Abstract
Effects on atmospheric prompt neutrino fluxes of present uncertainties affecting the nucleon composition are studied by using the PROSA fit to parton distribution functions (PDFs). The PROSA fit extends the precision of the PDFs to low x, which is the kinematic region of relevance for high-energy neutrino production, by taking into account LHCb data on charm and bottom hadroproduction collected at the center-of-mass energy of \( \sqrt{s}=7 \) TeV. In the range of neutrino energies explored by present Very Large Volume Neutrino Telescopes, it is found that PDF uncertainties are far smaller with respect to those due to renormalization and factorization scale variation and to assumptions on the cosmic ray composition, which at present dominate and limit our knowledge of prompt neutrino fluxes. A discussion is presented on how these uncertainties affect the expected number of atmospheric prompt neutrino events in the analysis of high-energy events characterized by interaction vertices fully contained within the instrumented volume of the detector, performed by the IceCube collaboration.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
IceCube collaboration, M.G. Aartsen et al., Evidence for High-Energy Extraterrestrial Neutrinos at the IceCube Detector, Science 342 (2013) 1242856 [arXiv:1311.5238] [INSPIRE].
KM3NeT collaboration, S. Adrian-Martinez et al., Letter of intent for KM3NeT 2.0, J. Phys. G 43 (2016) 084001 [arXiv:1601.07459] [INSPIRE].
D. Franco et al., Mass hierarchy discrimination with atmospheric neutrinos in large volume ice/water Cherenkov detectors, JHEP 04 (2013) 008 [arXiv:1301.4332] [INSPIRE].
IceCube Gen2 collaboration, J.P. Yañez, From DeepCore to PINGU: Measuring atmospheric neutrino oscillations at the South Pole, EPJ Web Conf. 116 (2016) 11009 [arXiv:1601.05245] [INSPIRE].
KM3NeT collaboration, U.F. Katz, The ORCA Option for KM3NeT, PoS(NEUTEL 2013) 057 [arXiv:1402.1022] [INSPIRE].
M.V. Garzelli, S. Moch and G. Sigl, Lepton fluxes from atmospheric charm revisited, JHEP 10 (2015) 115 [arXiv:1507.01570] [INSPIRE].
M. Honda, T. Kajita, K. Kasahara, S. Midorikawa and T. Sanuki, Calculation of atmospheric neutrino flux using the interaction model calibrated with atmospheric muon data, Phys. Rev. D 75 (2007) 043006 [astro-ph/0611418] [INSPIRE].
A. Accardi et al., A Critical Appraisal and Evaluation of Modern PDFs, Eur. Phys. J. C 76 (2016) 471 [arXiv:1603.08906] [INSPIRE].
PROSA collaboration, O. Zenaiev et al., Impact of heavy-flavour production cross sections measured by the LHCb experiment on parton distribution functions at low x, Eur. Phys. J. C 75 (2015)396 [arXiv:1503.04581] [INSPIRE].
R. Gauld, J. Rojo, L. Rottoli and J. Talbert, Charm production in the forward region: constraints on the small-x gluon and backgrounds for neutrino astronomy, JHEP 11 (2015) 009 [arXiv:1506.08025] [INSPIRE].
NNPDF collaboration, R.D. Ball et al., Reweighting NNPDFs: the W lepton asymmetry, Nucl. Phys. B 849 (2011) 112 [Erratum ibid. B 854 (2012) 926] [arXiv:1012.0836] [INSPIRE].
R.D. Ball et al., Reweighting and Unweighting of Parton Distributions and the LHC W lepton asymmetry data, Nucl. Phys. B 855 (2012) 608 [arXiv:1108.1758] [INSPIRE].
R. Gauld and J. Rojo, Precision determination of the small-x gluon from charm production at LHCb, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 (2017) 072001 [arXiv:1610.09373] [INSPIRE].
LHCb collaboration, Measurements of prompt charm production cross-sections in pp collisions at \( \sqrt{s}=13 \) TeV, JHEP 03 (2016) 159 [Erratum ibid. 09 (2016) 013] [arXiv:1510.01707] [INSPIRE].
LHCb collaboration, Measurements of prompt charm production cross-sections in pp collisions at \( \sqrt{s}=5 \) TeV, arXiv:1610.02230 [INSPIRE].
LHCb collaboration, Measurement of B meson production cross-sections in proton-proton collisions at \( \sqrt{s}=7 \) TeV, JHEP 08 (2013) 117 [arXiv:1306.3663] [INSPIRE].
IceCube collaboration, M.G. Aartsen et al., IceCube-Gen2: A Vision for the Future of Neutrino Astronomy in Antarctica, arXiv:1412.5106 [INSPIRE].
IceCube collaboration, M.G. Aartsen et al., Observation of High-Energy Astrophysical Neutrinos in Three Years of IceCube Data, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113 (2014) 101101 [arXiv:1405.5303] [INSPIRE].
IceCube collaboration, M.G. Aartsen et al., The IceCube Neutrino Observatory — Contributions to ICRC 2015 Part II: Atmospheric and Astrophysical Diffuse Neutrino Searches of All Flavors, arXiv:1510.05223 [INSPIRE].
IceCube collaboration, M.G. Aartsen et al., Observation and Characterization of a Cosmic Muon Neutrino Flux from the Northern Hemisphere using six years of IceCube data, Astrophys. J. 833 (2016) 3 [arXiv:1607.08006] [INSPIRE].
C. Lourenco and H.K. Wöhri, Heavy flavour hadro-production from fixed-target to collider energies, Phys. Rept. 433 (2006) 127 [hep-ph/0609101] [INSPIRE].
O. Behnke, A. Geiser and M. Lisovyi, Charm, Beauty and Top at HERA, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 84 (2015) 1 [arXiv:1506.07519] [INSPIRE].
P. Nason, S. Dawson and R.K. Ellis, The Total Cross-Section for the Production of Heavy Quarks in Hadronic Collisions, Nucl. Phys. B 303 (1988) 607 [INSPIRE].
M.L. Mangano, P. Nason and G. Ridolfi, Heavy quark correlations in hadron collisions at next-to-leading order, Nucl. Phys. B 373 (1992) 295 [INSPIRE].
S. Frixione, P. Nason and B.R. Webber, Matching NLO QCD and parton showers in heavy flavor production, JHEP 08 (2003) 007 [hep-ph/0305252] [INSPIRE].
S. Frixione, P. Nason and G. Ridolfi, A Positive-weight next-to-leading-order Monte Carlo for heavy flavour hadroproduction, JHEP 09 (2007) 126 [arXiv:0707.3088] [INSPIRE].
P. Uwer, Electroweak corrections in top physics (1), PoS(TOP2015)050 [INSPIRE].
D. Pagani, Electroweak corrections in top physics (2), PoS(TOP2015)051 [INSPIRE].
M.L. Mangano et al., Physics at a 100 TeV pp collider: Standard Model processes, arXiv:1607.01831 [INSPIRE].
M. Czakon, D. Heymes and A. Mitov, High-precision differential predictions for top-quark pairs at the LHC, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 (2016) 082003 [arXiv:1511.00549] [INSPIRE].
M. Czakon, D. Heymes and A. Mitov, Dynamical scales for multi-TeV top-pair production at the LHC, JHEP 04 (2017) 071 [arXiv:1606.03350] [INSPIRE].
S. Alioli, P. Nason, C. Oleari and E. Re, A general framework for implementing NLO calculations in shower Monte Carlo programs: the POWHEG BOX, JHEP 06 (2010) 043 [arXiv:1002.2581] [INSPIRE].
T. Sjöstrand, S. Mrenna and P.Z. Skands, PYTHIA 6.4 Physics and Manual, JHEP 05 (2006) 026 [hep-ph/0603175] [INSPIRE].
T. Sjöstrand et al., An Introduction to PYTHIA 8.2, Comput. Phys. Commun. 191 (2015) 159 [arXiv:1410.3012] [INSPIRE].
P.Z. Skands, Tuning Monte Carlo Generators: The Perugia Tunes, Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 074018 [arXiv:1005.3457] [INSPIRE].
ATLAS collaboration, ATLAS Run 1 PYTHIA8 tunes, ATL-PHYS-PUB-2014-021 (2014).
P. Skands, S. Carrazza and J. Rojo, Tuning PYTHIA 8.1: the Monash 2013 Tune, Eur. Phys. J. C 74 (2014) 3024 [arXiv:1404.5630] [INSPIRE].
R. Gauld, J. Rojo, L. Rottoli, S. Sarkar and J. Talbert, The prompt atmospheric neutrino flux in the light of LHCb, JHEP 02 (2016) 130 [arXiv:1511.06346] [INSPIRE].
A. Bhattacharya, R. Enberg, M.H. Reno, I. Sarcevic and A. Stasto, Perturbative charm production and the prompt atmospheric neutrino flux in light of RHIC and LHC, JHEP 06 (2015) 110 [arXiv:1502.01076] [INSPIRE].
A. Bhattacharya et al., Prompt atmospheric neutrino fluxes: perturbative QCD models and nuclear effects, JHEP 11 (2016) 167 [arXiv:1607.00193] [INSPIRE].
LHCb collaboration, Prompt charm production in pp collisions at \( \sqrt{s}=7 \) TeV, Nucl. Phys. B 871 (2013) 1 [arXiv:1302.2864] [INSPIRE].
M. Lisovyi, A. Verbytskyi and O. Zenaiev, Combined analysis of charm-quark fragmentation-fraction measurements, Eur. Phys. J. C 76 (2016) 397 [arXiv:1509.01061] [INSPIRE].
T.K. Gaisser, Cosmic rays and particle physics, Cambridge University Press (1990) [INSPIRE].
P. Lipari, Lepton spectra in the earth’s atmosphere, Astropart. Phys. 1 (1993) 195 [INSPIRE].
L. Pasquali, M.H. Reno and I. Sarcevic, Lepton fluxes from atmospheric charm, Phys. Rev. D 59 (1999) 034020 [hep-ph/9806428] [INSPIRE].
M. Cacciari, S. Frixione, N. Houdeau, M.L. Mangano, P. Nason and G. Ridolfi, Theoretical predictions for charm and bottom production at the LHC, JHEP 10 (2012) 137 [arXiv:1205.6344] [INSPIRE].
T.K. Gaisser, T. Stanev and S. Tilav, Cosmic Ray Energy Spectrum from Measurements of Air Showers, Front. Phys. (Beijing) 8 (2013) 748 [arXiv:1303.3565] [INSPIRE].
T. Stanev, T.K. Gaisser and S. Tilav, High energy cosmic rays: sources and fluxes, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 742 (2014) 42 [INSPIRE].
T.K. Gaisser, Spectrum of cosmic-ray nucleons, kaon production and the atmospheric muon charge ratio, Astropart. Phys. 35 (2012) 801 [arXiv:1111.6675] [INSPIRE].
V.G. Kartvelishvili, A.K. Likhoded and V.A. Petrov, On the Fragmentation Functions of Heavy Quarks Into Hadrons, Phys. Lett. B 78 (1978) 615 [INSPIRE].
ZEUS, H1 collaborations, F.D. Aaron et al., Combined Measurement and QCD Analysis of the Inclusive e ± p Scattering Cross sections at HERA, JHEP 01 (2010) 109 [arXiv:0911.0884] [INSPIRE].
S. Alekhin, J. Blümlein and S. Moch, Parton Distribution Functions and Benchmark Cross sections at NNLO, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 054009 [arXiv:1202.2281] [INSPIRE].
A. Accardi, L.T. Brady, W. Melnitchouk, J.F. Owens and N. Sato, Constraints on large-x parton distributions from new weak boson production and deep-inelastic scattering data, Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 114017 [arXiv:1602.03154] [INSPIRE].
S. Dulat et al., New parton distribution functions from a global analysis of quantum chromodynamics, Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 033006 [arXiv:1506.07443] [INSPIRE].
P. Jimenez-Delgado and E. Reya, Delineating parton distributions and the strong coupling, Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 074049 [arXiv:1403.1852] [INSPIRE].
ZEUS, H1 collaborations, H. Abramowicz et al., Combination of measurements of inclusive deep inelastic e ± p scattering cross sections and QCD analysis of HERA data, Eur. Phys. J. C 75 (2015) 580 [arXiv:1506.06042] [INSPIRE].
L.A. Harland-Lang, A.D. Martin, P. Motylinski and R.S. Thorne, Parton distributions in the LHC era: MMHT 2014 PDFs, Eur. Phys. J. C 75 (2015) 204 [arXiv:1412.3989] [INSPIRE].
NNPDF collaboration, R.D. Ball et al., Parton distributions for the LHC Run II, JHEP 04 (2015) 040 [arXiv:1410.8849] [INSPIRE].
A. Buckley et al., LHAPDF6: parton density access in the LHC precision era, Eur. Phys. J. C 75 (2015) 132 [arXiv:1412.7420] [INSPIRE].
S. Alekhin et al., HERAFitter, Eur. Phys. J. C 75 (2015) 304 [arXiv:1410.4412] [INSPIRE].
xFitter, An open source QCD fit framework, http://xFitter.org.
Particle Data Group collaboration, K.A. Olive et al., Review of Particle Physics, Chin. Phys. C 38 (2014) 090001 [INSPIRE].
Particle Data Group collaboration, C. Patrignani et al., Review of Particle Physics, Chin. Phys. C 40 (2016) 100001 [INSPIRE].
E.S. Seo, Direct measurements of cosmic rays using balloon borne experiments, Astropart. Phys. 39-40 (2012) 76 [INSPIRE].
A. Haungs, H. Rebel and M. Roth, Energy spectrum and mass composition of high-energy cosmic rays, Rept. Prog. Phys. 66 (2003) 1145 [INSPIRE].
K.-H. Kampert and M. Unger, Measurements of the Cosmic Ray Composition with Air Shower Experiments, Astropart. Phys. 35 (2012) 660 [arXiv:1201.0018] [INSPIRE].
Pierre Auger collaboration, A. Aab et al., Evidence for a mixed mass composition at the ‘ankle’ in the cosmic-ray spectrum, Phys. Lett. B 762 (2016) 288 [arXiv:1609.08567] [INSPIRE].
Pierre Auger collaboration, A. Aab et al., Testing Hadronic Interactions at Ultrahigh Energies with Air Showers Measured by the Pierre Auger Observatory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 (2016) 192001 [arXiv:1610.08509] [INSPIRE].
P. Gondolo, G. Ingelman and M. Thunman, Charm production and high-energy atmospheric muon and neutrino fluxes, Astropart. Phys. 5 (1996) 309 [hep-ph/9505417] [INSPIRE].
A. Fedynitch, R. Engel, T.K. Gaisser, F. Riehn and T. Stanev, Calculation of conventional and prompt lepton fluxes at very high energy, EPJ Web Conf. 99 (2015) 08001 [arXiv:1503.00544] [INSPIRE].
R. Enberg, M.H. Reno and I. Sarcevic, Prompt neutrino fluxes from atmospheric charm, Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) 043005 [arXiv:0806.0418] [INSPIRE].
F. Riehn, R. Engel, A. Fedynitch, T.K. Gaisser and T. Stanev, A new version of the event generator Sibyll, arXiv:1510.00568 [INSPIRE].
K.J. Eskola, H. Paukkunen and C.A. Salgado, EPS09: A New Generation of NLO and LO Nuclear Parton Distribution Functions, JHEP 04 (2009) 065 [arXiv:0902.4154] [INSPIRE].
K. Kovarik et al., nCTEQ15 — Global analysis of nuclear parton distributions with uncertainties in the CTEQ framework, Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 085037 [arXiv:1509.00792] [INSPIRE].
T.K. Gaisser, K. Jero, A. Karle and J. van Santen, Generalized self-veto probability for atmospheric neutrinos, Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 023009 [arXiv:1405.0525] [INSPIRE].
IceCube collaboration, M.G. Aartsen et al., Search for a diffuse flux of astrophysical muon neutrinos with the IceCube 59-string configuration, Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 062007 [arXiv:1311.7048] [INSPIRE].
IceCube collaboration, M.G. Aartsen et al., Evidence for Astrophysical Muon Neutrinos from the Northern Sky with IceCube, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 (2015) 081102 [arXiv:1507.04005] [INSPIRE].
Open Access
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Consortia
Corresponding author
Additional information
ArXiv ePrint: 1611.03815
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits use, duplication, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
The PROSA collaboration., Garzelli, M.V., Moch, S. et al. Prompt neutrino fluxes in the atmosphere with PROSA parton distribution functions. J. High Energ. Phys. 2017, 4 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP05(2017)004
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP05(2017)004