1 Introduction

Late Palaeozoic (Permian) rifting of the future Neotethys Ocean has formed ribbon continental fragments in Iran that broke away from the northern margin of Gondwana (e.g., Berberian and King 1981; Şengör 1990; Stampfli et al. 1991; Stampfli and Borel 2002; Mohajjel et al. 2003; Ghasemi and Talbot 2006; Agard et al. 2011; Richards 2015) although relationships to Triassic terrane accretion to the north of Central Iran remains partly unclear (Buchs et al. 2013; Zanchi et al. 2015). This contribution deals with the Sanandaj–Sirjan zone (SSZ; Fig. 1), which represents the passive margin facing the Neotethyan Ocean in the south and was part of the Cimmerian microcontinent during Triassic times (Alavi 1994; Agard et al. 2011; Hassanzadeh and Wernicke 2016 and references therein).

Fig. 1
figure 1

a Tectonic zones of Iran after Alavi (1994). b Simplified geological map of the Dorud–Azna region (after Mohajjel and Fergusson 2000). c Simplified lithostratigraphic section of Triassic and Jurassic sedimentary units of the Dorud–Azna region (after Mohajjel et al. 2003)

Late Carboniferous–Permian rifting of the Neotethys Ocean was followed by a phase of pronounced subsidence and shallow marine and basinal sedimentation in Permian through Triassic time (e.g., Stampfli et al. 1991, 2001; Besse et al. 1998; Mohajjel and Fergusson 2014; Hassanzadeh and Wernicke 2016). Hassanzadeh and Wernicke (2016) recently considered the SSZ as an archetype of passive continental margin subsequently, during Jurassic, transformed into an active continental margin.

A remarkable example of low-grade metamorphic sedimentary units recording the Carboniferous rifting, Permian shallow water deposition and Triassic to Jurassic basinal sedimentation on a passive continental margin is exposed in the Dorud–Azna region, Western Iran, in the central part of SSZ (Fig. 1a, b). Structural studies comprise that these metasedimentary units are imbricated with older, higher-grade metamorphic units. These are from footwall to hangingwall: (1) Permian Marble and overlying Triassic Complex metamorphosed within greenschist facies conditions and, to the southeast, intruded by the Jurassic Darijune gabbro, tectonically overlain by (2) amphibolite-facies Panafrican orthogneiss and (3) Carboniferous Amphibolite–Metagabbro unit (Mohajjel et al. 2003; Shakerardakani et al. 2015; Fergusson et al. 2016).

This contribution aims to study the mafic rocks within the Triassic unit (1) with focus on their geochemical characteristics and tectonic environment. The new data gives insights into the nature of magmatism in the passive margin of Neo-Tethys.

2 Geological setting

The Dorud–Azna region is situated in the central part of the SSZ (Fig. 1b). The SSZ is a polyphase metamorphic terrain with a metamorphic Panafrican and Carboniferous basement overlain by Permian to Upper Cretaceous sedimentary successions, which experienced metamorphism ranging from greenschist to eclogite facies conditions (e.g., Agard et al. 2005; Davoudian et al. 2011, 2016; Shakerardakani et al. 2015; Hassanzadeh and Wernicke 2016). Agard et al. (2011) suggest that the metamorphosed Permian and Triassic rocks are thrust along the Main Zagros thrust (MZT) on top of the Crush Zone (Gidon et al. 1974).

The studied Triassic Complex is a mixed low-grade metamorphic sequence of metasedimentary and subordinate mafic rocks (Fig. 1c), which is tectonically overlain by a Panafrican basement with the Gondwanan affiliation of orthogneiss and various in part Carboniferous-aged amphibolites and metagabbros (Nutman et al. 2014; Shakerardakani et al. 2015, 2017; Fergusson et al. 2016).

The Triassic metasediments consists of three members including a quartzite-dominated base, a calcite marble at the middle level, and an upper level with schists interbedded mafic rocks (Mohajjel and Fergusson 2000; Fig. 1b, c). A Middle to Late Triassic age is defined by fossils in dolomite and calcite marbles (Sahandi et al. 2006) and Permian fossils in the underlying dolomite marbles (Sahandi et al. 2006).

Interlayered mafic rocks consist of various types of epidote–amphibolite and greenschists, which have experienced upper greenschist to epidote–amphibolite facies metamorphism (Shakerardakani et al. 2015).

The Middle–Upper Triassic succession of the study area is tectonically bordered by the Panafrican orthogneiss and Upper Triassic–Jurassic phyllites to the north and is, to the south structurally overlying unmetamorphic Upper Jurassic to Lower Cretaceous andesitic lavas and pyroclastic rocks (Fig. 1b).

3 Field relation and petrography

The samples used for this study were taken to the southeast of the Shur-Shur village (Fig. 1b; Table 1), where they form boudinaged lenses or are interlayered within marbles are aligned for a distance over more than 1 km. The contact to host rocks is sharp without evidence of either intense shearing or contact metamorphism.

Table 1 Locations and magmatic and metamorphic mineralogy of investigated samples used in this paper

Petrographically, the mafic rocks can be categorized as actinolite-bearing greenschist (Fig. 2a, b), talc-bearing greenschist and metagabbroic greenschists (epidote–amphibolite). Talc- and actinolite-bearing greenschists mainly crop out in form of lens-shaped boudins in dolomite and calcite marble (Fig. 2c, d). The metagabbroic greenschists (epidote–amphibolites) form kilometer-scaled layers intercalated with calcareous phyllites and impure marbles (Fig. 2d).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Field photographs of mafic and other rocks from the study area. a Mafic rocks close to the contact to the metasedimentary rocks containing metasandstone layers. b Folded dolomite marble interlayered with greenschists. c Representative lensoid talc-bearing greenschist within quartzite/metachert layer. Note decreasing intensity of foliation away from contact to metasediment. d Strongly sheared and boudinaged fine-grained metagabbroic greenschist

Metagabbroic greenschists (epidote–amphibolite) vary from medium- to fine-grained, although some exposures are coarse-grained in places (Fig. 2d). The observed textures include porphyritic and ophitic ones. Magmatic minerals include plagioclase and amphibole (Table 1), which are in textural equilibrium. Along margins of these minerals and the matrix are overprinted by fine-grained metamorphic mineral assemblages including chlorite, epidote, quartz, and calcite, which formed within upper greenschist facies metamorphic conditions (Fig. 2c) implying some shear along the contact to host metasediments. The medium- to fine-grained metagabbroic greenschists are green to gray, porphyritic rocks, containing up to 10 vol% ca. 2–4 mm large phenocryst of magmatic amphibole, plagioclase, and rare K-feldspar and microcrystalline metamorphic aggregates of feldspar, quartz, epidote, titanite, chlorite, sericite and calcite (Fig. 3a; Table 1).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Photomicrographs (ac, e, f) and back-scattered electron (BSE) image (d) of various metagabbroic greenschists (epidote–amphibolite), and talc- and actinolite-bearing greenschists. a Foliated, fine-grained metagabbroic greenschist (epidote–amphibolite). b Talc-bearing greenschist showing euhedral clinopyroxene porphyroclast surrounded by talc and chlorite ribbons. c, d Clinopyroxene phenocryst intergrown with brownish hornblende. e Actinolite porphyroclast in actinolite-bearing greenschist. Mineral abbreviations: Cpx clinopyroxene, Amp amphibole, Ep epidote, Act actinolite, Hbl hornblende, Pl plagioclase, Ilm Ilmenite, (Fe)Mg-Hbl Ferro-magnesio-hornblende, Tlc talc, Chl chlorite

The talc-bearing greenschists are medium- to coarse-grained with the characteristic assemblage of clinopyroxene, amphibole, plagioclase and K-feldspar (Fig. 3b). Large aggregates of metamorphic talc, chlorite and ilmenite have replaced large magmatic clinopyroxene (up to ca. 4 mm), few amphibole phenocrysts or plagioclase crystals. Although the primary magmatic phases are commonly altered, the primary igneous texture is still well preserved. Clinopyroxene habits range from euhedral to anhedral and they present an oscillatory zoning, with locally overgrowth texture, or patchy zoning. The poikilitic magmatic clinopyroxene is occasionally rimmed by large, potentially magmatic brownish amphibole and fine-grained metamorphic actinolite (Fig. 3c, d). The amphibole grains reveal variable retrogression with irregular brownish patches in the interior of the grains surrounded by greenish amphibole, with actinolite representing the texturally latest amphibole forming the rims or occurring along cleavage planes together with chlorite. Late-magmatic brown amphibole forms poikilitic grains and overgrowths surrounding clinopyroxene, and dominates the intercumulate assemblage (Fig. 3e). Plagioclase has been part of the magmatic assemblage but is largely replaced by albite and dense mats of sericite and chlorite. K-feldspar forms tabular crystals of magmatic origin, and fine-grained recrystallized masses or irregular aggregates.

The dark greenish-gray actinolite-bearing greenschists are medium-grained and characterized by the mineral assemblage of magmatic amphibole, clinopyroxene, and the accessories like apatite and rutile. Euhedral to subhedral porphyroclastic amphibole grains form the dominant magmatic mineral in this rock as well as fine grains in the recrystallized matrix. Locally, some amphiboles occur as results of reactions of clinopyroxene. The amphibole porphyroclasts exhibit an optical color zoning ranging from yellow brownish magmatic cores to greenish metamorphic rims (Fig. 3f). However, the occurrence of magnesio-hornblende, pargasite, and edenite (see below), locally with magmatic or metamorphic textures, indicates that they were probably formed at the late-magmatic to early-metamorphic stages (Sappin et al. 2012). Pale green clinopyroxene forms heavily fractured grains with ragged margins, which commonly becomes an unstable magmatic mineral phase and underwent metamorphic replacement by greenish amphibole and chlorite along margins and cleavage planes.

4 Analytical methods

From a major number of samples, six of most unaltered samples, two of each of the three described types, were selected for geochemical analysis. On mostly magmatic minerals of three samples, the composition was investigated by microprobe. On one non-cumulatic sample, Sr–Nd isotopic composition was investigated. Details on electron microprobe work, geochemical work and Sr–Nd isotopic work are given in the Appendix.

5 Mineral chemistry

5.1 Clinopyroxene

The average chemical composition of clinopyroxene for talc- and actinolite-bearing greenschists is shown in the Wo–En–Fs diagram (Fig. 4a). The relictic clinopyroxenes in actinolite-bearing greenschist are generally diopside in composition. Mg# varies from 73.7 to 87.6 from core to rim. Most clinopyroxene phenocrysts of the talc-bearing greenschist are chemically zoned with a diopside core and an augite rim. The core is higher in Mg# (0.83–0.87) and Si but poorer in Al content than the rim (Fig. 5a, b). The compositional profile of a well preserved clinopyroxene crystal of sample P105 shows a rim composition with an Al content between 0.145 and 0.191 (a.p.f.u.) suddenly decreasing to 0.099 a.p.f.u. in the core (Fig. 5b; Table 2). Conversely, the Na contents progressively increases from rim to core (from 0.017 to 0.033 a.p.f.u.).

Fig. 4
figure 4

a Pyroxene quadrilateral plot (Morimoto 1989) showing clinopyroxene compositions of talc- and actinolite bearing greenschist from studied mafic rocks. b Albite–anorthite–orthoclase diagram showing the compositions of plagioclase from talc-bearing and metagabbroic greenschists. ab albite, ol oligoclase, and andesine, la labradorite, by bytownite, an anorthite

Fig. 5
figure 5

a, b Rim to core chemical zoning (cations per 6 oxygens) in a clinopyroxene grain of talc-bearing greenschist from the June Complex

Table 2 Representative analyses of clinopyroxene from the June Complex

5.2 Feldspar

Plagioclase in the talc-bearing greenschist is nearly pure albite (Ab93–98), while plagioclase in the metagabbroic greenschist is andesine (Ab62–71) (Fig. 4b; Table 3). The alkali feldspar is commonly orthoclase (Or96) in talc-bearing greenschist.

Table 3 Representative analyses of amphibole, plagioclase and K-feldspar from the June Complex

5.3 Amphibole

All investigated amphiboles are Ca-amphiboles (Table 3; classification of Leake et al. 1997). The amphiboles of the metagabbroic greenschist are magnesio-hornblende. They have Mg# range from 0.71 to 0.74 and relatively high TiO2 and Al2O3 contents (0.36–0.54 and 9.12–11.67 wt%, respectively). In the talc-bearing greenschist, amphiboles correspond to magnesio-hornblende, ferri-magnesio-hornblende, ferri-tremolite, and actinolite with Mg# between 0.72 and 0.80. Actinolite has low TiO2 and Al2O3 contents (0.01–0.08 and 1.35–3.79 wt%, respectively). Brown amphiboles at the contact to clinopyroxene are magnesio-hornblende and ferri-magnesio-hornblende with TiO2 (0.46–1.06 wt%) for the same Mg# and Al2O3 contents of actinolites. In sheared actinolite-bearing greenschists, optically zoned amphibole porphyroclasts and matrix amphiboles occur. Some calcic amphiboles formed by decomposition of clinopyroxene by hydration processes. Porphyroclastic amphiboles show a relatively wide compositional range from magnesio-hornblende, ferro-actinolite, pargasite, edenite, to actinolite. All matrix amphiboles are actinolite. Its Mg# varies between 0.67 and 0.85. They have TiO2 and Al2O3 contents of 0.01–0.07 and 0.19–1.20 (wt%) in actinolite to 0.75–3.39 and 3.17–9.31 (wt%) in magnesio-hornblende and edenite.

6 Geochemistry

Table 4 lists the whole-rock major and trace element data of six samples of talc- and actinolite-bearing greenschists, and metagabbroic greenschists (epidote–amphibolite). The new results (Table 4) are combined with four analyses from a preliminary, inconclusive survey (Shakerardakani et al. 2015). These included a cumulate talc-bearing greenschist and three talc-bearing and metagabbroic greenschists but no actinolite-bearing greenschists, which is suspected to represent the closest composition to basaltic liquids.

Table 4 Major (in wt%) and trace element (in ppm) data for the mafic rocks from the June Complex

The immobile nature of Ti, Zr, P, Y, Nb means that they are neither affected by low-temperature alteration nor by metamorphism (e.g., Winchester and Floyd 1976; Pearce and Norry 1979) in the metamorphic P–T range experienced by the studied samples. This is supported by the fairly good correlation on variation diagrams of Zr. vs. selected major elements (e.g., SiO2, Al2O3, Fe2O3, and CaO), as well as incompatible trace elements (e.g., Ti, Nb, Y and Th), light (l) and heavy (h) rare earth elements (REE) (see below). Therefore, the analyses can be considered to represent primary geochemical features of the studied mafic rocks (e.g., Polat and Hofmann 2003; Saccani et al. 2010).

6.1 Major element oxides

SiO2 contents of the actinolite- and talc-bearing greenschists, and metagabbroic greenschists confirm that they are dominantly mafic (SiO2 = 43.36–49.09 wt%). Alkali elements range from 0.20 to 4.29 wt% for Na2O and from 0.04 to 1.22 wt% for K2O. They have relatively high Al2O3 (6.76–16.2 wt%) and Fe2O3 (up to 13.76 wt%) contents, but all samples are low in MnO (≤0.2 wt%) and P2O5 (≤0.4 wt%) contents. The investigated samples except one metagabbroic greenschist sample (P-125; LOI ≥ 6 wt%) have a loss on ignition (LOI) values of 1.19–5.82 wt% (mean = 3.51 wt%), reflecting a minor contribution of secondary hydrated and carbonate phases (e.g., Polat and Hofmann 2003; Farahat 2011).

Mg-values [Mg# = Mg/(Mg + Fe2+)] indicate two distinct groups of cumulates with Mg# of 51.6–58.9 to basaltic liquids with Mg# of 24.5–42.7 (Fig. 6a). Based on the total alkalies versus silica (TAS) diagram the magmatic protoliths of the studied rocks include peridotite–gabbro for cumulates, as well as monzo-gabbro and gabbro (Fig. 6b).

Fig. 6
figure 6

Petrochemical classifications and characteristics of the studied mafic rocks. a TiO2 vs. Al2O3 diagram (Pearce 1983) showing the discrimination between basaltic liquids and cumulate. b Total alkali vs. Silica diagram of Le Maitre et al. (1989) with subalkaline–alkaline fields after Miyashiro (1978) displays the compositional range of the magmatic protoliths. c Zr/TiO2 × 0.0001-Nb/Yb classification diagram. d Mg# vs. SiO2/Al2O3 diagram showing both the field of tholeiitic and alkali differentiation trends (Irvine and Baragar 1972) and mineral fractionation (after Kempton and Harmon 1992)

6.2 Trace and rare earth elements

Based on immobile elements, the mafic samples show a continuous range of compositions from alkaline to subalkaline basalt (Fig. 6c; Winchester and Floyd 1977). On the Mg# vs. SiO2/Al2O3 diagram (Fig. 6d), the majority of the mafic rocks plots in the field of primitive basalt, which correlates with the alkaline and tholeiitic fractionation trend, whereas the cumulate mafic rocks (Mg# > 50) reveal a correlation with a compositional trend referenced by pyroxene accumulation.

The rare earth element (REE) contents of mafic samples (Fig. 7a) show that the analyzed samples, except for samples P-124, P-125 and P-105, are similar to OIB patterns. Most of the samples are REE enriched, likewise steep REE patterns with total REE concentrations (64.15–155.95 ppm), (La/Yb)N ratios of 5.44–9.00, and no pronounced negative Eu anomaly (Eu/Eu* = + 0.96 to +1.61). The REE pattern of two fine-grained metagabbroic greenschists (P-124, P-125) and a talc-bearing greenschist (P-105) are different. They have lower (La/Yb)N ratio (2.48–3.70) and show E-type MORB-like trace element patterns. In the primitive mantle-normalized multi-element diagram (Fig. 7b) samples are characterized by enrichments in large-ion lithophile elements (LILE) relative to high field strength elements (HFSE). Nb shows either positive or no anomaly except for a fine-grained metagabbroic greenschist (P-125) that shows a negative anomaly (Fig. 7b). The positive Nb anomalies have been explained in terms of magma generation at plume source containing slab material recycled at greatest mantle depths (Kerrich and Xie 2002). Compared to cumulate samples, the other samples have slight positive Ba, Sr and Pb anomalies. The slight positive Sr, Ba and Eu anomalies can be caused by accumulation of plagioclase (Blundy and Wood 1991).

Fig. 7
figure 7

a Chondrite-normalized (Boynton 1984) REE patterns and b primitive-mantle normalized incompatible trace element patterns of the analyzed mafic rocks (Sun and McDonough 1989). Symbols are as in Fig. 6

7 Sr–Nd isotopes

Whole-rock Rb–Sr and Sm–Nd isotopic data for the Late Triassic an actinolite-bearing greenschist (P-147) is given in Table 5. The sample has a 87Sr/86Sr initial ratio of 0.706 and ɛNd220 value of +1.002. Considering the low 87Sr/86Sr and ɛNd220 value above that of bulk earth, suggest an enriched mantle source with a relatively low degree of crustal contamination for the cumulate mafic magmas (Fig. 8).

Table 5 Sr–Nd isotopic compositions of the talc-bearing greenschist from June Complex
Fig. 8
figure 8

(143Nd/144Nd)t values versus (87Sr/86Sr)0 values diagram for the studied Middle–Late Triassic sample from the June Complex. Sr–Nd isotope data sources for mafic rocks from the Late Jurassic Darijune gabbro, Carboniferous Amphibolite–Metagabbro unit and Carboniferous dykes are from Shakerardakani et al. (2017)

8 Discussion

Fossils indicate a Triassic age of the June Complex and these also infer a Triassic age for the basaltic rocks, particularly because of the interlayering of greenschists and metasediments (Fig. 2a, b). The boudinaged metagabbroic and talc-bearing greenschists could represent cumulates of sills.

8.1 Magma source

Geochemical characteristics in both cumulate and basaltic mafic rocks can be used to monitor mantle source compositions, the conditions of partial melting, and possibly shallow level processes during magma emplacement (e.g., fractional crystallization and/or crustal contamination). Thus, the role of fractional crystallization and crustal contamination should be initially assessed before addressing the nature of magma sources of these mafic rocks.

High concentrations of Cr (1073–1341 ppm) and Ni (584–709 ppm) in cumulate samples are in agreement with a mantle origin for the magma, which was enriched in pyroxene and olivine. This magma underwent fractional crystallization and accumulation of mafic minerals as shown by the Fig. 6d. The basaltic samples have lower MgO and compatible trace elements (e.g., Ni, Cr). This feature suggests that the studied samples experienced significant fractional crystallization and/or the source area was affected by different degrees of partial melting. All mafic samples yield a negative correlation of MgO and compatible elements (e.g., Ni, Cr) with increasing Zr contents and positive correlation of LREE, HREE and Nb (Fig. 9). This feature is consistent with the fractionation of olivine, pyroxene and plagioclase (e.g., Ordóñez-Calderón et al. 2011). In addition, TiO2 and V abundances increase with increasing Zr contents suggest that Fe–Ti oxides (ilmenite and titanomagnetite) were not significant mineral phases during fractionation (e.g., Ordóñez-Calderón et al. 2011; Deng et al. 2013). Nevertheless, it is uncertain whether such covariations between the major and trace elements indicate fractional crystallization of basaltic magmas or reflect the nature of magma sources. However, the increasing Zr/Nb (<10) ratios are accompanied by decreasing Ce/Y ratios (not shown) pointing to a variable degree of partial melting rather than a fractional crystallization process (e.g., Baker et al. 1997; Xia et al. 2004; Viccaro and Cristofolini 2008; Saccani et al. 2014).

Fig. 9
figure 9

Variation in selected major and trace elements vs. Zr for various mafic rocks from the June Complex. Arrows show inferred fractionation trends of mafic rocks

Similar inferences are derived from the (La/Sm)PM vs. (Tb/Yb)PM diagram (Fig. 10a). The cumulate mafic samples plot above the Tb/Yb discrimination line indicative of melting of garnet peridotite mantle at depth >90 km, whereas isotropic mafic samples derive from shallower spinel-peridotite mantle melting at a depth <90 km (Herzberg 1995; Wang et al. 2002; Khudoley et al. 2013). Except for samples P-124, P-125 (fine-grained metagabbroic greenschists) and P-105 (talc-bearing greenschist) that show moderately low (La/Sm)PM ratios, all the other samples have higher (La/Sm)PM ratios. Khudoley et al. (2013) suggest that this difference can be caused by three processes, namely crustal contamination or increased partial melting, both of which can increase La/Sm ratios in a melt, or melting of a depleted source, which would lower La/Sm ratios. In the (Th/Yb)PM vs. (Nb/Yb)PM diagram (Fig. 10b) all mafic samples fall into the field of mantle melts. Moreover, all samples lie close to E-MORB and OIB, indicating insignificant crustal contamination (Fig. 10c). These diagrams clearly rule out significant crustal contamination and suggest a control of composition of mafic rocks by differences in the source region during mantle melting. Therefore, the differences in La/Sm ratios is likely due to various degrees of partial melting, indicating that most mafic magmas being generated by partial melting at greater depth. This led to the formation of alkaline basalts, rather than tholeiitic basalts, with shallower partial melting. In addition, elevated (Nb/Yb)PM ratios (Fig. 10b) in the alkaline mafic samples potentially indicate mixing between magmas derived from both enriched and depleted mantle sources (Khudoley et al. 2013; Prokopiev et al. 2016).

Fig. 10
figure 10

a (La/Sm)PM versus (Tb/Yb)PM diagram for the cumulate and isotropic mafic rocks of the June Complex; ratios are normalized to primitive Mantle values of McDonough and Sun (1995). The discrimination dashed line separates two fields for melting of garnet-bearing peridotite and of spinel-bearing peridotite (Wang et al. 2002). b Diagram showing variations in (Th/Yb)PM and (Nb/Yb)PM ratios. N-MORB composition is from Hofmann (1988), Upper Continental Crust (UCC) composition is from Taylor and McLennan (1985), and enriched mantle (EMI, EMII) and HIMU values are from Condie 2001. c Nb/La vs. Nb/Th diagram showing the trend of crustal contamination (after Zhang et al. 2014)

8.2 Crystallization conditions

The composition of pyroxene, plagioclase and hornblende can be used to evaluate the chemical variation of magma and to determine magmatic P–T conditions. In the metagabbroic greenschists, temperature and pressure were calculated with the PET software (Dachs 2004). These calibrations yield crystallization temperatures and pressures for magmatic amphiboles at 690 ± 30 °C and 5.6 ± 0.8 kbar.

In addition, the relation between Al in the tetrahedral sites and the Ti content in clinopyroxene can be used to discriminate geotectonic settings (Loucks 1990; Himmelberg and Loney 1995). Most clinopyroxenes of actinolite- and talc-bearing greenschists follow the rift-related cumulate trend (Fig. 11).

Fig. 11
figure 11

Alz (=Aliv × 100/2) vs. TiO2 of clinopyroxene composition from the June Complex. The trends of clinopyroxenes in arc- and rift-related mafic–ultramafic cumulates are from Loucks (1990)

Here we use clinopyroxene of talc-bearing and actinolite-bearing greenschists for estimation of P–T conditions of magmatic mineral growth. The magmatic clinopyroxene of the basaltic talc-bearing greenschist (P-105) shows a sudden increase in the Al content in the rim of clinopyroxene (Fig. 5a, b). The Al concentration in clinopyroxene is controlled either by reaction of NaAlSi3O8 = NaAlSi2O6 + SiO2 (a) at high pressure (>3.5 GPa, Kushiro 1969) or CaAl2Si2O8 = CaAl2SiO6 + SiO2 (b) at low pressure (0.5–1.2 GPa, Green 1967). Zhu and Ogasawara (2004) have suggested that the reaction (a) could happen only at depths >120 km (in a deep magma chamber), which would be recorded in the Al content of the diopside cores. The low Al concentration in diopside cores may indicate that they grew at a depth less than 120 km where reaction (a) occurred. A general decrease in Fe3+ in the core of clinopyroxene with increasing temperature is observed, too (Woodland 2009). We relate these changes to the evolution within the precursor magma within a magma chamber.

The empirical thermometer for clinopyroxene and amphibole of Perchuck et al. (1985) applied to clinopyroxene overgrown by magmatic hornblende of talc-bearing greenschists gives temperatures ranging between 800–1080 °C in the core and 650–780 °C in the rim.

In talc-bearing greenschists, the single-grain Cpx thermobarometry of Nimis and Taylor (2000) gives a similar temperature (880–1000 °C). The diopsidic cores (P-149) yield a higher pressure (ca. 6 kbar) than the augitic rim (ca. 1.2 kbar), although some rim compositions yield moderately negative P values interpreted as recording Cpx crystallized at shallow levels (Nimis, personal communication).

It has to be noted that the source of cumulate talc-bearing greenschist occur in the stability field of the garnet peridotite mantle (Fig. 10a).

8.3 Tectonic setting implications

The studied Upper Triassic mafic rocks display a range of compositions from subalkaline to alkaline basaltic magmas and show a transitional to alkaline signature (Fig. 6d). On the Zr vs. Y diagram (Fig. 12a), regression lines for nearly all samples have Zr/Y ratios of 3–7, indicating an affinity with transitional and tholeiitic magmas. Almost all samples plot either in or close to the MORB + OIB subfield (Fig. 12b). The ratios of Th/Yb and Ta/Yb are largely independent of variations caused by the degree of partial melting and crystal fractionation, and thus essentially reflect the mantle source affinities (Pearce 1982; Pearce and Peate 1995). The Th/Yb vs. Ta/Yb plot (Fig. 12c) illustrates that the mafic samples are transitional between E-MORB and OIB, consistent with their REE patterns, suggesting that they formed in an intraplate setting (Fig. 11). Further, on the TiO2/Yb vs. Nb/Yb diagram, the mafic samples fall into the OIB field partly overlapping with the MORB field indicating potential plume-ridge interaction features (Fig. 12d).

Fig. 12
figure 12

a Y/Zr plot used for discrimination of magmatic affinity (after MacLean and Barrett 1993). Th/Yb vs. Ta/Yb discrimination diagram (Pearce 1982). Values for N-MORB, E-MORB, and oceanic-island basalt (OIB, within-plate basalt) are from Sun and McDonough (1989). Figures indicate Zr/Y ratios. b Discrimination plots of Nb/Th vs. Nb and c TiO2/Yb vs. Nb/Yb (after Pearce 2014). Primitive Mantle composition is from Hofmann (1988), Continental Crust, MORB (Mid-Ocean Ridge Basalts), OIB (Ocean-Island Basalt) and Arc Volcanics from Schmidberger and Hegner (1999)

Even though limited in volume, the Middle to Upper Triassic mafic rocks are widespread through the SSZ (e.g., Berberian and King 1981; Badrzadeh et al. 2011; Mousivand et al. 2012) and Central Iran (e.g., Bagheri and Stampfli 2008; Buchs et al. 2013). In the southeastern of SSZ, Arvin et al. (2007) reported calcalkaline, I-type granites with a Sm–Nd ‘errorchron’ age of 199 ± 30 Ma and interpreted this suite to have formed in a volcanic arc setting due to onset of Neotethys subduction. However, the analytical error is large, and is within error similar Middle Jurassic calc-alkaline granitoids and gabbros (Shakerardakani et al. 2015; Hassanzadeh and Wernicke 2016). Mousivand et al. (2012) found arc tholeiites with a U–Pb zircon age of 191 ± 12 Ma (Early Jurassic) associated with massive sulphide deposits (see also Badrzadeh et al. 2011) also interpreted to relate to Neotethys subduction. Consequently, the Upper Triassic mafic rocks of the study area were formed during the stage of the Neotethys oceanic expansion prior to the Early Jurassic onset of subduction.

Berberian and King (1981) suggested that after the quiet Paleozoic Gondwanan tectono-sedimentary regime in Iran, tectonic activity began by continental rifting and alkali volcanism in the late Paleozoic-early Mesozoic and was followed by sea-floor spreading preserved in the Upper Triassic ophiolitic remnants exposed along the Main Zagros reverse fault (e.g., Saccani et al. 2013a).

8.4 Tectonic model

The continental crust of the SSZ has been thinned during Permian and Triassic times and the pressure estimates of clinopyroxene cores might indicate its crystallization in a lower crustal magma chamber (Fig. 13b). From that level, the basaltic magmas has risen into the shallow-water and basinal Triassic sediments. We assume that some magmas were extruded as lavas and pyroclastic rocks and parts were emplaced as sills as testified by the presence of cumulates as testified also by growth of clinopyroxene rims.

Fig. 13
figure 13

a Tectonic model of the emplacement of the mafic rocks in the June Complex. The model is largely modified after Saccani et al. (2013a), who assumed no plume-MORB interaction in the northeastern/northern side of the Neotethyan Ocean. b Detail of the suggested emplacement of basalts in the June Complex rising up through the Sanandaj–Sirjan crust

The nature of rocks argues that the depositional environment of the Middle–Upper Triassic sedimentary rocks was a shallow marine to basinal shelf facing the Neotethyan Ocean. The thick sedimentary sequence was deposited either in a passive continental margin during a late stage of rifting or rather during the drift stage of the Neotethys Ocean. Recent models assume that the opening of Neotethys started not later than during Middle Triassic times (e.g., Saccani et al. 2014, 2015). The composition of the oceanic crust is influenced by plume-type material (Saccani et al. 2013a, b; Fig. 13a). We argue that the studied mafic rocks represent basalts, which originated from hotspot magmas intruding into the crustal base of the thinned Sanandaj–Sirjan passive margin basement and rose up into shallow levels.

The new data of the central part of SSZ indicates that there are obvious differences to the southernmost part of SSZ, where tholeiites (and even boninites) with an early Jurassic age associated with massive sulphide deposits are reported (Mousivand et al. 2012). These potentially indicate a switch from drifting stage to subduction as proposed for the Early Jurassic eclogite metamorphism (Davoudian et al. 2016).