furstenberg sets. Rev. Mat. Iberoam. 38(1), 295–322 (2022)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Hawk Katz, N., Tao, T.: Some connections between Falconer’s distance set conjecture and sets of Furstenburg type. N.Y. J. Math. 7, 149–187 (2001)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Kaufman, R.: On Hausdorff dimension of projections. Mathematika 15, 153–155 (1968)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Keleti, T., Shmerkin, P.: New bounds on the dimensions of planar distance sets. Geom. Funct. Anal. 29(6), 1886–1948 (2019)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Liu, B.: On Hausdorff dimension of radial projections. Rev. Mat. Iberoam. 37(4), 1307–1319 (2021)

    Article  MathSciNet  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Liu, B., Shen, C.-Y.: Intersection between pencils of tubes, discretized sum-product, and radial projections. Asian J. Math. (2020, to appear). arXiv:2001.02551

  18. Lund, B., Pham, T., Huong Thu, V.T.: Radial projection theorems in finite spaces. arXiv e-prints (2022). arXiv:2205.07431

  19. Lutz, N., Stull, D.M.: Bounding the dimension of points on a line. Inf. Comput. 275, 104601 (2020)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Marstrand, J.M.: Some fundamental geometrical properties of plane sets of fractional dimensions. Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. 3(4), 257–302 (1954)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Mattila, P.: Geometry of Sets and Measures in Euclidean Spaces. Fractals and Rectifiability, 1st paperback edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Mattila, P.: Hausdorff dimension, projections, and the Fourier transform. Publ. Mat. 48(1), 3–48 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Mattila, P.: Fourier Analysis and Hausdorff Dimension. Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics, vol. 150. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2015)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  24. Mattila, P.: Hausdorff dimension, projections, intersections, and Besicovitch sets. In: Akram Aldroubi, S.J., Cabrelli, C., Molter, U. (eds.) New Trends in Applied Harmonic Analysis, Volume 2, Applied and Numerical Harmonic Analysis, pp. 129–157. Brikhäuser, Cham (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Orponen, T.: A sharp exceptional set estimate for visibility. Bull. Lond. Math. Soc. 50(1), 1–6 (2018)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Orponen, T.: On the dimension and smoothness of radial projections. Anal. PDE 12(5), 1273–1294 (2019)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. Orponen, T., Shmerkin, P.: On exceptional sets of radial projections. arXiv e-prints. Unpublished preprint. (2022). arXiv:2205.13890

  28. Orponen, T., Shmerkin, P.: On the Hausdorff dimension of Furstenberg sets and orthogonal projections in the plane. Duke Math. J. (2022, to appear). arXiv:2106.03338

  29. Peres, Y., Schlag, W.: Smoothness of projections, Bernoulli convolutions, and the dimension of exceptions. Duke Math. J. 102(2), 193–251 (2000)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  30. Raz, O.E., Zahl, J.: On the dimension of exceptional parameters for nonlinear projections, and the discretized Elekes-Rónyai theorem. Geom. Funct. Anal. (2023, to appear). arXiv:2108.07311

  31. Shmerkin, P.: A non-linear version of Bourgain’s projection theorem. J. Eur. Math. Soc. 25(10), 4155–4204 (2023)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  32. Shmerkin, P., Wang, H.: On the distance sets spanned by sets of dimension d/2 in \(\mathbb{R}^{d}\). arXiv e-prints (2021). arXiv:2112.09044

  33. Simon, K., Solomyak, B.: Visibility for self-similar sets of dimension one in the plane. Real Anal. Exch. 32(1), 67–78 (2006/07)

  34. Stull, D.M.: Pinned distance sets using effective dimension. arXiv e-prints (2022). arXiv:2207.12501

  35. Szemerédi, E., Trotter, W.T. Jr.: Extremal problems in discrete geometry. Combinatorica 3(3–4), 381–392 (1983)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  36. Ungar, P.: 2N noncollinear points determine at least 2N directions. J. Comb. Theory, Ser. A 33(3), 343–347 (1982)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  37. Wolff, T.: Recent work connected with the Kakeya problem. In: Prospects in Mathematics (Princeton, NJ, 1996), pp. 129–162. Am. Math. Soc., Providence (1999)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Some ideas for this paper were conceived while the first two authors were visiting the Hausdorff Research Institute for Mathematics, Bonn, during the trimester Interactions between Geometric measure theory, Singular integrals, and PDE. We would like to thank the institute and its staff for their generous hospitality. We also thank Katrin Fässler, Jiayin Liu, and Josh Zahl for useful discussions. Part of this research was done while the third author was visiting Po Lam Yung at the Australian National University, she would like to thank him and the analysis group for the warm hospitality.

We are grateful to the reviewers for reading the manuscript with great care, and for making numerous helpful suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pablo Shmerkin.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

T.O. is supported by the Academy of Finland via the projects Quantitative rectifiability in Euclidean and non-Euclidean spaces and Incidences on Fractals, grant Nos. 309365, 314172, 321896.

P.S. is supported by an NSERC Discovery Grant.

H.W. is supported by NSF Grant DMS-2055544.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Orponen, T., Shmerkin, P. & Wang, H. Kaufman and Falconer Estimates for Radial Projections and a Continuum Version of Beck’s Theorem. Geom. Funct. Anal. 34, 164–201 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00039-024-00660-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00039-024-00660-3

Keywords and phrases

Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation