Abstract
We obtain SMEFT bounds using an approach that utilises the complete multi-dimensional differential information of a process. This approach is based on the fact that at a given EFT order, the full angular distribution in the most important electroweak processes can be expressed as a sum of a fixed number of basis functions. The coefficients of these basis functions — the so-called angular moments — and their energy dependance, thus form an ideal set of experimental observables that encapsulates the complete multi-dimensional differential information of the process. This approach is generic and the observables constructed allow to avoid blind directions in the SMEFT parameter space. While this method is applicable to many of the important electroweak processes, as a first example we study the pp → V(ℓℓ)h(bb) process (V ≡ Z/W±, ℓℓ ≡ ℓ+ℓ−/ℓ±ν), including QCD NLO effects, differentially. We show that using the full differential data in this way plays a crucial role in simultaneously and maximally constraining the different vertex structures of the Higgs coupling to gauge bosons. In particular, our method yields bounds on the \( {hV}_{\mu \nu}{V}^{\mu \nu},{hV}_{\mu \nu}{\tilde{V}}^{\mu \nu} \) and \( hVff\left( ff\equiv f\overline{f}/f\overline{f}^{\prime}\right) \) couplings, stronger than projected bounds reported in any other process. This matrix-element-based method can provide a transparent alternative to complement machine learning techniques that also aim to disentangle correlations in the SMEFT parameter space.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
W. Buchmüller and D. Wyler, Effective Lagrangian Analysis of New Interactions and Flavor Conservation, Nucl. Phys. B 268 (1986) 621 [INSPIRE].
G.F. Giudice, C. Grojean, A. Pomarol and R. Rattazzi, The Strongly-Interacting Light Higgs, JHEP 06 (2007) 045 [hep-ph/0703164] [INSPIRE].
B. Grzadkowski, M. Iskrzynski, M. Misiak and J. Rosiek, Dimension-Six Terms in the Standard Model Lagrangian, JHEP 10 (2010) 085 [arXiv:1008.4884] [INSPIRE].
R.S. Gupta, Probing Quartic Neutral Gauge Boson Couplings using diffractive photon fusion at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 014006 [arXiv:1111.3354] [INSPIRE].
R.S. Gupta, H. Rzehak and J.D. Wells, How well do we need to measure Higgs boson couplings?, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 095001 [arXiv:1206.3560] [INSPIRE].
S. Banerjee, S. Mukhopadhyay and B. Mukhopadhyaya, New Higgs interactions and recent data from the LHC and the Tevatron, JHEP 10 (2012) 062 [arXiv:1207.3588] [INSPIRE].
R.S. Gupta, M. Montull and F. Riva, SUSY Faces its Higgs Couplings, JHEP 04 (2013) 132 [arXiv:1212.5240] [INSPIRE].
S. Banerjee, S. Mukhopadhyay and B. Mukhopadhyaya, Higher dimensional operators and the LHC Higgs data: The role of modified kinematics, Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 053010 [arXiv:1308.4860] [INSPIRE].
R.S. Gupta, H. Rzehak and J.D. Wells, How well do we need to measure the Higgs boson mass and self-coupling?, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 055024 [arXiv:1305.6397] [INSPIRE].
J. Elias-Miró, C. Grojean, R.S. Gupta and D. Marzocca, Scaling and tuning of EW and Higgs observables, JHEP 05 (2014) 019 [arXiv:1312.2928] [INSPIRE].
R. Contino, M. Ghezzi, C. Grojean, M. Muhlleitner and M. Spira, Effective Lagrangian for a light Higgs-like scalar, JHEP 07 (2013) 035 [arXiv:1303.3876] [INSPIRE].
A. Falkowski and F. Riva, Model-independent precision constraints on dimension-6 operators, JHEP 02 (2015) 039 [arXiv:1411.0669] [INSPIRE].
C. Englert and M. Spannowsky, Effective Theories and Measurements at Colliders, Phys. Lett. B 740 (2015) 8 [arXiv:1408.5147] [INSPIRE].
R.S. Gupta, A. Pomarol and F. Riva, BSM Primary Effects, Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015) 035001 [arXiv:1405.0181] [INSPIRE].
G. Amar et al., Exploration of the tensor structure of the Higgs boson coupling to weak bosons in e+e− collisions, JHEP 02 (2015) 128 [arXiv:1405.3957] [INSPIRE].
M. Buschmann, D. Goncalves, S. Kuttimalai, M. Schonherr, F. Krauss and T. Plehn, Mass Effects in the Higgs-Gluon Coupling: Boosted vs Off-Shell Production, JHEP 02 (2015) 038 [arXiv:1410.5806] [INSPIRE].
N. Craig, M. Farina, M. McCullough and M. Perelstein, Precision Higgsstrahlung as a Probe of New Physics, JHEP 03 (2015) 146 [arXiv:1411.0676] [INSPIRE].
J. Ellis, V. Sanz and T. You, Complete Higgs Sector Constraints on Dimension-6 Operators, JHEP 07 (2014) 036 [arXiv:1404.3667] [INSPIRE].
J. Ellis, V. Sanz and T. You, The Effective Standard Model after LHC Run I, JHEP 03 (2015) 157 [arXiv:1410.7703] [INSPIRE].
S. Banerjee, T. Mandal, B. Mellado and B. Mukhopadhyaya, Cornering dimension-6 HVV interactions at high luminosity LHC: the role of event ratios, JHEP 09 (2015) 057 [arXiv:1505.00226] [INSPIRE].
C. Englert, R. Kogler, H. Schulz and M. Spannowsky, Higgs coupling measurements at the LHC, Eur. Phys. J. C 76 (2016) 393 [arXiv:1511.05170] [INSPIRE].
D. Ghosh, R.S. Gupta and G. Perez, Is the Higgs Mechanism of Fermion Mass Generation a Fact? A Yukawa-less First-Two-Generation Model, Phys. Lett. B 755 (2016) 504 [arXiv:1508.01501] [INSPIRE].
J. Cohen, S. Bar-Shalom and G. Eilam, Contact Interactions in Higgs-Vector Boson Associated Production at the ILC, Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016) 035030 [arXiv:1602.01698] [INSPIRE].
S.-F. Ge, H.-J. He and R.-Q. Xiao, Probing new physics scales from Higgs and electroweak observables at e+e− Higgs factory, JHEP 10 (2016) 007 [arXiv:1603.03385] [INSPIRE].
R. Contino, A. Falkowski, F. Goertz, C. Grojean and F. Riva, On the Validity of the Effective Field Theory Approach to SM Precision Tests, JHEP 07 (2016) 144 [arXiv:1604.06444] [INSPIRE].
A. Biekötter, J. Brehmer and T. Plehn, Extending the limits of Higgs effective theory, Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016) 055032 [arXiv:1602.05202] [INSPIRE].
J. de Blas et al., Electroweak precision observables and Higgs-boson signal strengths in the Standard Model and beyond: present and future, JHEP 12 (2016) 135 [arXiv:1608.01509] [INSPIRE].
H. Denizli and A. Senol, Constraints on Higgs effective couplings in \( H\nu \overline{\nu} \) production of CLIC at 380 GeV, Adv. High Energy Phys. 2018 (2018) 1627051 [arXiv:1707.03890] [INSPIRE].
T. Barklow et al., Improved Formalism for Precision Higgs Coupling Fits, Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) 053003 [arXiv:1708.08912] [INSPIRE].
I. Brivio and M. Trott, The Standard Model as an Effective Field Theory, Phys. Rept. 793 (2019) 1 [arXiv:1706.08945] [INSPIRE].
T. Barklow, K. Fujii, S. Jung, M.E. Peskin and J. Tian, Model-Independent Determination of the Triple Higgs Coupling at e+e− Colliders, Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) 053004 [arXiv:1708.09079] [INSPIRE].
H. Khanpour and M. Mohammadi Najafabadi, Constraining Higgs boson effective couplings at electron-positron colliders, Phys. Rev. D 95 (2017) 055026 [arXiv:1702.00951] [INSPIRE].
C. Englert, R. Kogler, H. Schulz and M. Spannowsky, Higgs characterisation in the presence of theoretical uncertainties and invisible decays, Eur. Phys. J. C 77 (2017) 789 [arXiv:1708.06355] [INSPIRE].
G. Panico, F. Riva and A. Wulzer, Diboson Interference Resurrection, Phys. Lett. B 776 (2018) 473 [arXiv:1708.07823] [INSPIRE].
S. Banerjee, C. Englert, R.S. Gupta and M. Spannowsky, Probing Electroweak Precision Physics via boosted Higgs-strahlung at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 095012 [arXiv:1807.01796] [INSPIRE].
C. Grojean, M. Montull and M. Riembau, Diboson at the LHC vs LEP, JHEP 03 (2019) 020 [arXiv:1810.05149] [INSPIRE].
A. Biekötter, T. Corbett and T. Plehn, The Gauge-Higgs Legacy of the LHC Run II, SciPost Phys. 6 (2019) 064 [arXiv:1812.07587] [INSPIRE].
D. Goncalves and J. Nakamura, Boosting the H → invisibles searches with Z boson polarization, Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) 055021 [arXiv:1809.07327] [INSPIRE].
F.F. Freitas, C.K. Khosa and V. Sanz, Exploring the standard model EFT in VH production with machine learning, Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 035040 [arXiv:1902.05803] [INSPIRE].
S. Banerjee, R.S. Gupta, J.Y. Reiness and M. Spannowsky, Resolving the tensor structure of the Higgs coupling to Z-bosons via Higgs-strahlung, Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 115004 [arXiv:1905.02728] [INSPIRE].
A. Azatov, R. Contino, C.S. Machado and F. Riva, Helicity selection rules and noninterference for BSM amplitudes, Phys. Rev. D 95 (2017) 065014 [arXiv:1607.05236] [INSPIRE].
K. Hagiwara, R.D. Peccei, D. Zeppenfeld and K. Hikasa, Probing the Weak Boson Sector in e+e− → W+W−, Nucl. Phys. B 282 (1987) 253 [INSPIRE].
A. Azatov, J. Elias-Miro, Y. Reyimuaji and E. Venturini, Novel measurements of anomalous triple gauge couplings for the LHC, JHEP 10 (2017) 027 [arXiv:1707.08060] [INSPIRE].
A. Azatov, D. Barducci and E. Venturini, Precision diboson measurements at hadron colliders, JHEP 04 (2019) 075 [arXiv:1901.04821] [INSPIRE].
B. Bellazzini and F. Riva, New phenomenological and theoretical perspective on anomalous ZZ and Zγ processes, Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 095021 [arXiv:1806.09640] [INSPIRE].
B. Henning and T. Melia, Constructing effective field theories via their harmonics, Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 016015 [arXiv:1902.06754] [INSPIRE].
I. Dunietz, H.R. Quinn, A. Snyder, W. Toki and H.J. Lipkin, How to extract CP-violating asymmetries from angular correlations, Phys. Rev. D 43 (1991) 2193 [INSPIRE].
A.S. Dighe, I. Dunietz and R. Fleischer, Extracting CKM phases and Bs − \( {\overline{B}}_s \) mixing parameters from angular distributions of nonleptonic B decays, Eur. Phys. J. C 6 (1999) 647 [hep-ph/9804253] [INSPIRE].
F. James, Statistical methods in experimental physics, World Scientific Singapore (2006) [INSPIRE].
F. Beaujean, M. Chrzaszcz, N. Serra and D. van Dyk, Extracting Angular Observables without a Likelihood and Applications to Rare Decays, Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015) 114012 [arXiv:1503.04100] [INSPIRE].
D. Atwood and A. Soni, Analysis for magnetic moment and electric dipole moment form-factors of the top quark via e+e− → \( t\overline{t} \), Phys. Rev. D 45 (1992) 2405 [INSPIRE].
M. Diehl and O. Nachtmann, Optimal observables for the measurement of three gauge boson couplings in e+e− → W+W−, Z. Phys. C 62 (1994) 397 [INSPIRE].
B. Grzadkowski, Z. Hioki, K. Ohkuma and J. Wudka, Optimal-observable analysis of possible new physics using the b-quark in γγ → \( t\overline{t} \) → bX, Phys. Lett. B 593 (2004) 189 [hep-ph/0403174] [INSPIRE].
R.M. Godbole, D.J. Miller and M. Muhlleitner, Aspects of CP-violation in the H ZZ coupling at the LHC, JHEP 12 (2007) 031 [arXiv:0708.0458] [INSPIRE].
R. Godbole, D.J. Miller, K. Mohan and C.D. White, Boosting Higgs CP properties via VH Production at the Large Hadron Collider, Phys. Lett. B 730 (2014) 275 [arXiv:1306.2573] [INSPIRE].
R.M. Godbole, D.J. Miller, K.A. Mohan and C.D. White, Jet substructure and probes of CP-violation in Vh production, JHEP 04 (2015) 103 [arXiv:1409.5449] [INSPIRE].
J. Gratrex, M. Hopfer and R. Zwicky, Generalised helicity formalism, higher moments and the \( B\to {K}_{J_K}\left(\to K\pi \right){\overline{\mathrm{\ell}}}_1{\mathrm{\ell}}_2 \) angular distributions, Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 054008 [arXiv:1506.03970] [INSPIRE].
K. Kondo, Dynamical Likelihood Method for Reconstruction of Events With Missing Momentum. 1: Method and Toy Models, J. Phys. Soc. Jap. 57 (1988) 4126 [INSPIRE].
J.S. Gainer, J. Lykken, K.T. Matchev, S. Mrenna and M. Park, The Matrix Element Method: Past, Present, and Future, in Community Summer Study 2013: Snowmass on the Mississippi, (2013) [arXiv:1307.3546] [INSPIRE].
D.E. Soper and M. Spannowsky, Finding physics signals with event deconstruction, Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 094005 [arXiv:1402.1189] [INSPIRE].
J. Brehmer, K. Cranmer, F. Kling and T. Plehn, Better Higgs boson measurements through information geometry, Phys. Rev. D 95 (2017) 073002 [arXiv:1612.05261] [INSPIRE].
J. Brehmer, F. Kling, T. Plehn and T.M.P. Tait, Better Higgs-CP Tests Through Information Geometry, Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) 095017 [arXiv:1712.02350] [INSPIRE].
J. Brehmer, G. Louppe, J. Pavez and K. Cranmer, Mining gold from implicit models to improve likelihood-free inference, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 117 (2020) 5242 [arXiv:1805.12244] [INSPIRE].
J. Brehmer, S. Dawson, S. Homiller, F. Kling and T. Plehn, Benchmarking simplified template cross sections in WH production, JHEP 11 (2019) 034 [arXiv:1908.06980] [INSPIRE].
J. Brehmer, F. Kling, I. Espejo and K. Cranmer, MadMiner: Machine learning-based inference for particle physics, Comput. Softw. Big Sci. 4 (2020) 3 [arXiv:1907.10621] [INSPIRE].
S. Prestel and M. Spannowsky, HYTREES: Combining Matrix Elements and Parton Shower for Hypothesis Testing, Eur. Phys. J. C 79 (2019) 546 [arXiv:1901.11035] [INSPIRE].
J. Brehmer, K. Cranmer, G. Louppe and J. Pavez, Constraining Effective Field Theories with Machine Learning, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 (2018) 111801 [arXiv:1805.00013] [INSPIRE].
C. Englert, P. Galler, P. Harris and M. Spannowsky, Machine Learning Uncertainties with Adversarial Neural Networks, Eur. Phys. J. C 79 (2019) 4 [arXiv:1807.08763] [INSPIRE].
R.T. D’Agnolo and A. Wulzer, Learning New Physics from a Machine, Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) 015014 [arXiv:1806.02350] [INSPIRE].
CMS collaboration, Observation of a New Boson at a Mass of 125 GeV with the CMS Experiment at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B 716 (2012) 30 [arXiv:1207.7235] [INSPIRE].
A. Pomarol, Higgs Physics, in 2014 European School of High-Energy Physics, pp. 59–77 (2016) [arXiv:1412.4410] [INSPIRE].
A. Pomarol and F. Riva, Towards the Ultimate SM Fit to Close in on Higgs Physics, JHEP 01 (2014) 151 [arXiv:1308.2803] [INSPIRE].
G. D’Ambrosio, G.F. Giudice, G. Isidori and A. Strumia, Minimal flavor violation: An Effective field theory approach, Nucl. Phys. B 645 (2002) 155 [hep-ph/0207036] [INSPIRE].
G. Isidori and M. Trott, Higgs form factors in Associated Production, JHEP 02 (2014) 082 [arXiv:1307.4051] [INSPIRE].
R. Franceschini, G. Panico, A. Pomarol, F. Riva and A. Wulzer, Electroweak Precision Tests in High-Energy Diboson Processes, JHEP 02 (2018) 111 [arXiv:1712.01310] [INSPIRE].
J. Nakamura, Polarisations of the Z and W bosons in the processes pp → ZH and pp → W±H, JHEP 08 (2017) 008 [arXiv:1706.01816] [INSPIRE].
J.C. Collins and D.E. Soper, Angular Distribution of Dileptons in High-Energy Hadron Collisions, Phys. Rev. D 16 (1977) 2219 [INSPIRE].
K. Hagiwara, K.-i. Hikasa and N. Kai, Parity Odd Asymmetries in W Jet Events at Hadron Colliders, Phys. Rev. Lett. 52 (1984) 1076 [INSPIRE].
I. Anderson et al., Constraining Anomalous HVV Interactions at Proton and Lepton Colliders, Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 035007 [arXiv:1309.4819] [INSPIRE].
V.D. Barger, K.-m. Cheung, A. Djouadi, B.A. Kniehl and P.M. Zerwas, Higgs bosons: Intermediate mass range at e+e− colliders, Phys. Rev. D 49 (1994) 79 [hep-ph/9306270] [INSPIRE].
C. Delaunay, G. Perez, H. de Sandes and W. Skiba, Higgs Up-Down CP Asymmetry at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 035004 [arXiv:1308.4930] [INSPIRE].
J. Alwall et al., The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations, JHEP 07 (2014) 079 [arXiv:1405.0301] [INSPIRE].
T. Sjöstrand, L. Lönnblad and S. Mrenna, PYTHIA 6.2: Physics and manual, hep-ph/0108264 [INSPIRE].
T. Sjöstrand et al., An introduction to PYTHIA 8.2, Comput. Phys. Commun. 191 (2015) 159 [arXiv:1410.3012] [INSPIRE].
S. Frixione, Z. Kunszt and A. Signer, Three jet cross-sections to next-to-leading order, Nucl. Phys. B 467 (1996) 399 [hep-ph/9512328] [INSPIRE].
G. Ossola, C.G. Papadopoulos and R. Pittau, Reducing full one-loop amplitudes to scalar integrals at the integrand level, Nucl. Phys. B 763 (2007) 147 [hep-ph/0609007] [INSPIRE].
S. Frixione and B.R. Webber, Matching NLO QCD computations and parton shower simulations, JHEP 06 (2002) 029 [hep-ph/0204244] [INSPIRE].
P. Artoisenet, R. Frederix, O. Mattelaer and R. Rietkerk, Automatic spin-entangled decays of heavy resonances in Monte Carlo simulations, JHEP 03 (2013) 015 [arXiv:1212.3460] [INSPIRE].
A. Alloul, N.D. Christensen, C. Degrande, C. Duhr and B. Fuks, FeynRules 2.0 — A complete toolbox for tree-level phenomenology, Comput. Phys. Commun. 185 (2014) 2250 [arXiv:1310.1921] [INSPIRE].
C. Degrande, Automatic evaluation of UV and R2 terms for beyond the Standard Model Lagrangians: a proof-of-principle, Comput. Phys. Commun. 197 (2015) 239 [arXiv:1406.3030] [INSPIRE].
J.M. Butterworth, A.R. Davison, M. Rubin and G.P. Salam, Jet substructure as a new Higgs search channel at the LHC, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 (2008) 242001 [arXiv:0802.2470] [INSPIRE].
D.E. Soper and M. Spannowsky, Combining subjet algorithms to enhance ZH detection at the LHC, JHEP 08 (2010) 029 [arXiv:1005.0417] [INSPIRE].
D.E. Soper and M. Spannowsky, Finding physics signals with shower deconstruction, Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011) 074002 [arXiv:1102.3480] [INSPIRE].
Y.L. Dokshitzer, G.D. Leder, S. Moretti and B.R. Webber, Better jet clustering algorithms, JHEP 08 (1997) 001 [hep-ph/9707323] [INSPIRE].
M. Wobisch and T. Wengler, Hadronization corrections to jet cross-sections in deep inelastic scattering, in Workshop on Monte Carlo Generators for HERA Physics (Plenary Starting Meeting), pp. 270–279 (1998) [hep-ph/9907280] [INSPIRE].
M.L. Mangano, M. Moretti, F. Piccinini and M. Treccani, Matching matrix elements and shower evolution for top-quark production in hadronic collisions, JHEP 01 (2007) 013 [hep-ph/0611129] [INSPIRE].
S. Alioli, F. Caola, G. Luisoni and R. Röntsch, ZZ production in gluon fusion at NLO matched to parton shower, Phys. Rev. D 95 (2017) 034042 [arXiv:1609.09719] [INSPIRE].
L. Altenkamp, S. Dittmaier, R.V. Harlander, H. Rzehak and T.J.E. Zirke, Gluon-induced Higgs-strahlung at next-to-leading order QCD, JHEP 02 (2013) 078 [arXiv:1211.5015] [INSPIRE].
J.M. Campbell and R. Ellis, An Update on vector boson pair production at hadron colliders, Phys. Rev. D 60 (1999) 113006 [hep-ph/9905386] [INSPIRE].
J.M. Campbell, R. Ellis and C. Williams, Vector boson pair production at the LHC, JHEP 07 (2011) 018 [arXiv:1105.0020] [INSPIRE].
J.M. Campbell, R.K. Ellis and W.T. Giele, A Multi-Threaded Version of MCFM, Eur. Phys. J. C 75 (2015) 246 [arXiv:1503.06182] [INSPIRE].
M. Cacciari, G.P. Salam and G. Soyez, FastJet User Manual, Eur. Phys. J. C 72 (2012) 1896 [arXiv:1111.6097] [INSPIRE].
A. Hocker et al., TMVA — Toolkit for Multivariate Data Analysis, physics/0703039 [INSPIRE].
D. Ciupke, Study of BDT Training Configurations with an Application to the Z/H → ττ → ee Analysis, (2012) [http://www.desy.de/f/students/2012/reports/david ciupke.pdf.gz].
M. Cepeda et al., Report from Working Group 2: Higgs Physics at the HL-LHC and HE-LHC, CERN Yellow Rep. Monogr. 7 (2019) 221 [arXiv:1902.00134] [INSPIRE].
N. Berger et al., Simplified Template Cross Sections — Stage 1.1, arXiv:1906.02754 [INSPIRE].
J. Anderson, S. Banerjee, R.S. Gupta and M. Spannowsky, A SMEFT analysis of weak boson fusion using the method of moments, in preparation.
S. Banerjee, R.S. Gupta, M. Spannowsky, O. Valeriano and E. Venturini, A SMEFT analysis of the golden channel using the method of moments, in preparation.
S. Banerjee, R.S. Gupta, S. Seth, M. Spannowsky and O. Valeriano, A SMEFT analysis of diboson production using the method of moments, in preparation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
ArXiv ePrint: 1912.07628
Rights and permissions
Open Access . This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
About this article
Cite this article
Banerjee, S., Gupta, R.S., Reiness, J.Y. et al. Towards the ultimate differential SMEFT analysis. J. High Energ. Phys. 2020, 170 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP09(2020)170
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP09(2020)170