Skip to main content
Log in

E-36: The First Proto-Megascience Experiment at NAL

  • Published:
Physics in Perspective Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

E-36, an experiment on small-angle proton-proton scattering, began testing equipment at the National Accelerator Laboratory (NAL) using a newly achieved 100 GeV proton beam on February 12, 1972, marking the beginning of NAL’s experimental program. This experiment, which drew collaborators from NAL, the Joint Institute for Nuclear Research (Dubna, USSR), the University of Rochester (Rochester, New York), and Rockefeller University (New York, New York) was significant not only as a milestone in Fermilab’s history but also as a model of cooperation between the East and West at a time when Cold War tensions still ran high. An examination of the origin, operation, and resolution of E-36 and the chain of experiments it spawned reveals the complex interplay of science and politics that drove these experiments as well as seeds of the megascience paradigm that has come to dominate high energy physics research since the 1970s.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The experiment had the formal number 36 because the experiments were numbered according to the order in which their proposals were submitted. Nevertheless, E-36 was the first experiment to actually receive the accelerated beam because it used the internal beam (circulating inside the ring) while the others necessitated beam extraction, which required additional construction work.

  2. The Pomeranchuk theorem stated that the p-p scattering cross sections asymptotically tend to the limiting value (not necessarily a constant), which was not realized at the early stages of data analysis when the experimentalists expected that it would tend to zero. When experiment had shown that the quantity rises above zero, the observation first invoked doubts in the data analysis procedure, and after lively debates resulted in a better understanding of the theorem.

  3. The suffix “A,” meaning “amended,” was given to the experiment subsequent to merging all relevant proposals.

  4. Telex (a typewriter connected to a phone line playing the role internet plays today) was a network similar to the telephone network for sending text messages, in use since the 1930s.

  5. Don Getz was an assistant director of NAL, who occasionally came to watch the process.

  6. This term was suggested by Fermilab Archivist and Historian, Valerie Higgins.

References

  1. Lillian Hoddeson, Adrienne W. Kolb, and Catherine Westfall, Fermilab: Physics, the Frontier, and Megascience (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2008), 3.

  2. David J. Gross and Frank Wilczek, “Ultraviolet Behavior of Non-Abelian Gauge Theories,” Physical Review Letters 30(26) (1973), 1343–46; H. David Politzer, “Reliable Perturbative Results for Strong Interactions,” Physical Review Letters 30(26) (1973), 1346–49.

  3. Guido Altarelli, The Development of Perturbative QCD (Singapore: World Scientific, 1994), 400.

  4. Tullio Regge, “Introduction to Complex Orbital Momenta,” Il Nuovo Cimento 14(5) (1959), 951–76.

  5. P. D. B. Collins, An Introduction to Regge Theory and High Energy Physics (Cambridge University Press, 1977).

  6. F. E. Low, “Model of the Bare Pomeron,” Physical Review D 12 (1975), 163–73; S. Nussinov, “Colored-Quark Version of Some Hadronic Puzzles,” Physical Review Letters 34 (1975), 1286–89.

  7. Geoffrey F. Chew and S. C. Frautschi, “Principle of Equivalence for All Strongly Interacting Particles within the S-Matrix Framework,” Physical Review Letters 7 (1961), 394–97.

  8. I. Ia. Pomeranchuk, “Equality of the Nucleon and Antinucleon Total Interaction Cross Section at High Energies,” Soviet Physics JETP 7(3) (1958), 499–501.

  9. M. Block, R. Fletcher, F. Halzen, B. Margolis, and P. Valin, “Theoretical Implications of Fermilab Tevatron Total and Elastic Differential-Cross-Section Measurements,” Physical Review D 41 (1990), 978–81.

  10. K. J. Foley, S. J. Lindenbaum, W. A. Love, S. Ozaki, J. J. Russell, and L. C. L. Yuan, “Small-Angle Elastic Scattering of Protons and Pions, 7-20 BeV/c,” Physical Review Letters 11 (1963) 425–29; S. Barshay, Y.-A. Chao, “Longitudinal Mass, Inclusive Transverse-Momentum Distributions, Proton-Proton Elastic Diffraction Slopes and the Total Cross Section,” Physics Letters B 38(4) (1972), 225–28.

  11. Dan A. Gross, “Low Momentum Transfer Proton Proton Elastic Scattering Up to 400-GeV” (PhD dissertation, University of Rochester, 1974), FERMILAB-THESIS-1974-01.

  12. Dick Carrigan, interview by Valerie Higgins, November 10, 2015, Fermilab Archives.

  13. Stephen Olsen, interview by Valerie Higgins, February 19, 2016, Fermilab Archives.

  14. N. J. Peacock, D. C. Robinson, M. J. Forrest, P. D. Wilcock, and V. V. Sannikov, “Measurement of the Electron Temperature by Thomson Scattering in Tokamak T3,” Nature 224(5218) (1969), 488–90.

  15. Audra J. Wolfe, Competing with the Soviets: Science, Technology, and the State in Cold War America (Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press, 2013), 54.

  16. V. P. Dzhelepov, V. P. Dmitrievsky, V. S. Katyshev, M. S. Kozodaev, M. G. Meshcheryakov, K. I. Tarakanov, and A. V. Chestnoi, “High Energy Particles from the Six-Meter Synchrocyclotron and Their Utilization (Review Article),” The Soviet Journal of Atomic Energy 1(4) (1956), 459–67. Because of secrecy, the first open publications appeared around 1956, when the accelerator energy had been elevated to 680 MeV.

  17. Wolfe, Competing with the Soviets (ref. 15), 31, where Wolfe also notes: “But perhaps more importantly for AEC’s continued funding for particle accelerators, some defense strategists believed that focused particle beam could be used to shoot down incoming nuclear weapons.”

  18. E. J. Lofgren, “Experiences with the Bevatron,” Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, Technical Report UCRL-3369, 1956, http://www.osti.gov/scitech/biblio/877349-experiences-bevatron.

  19. A. M. Baldin and I. N. Semenyushkin, “Twenty Years of the Synchrophasotron of the JINR High-Energy Physics Laboratory,” Soviet Atomic Energy 43(6) (1977), 1146–47.

  20. Andrew Sessler and Edward Wilson, Engines of Discovery: A Century of Particle Accelerators, rev. and exp. ed., (Singapore, World Scientific, 2014), 232.

  21. Günther Plass, “The CERN Proton Synchrotron: 50 Years of Reliable Operation and Continued Development,” The European Physics Journal H 36(4) (2011), 439–54.

  22. Jack M. Holl, Argonne National Laboratory, 1946–96 (Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press, 1997), 169.

  23. Zhu Hong-Yuan, talk delivered at the 12th Session of the JINR Scientific Council, May 31, 1965, trans. Vitaly Pronskikh.

  24. Ibid.

  25. Ibid.

  26. V. Bartenev, G. Beznogikh, A. Buyak, K. Iovchev, L. Kirillova, P. Markov, B. Morozov, V. Nikitin, et al., “The Differential Cross Sections of the p-p and p-d Elastic Scattering at Small Angles in an Energy Range of 10–70 GeV,” talk presented at the 15th International Conference on High-energy Physics (ICHEP 70), Kiev, Ukraine, August 26–September 4, 1970.

  27. Ernie Malamud, interview by Valerie Higgins, November 6, 2015 and January 28, 2016, Fermilab Archives.

  28. Vladimir Nikitin, interview by Vitaly Pronskikh, May 13, 2016, Fermilab Archives.

  29. Ibid.

  30. Malamud, interview (ref. 27).

  31. Carrigan, interview (ref. 12).

  32. Malamud, interview (ref. 27).

  33. Dan Gross, private communication to the author, 2016.

  34. Malamud, interview (ref. 27).

  35. Jennifer Ross-Nazzal, “Détente on Earth and in Space: The Apollo-Soyuz Test Project,” Organization of American Historians Magazine of History 24(3) (September 2010), 29–34.

  36. R. A. Carrigan Jr., “Does the Slope of the High-Energy Elastic Proton-Proton Scattering Cross Section Increase at Small Momentum Transfer?,” Physical Review Letters 24 (1970), 168–71.

  37. Edwin L. Goldwasser, letter to I. Smolin on July 11, 1972. C.4.a.8: Russia Correspondence, 1972.

  38. Ibid.

  39. Carrigan, interview (ref. 12).

  40. Robert R. Wilson, letter to Dick Carrigan, September 15, 1970. In folder of materials loaned by Dick Carrigan.

  41. Edwin L. Goldwasser, memo re: Telecon with V. A. Nikitin this date/ELG on December 29, 1970. Quote: “He is willing to leave his equipment in the US if we are willing to purchase it from him with American dollars which they will then use to support their scientists’ living expenses while in the US. Can we do this? Are we interested and are we permitted? ($80,000 is Nikitin figure—living expenses for 6 scientists for a year, some with families.),” C.5.a.4: “36A Proton-Proton Scattering (part 1).”, Fermilab Archives. [A2013.061 Fermilab Directorate Records (unprocessed), C.5.a.4: “36A Proton-Proton Scattering (part 1).]

  42. Edwin L. Goldwasser, letter to V. Nikitin, January 5, 1971: “36A Proton-Proton Scattering (part 1).” Quote: “We are also concerned about your inability to get the funds that will be required to support your coworkers during your stay in the U.S. We have discussed the possibility of purchasing some of the equipment that you intend to bring to the experiment, but this does not now seem to us to be a feasible plan.” J. R. Sanford, memo to E. L. Goldwasser, January 8, 1971. C.5.a.4: “36A Proton-Proton Scattering (part 1).” Quote: “I don’t think that it would be a good idea to purchase Nikitin’s target. We are already funding the costs for such a target in the United States.” See also, Rodney L. Cool, letter to Robert R. Wilson, January 11, 1971. C.5.a.4: “36A Proton-Proton Scattering (part 1).” Fermilab Archives C.5.a.4 [A2013.061 Fermilab Directorate Records (unprocessed), C.5.a.4: “36A Proton-Proton Scattering (part 1).]

  43. Edwin L. Goldwasser, letter to V. Nikitin on April 21, 1971. C.5.a.4: “36A Proton-Proton Scattering (part 1).” This is not the letter that quote comes from, but see also: Mel Abrahams, letter to to Edwin L. Goldwasser, March 11, 1971. C.5.a.4: “36A Proton-Proton Scattering (part 1).” Quote: “Just a note to let you know that we have passed the word to the Scientific Attache in the U. S. Embassy, Moscow, that the AEC is agreeable to an arrangement for free housing at the National Accelerator Laboratory for the Nikitin group, along the lines you described to me. The Soviets were to be advised that when the joint experiment now under consideration is acceptable to the National Accelerator Laboratory and to the Soviets, NAL would provide the housing for reciprocal treatment of the Drickey group at the Institute of High Energy Physics.”

  44. G. T. Adylov, F. K. Aliev, D. Yu. Bardin, W. Gajewski, I. Ion, B. A. Kulakov, G. V. Micelmacher, B. Niczyporuk, et al., “The Pion Radius,” Physics Letters B 51(4) (1974), 402–6.

  45. Ernie Malamud, private communication to the author, January 16, 2016.

  46. Telex message, November 25, 1971. C.4.a.8: “Russian Teletype Log, 1971-1975.”

  47. Telex message, October 14, 1971. C.4.a.8: “Russian Teletype Log, 1971-1975.”

  48. Rudolf Pose, interview by N. A. Vinokurova, February 6, 2014, http://oralhistory.ru.

  49. Richard A. Carrigan, memo to “Interested Parties, Dubna Group Arrival,” March 6, 1972. C.5.a.4: “36A Proton-Proton Scattering (part 1).”

  50. Ryuji Yamada, interview by Valerie Higgins, January 28, 2016, Fermilab Archives.

  51. Carrigan, interview (ref. 12).

  52. Goldwasser, letter to Smolin (ref. 37).

  53. Malamud, interview (ref. 27).

  54. Nikitin, interview (ref. 28).

  55. Carrigan, “Dubna Group Arrival” (ref. 49).

  56. TaraShea Nesbit, The Wives of Los Alamos (New York: Bloomsbury, 2014).

  57. Dan Gross, interview by Valerie Higgins, February 18, 2016, Fermilab Archives.

  58. Konstantin Goulianos, interview by Valerie Higgins, February 19, 2016, Fermilab Archives.

  59. Carrigan, interview (ref. 12).

  60. Robert R. Wilson, letter to A. M. Baldin, March 15, 1973. C.5.a.4: “36A Proton-Proton Scattering (part 1).”

  61. Malamud, private communication (ref. 45).

  62. Carrigan, interview (ref. 12).

  63. Ibid.

  64. V. Bartenev, A. Kuznetsov, B. Morozov, V. Nikitin, Y. Pilipenko, V. Popov, L. Zolin, R. Carrigan, et al., “Small-Angle Elastic Proton-Proton Scattering from 25 to 200 GeV,” Physical Review Letters 29 (1972), 1755–58.

  65. Adrian Melissinos, Reminiscences: A Journey through Particle Physics (Singapore: World Scientific, 2013).

  66. V. Bartenev, R. Carrigan, I. H. Chiang, R. L. Cool, K. Goulianos, D. Gross, A. Kuznetsov, E. Malamud, et al., “Small Angle Elastic Proton-Proton Scattering from 25 to 2000 GeV,” Technical Report NAL-080, 1972.

  67. V. D. Bartenev, A. A. Belushkina, A. I. Valevich, G. I. Gai, A. M. Gorelov, V. P. Ershov, L. S. Kotova, V. A. Nikitin, et al., “Assembly to Obtain a Jet Target Acting on an Internal Accelerator Beam,” Pribory i Tekhnika Eksperimenta 1 (1973), 30–33.

  68. V. Bartenev, A. Kuznetsov, B. Morozov, V. Nikitin, Y. Pilipenko, V. Popov, L. Zolin, R. A. Carrigan Jr., et al., “Measurement of the Slope of the Diffraction Peak for Elastic p-p Scattering from 8 to 400 GeV,” Physical Review Letters 31 (1973), 1088–91; V. Bartenev, R. A. Carrigan Jr., I-Hung Chiang, R. L. Cool, K. Goulianos, D. Gross, A. Kuznetsov, E. Malamud, et al., “Real Part of the Proton-Proton Forward-Scattering Amplitude from 50 to 400 GeV,” Physical Review Letters 31 (1973), 1367–70.

  69. Malamud, private communication (ref. 45).

  70. Carrigan, interview (ref. 12).

  71. Goulianos, interview (ref. 58).

  72. Robert R. Wilson, letter to A. M. Baldin, March 15, 1973. C.5.a.4: “36A Proton-Proton Scattering (part 1).”

  73. Nikitin, interview (ref. 28).

  74. Robert G. Sachs, letter to Shaul Ramati, October 18, 1972. C.4.a.8: “Russia Correspondence 1972.”

  75. Malamud, private communication (ref. 45).

  76. Hoddeson, Kolb, and Westfall, Fermilab (ref. 1), 497.

  77. Peter Galison, Image and Logic: A Material Culture of Microphysics (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1997).

  78. Nikitin, interview (ref. 28).

  79. Robert P. Crease and Catherine Westfall, “The New Big Science,” Physics Today 69(5) (2016), 30–36.

  80. SESAME, accessed September 30, 2016, http://www.sesame.org.jo/sesame/index.php.

  81. V. Pronskikh, “Dreams of a Super Collider: Review of Tunnel Visions: The Rise and Fall of the Superconducting Supercollider by Michael Riordan, Lillian Hoddeson, and Adrienne W. Kolb, University of Chicago Press, 2015,” Endeavour 40(2) (2016), 136.

  82. “An Open Letter to Professors R. Wilson, E. Goldwasser; F. Mattmueller, A. Mravca, All NAL and AEC Employees,” September 13, 1973. C.5.a.4: “36A Proton-Proton Scattering (part 1).”

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author is indebted to Richard Carrigan, Konstantin Goulianos, Dan Gross, Ernest Malamud, Adrian Melissinos, Stephen Olsen, Vladimir Nikitin, and Ryuji Yamada for taking the time to share their memories. I am thankful to Yuri Eidelman and Nikolai Mokhov for reading and commenting on the manuscript, and to Peter Garbincius for useful discussions of the experiment numbering at NAL. I am grateful to Alexey Zhemchugov (JINR) for providing us documents related to Chinese participation in JINR. I express my condolences to Vladimir Nikitin in connection with the death of his spouse, Valentina, a NAL visitor during E-36A. The author is grateful to Fermilab Archivist and Historian Valerie Higgins who conducted most of the oral history interviews for this paper and significantly contributed at all stages of work on the manuscript. I am grateful to Heath O’Connell for supporting this study. I thank the editors and the anonymous reviewer for their constructive comments, which helped me to improve the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vitaly S. Pronskikh.

Additional information

Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, USA. The author holds PhD in physics. His research interests are in nuclear and particle physics, and history and philosophy of science, broadly construed.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pronskikh, V.S. E-36: The First Proto-Megascience Experiment at NAL. Phys. Perspect. 18, 357–378 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00016-016-0192-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00016-016-0192-1

Keywords

Navigation