Abstract
The lattice \({\mathcal {L}}_{\Delta }\) of all equational theories of signature \(\Delta \) has an undecidable elementary theory, according to a theorem of Burris and Sankappanavar from 1975, provided \(\Delta \) is large in the sense of providing at least one operation symbol of rank at least two or at least two operation symbols of rank one. On the other hand, Burris also noted in 1971 that the equational theory of \({\mathcal {L}}_{\Delta }\) is decidable. We use the work of Jaroslav Ježek in a effort to find the point along the spectrum from the equational theory to the elementary theory where undecidability enters. We provide four additional proofs that \({\mathcal {L}}_{\Delta }\) has an undecidable elementary theory. Our sharpest result is that the \(\forall ^*\exists ^*\forall ^*\) theory of \({\mathcal {L}}_{\Delta }\) is hereditarily undecidable.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bernays, P., Schönfinkel, M.: Zum Entscheidungsproblem der mathematischen Logik. Math. Ann. 99(1), 342–372 (1928). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01459101
Burris, S.: On the structure of the lattice of equational classes \({\cal{L}}(\tau )\). Algebra Universalis 1(1), 39–45 (1971). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02944953
Burris, S., McKenzie, R.: Decidable varieties with modular congruence lattices. Bull. Am. Math. Soc. (N.S.) 4(3), 350–352 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1090/S0273-0979-1981-14912-0
Burris, S., Sankappanavar, H.P.: Lattice-theoretic decision problems in universal algebra. Algebra Universalis 5(2), 163–177 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02485250
Eršov, J.L., Lavrov, I.A., Taĭmanov, A.D., Taĭclin, M.A.: Elementary theories. Uspehi Mat. Nauk 20(4(124)), 37–108 (1965)
Eršov, J.L., Taĭclin, M.A.: Undecidability of certain theories. Algebra i Logika Sem. 2(5), 37–41 (1963)
Freese, R.: Free modular lattices. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 261(1), 81–91 (1980). https://doi.org/10.2307/1998318
Herrmann, C.: On the word problem for the modular lattice with four free generators. Math. Ann. 265(4), 513–527 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01455951
Jacobs, E., Schwabauer, R.: The lattice of equational classes of algebras with one unary operation. Am. Math. Mon. 71, 151–155 (1964). https://doi.org/10.2307/2311743
Ježek, J.: Primitive classes of algebras with unary and nullary operations. Colloq. Math. 20, 159–179 (1969). https://doi.org/10.4064/cm-20-2-159-179
Ježek, J.: Intervals in the lattice of varieties. Algebra Universalis 6(2), 147–158 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02485826
Ježek, J.: The lattice of equational theories. I. Modular elements. Czechoslovak Math. J. 31(106)(1), 127–152 (1981). With a loose Russian summary
Ježek, J.: The lattice of equational theories. II. The lattice of full sets of terms. Czechoslovak Math. J. 31(106)(4), 573–603 (1981)
Ježek, J.: The lattice of equational theories. III. Definability and automorphisms. Čzechoslovak Math. J. 32(107)(1), 129–164 (1982)
Ježek, J.: The lattice of equational theories. IV. Equational theories of finite algebras. Čzechoslovak Math. J. 36(111)(2), 331–341 (1986)
Lerman, M.: Degrees of unsolvability. Perspectives in Mathematical Logic. Springer-Verlag, Berlin (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-21755-9. Local and global theory
Mal’cev, A.I.: Identity relations on manifolds of quasigroups. Mat. Sb. (N.S.) 69(111), 3–12 (1966)
Markoff, A.: On the impossibility of certain algorithms in the theory of associative systems. C. R. (Doklady) Acad. Sci. URSS (N.S.) 55, 583–586 (1947)
McNulty, G.F.: THE DECISION PROBLEM FOR BASES OF EQUATIONAL THEORIES OF ALGEBRAS (1972). Thesis (Ph.D.)–University of California, Berkeley
McNulty, G.F.: The decision problem for equational bases of algebras. Ann. Math. Logic 10(3–4), 193–259 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4843(76)90009-7
Monk, J.D.: Mathematical logic. Springer-Verlag, New York-Heidelberg (1976). Graduate Texts in Mathematics, No. 37
Murskiĭ, V.L.: Unrecognizable properties of finite systems of identity relations. Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 196, 520–522 (1971)
Perkins, P.: DECISION PROBLEMS FOR EQUATIONAL THEORIES OF SEMIGROUPS AND GENERAL ALGEBRAS (1966). Thesis (Ph.D.)–University of California, Berkeley
Perkins, P.: Unsolvable problems for equational theories. Notre Dame J. Formal Logic 8, 175–185 (1967). http://projecteuclid.org/euclid.ndjfl/1093956081
Post, E.L.: Recursive unsolvability of a problem of Thue. J. Symb. Logic 12, 1–11 (1947). https://doi.org/10.2307/2267170
Rabin, M.O.: A simple method for undecidability proofs and some applications. In: Logic, Methodology and Philos. Sci. (Proc. 1964 Internat. Congr.), pp. 58–68. North-Holland, Amsterdam (1965)
Sachs, D.: Identities in finite partition lattices. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 12, 944–945 (1961). https://doi.org/10.2307/2034397
Skolem, T.: Logisch-kombinatorische untersuchungen über die erfüllbarkeit und beweisbarkeit mathematischen sätze nebst einem theoreme über dichte mengen. Videnskapsselskapets skrifter I, Matematisk-natruv. klasse, Videnskabsakademiet i Kristiania 4, 1–36 (1920)
Skolem, T.: Selected works in logic. Edited by Jens Erik Fenstad. Universitetsforlaget, Oslo (1970)
Tarski, A.: Undecidable theories. Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics. North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam (1953). In collaboration with Andrzej Mostowski and Raphael M. Robinson
Whitman, P.M.: Free lattices. Ann. Math. 2(42), 325–330 (1941). https://doi.org/10.2307/1969001
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
For the Hawai‘ian Masters Bill Lampe, Ralph Freese, JB Nation (and Jarda Ježek): Mahalo!
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
This paper was prepared while the author was supported by the NSF Grant 150016.
This article is part of the topical collection “Algebras and Lattices in Hawaii” edited by W. DeMeo.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
McNulty, G.F. The undecidability of the elementary theory of lattices of all equational theories of large signature. Algebra Univers. 80, 27 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00012-019-0601-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00012-019-0601-9