Abstract
Synaptic loss is an early event in the penumbra area after an ischemic stroke. Promoting synaptic preservation in this area would likely improve functional neurological recovery. We aimed to detect proteins involved in endogenous protection mechanisms of synapses in the penumbra after stroke and to analyse potential beneficial effects of these candidates for a prospective stroke treatment. For this, we performed Liquid Chromatography coupled to Mass Spectrometry (LC–MS)-based proteomics of synaptosomes isolated from the ipsilateral hemispheres of mice subjected to experimental stroke at different time points (24 h, 4 and 7 days) and compared them to sham-operated mice. Proteomic analyses indicated that, among the differentially expressed proteins between the two groups, cystatin C (CysC) was significantly increased at 24 h and 4 days following stroke, before returning to steady-state levels at 7 days, thus indicating a potential transient and intrinsic rescue mechanism attempt of neurons. When CysC was applied to primary neuronal cultures subjected to an in vitro model of ischemic damage, this treatment significantly improved the preservation of synaptic structures. Notably, similar effects were observed when CysC was loaded into brain-derived extracellular vesicles (BDEVs). Finally, when CysC contained in BDEVs was administered intracerebroventricularly to stroked mice, it significantly increased the expression of synaptic markers such as SNAP25, Homer-1, and NCAM in the penumbra area compared to the group supplied with empty BDEVs. Thus, we show that CysC-loaded BDEVs promote synaptic protection after ischemic damage in vitro and in vivo, opening the possibility of a therapeutic use in stroke patients.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Ischemic stroke is a condition characterized by high mortality and a high disability rate [1]. It is caused when an embolus or thrombus occludes a cerebral vessel leading to immediate cerebral tissue damage. This is followed by a complex pathophysiological reaction involving the activation of different cell types and neuroinflammation progressing in a spatiotemporal manner [2]. The core of the infarcted tissue (where cells rapidly die by oncosis/necroptosis) is surrounded by a hypoperfused area (the penumbra), where neurons are functionally damaged but still rescuable [3]. Currently approved therapies, such as the delivery of recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rtPA) or mechanical thrombectomy (in case of a large arterial occlusion), are aimed at reperfusing the affected area as soon as possible to rescue cells in the penumbra. Both therapies need to be performed within a critical period, originally between 4.5 and 6 h after stroke onset, although new studies show that the time window can be extended if certain inclusion criteria are met [4,5,6]. Beyond this critical time window, these treatments are even detrimental as they increase the risk of hemorrhagic transformation [7]. As a consequence of this limited treatment window, strict inclusion criteria, and a general lack of proper devices and expertise for thrombectomy procedures out of specialized hospitals, the majority of stroke patients cannot benefit from these interventions [8,9,10]. Therefore, identifying (endogenous) protective mechanisms and exploring new regenerative therapies to promote neuronal recovery in the penumbra that are independent of the above-mentioned limitations is of utmost importance.
Synaptic neurotransmission is highly dependent on energy supply, and lack of the latter is one of the first consequences of vessel occlusion and hypoxia. Both, pre- and post-synaptic terminals are rapidly lost after ischemia. In the penumbra, this process may occur without neuronal loss as neurons enter into electrical silence to save energy but are still viable and metabolically active [11]. In vitro studies show that synaptic connectivity can be fully restored 6 h after hypoxia, implying the reestablishment of neuronal functionality [12, 13]. Moreover, synaptic reconstruction is a feature seen in the penumbra during the early phases of recovery after stroke. Thus, in a gerbil model of stroke, the number of synapses initially decreased up to day 4, then started recovering one week after stroke [14], and increased SNAP-25 (a synaptic marker protein involved in axonal outgrowth) immunoreactivity was observed as early as two days after ischemic induction [15]. In vivo experiments revealed that, after moderate ischemic damage (equivalent to damage in the penumbra area), dendritic spines were resilient for the first 5 h, to become gradually lost after 7 h, triggering the activation of signalling cascades that promoted apoptotic cell death [16].
Rescuing synapses at the penumbra, increasing connectivity and functionality (and thereby neuronal survival), may represent an important therapeutical niche [17, 18]. In the present study, we aimed to unveil protein changes undergone by synapses at different time points after stroke to identify candidates that may be involved in the intrinsic mechanisms of synaptic protection and/or recovery. Our findings show that cystatin C (CysC), a cysteine protease inhibitor expressed by all nucleated cells, is increased in synaptosomes isolated from mice at early time points after stroke. We demonstrate that CysC rescues synapses in vitro when externally delivered either free or loaded into brain-derived extracellular vesicles (BDEVs). Furthermore, treatment of stroked mice with CysC-loaded BDEVs increased/rescued the expression of synaptic marker proteins at 24 h after the insult. Thus, due to the capability of EVs to cross the blood–brain barrier (BBB) and the higher stability of drugs when encapsulated by EVs [19], we envisage CysC-loaded EVs as a potential clinically relevant future treatment for stroke.
Materials and methods
Animals
The mice used for the stroke experiments were male C57BL/6 aged between 11 and 17 weeks, kept under a 12 h dark–light cycle with ad libitum access to food and water. Animal experiments were approved by the local animal care committee (Behörde für Gesundheit und Verbraucherschutz, Veterinärwesen und Lebensmittelsicherheit of the Freie und Hansestadt Hamburg, project number N045/2018 and ORG1055) and in compliance with the guidelines of the animal facility of the University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf. BDEVs were isolated from the brain of 4 months old CysC knock-out mice [20]. Animal procedures were performed following the National Institutes of Health guidelines with approval from the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at the Nathan S. Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research.
Transient middle cerebral artery occlusion (tMCAO)
Left-side tMCAO in mice was performed as previously described [21] with minor changes. Briefly, after anesthesia and analgesia, a one-centimeter incision was made along the mouse neck midline, and the left carotid artery branch was exposed. The external carotid artery was ligated and notched at the distal end, and a filament (6-0 nylon, 602312PK10, Doccol) was inserted to block the middle cerebral artery. After 45 min of arterial occlusion, the filament was removed to allow reperfusion. The sham-operated mice also had the arteries exposed but no occlusion was made.
Isolation of synaptosomes from mouse brains
Synaptosomes were isolated from fresh brain tissue and an overview of the whole procedure is depicted in Fig. 1A. Briefly, the ipsilateral hemisphere was excised and gently homogenized with a Dounce grinder by 15 strokes in the homogenization buffer (HB: 0.32 M sucrose in 5 mM HEPES pH = 7.4 supplemented with protease inhibitors (P.I., Sigma #11697498001) at a ratio of 1:10 w/v on ice. Samples were then centrifuged at 1000 × g for 10 min at 4 °C; the supernatant (S1) was kept on ice, and the pellet (P1) was again resuspended in HB buffer (1:10 w/v). The resulting supernatant (S2) was mixed with S1 and centrifuged at 12,000 × g for 15 min at 4 °C. The resulting pellet (P3) was resuspended again in the HB buffer (1:10 w/v) and centrifuged at 12,000 × g for 20 min at 4 °C. The resulting pellet (P4, crude synaptosome fraction) was resuspended in 1 mL of isolation buffer (IB: 0.2 M sucrose in 5 mM HEPES buffer pH = 7.4 supplemented with P.I.) and layered on top of a sucrose gradient (0.8 M, 1.0 M, 1.2 M sucrose in 5 mM HEPES buffer pH = 7.4). Samples were then centrifuged at 82,600 × g at 4 °C for 2 h (Beckman ultracentrifuge optima L-100 XP). After the first ultracentrifugation, the white band between the 1.0 M and 1.2 M sucrose layers was collected, resuspended in 10 mL of IB, and centrifuged again at 26,000 × g at 4 °C for 30 min. The final synaptosome pellet was resuspended either in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) containing 2.5% glutaraldehyde for electron microscopy or in 10 mM HEPES buffer pH = 7.4 supplemented with P.I. for mass spectrometry or western blot analysis. For comparison purposes, 100 µL of total brain homogenate were extracted and mixed with 100 µL of 2 × radio-immunoprecipitation assay (RIPA) buffer (50 mM Tris–HCl pH = 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 1% NP40, 0.5% Na-Deoxycholate and 0.1% SDS).
Electron microscopy
Synaptosome pellets were fixed in 4% PFA containing 2.5% glutaraldehyde, centrifuged, washed three times with PBS, embedded in 3% agarose, and cut into small slices. Osmification was performed on the slices to add more contrast to the samples. Afterwards, samples were gradually dehydrated with ethanol and embedded in Epon resin (Carl Roth, #2545.1) for sectioning, and trimmed into ultrathin section (60 nm) with a Leica Ultra Cut. Samples were analysed using an EM902 transmission electron microscope (Zeiss, Germany) equipped with a 2 K digital camera with a CCD lens and running ImageSP software (Tröndle).
For brain EVs, 100 mesh nickel grids coated with formvar and carbon were glow discharged in a PELCO easiGlow. Then 5 µL of fixed purified EVs were placed on the grid for 5 min. The grid was rinsed with PBS three times for 5 min each before being treated with 50 µL of 0.05 M glycine for 10 min. After quenching the free aldehyde groups the grid was transferred to a drop of blocking buffer for 30 min followed by incubation with rat anti CysC primary antibody (Rat mAb, 1:500, R&D Systems, Cat# MAB1238, Minneapolis, MN, USA, RRID:AB_2088192) at a dilution of 1:2 at 4 °C overnight. The grid was washed 5 times in PBS with 0.1% BSA for 5 min each followed by incubation with anti-rat secondary antibody conjugated to 6 nm gold particles at 1:50 dilution for 1 h at room temperature. The grid was then washed 5 times in PBS with 0.1% BSA for 5 min each and twice in distilled water. The solution was then wicked off with a Whatman filter paper and negatively-stained in 1% w/v uranyl acetate (Electron Microscopy Sciences) before being immediately wicked off using filter paper. This process was repeated three times before a final incubation of 5 min. The excess solution was wicked off and the grid allowed to air dry. Imaging took place on a Talos L120C transmission electron microscope operating at 120 kV (ThermoFisher Scientific) using a 16M Ceta Camera.
Electrophoresis and western blotting
Protein concentrations were measured with Pierce BCA protein assay (Thermo Scientific #23225) according to the manufacturer´s protocol. Samples were diluted to 1 µg/µL in Laemmli loading buffer 1 × (60 mM Tris–HCl, 2% SDS, 10% glycerol, 0.05% bromophenol blue, 1.25% β-mercaptoethanol, pH = 6.8) and deionized H2O, denatured at 95 °C for 5 min, and 9 to 10 µg of protein were loaded in a 12% acrylamide gel. Electrophoresis was performed at a constant current of 150 mV in a Mini-PROTEAN Tetra cell (BIO-RAD). Proteins were then transferred onto nitrocellulose membrane (LI-COR Biosciences) in a wet chamber [Mini-PROTEAN II cell (BIO-RAD)] filled with transfer buffer (25 mM Tris base, 192 mM glycine, 10% methanol). The membranes were then stained with Revert Total Protein Stain Kit (LI-COR Biosciences) following the manufacturer’s instructions and images of the total staining were taken in an Odyssey® CLx Infrared Imaging System (LI-COR Biosciences). Subsequently, unspecific binding was blocked with Roti-Block buffer (Carl Roth, #A151.2) 1 × for 1 h at room temperature (RT). Primary antibodies were incubated at 4 °C overnight or over the weekend on a shaking platform. The antibodies used here were: mouse against PSD95 (1:1000; Millipore #MABN68), mouse against GM130 (1:1,000; BD Biosciences #610822), rabbit against Synapsin1 (1:1000; Synaptic Systems #163103), rabbit against SNAP25 (1:2000; Cell Signaling #3926), mouse against Histone H1 (1:500; Millipore #MABE446), and goat against CysC (1:1,000; R&D #AF1238). Afterwards, the membranes were washed with 1 × TBST buffer (10 mM Tris Base, 14 mM NaCl, pH = 7.4, 0.01% Tween-20) for 5 min three times and then incubated with the appropriate secondary antibody (anti-mouse #7076 or anti-rabbit #7074 (both 1:1,000; Cell Signaling) or anti-goat (1:1000; Promega #V805A)) for 1 h at RT while shaking. The chemiluminescence signal was developed with SuperSignal West Pico PLUS chemiluminescent substrate (Thermo Scientific #34577) or SuperSignal West Femto maximum sensitivity substrate (Thermo Scientific #34095) and visualized with either a ChemiDoc imaging system (BIO-RAD) or an Azure 400 visible fluorescent western system (Biozym). The protein bands’ signal intensities were analysed with Image Studio software (LI-COR).
To characterize cEVs and eEVs, 5 µL of lysed brain EVs (4.8 × 109 particles/µL) was run on 4–20% tris–glycine gels (Criterion precast gel, Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) and transferred onto Immobilon-P PVDF membranes (EMD Millipore, Billerica, MA). 5 µg of brain homogenates were included for negative control analysis. To quantify the CysC loaded in brain EVs, the human urine-derived CysC (Millipore Sigma #240896-50UG) was diluted to 50, 25, 12.5 and 6.25 ng and run on the same gel with cEVs and eEVs and the amount of CysC in the EVs was determined based on a standard curve generated for the diluted CysC protein. Membranes were then blocked using 5% (w/v) blotting grade non-fat dry milk (Bio-Rad) or 5% (w/v) BSA (Sigma-Aldrich) in Tris-buffered saline (50mM Tris-base, 150mM NaCl, pH 7.5) containing 0.05% (v/v) Tween-20 (Sigma-Aldrich). Blots were incubated with primary antibodies overnight at 4 °C, followed by incubation with horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated secondary antibodies (Jackson ImmunoResearch, West Grove, PA, US). Blots were developed with electrochemiluminescence (ECL) substrate (Pierce, ThermoFisher Scientific) or femto ECL (Pierce, ThermoFisher Scientific) when necessary. Primary antibodies used were: CysC (Rat mAb, 1:500, R&D Systems, #MAB1238, Minneapolis, MN, USA, RRID:AB_2088192), Alix (Rabbit mAb, 1:1000, Cell Signaling Technology, # 92880, Danvers, MA, USA, RRID:AB_2800192), Annexin A2 (Rabbit mAb, 1:5000, Abcam, # ab178677, Cambridge, UK), CD63 (Rabbit mAb, 1:1000, Abcam # ab217345, Cambridge, UK, RRID:AB_2754982), GM130 (Mouse mAb, 1:1000, BD Biosciences # 610823, San Jose, CA, USA, RRID:AB_398141), HSC70 (Mouse mAb, 1:1000, Santa Cruz Biotechnology # sc-7298, Santa Cruz, CA, USA, RRID:AB_627761), and Lamin A/C (Mouse mAb, 1:100, Santa Cruz Biotechnology # sc-376248, Santa Cruz, CA, USA, RRID:AB_10991536).
Bottom-up proteomic LC–MS/MS measurement of murine synaptosomes
To detect proteomic differences of synaptosomes between the stroked and sham-treated mice, the protein concentrations of synaptosome samples resuspended in HEPES buffer were assessed by the Pierce BCA Protein Assay Kit (Thermo Fisher #23225) following the manufacturer’s instructions and then diluted to 1 µg/µL. 20 µg of each sample were used for tryptic digestion. Disulfide bonds were reduced, using 10 mM DTT for 30 min at 60 °C. Alkylation was achieved with 20 mM iodoacetamide (IAA) for 30 min at 37 °C in the dark. Tryptic digestion was performed at a trypsin: protein ratio of 1:100 overnight at 37 °C and stopped by adding 1% formic acid (FA). The samples were dried in a vacuum concentrator (SpeedVac SC110 Savant; Thermo Fisher Scientific) and stored at − 80 °C until further use.
Directly before LC–MS analysis, samples were resolved in 0.1% FA to a final concentration of 1 µg/µL. 1 µg of tryptic peptides were injected into a UPLC (nano Ultra-Performance Liquid Chromatography, nanoAcquity system; Waters).
Chromatographic separation of peptides was achieved with a two-buffer system (buffer A: 0.1% FA in water, buffer B: 0.1% FA in acetonitrile (ANC)). Attached to the UPLC was a peptide trap (180 μm × 20 mm, 100 Å pore size, 5 μm particle size, Symmetry C18; Waters) for online desalting and purification followed by a 25 cm C18 reversed-phase column (75 μm × 200 mm, 130 Å pore size, 1.7 μm particle size, Peptide BEH C18; Waters). Peptides were separated using an 80 min gradient with linearly increasing ACN concentration from 2 to 30% in 65 min. The eluting peptides were analyzed on a Quadrupole Orbitrap hybrid mass spectrometer (QExactive; Thermo Fisher Scientific). Here, the ions being responsible for the 12 highest signal intensities per precursor scan (1 × 106 ions, 70,000 resolution, 240 ms fill time) were analyzed by MS/MS higher-energy collisional dissociation (HCD) at 25 normalized collision energy (1 × 105 ions, 17,500 Resolution, 50 ms fill time) in a range of 400–1200 m/z. A dynamic precursor exclusion of 20 s was used.
Raw data processing for proteome data
LC–MS/MS data were searched with the CHIMERYS algorithm integrated into the Proteome Discoverer software (v 3.0; Thermo Fisher Scientific), using inferys 2.1 fragmentation as a prediction model, against a reviewed murine Swissprot database, obtained in February 2023, containing 20,365 entries. Carbamidomethylation was set as a fixed modification for cysteine residues and the oxidation of methionine was allowed as a variable modification. A maximum number of 2 missing tryptic cleavages was set. Peptides between 7 and 30 amino acids were considered. The fragment tolerance was set to 20 ppm. A strict cutoff (false discovery rate (FDR) < 0.01) was set for peptide and protein identification. For target decoy selection, the Percolator node was used. Protein quantification was carried out using the Minora Algorithm implemented in Proteome Discoverer. For quantification, razor and unique peptides were used. Protein quantification was performed based on summed abundances. For data processing and statistical analysis, each time point (24 h, 4 days, 7 days) was handled separately. All proteomic data has been submitted to a public repository (PRIDE): http://www.ebi.ac.uk/pride.
Primary neuronal cell culture
Hippocampal neurons were obtained from postnatal day 1 or 2 (P1-P2) mouse pups. After decapitation, the brains were extracted and cleaned from the meninges with caution. The hippocampi were collected and transferred to ice-cold 10 mM glucose in PBS, which was later replaced with 5 mL digestion solution [PBS/10 mM glucose, 0.5 mg/mL papain (Sigma #P4762-100MG) and 20 µg/mL DNase (Sigma #DN25-10MG)]. The digestion was performed for 30 min in a 37 °C shaking water bath. The hippocampi were washed 4 times with plating medium [70% (v/v) MEM (Gibco #51200-046), PBS/20 mM glucose, and 10% (v/v) horse serum (Gibco #16050-130)], gently dissociated with a pipette and resuspended in 1 mL of plating medium. Cell counting was conducted by adding 20 µL of the cell suspension to 20 µL Trypan Blue (Sigma #T8154-100ML), and cell numbers were determined with the Countess® II cytometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific). 70,000 cells/well were plated onto 13 mm diameter coverslips in 24-well plates containing plating medium (500 µL/well). The coverslips were previously coated with poly-l-lysine (Sigma #P9155-5MG) at 37 °C for 2–3 h and washed three times with PBS. 3–4 h after plating, the plating medium was changed to maintenance medium [Neurobasal A (Gibco #10888-022) containing 0.1% Gentamicin (Thermo Fisher #15750-060), 1 × Glutamax (Thermo Fisher #35050-038) and 2% B27 serum (Gibco #17504-044)] (1 mL/well). 24 h after plating, 20 mM 5-Fluoro-2’-deoxyuridine (EMD Millipore #34333) was added to each well to eliminate non-neuronal cells. Half of the maintenance medium was replaced every 3–4 days with fresh media. Primary neurons were cultured for 14 days to allow them to establish a mature synaptic network.
Isolation of BDEVs and CysC loading
Isolation of BDEVs was performed as published previously [22]. Briefly, frozen right hemibrains of mice were minced and incubated with 20 units/mL papain (Worthington) in Hibernate A solution (HA, 3.5 mL/sample; BrainBits) for 15 min at 37 °C for gentle dissociation. The papain was inactivated by the addition of 6.5 mL of ice-cold HA supplemented with protease inhibitors [5 μg/mL leupeptin, 5 μg/mL antipain dihydrochloride, 5 μg/mL pepstatin A, 1 mM phenylmethanesulfonyl fluoride (PMSF), 1 μM E-64, all from Sigma-Aldrich]. The digested brain tissue was centrifuged at 300 × g for 10 min at 4 °C to discard undigested tissue and intact cells. The supernatant was sequentially filtered using a 40 μm mesh filter (BD Biosciences) and a 0.2 μm syringe filter (Corning Life Sciences). The filtrate was subjected to sequential centrifugations at 4 °C, at 2,000 × g for 10 min and 10,000 × g for 30 min to discard membranes and debris, and at 100,000 × g for 70 min to pellet the EVs. The pellet was washed once in PBS, recentrifuged at 100,000 × g for 70 min at 4 °C and resuspended in 1.5 mL of a 40% (v/v) OptiPrep (iodixanol) solution, containing 10 mM Tris–HCl (pH = 7.4), 0.25 M sucrose, and 40% iodixanol (all reagents from Sigma-Aldrich). An OptiPrep density step gradient column was set up by placing the 40% OptiPrep-equilibrated BDEVs in the bottom of a column tube and carefully layering on the top of it a decreasing scale of OptiPrep solutions (1.5 mL steps for 20, 15, 13, 11, 9, and 7%, and 2 mL for 5%). The sucrose step gradient was centrifuged at 200,000 × g for 16 h at 4 °C. Fractions 3 to 6 were combined and centrifuged at 100,000 × g for 70 min, followed by resuspension in PBS.
CysC protein was loaded into BDEVs by sonication [23]. The BDEV suspension (combined fractions 3–6) was quantified using a nanoparticle analysis machine and diluted to 4.8 × 109 particles/µL. Human urine-derived CysC (Millipore Sigma #240896-50UG) was reconstituted in 500 µL of 100 mM sodium acetate buffer, pH = 4.5, to reach a concentration of 0.1 µg/µL. The 100 µL BDEV suspension, which corresponds to approximately 100 µg of total BDEV protein, was mixed with 20 µL of CysC solution (2 µg) to yield a 50:1 ratio of BDEV protein to CysC in a total 1 mL of PBS. The mixture of BDEVs and CysC rotated overnight at 4 °C. Next, the mixture was sonicated (20% power, 6 cycles by 4-s pulse / 2-s pause), cooled down on ice for 2 min, and then sonicated again, using Fisher Sonic Dismembrator (Fisher Scientific). The CysC-loaded BDEVs (cEVs) were then washed to remove free CysC by ultracentrifugation at 100,000 × g for 70 min. The EV pellet was resuspended in PBS and diluted to 4.8 × 109 particles/µL. As a control (empty EVs; eEVs), BDEVs were not mixed with CysC, but underwent the same procedure as the BDEVs mixed with CysC.
Nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA)
The brain EVs loaded with or without CysC (cEVs or eEVs, respectively) were characterized and quantified using the ZetaView model PMX-220 analyzer (Particle Metrix, Meerbusch, Germany) equipped with 488nm and 640nm lasers. Prior to each analysis, using deionized distilled water, the machine underwent a quality control analysis followed by assessment of polystyrene particles of 100 nm size (ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) with an expected range of 100 nm ± 3.9 nm. Prior to video capture of particles, the EVs were further diluted in filtered PBS. The dilution factor used for acquisition was 1:100,000. The parameters set for acquisition were: Sensitivity 85, Shutter 100, Frame rate 30, Minimum area 10, Maximum area 2000, Trace length 15, and Bin size 5. The EV particles were measured in each of the 11 video locations within a certain video capture time interval.
Oxygen–glucose deprivation (OGD) and CysC (free or loaded in BDEVs) treatment
To mimic the conditions in the penumbra region, where synaptic disruption has taken place while neuronal death has not yet started, OGD was performed on primary neurons for 20 min on day in vitro (DIV) 14 as previously described with some modifications [24]. In brief, cells were washed twice with 1 mL of pre-warmed OGD medium (Neurobasal A medium without glucose (Gibco #A24775-01) containing 0.1% Gentamicin (Thermo Fisher #15750-060), 1 × Glutamax (Thermo Fisher #35050-038), and 2% B27 serum (Gibco #17504-044)) to deplete glucose from intracellular storage, and then incubated in the pre-warmed OGD medium (1 mL/well). Afterwards, the 24-well plate was put without lid, yet under sterile conditions, into an anaerobic chamber (Modulator incubator chamber; Billups-Rothenberg), which was flushed with a gas mixture of 95% N2 and 5% CO2 for 5 min at a flow rate of 4–6 L/min to yield an N2-enriched atmosphere before the complete seal. The anaerobic chamber was placed back into the incubator at 37 °C for 20 min [25]. After OGD exposure, the cell plate was removed from the anaerobic chamber, and the OGD media was changed back to the normal maintenance medium under sterile conditions. The control group treated in parallel underwent the same procedure (except for the washing step with OGD medium), was maintained in normal culture medium, and incubated under normoxic conditions with 5% CO2 at 37 °C. Free CysC (human urine CysC; Millipore Sigma #240896-50UG) was dissolved in 100 mM sodium acetate buffer pH = 4.5 (concentration of the stock solution = 15 µM) and added at a concentration of 0.15 µM [26] into the maintenance medium (8 µL from the stock solution to 800 µL of maintenance medium; the final amount of free CysC was 1.6 µg per well) after OGD exposure. As a control, the same volume of solvent but without CysC was used. For the experiments involving CysC loaded into BDEVs (cEVs) or empty BDEVs (eEVs, used as a control), we used the amount of BDEVs that contained between 18 ng or 36 ng of CysC per well and added them to the cells after OGD. Thus, four conditions for every set of experiments were set up: normoxia + solvent/eEVs; normoxia + CysC/cEVs; OGD + solvent/eEVs; and OGD + CysC/cEVs. Every experiment was repeated at least 3 times except for the ‘18 ng BDEVs’ treatment (which was only performed once).
LDH and MTT assay
The CyQUANT™ LDH Cytotoxicity Assay (Thermo Fisher #C20300) was used to detect neuronal cytotoxicity 24 h after OGD according to the manufacturer’s manual. As a positive control (100% of cell death), the provided lysis buffer was diluted to 1 × with cell medium in the designated wells. The CellTiter 96® Non-Radioactive Cell Proliferation Assay (MTT) (Promega #G4000) was used to check for cell viability 24 h after OGD treatment in the 24-well plate following the manufacturer’s instructions. Wells filled with medium containing only solvent were used as background control. Absorbance was recorded at 490 nm and 570 nm for the LDH and MTT assay, respectively, using a BioTek microplate reader. Three replicates were made for each group.
Immunocytochemistry and confocal microscopy
Immunocytochemistry was performed as previously described [27]. Briefly, coverslips were fixed with 4% PFA at RT for 10 min and then permeabilized with 0.5% saponin in PBS for 10 min. Next, the coverslips were incubated with 1% BSA in PBS for 30 min at RT to block unspecific binding, further incubated with primary antibodies overnight, and, after 3 washes in TBST, incubated with the corresponding secondary antibodies in 0.1% BSA in PBS. The primary antibodies used here were: goat against MAP2 (S-15; 1:100; Santa Cruz #sc-12012) and rabbit against Synapsin1 (1:500; Synaptic Systems #163103). Secondary antibodies were: anti-goat 555 (1:500; Thermo Fisher #A21432) and anti-rabbit 488 (1:500; Thermo Fisher #AF21206). Images were taken with a Leica TSC SP8 confocal microscope to quantify synaptic density. Roughly 10 neurons (ranging between 7 and 13) were randomly chosen per coverslip, and 2–3 coverslips were checked per condition per experiment, thus a total of 20–25 neurons per condition per experiment were imaged. Pictures were taken with the 63 × objective with 1 × digital zoom. For the 3D images, z-stacks were set up at 0.3 µm. The starting and ending points of the z-series were determined by dendritic spatial distribution on the z-axis. Only neurons that were clearly isolated but also not far away from other neurons and with a dendritic length between 80 and 100% width or height of the picture frame (90 × 90 µm) were chosen. For synaptic quantification, the z-stacks were reconstructed with Imaris software (Bitplane 7.4.2). The optimized settings used to reconstruct the dendrites and synapses within the surpass module were fixed for every experiment. Synaptic density was considered as the number of Synapsin1 positive puncta per unit area of the dendrites, indicated by the MAP2 fluorescence signal revealing neuronal shape.
Intracerebroventricular (ICV) injection of BDEVs
Mice were subjected to tMCAO as described above, and 6 h after artery occlusion and reperfusion, 2 µL of resuspended BDEVs loaded or not with CysC (cEVs or eEVs) were injected into the ipsilateral ventricle with a stereotactic device (Stoelting #51730D). The injection coordinates used were 1.1 mm lateral, 0.5 mm posterior, and 2.3 mm ventral to the skull bregma. All the experiments were performed blindly as the tubes were labelled with A or B and the experimenters did not know which ones contained BDEVs loaded with CysC or empty BDEVs.
Mice were sacrificed 24 h after ICV injection with BDEVs, their brains were removed, and the infarct area along with the surrounding penumbra were excised and homogenized in HEPES buffer (10 mM, pH = 7.4, supplemented with P.I.) on ice. The homogenates were kept at – 80 °C. After measuring total protein concentration by BCA assay, samples were used for proteomics or western blot analysis.
TTC cell viability assay staining
2,3,5-Triphenyltetrazoliumchlorid (TTC) solution was used to confirm the overall stroke volume. The colorless TTC is converted by the mitochondrial succinate dehydrogenase of living cells into formazan, turning viable brain tissue into red, while the dead tissue areas (i.e., the stroke core) remains white. Mouse brains were sliced rostrocaudal into serial 1 mm thick slices and the whole set of brain slices was incubated in the TTC solution for 20 min at RT. Brain slices were scanned and the stroke volume was calculated with Image J software (National Institutes of Health, NIH).
Immunohistochemistry and fluorescence microscopy analysis
Brain tissues were fixed with 4% PFA at 4 °C for 24 h, rinsed in ice-cold PBS, and embedded in paraffin in a Modular Tissue Embedding Center (Leica #EG1150H). Paraffin-embedded sections were cut in 5 µm thick slices with a microtome (SM 2010R Leica) and affixed to Superfrost microscope slides (VWR #631-0108). After drying at 37 °C overnight, slides were deparaffinized and boiled for 20 min in citrate buffer (0.1 M sodium citrate and 0.1 M citric acid in distilled H2O) for antigen retrieval and incubated with 5% normal rabbit serum (Vector laboratory #S-5000) in PBS containing 0.2% Triton for 1 h at RT to block unspecific binding. Afterwards, the sections were incubated with primary antibodies diluted in 5% normal rabbit serum in PBS at 4 °C overnight in a wet chamber. The next day, slides were adjusted to RT for 30 min and, after four PBS washes of 5 min each, incubated with secondary antibodies diluted in 5% normal rabbit serum in PBS for 45 min at RT in the dark. Samples were finally mounted with DAPI Fluoromount-G mounting medium (Southern Biotech #0100-20). The primary antibodies used were: NeuN (1:2500; EMD Millipore #ABN91) and GFAP (1:100; Invitrogen #13-0300) whereas anti-chicken AF647 (1:500; Thermo Fisher #A21449) and anti-rat AF555 (1:500; Abcam #ab150154) were used as secondary antibodies. Anti-Isolectin GS-IB4, Alexa Fluor 488 conjugate (Invitrogen #121411), to label the microglia, was applied with the secondary antibodies. Immunofluorescence imaging was conducted with an Apotome microscope (Zeiss) with a 20 × objective.
Data processing and statistical analysis
For the analysis of LC–MS-derived Proteome data, each experiment was handled separately. Protein abundances were loaded into Perseus (Max Plank Institute for Biochemistry, Version 2.0.3) and log2 transformed to approximate the Gaussian probability distribution. Protein abundances were median normalized by column to cope for injection-related discrepancies in total protein amounts. T-testing was performed, accepting proteins identified at a p-value < 0.05 with a fold change difference of > 1.5 being considered as significantly differential abundant between sham and stroke mice. T-testing results of proteins found in at least two samples per group were visualized using an in house-script, implementing the ggplot2 and ggrepel packages in the R-software environment (version 4.4.2).
For Principal Component Analysis (PCA), linear PCA was performed based on all proteins found in all samples and being significantly differentially abundant. Log2-transformed and normalized values were used. The first two main principal components were plotted against each other, using a scatter plot in Perseus (version 2.0.3). Visualization was performed in GraphPad Prism Version 8.0.2.
For further analysis, proteins that were found in at least two samples per phenotype (sham/stroke) were used. Data were analysed with the QIAGEN Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) [28]. Canonical Pathways Analysis identified the pathways from the QIAGEN IPA library of canonical pathways that were most significant in the data set. Molecules from the data set that met the significance cut-off (p-value < 0.05, fold-change > 1.5) and that were associated with a canonical pathway in the QIAGEN Knowledge Base were considered for the analysis. Cancer and xenobiotic metabolism related terms were excluded. A right-tailed Fisher’s Exact Test was used to calculate a p-value determining the probability that the association between the genes in the dataset and the canonical pathway is explained by chance alone (p-value < 0.05). A z-score was calculated to indicate the likelihood of activation or inhibition of that pathway. The results are displayed as bubble chart.
GraphPad Prism 9 software was used to analyze the data from western blots, cellular viability and cytotoxicity, immunocytochemistry, and immunofluorescence experiments. Student’s t-test or Mann–Whitney U test was used to compare the difference between groups, and the statistical difference was considered when *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001. Values are described as mean ± standard deviation (SD). The exact p-values are given in the text.
Results
Synaptosome characterization
Our first goal was to analyse protein changes at the level of the synapses in the core and penumbra area at different time points after tMCAO in mice. For this, we excised the affected area of the ipsilateral hemisphere and isolated the synaptosomes as shown in Fig. 1A. Western blot analysis of the synaptosomal fraction (SN) revealed relative enrichment of several synaptic proteins (Synapsin1, PSD95, and SNAP25) when compared to a total homogenate of the brain (TH) (Fig. 1B). The SN fraction lacks the nucleic marker Histone H1 and the Golgi marker GM130, used here as indicators of potential contamination from other cellular compartments (i.e., negative control). A representative electron microscopy picture in Fig. 1C shows several structures attributable to bona fide synaptosomes (highlighted in the squared boxes).
Cystatin C is upregulated at 24 h and 4 days after stroke
Ito et al. [14] described that, after tMCAO was performed in Mongolian gerbils, axons and dendritic spines decreased till day 4 to eventually start recovering from this time point onwards. To investigate the temporal proteomic changes of the neuronal synapses after stroke in a mouse model, we isolated the synaptosomes from tMCAO and sham-treated mice at 24 h (n = 4 per group), 4 days (n = 5 per group) and 7 days (n = 5 per group) after stroke and performed mass spectrometry-based proteome analysis. At 24 h we identified 166 proteins significantly differentially abundant (145 upregulated and 21 downregulated) in stroke compared to sham with a p-value ≤ 0.05 and with a log2 fold-change (log2FC) cutoff of ≥ 1.5. After 4 days, 84 proteins were significantly differentially abundant (30 upregulated and 54 downregulated) between shams and strokes (p-value ≤ 0.05 and a log2FC ≥ 1.5). Finally, at 7 days post-insult, 64 proteins were found significantly differentially abundant in stroke compared to shams (p-value ≤ 0.05) with 34 proteins being significantly upregulated and 30 significantly downregulated with a log2FC ≥ 1.5. The list of the most up and downregulated proteins is provided in Suppl. Table 1. Heat maps and supervised principal component analysis (PCA) showing the differential clustering of the sham samples and the tMCAO samples are shown in Suppl. Figure 1. The volcano plots in Fig. 2A–C show the names of the top up-and downregulated proteins for each time point, whereas Fig. 2D, and E depict the changes between sham and strokes at different time points analysed by Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA). This analysis showed that several upregulated proteins at 24 h belonged to the IPA canonical pathways related to ‘intracellular second messenger signal’, ‘cellular stress injury’ or ‘cellular growth and proliferation development’, indicating the setup of a complex response to injury (Fig. 2D in dark blue). Surprisingly, the IPA at day 4 after tMCAO showed a significant downregulation of several pathways and only some proteins related to ‘neurotransmitter of the nervous system signaling’ or ‘disease specific pathways’ were upregulated (Fig. 2F in blue). Finally, at 7 days, no concrete pathway could be associated to be overrepresented in the tMCAO group (Suppl. Figure 2).
For the present study, our working hypothesis was that proteins known to be protective or beneficial in ischemic injury and found upregulated at early time points after stroke, could be involved in an endogenous mechanism of response to ischemic damage, worth to be studied and employed as a potential therapeutic option. Among the upregulated proteins at 24 h and 4 days after tMCAO, we found that cystatin C (CysC, CST3), a protease inhibitor known to exert protective effects against ischemic brain injury and neurodegeneration [29, 30] was significantly (p = 0.032) upregulated (Fig. 2A and B, in red) by threefold in the stroke synaptosome preparations. As depicted in Fig. 2B, CysC was still significantly increased (by 1.6-fold) at 4 d after ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) compared with the sham group, whereas after 7 days, CysC levels in the I/R group were found to be comparable to the sham group.
To confirm the results obtained for CysC by quantitative mass spectrometry, we performed western blot analysis. As shown in Fig. 3, expression levels of CysC in the tMCAO group were significantly elevated (p = 0.0286) at 24 h post-stroke and, also at 4 days after stroke (p = 0.0159), while this difference between groups disappeared 7 days post-stroke, fitting with the mass spectrometry results. Notably, expression levels of the synaptic markers SNAP25 and PSD95 at 24 h post-stroke were significantly lower in the tMCAO group, possibly indicating a substantial loss of synapses at this time point (both p = 0.0286). This particular difference was not seen later, at 4 and 7 days post-stroke, maybe indicating a partial synaptic recovery over time. Thus, fitting to our premises for a candidate protein, we decided to focus on CysC to further study its effects on synapses under ischemic damage.
CysC, either free or loaded into BDEVs, has a protective effect on synapses of neurons subjected to OGD
To test the effect of CysC on hypoxia-challenged neurons in vitro, we first established the proper conditions simulating ischemic damage in the penumbra area, where neurons are still viable and can be rescued. For this, based on our previous experiences, we submitted primary neurons isolated from P0-P1 mice to oxygen–glucose deprivation (OGD) treatment for 20 min. To additionally measure whether the addition of CysC was causing any effect on neuronal viability (cytotoxicity), we established four experimental groups (normoxia or OGD, and each either with or without CysC administration), and cytotoxicity and viability were assessed with LDH and MTT assays, respectively. As shown in Fig. 4A, no significant differences in cytotoxicity or viability were observed between the OGD and normoxia groups, implying that the 20 min OGD treatment only caused negligible cell death. The addition of CysC did not have any effect either in normoxia nor after these OGD conditions.
We then proceeded to check the status of the synapses under these four conditions. For this, we labeled the neurons with MAP2 (labelling the dendrites of mature neurons) and Synapsin1 (a resident protein of synaptic vesicles) as a proxy for axon numbers (Fig. 4B and Suppl. Figure 2). After OGD or normoxic conditions, neurons were treated with or without CysC and stained. The amount of CysC used for the treatment was 1.6 µg (0.15 µM) per well as previously described [31]. More than 100 neurons for each condition [normoxia + solvent (n = 114), normoxia + CysC (n = 113), OGD + solvent (n = 114), OGD + CysC (n = 114)] were analysed with the Imaris program (Fig. 4C). As shown in Fig. 4D, neuronal synaptic density was significantly reduced after OGD treatment (OGD + solvent: 31.88 ± 12.56 synapses/1000 µm2; p < 0.0001) when compared to normoxia conditions (normoxia + solvent: 46.96 ± 12.55 synapses/1000 µm2), while the addition of CysC after OGD significantly increased synaptic density (OGD + CysC: 42.00 ± 11.58 synapses/1000 µm2; p < 0.0001). The addition of CysC did not change the synaptic density of neurons in the normoxia group (normoxia + solvent: 48.60 ± 11.96 synapses/1000 µm2, p = 0.3155). Values are given as mean ± SD. It was previously described that CysC loaded in EVs conferred protection against nutrient deprivation in primary neurons [31]. EVs have the potential to be used as therapeutic vehicles for drug delivery and treatment of neurological diseases, as they (i) cross the BBB [32], (ii) increase drug biostability as they protect their cargos from extracellular degradation crediting to their specific membrane composition [19], and (iii) have high biocompatibility and low immunogenicity [33, 34]. Thus, we checked whether the effect seen with free CysC could be reproduced when CysC was loaded into BDEVs as a proof of concept for future treatment approaches. BDEVs were isolated from brains of CysC KO mice and the loading of CysC was not affecting the properties of EVs as assessed by the presence of common EV markers, NTA analysis and their morphology viewed by TEM (Suppl. Figure 3). Of note, BDEVs that were not loaded with CysC underwent the same procedure. After OGD or normoxic conditions, primary neurons were treated with either non-loaded (described here as “empty" BDEVs, eEVs) or BDEVs loaded with CysC (cEVs), and the same analysis was performed as described above. Due to the restricted amounts available of BDEVs loaded with CysC, two doses of cEVs were used: 14 µL (4.8 × 109 particles/µL, 1.28 ng/µL of CysC, total amount of 17.92 ng of CysC; n = 21 neurons per condition) or 28 µL of EVs (equivalent to 4.8 × 109 particles/µL, 1.28 ng/µL of CysC, total amount of 35.84 ng of CysC; n = 60 neurons per condition), which were around 89 times lower (in the case of 18 ng) and around 44 times lower (in the case of 36 ng) than the amounts of free CysC (1600 ng) used.
No differences in treatment of cEVs in normoxia or OGD (normoxia + eEVs: 36.78 ± 10.58 synapses/1000 µm2; OGD with eEVs: 27.88 ± 11.54 synapses /1000 µm2); normoxia + cEVs: 36.28 ± 10.41 synapses/1000 µm2; OGD with cEVs: 31.93 ± 9.701 synapses/1000 µm2) were observed for the pilot experiment with 14 µL of cEVs (Suppl. Figure 4). However, significant differences were observed after adding the double amount of cEVs (28 µL) after OGD treatment (Fig. 4E; p < 0.0001, synaptic density after OGD with eEVs: 26.34 ± 9.627 synapses/1000 µm2 and after OGD with cEVs treatment: 40.03 ± 11.83 synapses/1000 µm2; normoxia + eEVs: 45.68 ± 14.28 synapses/1000 µm2; normoxia + cEVs: 41.12 ± 16.43 synapses/1000 µm2; Suppl. Figure 5), indicating a dose-dependent effect of CysC loaded into BDEVs.
BDEVs loaded with CysC rescue synapses in vivo after induced stroke in mice
To assess whether the protective effect of CysC on synapses observed in vitro is also present in vivo, we injected eEVs or cEVs intracerebroventricularly (ICV) 6 h after tMCAO and sacrificed the mice 24 h afterwards to evaluate treatment outcome. We chose this time point as we hypothesized that 6 h post-insult might be relevant for treatment in a clinical setting. To analyse changes in the volume of stroke, we used the TTC cell viability assay with n = 6 per group (Fig. 5A). After quantifying the ratio between stroke area related to total brain area, we found no significant differences in the brain infarct area between the two groups of mice (Fig. 5B). Immunohistochemistry for NeuN (as a marker of nuclei and cell bodies of most differentiated neuronal cell types in rodents), isolectin B4 (as a marker of rodent cerebral vasculature and microglia) or GFAP (as a marker of astrocytes) likewise showed no significant differences between the two treated groups (Suppl. Figure 6; eEVs: n = 6, cEVs: n = 5).
To explore the pathways activated by the treatment with cEVs, we performed mass spectrometry of the ipsilateral hemisphere of the eEVs- (n = 5) and the cEVs-treated groups (n = 5). As shown in Suppl. Figure 7, we identified 3911 proteins, 6 of which were significantly upregulated (log2FC ≥ 1.5; p ≤ 0.05) in cEVs and 9 significantly downregulated (log2FC ≤ − 0.58; p ≤ 0.05) (Suppl. Table 1). No enrichment cluster analysis was possible due to the low amount of upregulated proteins, however, five out of the six upregulated proteins (Developmentally-regulated GTP-binding protein 2 (DRG2); Exopolyphosphatase PRUNE1 (PRUNE1); Craniofacial development protein 1 (CFDP1); Cullin-1 (CUL1); and Centrosomal protein of 170 kDa protein B (CEP170B)) can be related to either microtubule reorganization or cell proliferation. The sixth protein upregulated is PPP1R1B, also known as DARPP-32, a dopamine and cAMP-regulated phosphoprotein implicated in the responses of the dopaminergic system [35].
Finally, because it was very difficult to assess and reliably quantify synaptic markers by immunohistochemical analysis in brain samples, we performed western blotting (n = 5 for each group) for several known pre- and post-synaptic markers. Homer-1 and PSD95 are components of the postsynaptic density, while SNAP25, Synaptophysin, Synaptotagmin, and Synapsin1 are used as presynaptic markers. NCAM, a neural cell adhesion molecule implicated in synaptic plasticity, has three isoforms with two of them (NCAM 180 kDa and NCAM 140 kDa) being located at the pre-and post-synaptic membrane, while the third isoform (NCAM 120 kDa) is mostly expressed in glia [36]; we therefore quantified the 180 and 140 kDa bands relevant for neuronal synapses. As shown in Fig. 5C and D, while expression levels of Synapsin1 and Synaptotagmin did not show any upregulation, Homer-1, SNAP25, and NCAM 180 kDa were significantly upregulated in the cEV-treated group compared to the control group (p = 0.031, p = 0.031 and p = 0.008, respectively). Levels of Synaptophysin, PSD95, and NCAM 140 kDa showed an increased trend in the cEV treatment group, yet this did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.0952, p = 0.4206 and p = 0.0556, respectively). Thus, we conclude that also in vivo, CysC-loaded BDEVs confer beneficial, synapse-protecting or -preserving effects after stroke.
Discussion
In the present study, as depicted in the summary in Fig. 6, we show that several proteins are upregulated in surviving synapses in the acute phase of stroke, possibly indicating an attempted protective response against the ischemic damage. Among these increased proteins, we chose to study the role of CysC, as it was transiently upregulated at 24 h and 4 days after reperfusion to finally decrease to normal levels after 7 days. When CysC was externally delivered, either free or encapsulated in EVs, it had positive effects at the synaptic level in vitro and in vivo. As synaptic preservation is fundamental for neuronal survival and functional outcome, treatment with CysC encapsulated in EVs may open the possibility of its use as a targetable therapeutic agent with improved pharmacodynamic and kinetic features.
Synaptic transmission is the most energy-consuming process of neurons [37] and, thus, after ischemic damage and the subsequent lack of energy, is one of the first processes to be shut down in the penumbra area [17]. In this region, loss of synapses is not always accompanied by neuronal death and, in fact, the rapid distortion suffered by synaptic structures can be fully recovered in case of intervention till 3 h after reperfusion (as observed with two-photon microscopy), suggesting a high capacity for a fast reorganization in this area [16, 38, 39]. Moreover, it was described that, during the recovery phase, the peri-infarcted area shows extraordinary neuronal plasticity, which, in global ischemic models of stroke, could be observed as soon as 4 days after reperfusion [14, 40]. Therefore, it was hypothesized that preserving synaptic structures or promoting their remodelling at the penumbra in a determined time window would improve functional neurological recovery in patients suffering from stroke [41]. Interestingly, in the synaptosomal preparations studied here, the IPA showed several canonical pathways upregulated as soon as 24 h after stroke, the most prominent ones being related to ‘intracellular second messenger signaling’, ‘cellular stress injury’ and ‘cellular growth proliferation and development’, which indicates an early cellular rescue response to the injury.
Among the upregulated proteins found in synaptosomes isolated from stroked mouse brains, we turned our attention to CysC, a secreted cysteine protease inhibitor expressed in the brain by neurons, astrocytes, and microglia [42] and shown to protect neurons from various toxic stimuli, such as nutrient deprivation or oxidative stress in vitro [26]. In vivo, CysC also confers protective effects after focal ischemia, as CysC knock-out mice presented with enlarged stroke volume. However, in the same study it was also shown that, by using the model of global ischemic damage, neuronal injury was decreased in certain brain populations [43], highlighting rather complex effects of CysC after ischemic insults. By studying preconditioning —the mechanism whereby a mild ischemic insult triggers molecular mediators that protect the brain from future acute ischemic stroke events [44,45,46]— it was found that, after repeated hyperbaric oxygen (HBO) pre-conditioning in rats followed by tMCAO, one of the molecules significantly upregulated in a serum proteomic screening was CysC [47]. As preconditioning is a paradigm to study lasting responses set up to reduce ischemic damage, the upregulation of CysC would imply an induced endogenous protection response towards stroke. In their model, the authors also observed that CysC was increased at the penumbra as early as 3 h upon insult [48]. In another study, the same group (with the same model) demonstrated that exogenous ICV injection of CysC 30 min after reperfusion leads to a reduction of the infarct volume found at 3 days after stroke [47]. Finally, Yang et al. also showed that intraventricular injection of CysC 30 min before tMCAO in mice (mimicking a preconditioning effect) reduced the infarct size 24 h after stroke/reperfusion injury [29].
Different mechanisms through which CysC exerts its neuroprotection have been proposed [30]. In stroke, it has been described that CysC leads to the preservation of the integrity of the lysosomal membrane and the induction of autolysosome formation, leading to autophagy promotion [47, 48]. But it can also act as a potent inhibitor of cysteine proteases such as cathepsin B and L [49], which play a detrimental role in stroke [50], or by promoting BBB integrity [51]. Our study revealed a significant upregulation of CysC in the synapses at the penumbra during the initial phase of stroke in tMCAO mice. Although we did not inspect the lysosomal system, it is known that, following stroke, neurons increase their autophagic activity, which may result in lysosomal dysfunction and destabilization of the lysosomal membrane, associated with perturbed synaptic ultrastructure and plasticity [52]. Thus, as CysC participates in conserving lysosomal membrane integrity and in stimulating autophagosome formation, we hypothesize that synaptic integrity is a consequence of its role in maintaining optimal lysosomal system performance. However, other experiments are needed to elucidate the possible direct mechanism at a molecular level, and we cannot rule out that other indirect or more complex mechanisms (for instance related to microglia) are implicated in these processes [53].
EVs are nanometer-sized membrane-enclosed particles that can transport cargo between cells and organ systems [54]. EVs were shown to have therapeutic potential [55] in several diseases, including cancer [56], neurological [57], and cardiovascular diseases [58]. The advantages of using EVs as drug vehicles for the central nervous system (CNS) are (i) their size, (ii) their stability in circulation, (iii) their ability to cross biological barriers such as the BBB, (iv) their ability to utilize endogenous cellular uptake mechanisms, and (v) their low immunogenicity [59]. In the present study, we have delivered CysC-loaded BDEVs to stroked mice and demonstrated that at 24 h after I/R some synaptic proteins in both pre- (SNAP25, NCAM) and postsynaptic (Homer1) terminals show increased abundance in treated animals compared to animals that only received empty BDEVs. In vivo, synaptic remodelling has been observed in several instances after ischemic damage, but in the acute phase of stroke, most synaptic proteins are decreased. For example, Marti et al. showed decreased Synapsin1 immunoreactivity after transient forebrain ischemia in Mongolian gerbils, followed by increased expression peaking at 7 days after stroke [60]. Upregulation of SNAP25 was found to be a synaptic response to ischemic damage in the hippocampus of gerbils two days after stroke [15], while others have found a prominent decrease of SNAP25 and synaptophysin for the same time point in the stroked gerbils that were subsequently incremented at 14 days [61]. In our analysis, we found SNAP25 significantly reduced in isolated synaptosomes at 24 h after stroke. Homer1 is a post-synaptic scaffold protein that promotes dendritic spine stability and has important implications for the whole post-synaptic network, as its absence alters the whole synaptic proteome [62]. It has been reported to be decreased after I/R in rats, probably contributing to the synaptic alterations and the neuronal fate in the penumbra [63]. In our study, treatment with CysC-loaded BDEVs increased these synaptic proteins as soon as 24 h after stroke, suggesting either promotion of synaptic remodelling or synaptic protection by CysC, thus corroborating our in vitro results in primary neurons. The fact that the significant upregulated proteins observed in western blot were not found to be upregulated in the mass spectrometry analysis could possibly be caused by the posttranslational modifications of the proteins. These modifications lead to a change in the molecular weight of the tryptic peptides, which are then not included in the quantification. Moreover, that the low amounts of CysC delivered into the brain via EVs have a synaptic protective effect is consistent with previous in vitro and in vivo studies that have shown that low levels of CysC prevent effects on numerous neuropathologies [26, 30, 64]. Interestingly, one of the proteins found to be upregulated in the mass spectrometry analysis after treatment with cEVs in mice subjected to tMCAO was PPP1R1B (DARPP-32), a phosphoprotein substrate of c-AMP-dependent protein kinase (PKA) involved in the regulation of the dopaminergic signaling [65] and a marker for medium-sized spiny neurons [66]. In several stroke models, it has been shown that following an initial massive increase and release of dopamine (DA) in the striatum a few hours after the insult, there is a substantial decrease in this neurotransmitter. Drugs enhancing DA release have a beneficial effect on motor recovery after tMCAO in mice, where synaptic plasticity may play a role [67]. Furthermore, dopaminergic signaling has been implicated in the regulation of inflammation in experimental models of ischemic stroke, as many cells of the immune system such as microglia, T cells or dendritic cells express dopamine receptors [68]. DARPP-32 activity is modulated by phosphorylation at different sites, and depending on this, it can inhibit protein phosphatase-1 (PP1), when phosphorylated at Thr34, or PKA when phosphorylated at Thr75. Since PP1 in turn regulates the phosphorylation of synaptic proteins such as SNAP25 [69], we cannot exclude the possibility that this is one of the pathways involved in the protection of synapses found in this study.
The fact that, despite protection at the level of synapses, we did not detect a decrease in stroke volume in mice after CysC administration may be attributed to the short time point after reperfusion of our observations (24 h). Longer intervals (e.g., 72 h or 96 h) may shed more light on overall neuronal survival at the penumbra area after CysC treatment, whereas the time point assessed in the present study may just be fitting for detecting changes occurring at the synapse level.
Overall, we show the capacity of CysC to safeguard neuronal synaptic structures against ischemic damage in vitro and in vivo and the utilization of EVs to effectively deliver CysC. This may open the possibility of its use in therapy as the delivery in EVs probably increases the efficiency of CysC to reach the CNS and prolongs its bioavailability, thus enhancing its protective potential.
Data availability
All the data are available upon request. The mass spectrometry proteomics data have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium via the PRIDE partner repository (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/pride) with the dataset identifier PXD044109. Reviewer account details: Username: reviewer_pxd044109@ebi.ac.uk; Password: Yqd2s5TK.
References
Feigin VL, Stark BA, Johnson CO, Roth GA, Bisignano C, Abady GG et al (2021) Global, regional, and national burden of stroke and its risk factors, 1990–2013;2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet Neurol 20(10):795–820. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(21)00252-0
Woodruff TM, Thundyil J, Tang SC, Sobey CG, Taylor SM, Arumugam TV (2011) Pathophysiology, treatment, and animal and cellular models of human ischemic stroke. Mol Neurodegener 6(1):11. https://doi.org/10.1186/1750-1326-6-11
Liu S, Levine SR, Winn HR (2010) Targeting ischemic penumbra: part I—from pathophysiology to therapeutic strategy. J Exp Stroke Transl Med 3(1):47–55
Nogueira RG, Jadhav AP, Haussen DC, Bonafe A, Budzik RF, Bhuva P et al (2018) Thrombectomy 6 to 24 hours after stroke with a mismatch between deficit and infarct. N Engl J Med 378(1):11–21. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1706442
Albers GW, Marks MP, Kemp S, Christensen S, Tsai JP, Ortega-Gutierrez S et al (2018) Thrombectomy for stroke at 6 to 16 hours with selection by perfusion imaging. N Engl J Med 378(8):708–718. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1713973
Ma H, Campbell BCV, Parsons MW, Churilov L, Levi CR, Hsu C et al (2019) Thrombolysis guided by perfusion imaging up to 9 hours after onset of stroke. N Engl J Med 380(19):1795–1803. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1813046
Wang X, Tsuji K, Lee SR, Ning M, Furie KL, Buchan AM et al (2004) Mechanisms of hemorrhagic transformation after tissue plasminogen activator reperfusion therapy for ischemic stroke. Stroke 35(11 Suppl 1):2726–2730. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000143219.16695.af
Tawil SE, Cheripelli B, Huang X, Moreton F, Kalladka D, MacDougal NJ et al (2016) How many stroke patients might be eligible for mechanical thrombectomy? Eur Stroke J 1(4):264–271. https://doi.org/10.1177/2396987316667176
Powers WJ, Rabinstein AA, Ackerson T, Adeoye OM, Bambakidis NC, Becker K et al (2018) 2018 Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: a Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 49(3):e46–e110. https://doi.org/10.1161/str.0000000000000158
Josephson SA, Kamel H (2018) The acute stroke care revolution: enhancing access to therapeutic advances. JAMA 320(12):1239–1240. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.11122
Hasbani MJ, Underhill SM, De Erausquin G, Goldberg MP (2000) Synapse loss and regeneration: a mechanism for functional decline and recovery after cerebral ischemia? Neuroscientist 6(2):110–119. https://doi.org/10.1177/107385840000600208
le Feber J, Tzafi Pavlidou S, Erkamp N, van Putten MJAM, Hofmeijer J (2016) Progression of neuronal damage in an in vitro model of the ischemic penumbra. PLoS ONE 11(2):e0147231. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147231
Hofmeijer J, Mulder ATB, Farinha AC, van Putten MJAM, le Feber J (2014) Mild hypoxia affects synaptic connectivity in cultured neuronal networks. Brain Res 1557:180–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2014.02.027
Ito U, Kuroiwa T, Nagasao J, Kawakami E, Oyanagi K (2006) Temporal profiles of axon terminals, synapses and spines in the ischemic penumbra of the cerebral cortex. Ultrastructure of Neuronal Remodeling 37(8):2134–2139. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000231875.96714.b1
Martí E, Ferrer I, Ballabriga J, Blasi J (1998) Increase in SNAP-25 immunoreactivity in the mossy fibers following transient forebrain ischemia in the gerbil. Acta Neuropathol 95(3):254–260. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004010050795
Zhu L, Wang L, Ju F, Ran Y, Wang C, Zhang S (2017) Transient global cerebral ischemia induces rapid and sustained reorganization of synaptic structures. J Cerebral Blood Flow Metab 37(8):2756–2767. https://doi.org/10.1177/0271678X16674736
Hofmeijer J, van Putten MJAM (2012) Ischemic cerebral damage: an appraisal of synaptic failure. Stroke 43(2):607–615. https://doi.org/10.1161/strokeaha.111.632943
Wang F, Xie X, Xing X, Sun X (2022) Excitatory synaptic transmission in ischemic stroke: a new outlet for classical neuroprotective strategies. Int J Mol Sci. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23169381
Simpson RJ, Jensen SS, Lim JW (2008) Proteomic profiling of exosomes: current perspectives. Proteomics 8(19):4083–4099. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmic.200800109
Huh CG, Håkansson K, Nathanson CM, Thorgeirsson UP, Jonsson N, Grubb A et al (1999) Decreased metastatic spread in mice homozygous for a null allele of the cystatin C protease inhibitor gene. Mol Pathol 52(6):332–340. https://doi.org/10.1136/mp.52.6.332
Gelderblom M, Leypoldt F, Steinbach K, Behrens D, Choe C-U, Siler DA et al (2009) Temporal and spatial dynamics of cerebral immune cell accumulation in stroke. Stroke 40(5):1849–1857. https://doi.org/10.1161/strokeaha.108.534503
D’Acunzo P, Kim Y, Ungania JM, Pérez-González R, Goulbourne CN, Levy E (2022) Isolation of mitochondria-derived mitovesicles and subpopulations of microvesicles and exosomes from brain tissues. Nat Protoc 17(11):2517–2549. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41596-022-00719-1
Haney MJ, Klyachko NL, Zhao Y, Gupta R, Plotnikova EG, He Z et al (2015) Exosomes as drug delivery vehicles for Parkinson’s disease therapy. J Controlled Release 207:18–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2015.03.033
Tasca CI, Dal-Cim T, Cimarosti H (2015) In vitro oxygen-glucose deprivation to study ischemic cell death. Methods Mol Biol 1254:197–210. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2152-2_15
Zhang Z, Cao X, Bao X, Zhang Y, Xu Y, Sha D (2020) Cocaine- and amphetamine-regulated transcript protects synaptic structures in neurons after ischemic cerebral injury. Neuropeptides 81:102023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.npep.2020.102023
Tizon B, Sahoo S, Yu H, Gauthier S, Kumar AR, Mohan P et al (2010) Induction of autophagy by cystatin C: a mechanism that protects murine primary cortical neurons and neuronal cell lines. PLoS ONE 5(3):e9819. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0009819
Brenna S, Altmeppen HC, Mohammadi B, Rissiek B, Schlink F, Ludewig P et al (2020) Characterization of brain-derived extracellular vesicles reveals changes in cellular origin after stroke and enrichment of the prion protein with a potential role in cellular uptake. J Extracell Vesicles 9(1):1809065. https://doi.org/10.1080/20013078.2020.1809065
Krämer A, Green J, Pollard J Jr, Tugendreich S (2013) Causal analysis approaches in ingenuity pathway analysis. Bioinformatics 30(4):523–530. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btt703
Yang B, Xu J, Chang L, Miao Z, Heang D, Pu Y et al (2020) Cystatin C improves blood-brain barrier integrity after ischemic brain injury in mice. J Neurochem 153(3):413–425. https://doi.org/10.1111/jnc.14894
Gauthier S, Kaur G, Mi W, Tizon B, Levy E (2011) Protective mechanisms by cystatin C in neurodegenerative diseases. Front Biosci (Schol Ed) 3:541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbd.2018.08.025
Pérez-González R, Sahoo S, Gauthier SA, Kim Y, Li M, Kumar A et al (2019) Neuroprotection mediated by cystatin C-loaded extracellular vesicles. Sci Rep 9(1):11104. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-47524-7
Saint-Pol J, Gosselet F, Duban-Deweer S, Pottiez G, Karamanos Y (2020) Targeting and crossing the blood-brain barrier with extracellular vesicles. Cells. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells9040851
Witwer KW, Wolfram J (2021) Extracellular vesicles versus synthetic nanoparticles for drug delivery. Nat Rev Mater 6(2):103–106. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41578-020-00277-6
Herrmann IK, Wood MJA, Fuhrmann G (2021) Extracellular vesicles as a next-generation drug delivery platform. Nat Nanotechnol 16(7):748–759. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41565-021-00931-2
Svenningsson P, Nishi A, Fisone G, Girault JA, Nairn AC, Greengard P (2004) DARPP-32: an integrator of neurotransmission. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 44:269–296. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.44.101802.121415
Sytnyk V, Leshchyns’ka I, Schachner M (2017) Neural cell adhesion molecules of the immunoglobulin superfamily regulate synapse formation, maintenance, and function. Trends Neurosci 40(5):295–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2017.03.003
Harris Julia J, Jolivet R, Attwell D (2012) Synaptic energy use and supply. Neuron 75(5):762–777. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2012.08.019
Li P, Murphy TH (2008) Two-photon imaging during prolonged middle cerebral artery occlusion in mice reveals recovery of dendritic structure after reperfusion. J Neurosci 28(46):11970–11979. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.3724-08.2008
Sigler A, Murphy TH (2010) In vivo 2-photon imaging of fine structure in the rodent brain. Stroke 41(10_suppl_1):S117–S123. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.594648
Brown CE, Li P, Boyd JD, Delaney KR, Murphy TH (2007) Extensive turnover of dendritic spines and vascular remodeling in cortical tissues recovering from stroke. J Neurosci 27(15):4101–4109. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.4295-06.2007
Furlan M, Marchal G, Derlon J-M, Baron J-C, Viader F (1996) Spontaneous neurological recovery after stroke and the fate of the ischemic penumbra. Ann Neurol 40(2):216–226. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.410400213
Zucker-Franklin D, Warfel A, Grusky G, Frangione B, Teitel D (1987) Novel monocyte-like properties of microglial/astroglial cells. Constitutive secretion of lysozyme and cystatin-C. Lab Invest 57(2):176–185
Olsson T, Nygren J, Håkansson K, Lundblad C, Grubb A, Smith ML et al (2004) Gene deletion of cystatin C aggravates brain damage following focal ischemia but mitigates the neuronal injury after global ischemia in the mouse. Neuroscience 128(1):65–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2004.06.024
Iadecola C, Anrather J (2011) Stroke research at a crossroad: asking the brain for directions. Nat Neurosci 14(11):1363–1368. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.2953
Lee M, Grabb MC, Zipfel GJ, Choi DW (2000) Brain tissue responses to ischemia. J Clin Investig 106(6):723–731. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI11003
Kitagawa K, Matsumoto M, Tagaya M, Hata R, Ueda H, Niinobe M et al (1990) ‘Ischemic tolerance’ phenomenon found in the brain. Brain Res 528(1):21–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-8993(90)90189-i
Fang Z, Deng J, Wu Z, Dong B, Wang S, Chen X et al (2017) Cystatin C is a crucial endogenous protective determinant against stroke. Stroke 48(2):436–444. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.014975
Fang Z, Feng Y, Li Y, Deng J, Nie H, Yang Q et al (2019) Neuroprotective autophagic flux induced by hyperbaric oxygen preconditioning is mediated by cystatin C. Neurosci Bull 35(2):336–346. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12264-018-0313-8
Yamashima T, Kohda Y, Tsuchiya K, Ueno T, Yamashita J, Yoshioka T et al (1998) Inhibition of ischaemic hippocampal neuronal death in primates with cathepsin B inhibitor CA-074: a novel strategy for neuroprotection based on ‘calpain-cathepsin hypothesis.’ Eur J Neurosci 10(5):1723–1733. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1460-9568.1998.00184.x
Ma L, Wu S, Gusdon AM, Chen H, Hu H, Paz AS et al (2022) Cathepsin L and acute ischemic stroke: a mini-review. Front Stroke. https://doi.org/10.3389/fstro.2022.1050536
Yang B, Zhu J, Miao Z, Zhou B, Ge W, Zhao H et al (2015) Cystatin C is an independent risk factor and therapeutic target for acute ischemic stroke. Neurotox Res 28(1):1–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12640-015-9522-3
Zhang X, Wei M, Fan J, Yan W, Zha X, Song H et al (2021) Ischemia-induced upregulation of autophagy preludes dysfunctional lysosomal storage and associated synaptic impairments in neurons. Autophagy 17(6):1519–1542. https://doi.org/10.1080/15548627.2020.1840796
Moshe A, Izraely S, Sagi-Assif O, Prakash R, Telerman A, Meshel T et al (2018) Cystatin C takes part in melanoma-microglia cross-talk: possible implications for brain metastasis. Clin Exp Metastasis 35(5–6):369–378. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10585-018-9891-0
Yáñez-Mó M, Siljander PRM, Andreu Z, Zavec AB, Borràs FE, Buzas EI et al (2015) Biological properties of extracellular vesicles and their physiological functions. J Extracell Vesicles. https://doi.org/10.3402/jev.v4.27066
Elsharkasy OM, Nordin JZ, Hagey DW, de Jong OG, Schiffelers RM, Andaloussi SEL et al (2020) Extracellular vesicles as drug delivery systems: why and how? Adv Drug Deliv Rev 159:332–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2020.04.004
Zhang X, Zhang H, Gu J, Zhang J, Shi H, Qian H et al (2021) Engineered extracellular vesicles for cancer therapy. Adv Mater 33(14):2005709. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202005709
Reed SL, Escayg A (2021) Extracellular vesicles in the treatment of neurological disorders. Neurobiol Dis 157:105445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbd.2021.105445
Zhang X, Wu Y, Cheng Q, Bai L, Huang S, Gao J (2022) Extracellular vesicles in cardiovascular diseases: diagnosis and therapy. Front Cell Dev Biol 10:875376. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2022.875376
Shahjin F, Chand S, Yelamanchili SV (2020) Extracellular vesicles as drug delivery vehicles to the central nervous system. J Neuroimmune Pharmacol 15(3):443–458. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11481-019-09875-w
Martí E, Ferrer I, Blasi J (1999) Transient increase of synapsin-I immunoreactivity in the mossy fiber layer of the hippocampus after transient forebrain ischemia in the mongolian gerbil. Brain Res 824(2):153–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0006-8993(99)01158-0
Ishimaru H, Casamenti F, Uéda K, Maruyama Y, Pepeu G (2001) Changes in presynaptic proteins, SNAP-25 and synaptophysin, in the hippocampal CA1 area in ischemic gerbils. Brain Res 903(1–2):94–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0006-8993(01)02439-8
Yoon S, Piguel NH, Khalatyan N, Dionisio LE, Savas JN, Penzes P (2021) Homer1 promotes dendritic spine growth through ankyrin-G and its loss reshapes the synaptic proteome. Mol Psychiatry 26(6):1775–1789. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-020-00991-1
Murotomi K, Takagi N, Muroyama A, Kaji N, Takeo S, Tanonaka K (2012) Transient focal cerebral ischemia differentially decreases Homer1a and 1b/c contents in the postsynaptic density. Neurosci Lett 515(1):92–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2012.03.036
Kaur G, Gauthier SA, Perez-Gonzalez R, Pawlik M, Singh AB, Cosby B et al (2018) Cystatin C prevents neuronal loss and behavioral deficits via the endosomal pathway in a mouse model of down syndrome. Neurobiol Dis 120:165–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbd.2018.08.025
Scheggi S, De Montis MG, Gambarana C (2018) DARPP-32 in the orchestration of responses to positive natural stimuli. J Neurochem 147(4):439–453. https://doi.org/10.1111/jnc.14558
Ouimet CC, Langley-Gullion KC, Greengard P (1998) Quantitative immunocytochemistry of DARPP-32-expressing neurons in the rat caudatoputamen. Brain Res 808(1):8–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-8993(98)00724-0
Gower A, Tiberi M (2018) The intersection of central dopamine system and stroke: potential avenues aiming at enhancement of motor recovery. Front Synaptic Neurosci. 10:18. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsyn.2018.00018
Talhada D, Rabenstein M, Ruscher K (2018) The role of dopaminergic immune cell signalling in poststroke inflammation. Ther Adv Neurol Disord 11:1756286418774225. https://doi.org/10.1177/1756286418774225
Foley K, McKee C, Nairn AC, Xia H (2021) Regulation of synaptic transmission and plasticity by protein phosphatase 1. J Neurosci 41(14):3040–3050. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.2026-20.2021
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Prof. Dr. Marina Mikhaylova (Humboldt University Berlin) for providing the synaptosome isolation protocol. We also want to thank the UMIF core facility (Dr. Antonio Virgilio Failla) for the support with the confocal microscopy.
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL. This study was supported by the Hermann and Lili Schilling Stiftung (to Tim Magnus); the China Scholarship Council (CSC to Yuqi Gui), the Werner Otto Stiftung (to Yuqi Gui); Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) INST 337/15-1, INST 337/16-1, INST 152/837-1, INST 152/947-1 FUGG (to Hartmut Schlüter); and the National Institutes of Health Grants AG017617, AG056732, AG057517 and DA044489 (to Efrat Levy).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Y.G. and B.P. conceived and designed the experiments. Y.G. performed most of the in vitro and in vivo experiments and analysed the data under the supervision of B.P.; Y.K., G.Z., and L.K.P. prepared BDEVs, loaded them with CysC, and analysed them under the supervision of E.L.; S.B. performed and analysed Western blots, M.W. injected BDEVs in vivo, L.K.P. performed the strokes and collected the data; B.S., H.V., and A.G. performed all the mass spectrometry proteomic experiments, analysis and visualisation under the supervision of H.S.; M.S. performed and analysed electron microscopy data; E.L. and T.M. funded the project; Y.G. and B.P. wrote the manuscript with the assistance of H.C.A., who contributed significantly to the visualisation; S.B., Y.K., H.C.A, T.M. and E.L. revised and edited the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.
Ethics approval
Animal experiments were approved and followed the guidelines of the local animal care committees: 1. Behörde für Gesundheit und Verbraucherschutz, Veterinärwesen und Lebensmittelsicherheit of the Freie und Hansestadt Hamburg, project number N045/2018 and ORG1005) and in compliance with the guidelines of the animal facility of the University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf. 2. National Institutes of Health guidelines with approval from the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at the Nathan S. Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Gui, Y., Kim, Y., Brenna, S. et al. Cystatin C loaded in brain-derived extracellular vesicles rescues synapses after ischemic insult in vitro and in vivo. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 81, 224 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-024-05266-4
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-024-05266-4