Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Shear Stress and b-value Fluctuations in a Hierarchical Rate-and-State Asperity Model

  • Published:
Pure and Applied Geophysics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The magnitude frequency distribution of earthquakes is generally observed to depend on regional differential stress. The typical signature is a decrease of the b-value with increasing differential stress, corresponding to an increased probability of larger events. At the scale of a seismogenic fault, regional stress changes translate into shear and normal stress variations that both influence the nucleation process and the maximum extent of earthquake ruptures. Recent models have shown that normal stress changes cannot explain the observed b-value dependency, suggesting that b-value is primarily controlled by shear stress conditions on faults resulting from regional loading. The relationship between shear stress and b-value is however still not clear. Here, I investigate numerically the shear stress contribution on magnitude statistics by analyzing the b-value evolution with shear stress changes along a planar rate-and-state interface containing hierechical asperities and forced by slow tectonic loading under constant normal stress. The b-value is shown to decrease from 1.2 to 0.7 when shear stress increases by 1 MPa which is in agreement with fracture mechanics predictions. An approximate expression relating shear stress and b value is proposed and validated by the simulations, where the rate of b-value decrease with shear stress is provided by the inverse stress drop of typical earthquakes. The effect of shear stress along a planar hierarchical interface is therefore too strong to explain current observations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and material

Earthquake catalogs and average stress timeseries used in this study are available at Dublanchet (2020a).

Code availability

The code used to perform simulations is available on request.

References

  • Abercrombie, R. E., & Rice, J. R. (2005). Can observations of earthquake scaling constrain slip weakening? Geophysical Journal International, 162(2), 406–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aki, K. (1965). Maximum likelihood estimate of b in the formula log n= a-bm and its confidence limits. Bulletin Earthquake Research Institute, Tokyo University, 43, 237–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amitrano, D. (2003). Brittle–ductile transition and associated seismicity: Experimental and numerical studies and relationship with the b value. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 108(B1), 2044–2058.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aochi, H., & Ide, S. (2009). Complexity in earthquake sequences controlled by multiscale heterogeneity in fault fracture energy. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 114(B3), 305–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bizzarri, A., & Cocco, M. (2003). Slip-weakening behavior during the propagation of dynamic ruptures obeying rate-and state-dependent friction laws. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 108(B8), 2373–2393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, J. M., Langer, J. S., & Shaw, B. E. (1994). Dynamics of earthquake faults. Reviews of Modern Physics, 66(2), 657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cattania, C. (2019). Complex earthquake sequences on simple faults. Geophysical Research Letters, 46(17–18), 10384–10393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y., & Huang, C. (2006). Time-dependent b value for aftershock sequences. Available in web

  • Dieterich, J. H. (1979). Modeling of rock friction-1. Experimental results and constitutive equations. Journal of Geophysical Research, 84, 2161–2168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dublanchet, P. (2018). Inferring fault slip rates from cumulative seismic moment in a multiple asperity context. Geophysical Journal International, 216(1), 395–413.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dublanchet, P. (2020a). Catalogs and stress history for "stress dependent b value variations in a heterogeneous rate-and-state fault model". https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3655290

  • Dublanchet, P. (2020b). Stress-dependent b value variations in a heterogeneous rate-and-state fault model. Geophysical Research Letters, 47(13):e2020GL087434

  • Dublanchet, P., Bernard, P., & Favreau, P. (2013). Interactions and triggering in a 3-d rate-and-state asperity model. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 118(5), 2225–2245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • El-Isa, Z. H., & Eaton, D. W. (2014). Spatiotemporal variations in the b-value of earthquake magnitude-frequency distributions: Classification and causes. Tectonophysics, 615, 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fehlberg, E. (1969). Low-order classical Runge–Kutta formulas with stepsize control and their application to some heat transfer problems

  • Galis, M., Ampuero, J. P., Mai, P. M., Cappa, F. (2017). Induced seismicity provides insight into why earthquake ruptures stop. Science Advances, 3(12):eaap7528

  • Gerstenberger, M., Wiemer, S., & Giardini, D. (2001). A systematic test of the hypothesis that the b value varies with depth in California. Geophysical Research Letters, 28(1), 57–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goebel, T. H., Kwiatek, G., Becker, T. W., Brodsky, E. E., & Dresen, G. (2017). What allows seismic events to grow big? Insights from b-value and fault roughness analysis in laboratory stick-slip experiments. Geology, 45(9), 815–818.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goebel, W., Schorlemmer, T., Becker, T., Dresen, G., & Sammis, C. (2013). Acoustic emissions document stress changes over many seismic cycles in stick-slip experiments. Geophysical Research Letters, 40(10), 2049–2054.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gulia, L., Rinaldi, A. P., Tormann, T., Vannucci, G., Enescu, B., & Wiemer, S. (2018). The effect of a mainshock on the size distribution of the aftershocks. Geophysical Research Letters, 45(24), 13–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gutenberg, B., & Richter, C. F. (1944). Frequency of earthquakes in California. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 34(4), 185–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heimisson, E. R. (2020). Crack to pulse transition and magnitude statistics during earthquake cycles on a self-similar rough fault. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 537, 116202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillers, G., Ben-Zion, Y., & Mai, P. (2006). Seismicity on a fault controlled by rate-and state-dependent friction with spatial variations of the critical slip distance. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 111(B1), 403–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ide, S., & Aochi, H. (2005). Earthquakes as multiscale dynamic ruptures with heterogeneous fracture surface energy. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 110(B11), 303–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaeger, J. C., Cook, N. G., & Zimmerman, R. (2009). Fundamentals of rock mechanics. Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knopoff, L., Kagan, Y. Y., & Knopoff, R. (1982). b values for foreshocks and aftershocks in real and simulated earthquake sequences. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 72(5), 1663–1676.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwiatek, G., Goebel, T., & Dresen, G. (2014). Seismic moment tensor and b value variations over successive seismic cycles in laboratory stick-slip experiments. Geophysical Research Letters, 41(16), 5838–5846.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, V., Lapusta, N., & Faulkner, D. (2021). Scale dependence of earthquake rupture prestress in models with enhanced weakening: Implications for event statistics and inferences of fault stress. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 126(10), 886–914.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawn, B. (1993). Fracture of brittle solids. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Marone, C. (1998). Laboratory-derived friction laws and their application to seismic faulting. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 26(1), 643–696.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molchan, G., Kronrod, T., & Nekrasova, A. (1999). Immediate foreshocks: Time variation of the b-value. Physics of the earth and planetary interiors, 111(3–4), 229–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Passelègue, F. X., Almakari, M., Dublanchet, P., Barras, F., Fortin, J., & Violay, M. (2020). Initial effective stress controls the nature of earthquakes. Nature Communications, 11(1), 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rice, J. R. (1992). Fault stress states, pore pressure distributions, and the weakness of the San Andreas fault. In: International geophysics (vol. 51, pp. 475–503). Elsevier, Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice, J. R. (1993). Spatio-temporal complexity of slip on a fault. Journal of Geophysical Research, 98, 9885–9907.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rice, J. R., & Ben-Zion, Y. (1996). Slip complexity in earthquake fault models. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 93(9), 3811–3818.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romanet, P., Bhat, H. S., Jolivet, R., & Madariaga, R. (2018). Fast and slow slip events emerge due to fault geometrical complexity. Geophysical Research Letters, 45(10), 4809–4819.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, A., & Ampuero, J. (2005). Earthquake nucleation on (aging) rate and state faults. J Geophys Res, 110, B11312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruina, A. L. (1983). Slip instability and state variable friction laws. Journal of Physical Research, 88, 10359–10370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sagy, A., Brodsky, E. E., & Axen, G. J. (2007). Evolution of fault-surface roughness with slip. Geology, 35(3), 283–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scholz, C. (1968). The frequency-magnitude relation of microfracturing in rock and its relation to earthquakes. Bulletin of the seismological society of America, 58(1), 399–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scholz, C. H. (2015). On the stress dependence of the earthquake b value. Geophysical Research Letters, 42(5), 1399–1402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scholz, C. H. (2019). The mechanics of earthquakes and faulting. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schorlemmer, D., Wiemer, S., & Wyss, M. (2005). Variations in earthquake-size distribution across different stress regimes. Nature, 437(7058), 539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spada, M., Tormann, T., Wiemer, S., & Enescu, B. (2013). Generic dependence of the frequency-size distribution of earthquakes on depth and its relation to the strength profile of the crust. Geophysical Research Letters, 40(4), 709–714.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tal, Y., Goebel, T., & Avouac, J. P. (2020). Experimental and modeling study of the effect of fault roughness on dynamic frictional sliding. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 536, 116133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, M. Y., Lapusta, N., Noda, H., & Avouac, J. P. (2014). Quasi-dynamic versus fully dynamic simulations of earthquakes and aseismic slip with and without enhanced coseismic weakening. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 119(3), 1986–2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turcotte, D. L., & Schubert, G. (2002). Geodynamics. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wiemer, S., & Katsumata, K. (1999). Spatial variability of seismicity parameters in aftershock zones. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 104(B6), 13135–13151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiemer, S., Gerstenberger, M., & Hauksson, E. (2002). Properties of the aftershock sequence of the 1999 m w 7.1 hector mine earthquake: implications for aftershock hazard. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 92(4), 1227–1240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zielke, O., Galis, M., & Mai, P. M. (2017). Fault roughness and strength heterogeneity control earthquake size and stress drop. Geophysical Research Letters, 44(2), 777–783.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ziv, A., & Rubin, A. (2003). Implications of rate-and-state friction for properties of aftershock sequence: Quasi-static inherently discrete simulations. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 108(B1), 2051–2065.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank Martijn van den Ende, an anonymous reviewer and the editor for their constructive comments that greatly improved the manuscript.

Funding

No funding was received for conducting this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. MINES ParisTech, Centre de Géosciences, PSL Research University, 35 rue saint-honoré, 77305, Fontainebleau, France

    Pierre Dublanchet

Authors
  1. Pierre Dublanchet
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pierre Dublanchet.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dublanchet, P. Shear Stress and b-value Fluctuations in a Hierarchical Rate-and-State Asperity Model. Pure Appl. Geophys. 179, 2423–2435 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-022-03039-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-022-03039-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation