Abstract
We study conformal boundary conditions for the theory of a single real scalar to investigate whether the known Dirichlet and Neumann conditions are the only possibilities. For this free bulk theory there are strong restrictions on the possible boundary dynamics. In particular, we find that the bulk-to-boundary operator expansion of the bulk field involves at most a ‘shadow pair’ of boundary fields, irrespective of the conformal boundary condition. We numerically analyze the four-point crossing equations for this shadow pair in the case of a three-dimensional boundary (so a four-dimensional scalar field) and find that large ranges of parameter space are excluded. However a ‘kink’ in the numerical bounds obeys all our consistency checks and might be an indication of a new conformal boundary condition.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
J.L. Cardy, Boundary conformal field theory, hep-th/0411189 [INSPIRE].
R. Rattazzi, V.S. Rychkov, E. Tonni and A. Vichi, Bounding scalar operator dimensions in 4D CFT, JHEP 12 (2008) 031 [arXiv:0807.0004] [INSPIRE].
D. Poland, S. Rychkov and A. Vichi, The conformal bootstrap: theory, numerical techniques, and applications, Rev. Mod. Phys. 91 (2019) 015002 [arXiv:1805.04405] [INSPIRE].
P. Liendo, L. Rastelli and B.C. van Rees, The bootstrap program for boundary CFTd, JHEP 07 (2013) 113 [arXiv:1210.4258] [INSPIRE].
D.M. McAvity and H. Osborn, Energy momentum tensor in conformal field theories near a boundary, Nucl. Phys. B 406 (1993) 655 [hep-th/9302068] [INSPIRE].
D.M. McAvity and H. Osborn, Conformal field theories near a boundary in general dimensions, Nucl. Phys. B 455 (1995) 522 [cond-mat/9505127] [INSPIRE].
E. Witten, SL(2, Z) action on three-dimensional conformal field theories with Abelian symmetry, in From fields to strings: circumnavigating theoretical physics. A conference in tribute to Ian Kogan, (2003), pg. 1173 [hep-th/0307041] [INSPIRE].
D. Gaiotto and E. Witten, S-duality of boundary conditions in N = 4 super Yang-Mills theory, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 13 (2009) 721 [arXiv:0807.3720] [INSPIRE].
N. Seiberg, T. Senthil, C. Wang and E. Witten, A duality web in 2 + 1 dimensions and condensed matter physics, Annals Phys. 374 (2016) 395 [arXiv:1606.01989] [INSPIRE].
L. Di Pietro, D. Gaiotto, E. Lauria and J. Wu, 3d Abelian gauge theories at the boundary, JHEP 05 (2019) 091 [arXiv:1902.09567] [INSPIRE].
S. Ferrara and G. Parisi, Conformal covariant correlation functions, Nucl. Phys. B 42 (1972) 281 [INSPIRE].
S. Ferrara, A.F. Grillo and G. Parisi, Nonequivalence between conformal covariant Wilson expansion in Euclidean and Minkowski space, Lett. Nuovo Cim. 5 (1972) 147 [INSPIRE].
S. Ferrara, A.F. Grillo, G. Parisi and R. Gatto, The shadow operator formalism for conformal algebra. Vacuum expectation values and operator products, Lett. Nuovo Cim. 4 (1972) 115 [INSPIRE].
S. Ferrara, A.F. Grillo, G. Parisi and R. Gatto, Covariant expansion of the conformal four-point function, Nucl. Phys. B 49 (1972) 77 [Erratum ibid. 53 (1973) 643] [INSPIRE].
E. Lauria, P. Liendo, B.C. Van Rees and X. Zhao, Line and surface defects for the free scalar field, arXiv:2005.02413 [INSPIRE].
M.F. Paulos, S. Rychkov, B.C. van Rees and B. Zan, Conformal invariance in the long-range Ising model, Nucl. Phys. B 902 (2016) 246 [arXiv:1509.00008] [INSPIRE].
C. Behan, L. Rastelli, S. Rychkov and B. Zan, A scaling theory for the long-range to short-range crossover and an infrared duality, J. Phys. A 50 (2017) 354002 [arXiv:1703.05325] [INSPIRE].
C. Behan, L. Rastelli, S. Rychkov and B. Zan, Long-range critical exponents near the short-range crossover, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 (2017) 241601 [arXiv:1703.03430] [INSPIRE].
C. Behan, Bootstrapping the long-range Ising model in three dimensions, J. Phys. A 52 (2019) 075401 [arXiv:1810.07199] [INSPIRE].
D. Poland and D. Simmons-Duffin, Bounds on 4D conformal and superconformal field theories, JHEP 05 (2011) 017 [arXiv:1009.2087] [INSPIRE].
S. El-Showk and M.F. Paulos, Bootstrapping conformal field theories with the extremal functional method, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 (2013) 241601 [arXiv:1211.2810] [INSPIRE].
T. Dimofte and D. Gaiotto, An E7 surprise, JHEP 10 (2012) 129 [arXiv:1209.1404] [INSPIRE].
D. Gaiotto, Boundary F-maximization, arXiv:1403.8052 [INSPIRE].
F. Gliozzi, P. Liendo, M. Meineri and A. Rago, Boundary and interface CFTs from the conformal bootstrap, JHEP 05 (2015) 036 [arXiv:1502.07217] [INSPIRE].
S. Giombi and H. Khanchandani, O(N) models with boundary interactions and their long range generalizations, JHEP 08 (2020) 010 [arXiv:1912.08169] [INSPIRE].
H. Osborn and A.C. Petkou, Implications of conformal invariance in field theories for general dimensions, Annals Phys. 231 (1994) 311 [hep-th/9307010] [INSPIRE].
M.S. Costa, J. Penedones, D. Poland and S. Rychkov, Spinning conformal correlators, JHEP 11 (2011) 071 [arXiv:1107.3554] [INSPIRE].
M. Billò, V. Gonçalves, E. Lauria and M. Meineri, Defects in conformal field theory, JHEP 04 (2016) 091 [arXiv:1601.02883] [INSPIRE].
E. Lauria, M. Meineri and E. Trevisani, Spinning operators and defects in conformal field theory, JHEP 08 (2019) 066 [arXiv:1807.02522] [INSPIRE].
Z. Komargodski and D. Simmons-Duffin, The random-bond Ising model in 2.01 and 3 dimensions, J. Phys. A 50 (2017) 154001 [arXiv:1603.04444] [INSPIRE].
C. Behan, Conformal manifolds: ODEs from OPEs, JHEP 03 (2018) 127 [arXiv:1709.03967] [INSPIRE].
R. Stanic, Renormalization group flows in quantum field theories with a boundary, master’s thesis, EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland (2019).
C.P. Herzog and K.-W. Huang, Boundary conformal field theory and a boundary central charge, JHEP 10 (2017) 189 [arXiv:1707.06224] [INSPIRE].
V. Procházka and A. Söderberg, Composite operators near the boundary, JHEP 03 (2020) 114 [arXiv:1912.07505] [INSPIRE].
F. Kos, D. Poland and D. Simmons-Duffin, Bootstrapping mixed correlators in the 3D Ising model, JHEP 11 (2014) 109 [arXiv:1406.4858] [INSPIRE].
F.A. Dolan and H. Osborn, Conformal four point functions and the operator product expansion, Nucl. Phys. B 599 (2001) 459 [hep-th/0011040] [INSPIRE].
F.A. Dolan and H. Osborn, Conformal partial waves: further mathematical results, arXiv:1108.6194 [INSPIRE].
D. Simmons-Duffin, A semidefinite program solver for the conformal bootstrap, JHEP 06 (2015) 174 [arXiv:1502.02033] [INSPIRE].
W. Landry and D. Simmons-Duffin, Scaling the semidefinite program solver SDPB, arXiv:1909.09745 [INSPIRE].
M. Go and Y. Tachikawa, autoboot: a generator of bootstrap equations with global symmetry, JHEP 06 (2019) 084 [arXiv:1903.10522] [INSPIRE].
C. Mortici, New approximation formulas for evaluating the ratio of gamma functions, Math. Comput. Model. 52 (2010) 425.
C. Behan, PyCFTBoot: a flexible interface for the conformal bootstrap, Commun. Comput. Phys. 22 (2017) 1 [arXiv:1602.02810] [INSPIRE].
M. Go, An automated generation of bootstrap equations for numerical study of critical phenomena, arXiv:2006.04173 [INSPIRE].
C. Behan, Unitary subsector of generalized minimal models, Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) 094020 [arXiv:1712.06622] [INSPIRE].
A. de la Fuente, Bootstrapping mixed correlators in the 2D Ising model, arXiv:1904.09801 [INSPIRE].
I. Esterlis, A.L. Fitzpatrick and D. Ramirez, Closure of the operator product expansion in the non-unitary bootstrap, JHEP 11 (2016) 030 [arXiv:1606.07458] [INSPIRE].
D. Karateev, P. Kravchuk, M. Serone and A. Vichi, Fermion conformal bootstrap in 4d, JHEP 06 (2019) 088 [arXiv:1902.05969] [INSPIRE].
A. Atanasov, A. Hillman and D. Poland, Bootstrapping the minimal 3D SCFT, JHEP 11 (2018) 140 [arXiv:1807.05702] [INSPIRE].
Y. Nakayama, Bootstrapping critical Ising model on three-dimensional real projective space, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 (2016) 141602 [arXiv:1601.06851] [INSPIRE].
A. Cappelli, L. Maffi and S. Okuda, Critical Ising model in varying dimension by conformal bootstrap, JHEP 01 (2019) 161 [arXiv:1811.07751] [INSPIRE].
S. El-Showk, M.F. Paulos, D. Poland, S. Rychkov, D. Simmons-Duffin and A. Vichi, Solving the 3D Ising model with the conformal bootstrap, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 025022 [arXiv:1203.6064] [INSPIRE].
S. El-Showk, M.F. Paulos, D. Poland, S. Rychkov, D. Simmons-Duffin and A. Vichi, Solving the 3d Ising model with the conformal bootstrap II. c-minimization and precise critical exponents, J. Stat. Phys. 157 (2014) 869 [arXiv:1403.4545] [INSPIRE].
A. Dymarsky, F. Kos, P. Kravchuk, D. Poland and D. Simmons-Duffin, The 3d stress-tensor bootstrap, JHEP 02 (2018) 164 [arXiv:1708.05718] [INSPIRE].
D. Simmons-Duffin, The lightcone bootstrap and the spectrum of the 3d Ising CFT, JHEP 03 (2017) 086 [arXiv:1612.08471] [INSPIRE].
F. Kos, D. Poland, D. Simmons-Duffin and A. Vichi, Precision islands in the Ising and O(N) models, JHEP 08 (2016) 036 [arXiv:1603.04436] [INSPIRE].
F. Caracciolo and V.S. Rychkov, Rigorous limits on the interaction strength in quantum field theory, Phys. Rev. D 81 (2010) 085037 [arXiv:0912.2726] [INSPIRE].
M.F. Paulos, J. Penedones, J. Toledo, B.C. van Rees and P. Vieira, The S-matrix bootstrap. Part I: QFT in AdS, JHEP 11 (2017) 133 [arXiv:1607.06109] [INSPIRE].
M. Baggio, N. Bobev, S.M. Chester, E. Lauria and S.S. Pufu, Decoding a three-dimensional conformal manifold, JHEP 02 (2018) 062 [arXiv:1712.02698] [INSPIRE].
A. Richards, University of Oxford advanced research computing, Zenodo, (2015).
S. Ferrara, A.F. Grillo and R. Gatto, Tensor representations of conformal algebra and conformally covariant operator product expansion, Annals Phys. 76 (1973) 161 [INSPIRE].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
ArXiv ePrint: 2009.03336
Rights and permissions
Open Access . This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
About this article
Cite this article
Behan, C., Di Pietro, L., Lauria, E. et al. Bootstrapping boundary-localized interactions. J. High Energ. Phys. 2020, 182 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP12(2020)182
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP12(2020)182