Abstract
In this paper, we propose a Green’s basis and also a new physical basis for dimension-seven (dim-7) operators, which are suitable for the matching of ultraviolet models onto the Standard Model effective field theory (SMEFT) and the deviation of renormalization group equations (RGEs) for dim-7 operators in the SMEFT. The reduction relations to convert operators in the Green’s basis to those in the physical basis are achieved as well, where some redundant dim-6 operators in the Green’s basis are involved if the dim-5 operator exists. Working in these two bases for dim-7 operators and with the help of the reduction relations, we work out the one-loop RGEs resulting from the mixing among different dimensional operators for the dim-5 and dim-7 operators up to \( \mathcal{O} \)(Λ−3) in the SMEFT. These new results complete the previous results for RGEs of the dim-5 and dim-7 operators and hence can be used for a consistent one-loop analysis of the SMEFT at \( \mathcal{O} \)(Λ−3).
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Particle Data Group collaboration, Review of Particle Physics, PTEP 2022 (2022) 083C01 [INSPIRE].
Z.-Z. Xing, Flavor structures of charged fermions and massive neutrinos, Phys. Rept. 854 (2020) 1 [arXiv:1909.09610] [INSPIRE].
W. Buchmuller and D. Wyler, Effective Lagrangian Analysis of New Interactions and Flavor Conservation, Nucl. Phys. B 268 (1986) 621 [INSPIRE].
B. Grzadkowski, M. Iskrzynski, M. Misiak and J. Rosiek, Dimension-Six Terms in the Standard Model Lagrangian, JHEP 10 (2010) 085 [arXiv:1008.4884] [INSPIRE].
I. Brivio and M. Trott, The Standard Model as an Effective Field Theory, Phys. Rept. 793 (2019) 1 [arXiv:1706.08945] [INSPIRE].
G. Isidori, F. Wilsch and D. Wyler, The Standard Model effective field theory at work, arXiv:2303.16922 [INSPIRE].
B. Henning, X. Lu and H. Murayama, How to use the Standard Model effective field theory, JHEP 01 (2016) 023 [arXiv:1412.1837] [INSPIRE].
S. Weinberg, Effective Gauge Theories, Phys. Lett. B 91 (1980) 51 [INSPIRE].
M. Jiang, N. Craig, Y.-Y. Li and D. Sutherland, Complete one-loop matching for a singlet scalar in the Standard Model EFT, JHEP 02 (2019) 031 [Erratum ibid. 01 (2021) 135] [arXiv:1811.08878] [INSPIRE].
J.C. Criado and M. Pérez-Victoria, Field redefinitions in effective theories at higher orders, JHEP 03 (2019) 038 [arXiv:1811.09413] [INSPIRE].
S. Weinberg, Baryon and Lepton Nonconserving Processes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 43 (1979) 1566 [INSPIRE].
B. Henning, X. Lu, T. Melia and H. Murayama, 2, 84, 30, 993, 560, 15456, 11962, 261485, . . . : higher dimension operators in the SM EFT, JHEP 08 (2017) 016 [Erratum ibid. 09 (2019) 019] [arXiv:1512.03433] [INSPIRE].
J.C. Criado, BasisGen: automatic generation of operator bases, Eur. Phys. J. C 79 (2019) 256 [arXiv:1901.03501] [INSPIRE].
R.M. Fonseca, Enumerating the operators of an effective field theory, Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 035040 [arXiv:1907.12584] [INSPIRE].
T. Ma, J. Shu and M.-L. Xiao, Standard model effective field theory from on-shell amplitudes*, Chin. Phys. C 47 (2023) 023105 [arXiv:1902.06752] [INSPIRE].
R. Aoude and C.S. Machado, The Rise of SMEFT On-shell Amplitudes, JHEP 12 (2019) 058 [arXiv:1905.11433] [INSPIRE].
L. Lehman, Extending the Standard Model Effective Field Theory with the Complete Set of Dimension-7 Operators, Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 125023 [arXiv:1410.4193] [INSPIRE].
Y. Liao and X.-D. Ma, Renormalization Group Evolution of Dimension-seven Baryon- and Lepton-number-violating Operators, JHEP 11 (2016) 043 [arXiv:1607.07309] [INSPIRE].
Y. Liao and X.-D. Ma, Renormalization Group Evolution of Dimension-seven Operators in Standard Model Effective Field Theory and Relevant Phenomenology, JHEP 03 (2019) 179 [arXiv:1901.10302] [INSPIRE].
C.W. Murphy, Dimension-8 operators in the Standard Model Eective Field Theory, JHEP 10 (2020) 174 [arXiv:2005.00059] [INSPIRE].
H.-L. Li et al., Complete set of dimension-eight operators in the standard model effective field theory, Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021) 015026 [arXiv:2005.00008] [INSPIRE].
G. Durieux, T. Kitahara, Y. Shadmi and Y. Weiss, The electroweak effective field theory from on-shell amplitudes, JHEP 01 (2020) 119 [arXiv:1909.10551] [INSPIRE].
M. Accettulli Huber and S. De Angelis, Standard Model EFTs via on-shell methods, JHEP 11 (2021) 221 [arXiv:2108.03669] [INSPIRE].
Y. Liao and X.-D. Ma, An explicit construction of the dimension-9 operator basis in the standard model effective field theory, JHEP 11 (2020) 152 [arXiv:2007.08125] [INSPIRE].
H.-L. Li et al., Complete set of dimension-nine operators in the standard model effective field theory, Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021) 015025 [arXiv:2007.07899] [INSPIRE].
R.V. Harlander, T. Kempkens and M.C. Schaaf, Standard model effective field theory up to mass dimension 12, Phys. Rev. D 108 (2023) 055020 [arXiv:2305.06832] [INSPIRE].
V. Gherardi, D. Marzocca and E. Venturini, Matching scalar leptoquarks to the SMEFT at one loop, JHEP 07 (2020) 225 [Erratum ibid. 01 (2021) 006] [arXiv:2003.12525] [INSPIRE].
M. Chala, Á. Díaz-Carmona and G. Guedes, A Green’s basis for the bosonic SMEFT to dimension 8, JHEP 05 (2022) 138 [arXiv:2112.12724] [INSPIRE].
Z. Ren and J.-H. Yu, A Complete Set of the Dimension-8 Green’s Basis Operators in the Standard Model Effective Field Theory, arXiv:2211.01420 [INSPIRE].
K.S. Babu, C.N. Leung and J.T. Pantaleone, Renormalization of the neutrino mass operator, Phys. Lett. B 319 (1993) 191 [hep-ph/9309223] [INSPIRE].
P.H. Chankowski and Z. Pluciennik, Renormalization group equations for seesaw neutrino masses, Phys. Lett. B 316 (1993) 312 [hep-ph/9306333] [INSPIRE].
S. Antusch et al., Neutrino mass operator renormalization revisited, Phys. Lett. B 519 (2001) 238 [hep-ph/0108005] [INSPIRE].
E.E. Jenkins, A.V. Manohar and M. Trott, Renormalization Group Evolution of the Standard Model Dimension Six Operators I: Formalism and lambda Dependence, JHEP 10 (2013) 087 [arXiv:1308.2627] [INSPIRE].
E.E. Jenkins, A.V. Manohar and M. Trott, Renormalization Group Evolution of the Standard Model Dimension Six Operators II: Yukawa Dependence, JHEP 01 (2014) 035 [arXiv:1310.4838] [INSPIRE].
R. Alonso, E.E. Jenkins, A.V. Manohar and M. Trott, Renormalization Group Evolution of the Standard Model Dimension Six Operators III: Gauge Coupling Dependence and Phenomenology, JHEP 04 (2014) 159 [arXiv:1312.2014] [INSPIRE].
R. Alonso et al., Renormalization group evolution of dimension-six baryon number violating operators, Phys. Lett. B 734 (2014) 302 [arXiv:1405.0486] [INSPIRE].
S. Davidson, M. Gorbahn and M. Leak, Majorana neutrino masses in the renormalization group equations for lepton flavor violation, Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 095014 [arXiv:1807.04283] [INSPIRE].
Y. Wang, D. Zhang and S. Zhou, Complete one-loop renormalization-group equations in the seesaw effective field theories, JHEP 05 (2023) 044 [arXiv:2302.08140] [INSPIRE].
M. Chala and A. Titov, Neutrino masses in the Standard Model effective field theory, Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021) 035002 [arXiv:2104.08248] [INSPIRE].
M. Chala, G. Guedes, M. Ramos and J. Santiago, Towards the renormalisation of the Standard Model effective field theory to dimension eight: Bosonic interactions I, SciPost Phys. 11 (2021) 065 [arXiv:2106.05291] [INSPIRE].
S. Das Bakshi, M. Chala, Á. Díaz-Carmona and G. Guedes, Towards the renormalisation of the Standard Model effective field theory to dimension eight: bosonic interactions II, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 137 (2022) 973 [arXiv:2205.03301] [INSPIRE].
A. Helset, E.E. Jenkins and A.V. Manohar, Renormalization of the Standard Model Effective Field Theory from geometry, JHEP 02 (2023) 063 [arXiv:2212.03253] [INSPIRE].
S. Das Bakshi and Á. Díaz-Carmona, Renormalisation of SMEFT bosonic interactions up to dimension eight by LNV operators, JHEP 06 (2023) 123 [arXiv:2301.07151] [INSPIRE].
M. Chala, Constraints on anomalous dimensions from the positivity of the S matrix, Phys. Rev. D 108 (2023) 015031 [arXiv:2301.09995] [INSPIRE].
A. Carmona, A. Lazopoulos, P. Olgoso and J. Santiago, Matchmakereft: automated tree-level and one-loop matching, SciPost Phys. 12 (2022) 198 [arXiv:2112.10787] [INSPIRE].
A. Barzinji, M. Trott and A. Vasudevan, Equations of Motion for the Standard Model Effective Field Theory: Theory and Applications, Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 116005 [arXiv:1806.06354] [INSPIRE].
M.S. Bilenky and A. Santamaria, One loop effective Lagrangian for a standard model with a heavy charged scalar singlet, Nucl. Phys. B 420 (1994) 47 [hep-ph/9310302] [INSPIRE].
P. Minkowski, μ → eγ at a Rate of One Out of 109 Muon Decays?, Phys. Lett. B 67 (1977) 421 [INSPIRE].
T. Yanagida, Horizontal gauge symmetry and masses of neutrinos, Conf. Proc. C 7902131 (1979) 95 [INSPIRE].
M. Gell-Mann, P. Ramond and R. Slansky, Complex Spinors and Unified Theories, Conf. Proc. C 790927 (1979) 315 [arXiv:1306.4669] [INSPIRE].
S.L. Glashow, The Future of Elementary Particle Physics, NATO Sci. Ser. B 61 (1980) 687 [INSPIRE].
R.N. Mohapatra and G. Senjanovic, Neutrino Mass and Spontaneous Parity Nonconservation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 44 (1980) 912 [INSPIRE].
W. Konetschny and W. Kummer, Nonconservation of Total Lepton Number with Scalar Bosons, Phys. Lett. B 70 (1977) 433 [INSPIRE].
M. Magg and C. Wetterich, Neutrino Mass Problem and Gauge Hierarchy, Phys. Lett. B 94 (1980) 61 [INSPIRE].
T.P. Cheng and L.-F. Li, Neutrino Masses, Mixings and Oscillations in SU(2) x U(1) Models of Electroweak Interactions, Phys. Rev. D 22 (1980) 2860 [INSPIRE].
R.N. Mohapatra and G. Senjanovic, Neutrino Masses and Mixings in Gauge Models with Spontaneous Parity Violation, Phys. Rev. D 23 (1981) 165 [INSPIRE].
J. Schechter and J.W.F. Valle, Neutrino Masses in SU(2) x U(1) Theories, Phys. Rev. D 22 (1980) 2227 [INSPIRE].
G. Lazarides, Q. Shafi and C. Wetterich, Proton Lifetime and Fermion Masses in an SO(10) Model, Nucl. Phys. B 181 (1981) 287 [INSPIRE].
R. Foot, H. Lew, X.G. He and G.C. Joshi, Seesaw Neutrino Masses Induced by a Triplet of Leptons, Z. Phys. C 44 (1989) 441 [INSPIRE].
E. Ma, Pathways to naturally small neutrino masses, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81 (1998) 1171 [hep-ph/9805219] [INSPIRE].
D. Zhang and S. Zhou, Radiative decays of charged leptons in the seesaw effective field theory with one-loop matching, Phys. Lett. B 819 (2021) 136463 [arXiv:2102.04954] [INSPIRE].
D. Zhang and S. Zhou, Complete one-loop matching of the type-I seesaw model onto the Standard Model effective field theory, JHEP 09 (2021) 163 [arXiv:2107.12133] [INSPIRE].
R. Coy and M. Frigerio, Effective comparison of neutrino-mass models, Phys. Rev. D 105 (2022) 115041 [arXiv:2110.09126] [INSPIRE].
T. Ohlsson and M. Pernow, One-loop matching conditions in neutrino effective theory, Nucl. Phys. B 978 (2022) 115729 [arXiv:2201.00840] [INSPIRE].
X. Li, D. Zhang and S. Zhou, One-loop matching of the type-II seesaw model onto the Standard Model effective field theory, JHEP 04 (2022) 038 [arXiv:2201.05082] [INSPIRE].
Y. Du, X.-X. Li and J.-H. Yu, Neutrino seesaw models at one-loop matching: discrimination by effective operators, JHEP 09 (2022) 207 [arXiv:2201.04646] [INSPIRE].
D. Zhang, Complete one-loop structure of the type-(I+II) seesaw effective field theory, JHEP 03 (2023) 217 [arXiv:2208.07869] [INSPIRE].
E. Ma, Verifiable radiative seesaw mechanism of neutrino mass and dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 73 (2006) 077301 [hep-ph/0601225] [INSPIRE].
Y. Liao and X.-D. Ma, One-loop matching of scotogenic model onto standard model effective field theory up to dimension 7, JHEP 12 (2022) 053 [arXiv:2210.04270] [INSPIRE].
N.D. Christensen and C. Duhr, FeynRules - Feynman rules made easy, Comput. Phys. Commun. 180 (2009) 1614 [arXiv:0806.4194] [INSPIRE].
A. Alloul et al., FeynRules 2.0 - A complete toolbox for tree-level phenomenology, Comput. Phys. Commun. 185 (2014) 2250 [arXiv:1310.1921] [INSPIRE].
T. Hahn, Generating Feynman diagrams and amplitudes with FeynArts 3, Comput. Phys. Commun. 140 (2001) 418 [hep-ph/0012260] [INSPIRE].
V. Shtabovenko, R. Mertig and F. Orellana, New Developments in FeynCalc 9.0, Comput. Phys. Commun. 207 (2016) 432 [arXiv:1601.01167] [INSPIRE].
V. Shtabovenko, R. Mertig and F. Orellana, FeynCalc 9.3: New features and improvements, Comput. Phys. Commun. 256 (2020) 107478 [arXiv:2001.04407] [INSPIRE].
V. Shtabovenko, FeynHelpers: Connecting FeynCalc to FIRE and Package-X, Comput. Phys. Commun. 218 (2017) 48 [arXiv:1611.06793] [INSPIRE].
H.H. Patel, Package-X: A Mathematica package for the analytic calculation of one-loop integrals, Comput. Phys. Commun. 197 (2015) 276 [arXiv:1503.01469] [INSPIRE].
H.H. Patel, Package-X 2.0: A Mathematica package for the analytic calculation of one-loop integrals, Comput. Phys. Commun. 218 (2017) 66 [arXiv:1612.00009] [INSPIRE].
A. Denner, H. Eck, O. Hahn and J. Kublbeck, Compact Feynman rules for Majorana fermions, Phys. Lett. B 291 (1992) 278 [INSPIRE].
A. Denner, H. Eck, O. Hahn and J. Kublbeck, Feynman rules for fermion number violating interactions, Nucl. Phys. B 387 (1992) 467 [INSPIRE].
J. Elias-Miro, J.R. Espinosa and A. Pomarol, One-loop non-renormalization results in EFTs, Phys. Lett. B 747 (2015) 272 [arXiv:1412.7151] [INSPIRE].
C. Cheung and C.-H. Shen, Nonrenormalization Theorems without Supersymmetry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 (2015) 071601 [arXiv:1505.01844] [INSPIRE].
Z. Bern, J. Parra-Martinez and E. Sawyer, Nonrenormalization and Operator Mixing via On-Shell Methods, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124 (2020) 051601 [arXiv:1910.05831] [INSPIRE].
W. Cao, F. Herzog, T. Melia and J. Roosmale Nepveu, Non-linear non-renormalization theorems, JHEP 08 (2023) 080 [arXiv:2303.07391] [INSPIRE].
K.S. Babu and C.N. Leung, Classification of effective neutrino mass operators, Nucl. Phys. B 619 (2001) 667 [hep-ph/0106054] [INSPIRE].
A. de Gouvea and J. Jenkins, A Survey of Lepton Number Violation Via Effective Operators, Phys. Rev. D 77 (2008) 013008 [arXiv:0708.1344] [INSPIRE].
Y. Cai et al., From the trees to the forest: a review of radiative neutrino mass models, Front. in Phys. 5 (2017) 63 [arXiv:1706.08524] [INSPIRE].
V. Cirigliano et al., Neutrinoless double beta decay in chiral effective field theory: lepton number violation at dimension seven, JHEP 12 (2017) 082 [arXiv:1708.09390] [INSPIRE].
V. Cirigliano et al., A neutrinoless double beta decay master formula from effective field theory, JHEP 12 (2018) 097 [arXiv:1806.02780] [INSPIRE].
Y. Liao, X.-D. Ma and H.-L. Wang, Effective field theory approach to lepton number violating decays K± → π∓l±l±: short-distance contribution, JHEP 01 (2020) 127 [arXiv:1909.06272] [INSPIRE].
Y. Liao, X.-D. Ma and H.-L. Wang, Effective field theory approach to lepton number violating decays K± → π∓\( {l}_{\alpha}^{\pm }{l}_{\beta}^{\pm } \): long-distance contribution, JHEP 03 (2020) 120 [arXiv:2001.07378] [INSPIRE].
J. Fuentes-Martín et al., Evanescent operators in one-loop matching computations, JHEP 02 (2023) 031 [arXiv:2211.09144] [INSPIRE].
X.-X. Li, Z. Ren and J.-H. Yu, A complete tree-level dictionary between simplified BSM models and SMEFT (d ≤ 7) operators, arXiv:2307.10380 [INSPIRE].
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
ArXiv ePrint: 2306.03008
Rights and permissions
Open Access . This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
About this article
Cite this article
Zhang, D. Renormalization group equations for the SMEFT operators up to dimension seven. J. High Energ. Phys. 2023, 148 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP10(2023)148
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP10(2023)148