Abstract
The use of three-parameter generalized normal (GNO) as a hydrological frequency distribution is well recognized, but its application is limited due to unavailability of popular goodness-of-fit (GOF) test statistics. This study develops popular empirical distribution function (EDF)-based test statistics to investigate the goodness-of-fit of the GNO distribution. The focus is on the case most relevant to the hydrologist, namely, that in which the parameter values are unidentified and estimated from a sample using the method of L-moments. The widely used EDF tests such as Kolmogorov–Smirnov, Cramer von Mises, and Anderson–Darling (AD) are considered in this study. A modified version of AD, namely, the Modified Anderson–Darling (MAD) test, is also considered and its performance is assessed against other EDF tests using a power study that incorporates six specific Wakeby distributions (WA-1, WA-2, WA-3, WA-4, WA-5, and WA-6) as the alternative distributions. The critical values of the proposed test statistics are approximated using Monte Carlo techniques and are summarized in chart and regression equation form to show the dependence of shape parameter and sample size. The performance results obtained from the power study suggest that the AD and a variant of the MAD (MAD-L) are the most powerful tests. Finally, the study performs case studies involving annual maximum flow data of selected gauged sites from Irish and US catchments to show the application of the derived critical values and recommends further assessments to be carried out on flow data sets of rivers with various hydrological regimes.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ahmad, M. I., Sinclair, C. D., & Spurr, B. D. (1988). Assessment of flood frequency models using empirical distribution function statistics. Water Resources Research, 24, 1323. https://doi.org/10.1029/WR024i008p01323.
Anderson, T. W., & Darling, D. A. (1952). Asymptotic theory of certain “goodness of fit” criteria based on stochastic processes. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 23, 193–212. https://doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177733256.
Basu, B., & Srinivas, V. V. (2013). Formulation of a mathematical approach to regional frequency analysis. Water Resources Research, 49, 6810–6833. https://doi.org/10.1002/wrcr.20540.
Chowdhury, J. U., Stedinger, J. R., & Lu, L. (1991). Goodness of fit tests for regional generalized extreme value flood distributions. Water Resources Research, 27, 1765–1776.
Cunnane, C. (1989). Statistical distributions for flood frequency analysis. Operational Hydrology Report (WMO), Geneva.
D’Agostino, R. B. (1986). Goodness-of-fit-techniques. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
Das, S. (2010). Examination of flood estimation techniques in the Irish context, Ph.D. thesis. Department of Engineering Hydrology, National University of Ireland Galway. Retrieved October 30, 2015 from http://hdl.handle.net/10379/1688.
Das, S. (2016). An assessment of using subsampling method in selection of a flood frequency distribution. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 31, 2033–2045. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-016-1318-3.
Das, S. (2017). Performance of region-of-influence approach of frequency analysis of extreme rainfall in monsoon climate conditions. International Journal of Climatology, 37, 612–623. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.5025.
Das, S., & Cunnane, C. (2011). Examination of homogeneity of selected Irish pooling groups. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 15, 819–830. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-819-2011.
Das, S., & Cunnane, C. (2012). Performance of flood frequency pooling analysis in a low CV context. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 57, 433–444. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2012.666635.
Das, S., Millington, N., & Simonovic, S. P. (2013). Distribution choice for the assessment of design rainfall for the city of London (Ontario, Canada) under climate change. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 40, 121–129. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjce-2011-0548.
Di Baldassarre, G., Laio, F., & Montanari, A. (2009). Design flood estimation using model selection criteria. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, A/B/C, 34, 606–611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2008.10.066.
Greenwood, J. A., Landwehr, J. M., Matalas, N. C., & Wallis, J. R. (1979). Probability weighted moments: Definition and relation to parameters of several distributions expressable in inverse form. Water Resources Research, 15, 1049–1054.
Heo, J. H., Shin, H., Nam, W., et al. (2013). Approximation of modified Anderson-Darling test statistics for extreme value distributions with unknown shape parameter. Journal of Hydrology, 499, 41–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.06.008.
Hosking, J. R. M. (1990). L-moments: Analysis and estimation of distributions using linear combinations of order statistics. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society C, 52, 105–124. https://doi.org/10.2307/2345653.
Hosking, J. R. M., & Wallis, J. R. (1997). Regional frequency analysis: An approach based on L-moments. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hosking, J. R. M., Wallis, J. R., & Wood, E. F. (1985). Estimation of the generalized extreme-value distribution by the method of probability-weighted moments. Technometrics, 27, 251–261.
Institute of Hydrology. (1999). Flood estimation handbook (Vol. 1–5). Wallingford: Institute of Hydrology.
Laio, F. (2004). Cramer-von Mises and Anderson–Darling goodness of fit tests for extreme value distributions with unknown parameters. Water Resources Research, 40, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1029/2004WR003204.
Landwehr, J. M., Matalas, N. C., & Wallis, J. R. (1980). Quantile estimation with more or less floodlike distributions. Water Resources Research, 16, 547–555. https://doi.org/10.1029/WR016i003p00547.
Mateu-Figueras, G., Puig, P., & Pewsey, A. (2007). Goodness-of-fit tests for the skew-normal distribution when the parameters are estimated from the data. Communications in Statistics, 36, 1735–1755. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610920601126217.
R Core Team. (2017). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
Rahman, A. S., Rahman, A., Zaman, M. A., et al. (2013). A study on selection of probability distributions for at-site flood frequency analysis in Australia. Natural Hazards, 69, 1803–1813. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-013-0775-y.
Rutkowska, A., Żelazny, M., Kohnová, S., et al. (2017). Regional L-moment-based flood frequency analysis in the Upper Vistula River basin, Poland. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 174, 701–721.
Sankarasubramanian, A., & Srinivasan, K. (1999). Investigation and comparison of sampling properties of L-moments and conventional moments. Journal of Hydrology, 218, 13–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(99)00018-9.
Shin, H., Jung, Y., Jeong, C., & Heo, J. H. (2012). Assessment of modified Anderson–Darling test statistics for the generalized extreme value and generalized logistic distributions. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 26, 105–114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-011-0463-y.
Stephens, M. (1986). Tests based on EDF statistics. In R. B. D’Agostino & M. A. Stephens (Eds.), Goodness-of-fit techniques. New York: Marcel Dekker Inc.
Tolikas, K., & Heravi, S. (2008). The Anderson–Darling goodness-of-fit test statistic for the three-parameter lognormal distribution. Communications in Statistics. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610920802101571.
Vaill, J. E. (2000). Analysis of the magnitude and frequency of floods in Colorado. Denver: U.S. Geological Survey.
Wang, D., & Hutson, A. D. (2013). Joint confidence region estimation of L-moment ratios with an extension to right censored data. Journal of Applied Statistics, 40, 368–379. https://doi.org/10.1080/02664763.2012.744386.
Wang, Y., McBean, E. A., & Jarrett, P. (2015). Identification of changes in heavy rainfall events in Ontario, Canada. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-015-1085-6.
Acknowledgements
The author would like to acknowledge the financial support in the form of faculty start-up fund made available by the Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology (NUIST), Nanjing, China. Selected Irish flood data sets were obtained during the author’s stay at NUI Galway, Ireland. The data series of selected stations are also available freely at the Irish Office of Public Works, Ireland: http://www.opw.ie/hydro-data. The selected US data sets were freely obtained from the USGS website: https://nwis.waterdata.usgs.gov/nwis. Comments and suggestions from two anonymous reviewers are gratefully acknowledged.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Das, S. Goodness-of-Fit Tests for Generalized Normal Distribution for Use in Hydrological Frequency Analysis. Pure Appl. Geophys. 175, 3605–3617 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-018-1877-y
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-018-1877-y