Skip to main content
Log in

Spatiotemporal Variability of Surface Meteorological Variables During Fog and No-Fog Events in the Heber Valley, UT; Selected Case Studies From MATERHORN-Fog

  • Published:
Pure and Applied Geophysics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We investigated the spatiotemporal variability of surface meteorological variables in the nocturnal boundary layer using six automatic weather stations deployed in the Heber Valley, UT, during the MATERHORN-Fog experiment. The stations were installed on the valley floor within a 1.5 km × 0.8 km area and collected 1-Hz wind and pressure data and 0.2-Hz temperature and humidity data. We describe the weather stations and analyze the spatiotemporal variability of the measured variables during three nights with radiative cooling. Two nights were characterized by the presence of dense ice fog, one night with a persistent (‘heavy’) fog, and one with a short-lived (‘moderate’) fog, while the third night had no fog. Frost-point depressions were larger preceding the night without fog and showed a continued decrease during the no-fog night. On both fog nights, the frost-point depression reached values close to zero early in the night, but ~5 h earlier on the heavy-fog night than on the moderate-fog night. Spatial variability of temperature and humidity was smallest during the heavy-fog night and increased temporarily during short periods when wind speeds increased and the fog lifted. During all three nights, wind speeds did not exceed 2 m/s. The temporal variability of the wind speed and direction was larger during the fog nights than during the no-fog nights, but was particularly large during the heavy-fog night. The large variability corresponded with short-lived (5–10 min) pressure variations with amplitudes on the order of 0.5 hPa, indicating gravity wave activity. These pressure fluctuations occurred at all stations and were correlated in particular with variability in wind direction. Although not able to provide a complete picture of the nocturnal boundary layer, our low-cost weather stations were able to continuously collect data that were comparable to those of nearby research-grade instruments. From these data, we distinguished between fog and no-fog events, successfully quantified spatiotemporal variations in surface properties during these events, and detected gravity waves.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acevedo, O. C., & Fitzjarrald, D. R. (2001). The early evening surface-layer transition: Temporal and spatial variability. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 58, 2650–2667.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duynkerke, P. (1991). Observation of a quasi-periodic oscillation due to gravity-waves in a shallow radiation fog. Quarterly Journal Royal Meteorological Society, 117, 1207–1224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernando, H. J. S., Pardyjak, E. R., Di Sabatino, S., Chow, F. K., De Wekker, S. F. J., Hoch, S. W., et al. (2015). The MATERHORN unraveling the intricacies of mountain weather. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 96, U1–U24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzjarrald, D., & Lala, G. (1989). Hudson valley fog environments. Journal of Applied Meteorology, 28, 1303–1328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goswami, P., & Sarkar, S. (2015). Analysis and quantification of contrasts in observed meteorological fields for foggy and non-foggy days. Meteorology and Atmospheric Physics, 127, 605–623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gultepe, I., Fernando, H.J.S., Pardyjak, E.R., Hoch, S.W., Silver, Z., & Creegan, E., et al. (2016). An overview of the MATERHORN fog project: Observations and predictability. Pure and Applied Geophysics. doi:10.1007/s00024-016-1374-0 (this issue).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gultepe, I., Tardif, R., Michaelides, S. C., Cermak, J., Bott, A., Bendix, J., et al. (2007). Fog research: A review of past achievements and future perspectives. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 164, 1121–1159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gultepe, I., Zhou, B., Milbrandt, J., Bott, A., Li, Y., Heymsfield, A. J., et al. (2015). A review on ice fog measurements and modeling. Atmospheric Research, 151, 2–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hang, C., Nadeau, D.F., Gultepe, I., Hoch, S., Roman-Cascon, C., & Pryor, K., et al. (2016). A case study of the mechanisms modulating the evolution of valley fog. Pure and Applied Geophysics. doi:10.1007/s00024-016-1370-4 (this issue).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauf, T., Finke, U., Neisser, J., Gull, G., & Stangenberg, J. G. (1996). A ground-based network for atmospheric pressure fluctuations. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 13, 1001–1023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahrt, L., Richardson, S., Seaman, N., & Stauffer, D. (2010). Non-stationary drainage flows and motions in the cold pool. Tellus Series A: Dynamic Meteorology and Oceanography, 62, 698–705.

    Google Scholar 

  • Makkonen, L., Lehtonen, P., & Helle, L. (2001). Anemometry in icing conditions. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 18, 1457–1469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, M., Lala, G., & Jiusto, J. (1986). Fog-82 - a cooperative field-study of radiation fog. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 67, 825–832.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nappo, C. J. (2012). An introduction to atmospheric gravity waves. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roach, W., Brown, R., Caughey, S., Garland, J., & Readings, C. (1976). Physics of radiation fog. 1. Field-study. Quarterly Journal Royal Meteorological Society, 102, 313–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steeneveld, G. J., Ronda, R. J., & Holtslag, A. A. M. (2015). The challenge of forecasting the onset and development of radiation fog using mesoscale atmospheric models. Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 154, 265–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strangeways, I. (1981). Instruments for mountainous areas. Nordic Hydrology, 12, 289–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun, J., Nappo, C. J., Mahrt, L., Belusic, D., Grisogono, B., Stauffer, D. R., et al. (2015). Review of wave-turbulence interactions in the stable atmospheric boundary layer. Reviews of Geophysics, 53, 956–993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Underwood, S. J., Ellrod, G. P., & Kuhnert, A. L. (2004). A multiple-case analysis of nocturnal radiation-fog development in the Central Valley of California utilizing the GOES nighttime fog product. Journal of Applied Meteorology, 43, 297–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Velde, I. R., Steeneveld, G. J., Schreur, B. G. J. W., & Holtslag, A. A. M. (2010). Modeling and forecasting the onset and duration of severe radiation fog under frost conditions. Monthly Weather Review, 138, 4237–4253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welch, R., Ravichandran, M., & Cox, S. (1986). Prediction of quasi-periodic oscillations in radiation fogs. 1. Comparison of simple similarity approaches. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 43, 633–651.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Meteorological Organization (WMO) (2008). Guide to meteorological instruments and methods of observation. Appendix 4B, WMO-No. 8 (CIMO Guide), Geneva.

  • Zhou, B., & Du, J. (2010). Fog prediction from a multimodel mesoscale ensemble prediction system. Weather Forecasting, 25, 303–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The MATERHORN Program was funded by the Office of Naval Research (MURI) Award N00014-11-1-0709 (Program Officers: Drs. Ronald Ferek and Daniel Eleuterio). We would like to thank Nathan Rose for help in the design and assembly of the weather stations, Chaoxun Hang for his invaluable field assistance and for providing us with the visibility and UU-tower data, Eric Pardyjak for his help in site selection, Sandip Pal for taking down the weather stations, and Ismail Gultepe for his encouragements to submit a paper to this special issue and for his helpful comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael van den Bossche.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

van den Bossche, M., De Wekker, S.F.J. Spatiotemporal Variability of Surface Meteorological Variables During Fog and No-Fog Events in the Heber Valley, UT; Selected Case Studies From MATERHORN-Fog. Pure Appl. Geophys. 173, 3031–3048 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-016-1352-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-016-1352-6

Keywords

Navigation