Abstract
Objectives
Smoking rates vary according to socioeconomic group. We investigated whether patterns of educational inequalities in smoking prevalence differ across three major European surveys.
Methods
Data on smoking came from National Health Interview Surveys (NHIS), the European Community Household Panel (ECHP) and the Eurobarometer (EB). We calculated prevalence ratios by education. We controlled for sex, country, data source and age. We used likelihood ratio tests to determine whether inequalities in each country differed between surveys and whether the association of education and smoking across countries was the same in different surveys.
Results
Smoking prevalence tended to be lower in the ECHP than in both other surveys, and was highest in the EB. The pattern of inequalities in smoking also differed between surveys. Statistically significant differences between surveys were found mainly in Southern Europe, where EB-based prevalence ratios often deviated from those in the other two surveys.
Conclusions
Relative inequalities in smoking prevalence depend on the survey used. Our results suggest that the NHIS and the ECHP are more reliable sources of information on educational inequalities in smoking than the EB.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ahmad OB, Boschi-Pinto C, Lopez AD, Murray CJL, Lozano R, Inoue M (2001) Age standardization of rates: a new WHO standard. GPE Discussion Paper Series No. 31. World Health Organisation 2001
Barros AJ, Hirakata VN (2003) Alternatives for logistic regression in cross-sectional studies: an empirical comparison of models that directly estimate the prevalence ratio. BMC Med Res Methodol 3:21. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-3-21
Bogdanovica I, Godfrey F, McNeill A, Britton J (2011) Smoking prevalence in the European Union: a comparison of national and transnational prevalence survey methods and results. Tob Control 20(1):e4. doi:10.1136/tc.2010.036103
Cavelaars AE, Kunst AE, Geurts JJ, Crialesi R, Grotvedt L, Helmert U, Lahelma E, Lundberg O, Matheson J, Mielck A, Rasmussen NK, Regidor E, do Rosario-Giraldes M, Spuhler T, Mackenbach JP (2000) Educational differences in smoking: international comparison. BMJ 320(7242):1102–1107
Christensen AI, Ekholm O, Glümer C, Juel K (2014) Effect of survey mode on response patterns: comparison of face-to-face and self-administered modes in health surveys. Eur J Public Health 24(2):327–332. doi:10.1093/eurpub/ckt067
Eikemo TA, Skalicka V, Avendano M (2009) Variations in relative health inequalities: are they a mathematical artefact? Int J Equity Health 8:32. doi:10.1186/1475-9276-8-32
Eurobarometer (2002) At: http://ec.europa.eu/health/eurobarometers/index_en.htm?Page=12 and http://ec.europa.eu/health/ph_information/documents/eb_58_en.pdf. Accessed Jan 2012
European Commission Health and Consumer Protection Directorate General. At: http://ec.europa.eu/health/tobacco/policy/index_en.htm. Accessed Aug 2012
Eurostat (2012) At: http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/microdata/echp. Accessed Jan 2012
Eurothine (2007) Tackling health inequalities in Europe: an integrated approach—EUROTHINE—final report (available at: http://survey.erasmusmc.nl/eurothine/)
Giskes K, Kunst AE, Benach J, Borrell C, Costa G, Dahl E, Dalstra JA, Federico B, Helmert U, Judge K, Lahelma E, Moussa K, Ostergren PO, Platt S, Prattala R, Rasmussen NK, Mackenbach JP (2005) Trends in smoking behaviour between 1985 and 2000 in nine European countries by education. J Epidemiol Community Health 59(5):395–401. doi:10.1136/jech.2004.025684
Huisman M, Kunst AE, Mackenbach JP (2005a) Educational inequalities in smoking among men and women aged 16 years and older in 11 European countries. Tob Control 14(2):106–113. doi:10.1136/tc.2004.008573
Huisman M, Kunst AE, Mackenbach JP (2005b) Inequalities in the prevalence of smoking in the European Union: comparing education and income. Prev Med 40(6):756–764. doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.09.022
Kulik MC, Menvielle G, Eikemo TA, Bopp M, Jasilionis D, Kulhanova I, Leinsalu M, Martikainen P, Ostergren O, Mackenbach JP, for the EURO-GBD-SE Consortium (2014) Educational inequalities in three smoking-related causes of death in 18 European populations. Nicotine Tob Res 16(5):507–518. doi:10.1093/ntr/ntt175
Lahelma E (2001) Health and social stratification. In: Cockerham W (ed) The Blackwell companion to medical sociology. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 64–93
Lindstrom M, Ostergren PO (2001) Intermittent and daily smokers: two different socioeconomic patterns, and diverging influence of social participation. Tob Control 10(3):258–266
OECD Education at a Glance (2002) OECD indicators. 2002 from: http://www.oecd.org/edu/skills-beyond-school/18528930.pdf. Accessed Mar 2012
Patrick DL, Cheadle A, Thompson DC, Diehr P, Koepsell T, Kinne S (1994) The validity of self-reported smoking: a review and meta-analysis. Am J Public Health 84(7):1086–1093
Ross CE, Wu CL (1995) The links between education and health. Am Sociol Rev 60(5):719–745
Schaap MM, Kunst AE (2009) Monitoring of socio-economic inequalities in smoking: learning from the experiences of recent scientific studies. Public Health 123(2):103–109. doi:10.1016/j.puhe.2008.10.015
Schaap MM, van Agt HM, Kunst AE (2008) Identification of socioeconomic groups at increased risk for smoking in European countries: looking beyond educational level. Nicotine Tob Res 10(2):359–369. doi:10.1080/14622200701825098
Schaap MM, Kunst AE, Leinsalu M, Regidor E, Espelt A, Ekholm O, Helmert U, Klumbiene J, Mackenbach JP (2009) Female ever-smoking, education, emancipation and economic development in 19 European countries. Soc Sci Med 68(7):1271–1278. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.01.007
SHARE available at: http://www.share-project.org. Accessed Sep 2011
Siegrist J, Marmot M (2006) Social inequalities in health. New evidence and policy implications. University Press, Oxford
Skov T, Deddens J, Petersen MR, Endahl L (1998) Prevalence proportion ratios: estimation and hypothesis testing. Int J Epidemiol 27(1):91–95
Suadicani P, Hein HO, Gyntelberg F (1994) Serum validated tobacco use and social inequalities in risk of ischaemic heart disease. Int J Epidemiol 23(2):293–300
Van Loon AJ, Tijhuis M, Picavet HS, Surtees PG, Ormel J (2003) Survey non-response in The Netherlands: effects on prevalence estimates and associations. Ann Epidemiol 13(2):105–110
Viera AJ (2008) Odds ratios and risk ratios: what’s the difference and why does it matter? South Med J 101(7):730–734. doi:10.1097/SMJ.0b013e31817a7ee4
WHO (2012) WHO global report—mortality attributable to tobacco
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Caspar Looman for his statistical advice. We thank the EURO-GBD-SE international project partners: Risk factor prevalence data providers: Satu Helakorpi (Finland), Bo Burström (Sweden), Ola Ekholm (Denmark), Ken Judge (England), J.J.M. Geurts (Netherlands), Herman van Oyen (Belgium), Uwe Helmert (Germany), Enrique Regidor (Spain), Giuseppe Costa (Italy), Paula Santana (Portugal). The project was funded by the European Commission, through the Public Health Programme, Grant Agreement 20081309 and through The Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development (ZonMw), Project Number 121020026.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
For the Euro-GBD-SE Consortium.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kulik, M.C., Eikemo, T.A., Regidor, E. et al. Does the pattern of educational inequalities in smoking in Western Europe depend on the choice of survey?. Int J Public Health 59, 587–597 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-014-0560-z
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-014-0560-z