Abstract
We report on an interesting realization of the QCD axion, with mass in the range \( \mathcal{O} \)(10) MeV. It has previously been shown that although this scenario is stringently constrained from multiple sources, the model remains viable for a range of parameters that leads to an explanation of the Atomki experiment anomaly. In this article we study in more detail the additional constraints proceeding from recent low energy experiments and study the compatibility of the allowed parameter space with the one leading to consistency of the most recent measurements of the electron anomalous magnetic moment and the fine structure constant. We further provide an ultraviolet completion of this axion variant and show the conditions under which it may lead to the observed quark masses and CKM mixing angles, and remain consistent with experimental constraints on the extended scalar sector appearing in this Standard Model extension. In particular, the decay of the Standard Model-like Higgs boson into two light axions may be relevant and leads to a novel Higgs boson signature that may be searched for at the LHC in the near future.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Particle Data Group collaboration, Review of Particle Physics, PTEP 2020 (2020) 083C01 [INSPIRE].
R.J. Crewther, P. Di Vecchia, G. Veneziano and E. Witten, Chiral Estimate of the Electric Dipole Moment of the Neutron in Quantum Chromodynamics, Phys. Lett. B 88 (1979) 123 [Erratum ibid. 91 (1980) 487] [INSPIRE].
nEDM collaboration, Measurement of the permanent electric dipole moment of the neutron, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124 (2020) 081803 [arXiv:2001.11966] [INSPIRE].
R.D. Peccei and H.R. Quinn, CP Conservation in the Presence of Instantons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 38 (1977) 1440 [INSPIRE].
R.D. Peccei and H.R. Quinn, Constraints Imposed by CP Conservation in the Presence of Instantons, Phys. Rev. D 16 (1977) 1791 [INSPIRE].
S. Weinberg, A New Light Boson?, Phys. Rev. Lett. 40 (1978) 223 [INSPIRE].
F. Wilczek, Problem of Strong P and T Invariance in the Presence of Instantons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 40 (1978) 279 [INSPIRE].
J. Blumlein et al., Limits on neutral light scalar and pseudoscalar particles in a proton beam dump experiment, Z. Phys. C 51 (1991) 341 [INSPIRE].
J. Blumlein et al., Limits on the mass of light (pseudo)scalar particles from Bethe-Heitler e+e− and μ+μ− pair production in a proton – iron beam dump experiment, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 7 (1992) 3835 [INSPIRE].
J.E. Kim and G. Carosi, Axions and the Strong CP Problem, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82 (2010) 557 [Erratum ibid. 91 (2019) 049902] [arXiv:0807.3125] [INSPIRE].
M. Kawasaki and K. Nakayama, Axions: Theory and Cosmological Role, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 63 (2013) 69 [arXiv:1301.1123] [INSPIRE].
P.W. Graham, I.G. Irastorza, S.K. Lamoreaux, A. Lindner and K.A. van Bibber, Experimental Searches for the Axion and Axion-Like Particles, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 65 (2015) 485 [arXiv:1602.00039] [INSPIRE].
J.E. Kim, Weak Interaction Singlet and Strong CP Invariance, Phys. Rev. Lett. 43 (1979) 103 [INSPIRE].
M.A. Shifman, A.I. Vainshtein and V.I. Zakharov, Can Confinement Ensure Natural CP Invariance of Strong Interactions?, Nucl. Phys. B 166 (1980) 493 [INSPIRE].
M. Dine, W. Fischler and M. Srednicki, A Simple Solution to the Strong CP Problem with a Harmless Axion, Phys. Lett. B 104 (1981) 199 [INSPIRE].
A.R. Zhitnitsky, On Possible Suppression of the Axion Hadron Interactions (in Russian), Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 31 (1980) 260 [INSPIRE].
L.M. Krauss and D.J. Nash, A viable weak interaction axion?, Phys. Lett. B 202 (1988) 560 [INSPIRE].
D.S.M. Alves and N. Weiner, A viable QCD axion in the MeV mass range, JHEP 07 (2018) 092 [arXiv:1710.03764] [INSPIRE].
D.S.M. Alves, Signals of the QCD axion with mass of 17 MeV/c2: Nuclear transitions and light meson decays, Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021) 055018 [arXiv:2009.05578] [INSPIRE].
A.J. Krasznahorkay et al., Observation of Anomalous Internal Pair Creation in 8Be: A Possible Indication of a Light, Neutral Boson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 (2016) 042501 [arXiv:1504.01527] [INSPIRE].
A.J. Krasznahorkay et al., New evidence supporting the existence of the hypothetic X17 particle, arXiv:1910.10459 [INSPIRE].
U. Ellwanger and S. Moretti, Possible Explanation of the Electron Positron Anomaly at 17 MeV in 8Be Transitions Through a Light Pseudoscalar, JHEP 11 (2016) 039 [arXiv:1609.01669] [INSPIRE].
L. Delle Rose, S. Khalil, S.J.D. King and S. Moretti, New Physics Suggested by Atomki Anomaly, Front. in Phys. 7 (2019) 73 [arXiv:1812.05497] [INSPIRE].
J.L. Feng, T.M.P. Tait and C.B. Verhaaren, Dynamical Evidence For a Fifth Force Explanation of the ATOMKI Nuclear Anomalies, Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020) 036016 [arXiv:2006.01151] [INSPIRE].
M. Hostert and M. Pospelov, Novel multi-lepton signatures of dark sectors in light meson decays, arXiv:2012.02142 [INSPIRE].
D. Buttazzo, P. Panci, D. Teresi and R. Ziegler, Xenon1T excess from electron recoils of non-relativistic Dark Matter, Phys. Lett. B 817 (2021) 136310 [arXiv:2011.08919] [INSPIRE].
A. Aleksejevs, S. Barkanova, Y.G. Kolomensky and B. Sheff, A Standard Model Explanation for the “ATOMKI Anomaly”, arXiv:2102.01127 [INSPIRE].
R.H. Parker, C. Yu, W. Zhong, B. Estey and H. Müller, Measurement of the fine-structure constant as a test of the Standard Model, Science 360 (2018) 191 [arXiv:1812.04130] [INSPIRE].
D. Hanneke, S. Fogwell and G. Gabrielse, New Measurement of the Electron Magnetic Moment and the Fine Structure Constant, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 (2008) 120801 [arXiv:0801.1134] [INSPIRE].
D. Hanneke, S.F. Hoogerheide and G. Gabrielse, Cavity Control of a Single-Electron Quantum Cyclotron: Measuring the Electron Magnetic Moment, Phys. Rev. A 83 (2011) 052122 [arXiv:1009.4831] [INSPIRE].
T. Aoyama, M. Hayakawa, T. Kinoshita and M. Nio, Tenth-Order Electron Anomalous Magnetic Moment — Contribution of Diagrams without Closed Lepton Loops, Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015) 033006 [Erratum ibid. 96 (2017) 019901] [arXiv:1412.8284] [INSPIRE].
P.J. Mohr, D.B. Newell and B.N. Taylor, CODATA Recommended Values of the Fundamental Physical Constants: 2014, Rev. Mod. Phys. 88 (2016) 035009 [arXiv:1507.07956] [INSPIRE].
L. Morel, Z. Yao, P. Cladé and S. Guellati-Khélifa, Determination of the fine-structure constant with an accuracy of 81 parts per trillion, Nature 588 (2020) 61 [INSPIRE].
J. Liu, C.E.M. Wagner and X.-P. Wang, A light complex scalar for the electron and muon anomalous magnetic moments, JHEP 03 (2019) 008 [arXiv:1810.11028] [INSPIRE].
W.A. Bardeen, R.D. Peccei and T. Yanagida, Constraints on variant axion models, Nucl. Phys. B 279 (1987) 401 [INSPIRE].
SINDRUM collaboration, Limits for Shortlived Neutral Particles Emitted μ+ or π+ Decay, Phys. Lett. B 175 (1986) 101 [INSPIRE].
M. Bauer, M. Neubert and A. Thamm, Collider Probes of Axion-Like Particles, JHEP 12 (2017) 044 [arXiv:1708.00443] [INSPIRE].
NA64 collaboration, Improved limits on a hypothetical X(16.7) boson and a dark photon decaying into e+e− pairs, Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 071101 [arXiv:1912.11389] [INSPIRE].
J. Jaeckel and M. Spannowsky, Probing MeV to 90 GeV axion-like particles with LEP and LHC, Phys. Lett. B 753 (2016) 482 [arXiv:1509.00476] [INSPIRE].
J. Liu, L.-T. Wang, X.-P. Wang and W. Xue, Exposing the dark sector with future Z factories, Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) 095044 [arXiv:1712.07237] [INSPIRE].
J.S. Lee, Revisiting Supernova 1987A Limits on Axion-Like-Particles, arXiv:1808.10136 [INSPIRE].
ATLAS collaboration, Electron reconstruction and identification in the ATLAS experiment using the 2015 and 2016 LHC proton-proton collision data at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV, Eur. Phys. J. C 79 (2019) 639 [arXiv:1902.04655] [INSPIRE].
A. Flórez et al., Probing axion-like particles with γγ final states from vector boson fusion processes at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021) 095001 [arXiv:2101.11119] [INSPIRE].
M. Bauer, M. Heiles, M. Neubert and A. Thamm, Axion-Like Particles at Future Colliders, Eur. Phys. J. C 79 (2019) 74 [arXiv:1808.10323] [INSPIRE].
S.B. Treiman and F. Wilczek, Axion Emission in Decay of Excited Nuclear States, Phys. Lett. B 74 (1978) 381 [INSPIRE].
T.W. Donnelly, S.J. Freedman, R.S. Lytel, R.D. Peccei and M. Schwartz, Do Axions Exist?, Phys. Rev. D 18 (1978) 1607 [INSPIRE].
A. Barroso and N.C. Mukhopadhyay, Nuclear axion decay, Phys. Rev. C 24 (1981) 2382 [INSPIRE].
L.M. Krauss and M.B. Wise, Constraints on Shortlived Axions From the Decay π+ → e+e−e+ Neutrino, Phys. Lett. B 176 (1986) 483 [INSPIRE].
H.-Y. Cheng and C.-W. Chiang, Revisiting Scalar and Pseudoscalar Couplings with Nucleons, JHEP 07 (2012) 009 [arXiv:1202.1292] [INSPIRE].
QCDSF collaboration, Strangeness Contribution to the Proton Spin from Lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 (2012) 222001 [arXiv:1112.3354] [INSPIRE].
A. Abdel-Rehim et al., Disconnected quark loop contributions to nucleon observables in lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 034501 [arXiv:1310.6339] [INSPIRE].
BaBar collaboration, Search for a Dark Photon in e+e− Collisions at BaBar, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113 (2014) 201801 [arXiv:1406.2980] [INSPIRE].
S. Knapen, T. Lin and K.M. Zurek, Light Dark Matter: Models and Constraints, Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 115021 [arXiv:1709.07882] [INSPIRE].
S. Jana, V.P.K. and S. Saad, Resolving electron and muon g − 2 within the 2HDM, Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 115037 [arXiv:2003.03386] [INSPIRE].
CMS Collaboration, Search for displaced photons using conversions at 8 TeV, CMS-PAS-EXO-14-017.
P. Agrawal, J. Fan, B. Heidenreich, M. Reece and M. Strassler, Experimental Considerations Motivated by the Diphoton Excess at the LHC, JHEP 06 (2016) 082 [arXiv:1512.05775] [INSPIRE].
B. Dasgupta, J. Kopp and P. Schwaller, Photons, photon jets, and dark photons at 750 GeV and beyond, Eur. Phys. J. C 76 (2016) 277 [arXiv:1602.04692] [INSPIRE].
Y. Tsai, L.-T. Wang and Y. Zhao, Faking ordinary photons by displaced dark photon decays, Phys. Rev. D 95 (2017) 015027 [arXiv:1603.00024] [INSPIRE].
ATLAS collaboration, Electron and photon performance measurements with the ATLAS detector using the 2015-2017 LHC proton-proton collision data, 2019 JINST 14 P12006 [arXiv:1908.00005] [INSPIRE].
N. Arkani-Hamed and N. Weiner, LHC Signals for a SuperUnified Theory of Dark Matter, JHEP 12 (2008) 104 [arXiv:0810.0714] [INSPIRE].
M. Baumgart, C. Cheung, J.T. Ruderman, L.-T. Wang and I. Yavin, Non-Abelian Dark Sectors and Their Collider Signatures, JHEP 04 (2009) 014 [arXiv:0901.0283] [INSPIRE].
J.T. Ruderman and T. Volansky, Decaying into the Hidden Sector, JHEP 02 (2010) 024 [arXiv:0908.1570] [INSPIRE].
C. Cheung, J.T. Ruderman, L.-T. Wang and I. Yavin, Lepton Jets in (Supersymmetric) Electroweak Processes, JHEP 04 (2010) 116 [arXiv:0909.0290] [INSPIRE].
ATLAS collaboration, Search for displaced muonic lepton jets from light Higgs boson decay in proton-proton collisions at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 7 TeV with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Lett. B 721 (2013) 32 [arXiv:1210.0435] [INSPIRE].
CMS collaboration, Search for a Non-Standard-Model Higgs Boson Decaying to a Pair of New Light Bosons in Four-Muon Final States, Phys. Lett. B 726 (2013) 564 [arXiv:1210.7619] [INSPIRE].
ATLAS collaboration, Search for long-lived neutral particles decaying into lepton jets in proton-proton collisions at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 8 TeV with the ATLAS detector, JHEP 11 (2014) 088 [arXiv:1409.0746] [INSPIRE].
CMS collaboration, A search for pair production of new light bosons decaying into muons in proton-proton collisions at 13 TeV, Phys. Lett. B 796 (2019) 131 [arXiv:1812.00380] [INSPIRE].
ATLAS collaboration, Search for light long-lived neutral particles produced in pp collisions at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV and decaying into collimated leptons or light hadrons with the ATLAS detector, Eur. Phys. J. C 80 (2020) 450 [arXiv:1909.01246] [INSPIRE].
ATLAS collaboration, Search for WH production with a light Higgs boson decaying to prompt electron-jets in proton-proton collisions at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 7 TeV with the ATLAS detector, New J. Phys. 15 (2013) 043009 [arXiv:1302.4403] [INSPIRE].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
ArXiv ePrint: 2102.10118
Rights and permissions
Open Access . This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
About this article
Cite this article
Liu, J., McGinnis, N., Wagner, C.E.M. et al. Challenges for a QCD axion at the 10 MeV scale. J. High Energ. Phys. 2021, 138 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP05(2021)138
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP05(2021)138