Abstract
The paper studies existence of ground states for the nonlinear Schrödinger equation
with a general external magnetic field. In particular, no lattice periodicity or symmetry of the magnetic field, or presence of external electric field is required.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aharonov, Y., Bohm, D.: Significance of electromagnetic potentials in the quantum theory. Phys. Rev. 115, 485–491 (1959)
Arioli, G., Szulkin, A.: A semilinear Schrödinger equation in the presence of a magnetic field. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 170, 277–295 (2003)
Bégout, P.: The dual space of a complex Banach restricted to the field of real numbers (preprint)
Begout, P., Schindler, I.: On a stationary Schrödinger equation with periodic magnetic potential. RACSAM 115, 72 (2021)
Bonheure, D., Nys, M., Van Schaftingen, J.: Properties of ground states of nonlinear Schrödinger equations under a weak constant magnetic field. J. Math. Pures Appl. 124, 123–168 (2019)
Bonheure, D., Cingolani, S., Nys, M.: Nonlinear Schrödinger equation: concentration on circles driven by an external magnetic field. Calc. Var. 55, 1–33 (2016)
Cingolani, S., Jeanjean, L., Tanaka, K.: Multiple complex-valued solutions for nonlinear magnetic Schrödinger equations. J. Fixed Point Theory Appl. 19, 37–66 (2017)
Clapp, M., Szulkin, A.: Multiple solutions to a nonlinear Schrödinger equation with Aharonov–Bohm magnetic potential. NoDEA Nonlinear Differ. Equ. Appl. 17, 229–248 (2010)
Devillanova, G., Tintarev, C.: Nonlinear Schrödinger equation with bounded magnetic field. J. Differ. Equ. 269, 8998–9025 (2020)
Devillanova, G., Solimini, S.: Some remarks on profile decomposition theorems. Adv. Nonlinear Stud. 16, 795–805 (2016)
Enstedt, M., Tintarev, K.: Weighted spectral gap for magnetic Schrödinger operators with a potential term. Potential Anal. 31(3), 215–226 (2009). (English summary)
Esteban, M., Lions, P.L.: Stationary solutions of nonlinear Schrödinger equations with an external magnetic field. In: Partial Differential Equations and the Calculus of Variations, vol. I, 401–449, Progr. Nonlinear Differential Equations Appl., vol. 1. Birkhäuser Boston, Boston, MA (1989)
Kurata, K.: Existence and semi-classical limit of the least energy solution to a nonlinear Schrödinger equation with electromagnetic fields. Nonlinear Anal. 41, 763–778 (2000)
Lions, P. L.: The concentration-compactness principle in the calculus of variations. The locally compact case, part 1. In: Annales de l’I.H.P. Analyse non linéaire, vol. 1, pp. 109–145 (1984)
Schindler, I., Tintarev, K.: A nonlinear Schrödinger equation with external magnetic field. Rostock. Math. Kolloq. 56, 49–54 (2002)
Schindler, I., Tintarev, K.: An abstract version of the concentration compactness principle. Rev. Mat. Complut. 15, 1–20 (2002)
Skrzypczak, L., Tintarev, C.: Defect of compactness for Sobolev spaces on manifolds with bounded geometry. Ann. Sc. Norm. Super. Pisa Cl. Sci. (5), vol. XX, 1665–1695 (2020)
Solimini, S.: A note on compactness-type properties with respect to Lorentz norms of bounded subsets of a Sobolev space. Ann. Inst. Henry Poincaré 12, 319–337 (1995)
Solimini, S., Tintarev, C.: Concentration analysis in Banach spaces. Commun. Contemp. Math. 18, 1550038 (2016)
Tintarev, C.: Concentration Compactness: Functional-Analytic Theory of Concentration Phenomena. De Gruyter, Berlin (2020)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
One of the authors (I.S.) acknowledges funding from ANR under Grant ANR-17-EUR-0010 (Investissements d’Avenir program). Another author (C.T.) thanks CEREMATH at University of Toulouse 1 Capitole for their warm hospitality. He also acknowledges access to the library resources of Uppsala University.
Appendix
Appendix
In homogeneous Sobolev spaces equipped with the group of shifts and dilations, one has the following profile decomposition of Solimini which we quote in a slightly refined version of [20, Theorem 4.6.4].
Theorem 5.2
(Sergio Solimini, [18]) Let \((u_{k})\) be a bounded sequence in \({\dot{H}}^{m,p}(\mathbb {R}^{N})\), \(m\in \mathbb {N}\), \(1<p<N/m\). Then it has a renamed subsequence and there exist sequences of isometries on \({\dot{H}}^{m,p}(\mathbb {R}^{N})\), \((g_{k}^{(n)})_{k\in \mathbb {N}})_{n\in \mathbb {N}}\), and functions \(w^{(n)}\in {\dot{H}}^{m,p}(\mathbb {R}^{N})\), such that \(g_{k}^{(n)}u{\mathop {=}\limits ^{\mathrm {def}}}2^{ \frac{N-mp}{p}j_{k}^{(n)}}u(2^{j_{k}^{(n)}}(\cdot -y_{k}^{(n)}))\), \(j_{k}^{(n)}\in \mathbb {Z}\), \(y_{k}^{(n)}\in \mathbb {R}^{N}\), \(n\in \mathbb {N}\), with
such that \([g_{k}^{(n)}]^{-1}u_{k}\rightharpoonup w^{(n)}\) in \({\dot{H}}^{m,p}(\mathbb {R}^{N})\),
the series \(\sum _{n\in \mathbb {N}} g_{k}^{(n)}w^{(n)}\) converges in \({\dot{H}}^{m,p}(\mathbb {R}^{N})\) unconditionally with respect to n and uniformly in k, and
This theorem cannot be directly applied to sequences bounded in \(\dot{H}^{1,2}_A(\mathbb {R}^N)\) with the magnetic potential as in (5.1). However its proof can be trivially modified for this space, given that \(\dot{H}^{1,2}_A(\mathbb {R}^N)\) is continuously embedded into \(H^{1,2}_\mathrm{loc}(\mathbb {R}^N)\) and into \(L^{p^*}(\mathbb {R}^N)\). The modifications are analogous to the argument used in the proof of Theorem 3.2 in the subcritical case and are omitted. We have:
Theorem 5.3
Let \((u_{k})\) be a bounded sequence in \(\dot{H}^{1,2}_A(\mathbb {R}^N)\), \(N\ge 3\). Then it has a renamed subsequence and there exist functions \(w^{(n)}\in {H}_\mathrm{loc}^{1,2}(\mathbb {R}^{N})\) and sequences of bounded operators in \({H}_\mathrm{loc}^{1,2}(\mathbb {R}^{N})\), \((g_{k}^{(n)})_{k\in \mathbb {N}}\), such that \(g_{k}^{(n)}u{\mathop {=}\limits ^{\mathrm {def}}}2^{ \frac{N-2}{2}j_{k}^{(n)}}u(2^{j_{k}^{(n)}}(\cdot -y_{k}^{(n)}))\), \(j_{k}^{(n)}\in \mathbb {Z}\), \(y_{k}^{(n)}\in \mathbb {R}^{N}\), \(n\in \mathbb {N}\), with
such that \([g_{k}^{(n)}]^{-1}u_{k}\rightharpoonup w^{(n)}\) in \({H}^{1,2}_\mathrm{loc}(\mathbb {R}^{N})\),
the series \(\sum _{n\in \mathbb {N}} g_{k}^{(n)}w^{(n)}\) converges in \({H}^{1,2}_\mathrm{loc}(\mathbb {R}^{N})\) unconditionally and uniformly in k, and
where
Moreover under conditions of Theorem 5.2 one has the following “iterated Brezis-Lieb lemma” [20, Theorem 4.7.1]:
An elementary modification of the argument from [20, Theorem 4.7.1] also gives
where
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schindler, I., Tintarev, C. Existence in the nonlinear Schrödinger equation with bounded magnetic field. Nonlinear Differ. Equ. Appl. 29, 33 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00030-022-00763-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00030-022-00763-6
Keywords
- Schrödinger operator
- Magnetic field
- Ground state
- Concentration compactness
- Profile decomposition
- Critical points