Abstract
Dark matter (DM) constitutes 85% of the matter in the Universe. However, its specific particle property is still unclear. The fundamentals of DM particles subject to gravitational interaction, and that the lepton excess in cosmic rays may originate from DM particles, inspired us to investigate DM particle properties beyond the standard model. We assume that a leptophilic SU(2) doublet exists in nature as the mediator connecting DM with visible leptons. Since general relativity is not renormalizable at the quantum level, it should be regarded as an effective field theory’s leading order term. One species of the next-to-leading-order term should be operators linear to the Ricci scalar and containing scalar fields, such as the Higgs field, scalar DM, or the newly introduced SU(2) scalar doublet. These operators can cause DM annihilation through gravity portals. We analyzed constraints from the cosmic antiproton flux, DM relic abundance, cosmic positron flux, cosmic microwave background, and direct detection experiments. The result shows that there is a vast parameter space that is compatible with current experiments. DM with a mass of electroweak scale is only allowed to annihilate into leptons. We further show that the purely gravitational DM better explains the DArk Matter Particle Explorer cosmic lepton excess. Our work provides a promising mechanism for DM particles to connect with standard model particles.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
M.A. DuVernois et al., Cosmic ray electrons and positrons from 1 to 100 GeV: measurements with HEAT and their interpretation, Astrophys. J. 559 (2001) 296 [INSPIRE].
J. Chang et al., An excess of cosmic ray electrons at energies of 300–800 GeV, Nature 456 (2008) 362 [INSPIRE].
PAMELA collaboration, Cosmic-ray electron flux measured by the PAMELA experiment between 1 and 625 GeV, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106 (2011) 201101 [arXiv:1103.2880] [INSPIRE].
Fermi-LAT collaboration, Measurement of the cosmic ray e+ + e− spectrum from 20 GeV to 1 TeV with the Fermi Large Area Telescope, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 (2009) 181101 [arXiv:0905.0025] [INSPIRE].
Fermi-LAT collaboration, Cosmic-ray electron-positron spectrum from 7 GeV to 2 TeV with the Fermi Large Area Telescope, Phys. Rev. D 95 (2017) 082007 [arXiv:1704.07195] [INSPIRE].
AMS collaboration, Precision measurement of the (e+ + e−) flux in primary cosmic rays from 0.5 GeV to 1 TeV with the Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer on the International Space Station, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113 (2014) 221102 [INSPIRE].
A.E. Nelson and C. Spitzer, Dark matter annihilation rate with nonstandard thermal history, JHEP 10 (2010) 066 [arXiv:0810.5167] [INSPIRE].
L. Bergström, T. Bringmann and J. Edsjö, New positron spectral features from supersymmetric dark matter — A way to explain the PAMELA data?, Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) 103520 [arXiv:0808.3725] [INSPIRE].
N. Arkani-Hamed, D.P. Finkbeiner, T.R. Slatyer and N. Weiner, A theory of dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 015014 [arXiv:0810.0713] [INSPIRE].
P.J. Fox and E. Poppitz, Leptophilic dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 083528 [arXiv:0811.0399] [INSPIRE].
R. Harnik and G.D. Kribs, Effective theory of Dirac dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 095007 [arXiv:0810.5557] [INSPIRE].
I. Cholis, L. Goodenough, D. Hooper, M. Simet and N. Weiner, High energy positrons from annihilating dark Matter, Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 123511 [arXiv:0809.1683] [INSPIRE].
I. Cholis, G. Dobler, D.P. Finkbeiner, L. Goodenough and N. Weiner, Case for a 700+ GeV WIMP: cosmic ray spectra from PAMELA, Fermi, and ATIC, Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 123518 [arXiv:0811.3641] [INSPIRE].
I. Cholis and D. Hooper, Dark matter and pulsar origins of the rising cosmic ray positron fraction in light of new data from the AMS, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 023013 [arXiv:1304.1840] [INSPIRE].
J. Kopp, Constraints on dark matter annihilation from AMS-02 results, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 076013 [arXiv:1304.1184] [INSPIRE].
K.R. Dienes, J. Kumar and B. Thomas, Dynamical dark matter and the positron excess in light of AMS results, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 103509 [arXiv:1306.2959] [INSPIRE].
P.S.B. Dev, D.K. Ghosh, N. Okada and I. Saha, Neutrino mass and dark matter in light of recent AMS-02 results, Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 095001 [arXiv:1307.6204] [INSPIRE].
M. Pospelov and A. Ritz, Astrophysical signatures of secluded dark matter, Phys. Lett. B 671 (2009) 391 [arXiv:0810.1502] [INSPIRE].
DAMPE collaboration, Direct detection of a break in the teraelectronvolt cosmic-ray spectrum of electrons and positrons, Nature 552 (2017) 63 [arXiv:1711.10981] [INSPIRE].
H.-B. Jin, B. Yue, X. Zhang and X. Chen, Dark matter explanation of the cosmic ray e+e− spectrum excess and peak feature observed by the DAMPE experiment, Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 123008 [arXiv:1712.00362] [INSPIRE].
X. Liu, Z. Liu and Y. Su, Two-mediator dark matter models and cosmic electron excess, JHEP 06 (2019) 109 [arXiv:1902.04916] [INSPIRE].
K. Ghorbani and P.H. Ghorbani, DAMPE electron-positron excess in leptophilic Z l model, JHEP 05 (2018) 125 [arXiv:1712.01239] [INSPIRE].
J. Cao, L. Feng, X. Guo, L. Shang, F. Wang, P. Wu et al., Explaining the DAMPE data with scalar dark matter and gauged \( U{(1)}_{L_e-{L}_{\mu }} \) interaction, Eur. Phys. J. C 78 (2018) 198 [arXiv:1712.01244] [INSPIRE].
J. Cao, L. Feng, X. Guo, L. Shang, F. Wang and P. Wu, Scalar dark matter interpretation of the DAMPE data with U(1) gauge interactions, Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) 095011 [arXiv:1711.11452] [INSPIRE].
N. Okada and O. Seto, DAMPE excess from decaying right-handed neutrino dark matter, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 33 (2018) 1850157 [arXiv:1712.03652] [INSPIRE].
T. Li, N. Okada and Q. Shafi, Scalar dark matter, Type II Seesaw and the DAMPE cosmic ray e+ + e− excess, Phys. Lett. B 779 (2018) 130 [arXiv:1712.00869] [INSPIRE].
S.-F. Ge, H.-J. He and Y.-C. Wang, Flavor structure of the cosmic-ray electron/positron excesses at DAMPE, Phys. Lett. B 781 (2018) 88 [arXiv:1712.02744] [INSPIRE].
S.F. Ge, H.J. He, Y.C. Wang and Q. Yuan, Probing flavor structure of cosmic ray e± spectrum and implications for dark matter indirect searches, Nucl. Phys. B 959 (2020) 115140.
CALET collaboration, Energy spectrum of cosmic-ray electron and positron from 10 GeV to 3 TeV observed with the Calorimetric Electron Telescope on the International Space Station, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 (2017) 181101 [arXiv:1712.01711] [INSPIRE].
O. Adriani et al., Extended measurement of the cosmic-ray electron and positron spectrum from 11 GeV to 4.8 TeV with the Calorimetric Electron Telescope on the International Space Station, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 (2018) 261102 [arXiv:1806.09728] [INSPIRE].
M. Khlopov, Cosmoparticle physics of dark matter, EPJ Web Conf. 222 (2019) 01006 [arXiv:1910.12910] [INSPIRE].
M. Atkins and X. Calmet, Bounds on the nonminimal coupling of the Higgs boson to gravity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 (2013) 051301 [arXiv:1211.0281] [INSPIRE].
J.F. Donoghue, General relativity as an effective field theory: the leading quantum corrections, Phys. Rev. D 50 (1994) 3874 [gr-qc/9405057] [INSPIRE].
J.F. Donoghue, The effective field theory treatment of quantum gravity, AIP Conf. Proc. 1483 (2012) 73 [arXiv:1209.3511] [INSPIRE].
O. Catà, A. Ibarra and S. Ingenhütt, Dark matter decays from nonminimal coupling to gravity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 (2016) 021302 [arXiv:1603.03696] [INSPIRE].
O. Catà, A. Ibarra and S. Ingenhütt, Dark matter decay through gravity portals, Phys. Rev. D 95 (2017) 035011 [arXiv:1611.00725] [INSPIRE].
X.-D. Sun and B.-Z. Dai, Observational constraints on dark matter decaying via gravity portals, Chin. Phys. C 44 (2020) 125103 [arXiv:2002.09955] [INSPIRE].
G. Alonso-Álvarez and J. Jaeckel, Lightish but clumpy: scalar dark matter from inflationary fluctuations, JCAP 10 (2018) 022 [arXiv:1807.09785] [INSPIRE].
J. Ren and H.-J. He, Probing gravitational dark matter, JCAP 03 (2015) 052 [arXiv:1410.6436] [INSPIRE].
C. Cosme, J.G. Rosa and O. Bertolami, Scale-invariant scalar field dark matter through the Higgs portal, JHEP 05 (2018) 129 [arXiv:1802.09434] [INSPIRE].
W. Cheng and L. Bian, From inflation to cosmological electroweak phase transition with a complex scalar singlet, Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 023524 [arXiv:1801.00662] [INSPIRE].
W. Cheng and L. Bian, Higgs inflation and cosmological electroweak phase transition with N scalars in the post-Higgs era, Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) 035038 [arXiv:1805.00199] [INSPIRE].
J. Ren, Z.-Z. Xianyu and H.-J. He, Higgs gravitational interaction, weak boson scattering, and Higgs inflation in Jordan and Einstein frames, JCAP 06 (2014) 032 [arXiv:1404.4627] [INSPIRE].
Z.-Z. Xianyu, J. Ren and H.-J. He, Gravitational interaction of Higgs boson and weak boson scattering, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 096013 [arXiv:1305.0251] [INSPIRE].
Particle Data Group collaboration, Review of particle physics, Chin. Phys. C 40 (2016) 100001 [INSPIRE].
BDX collaboration, Dark matter search in a Beam-Dump eXperiment (BDX) at Jefferson lab, arXiv:1607.01390 [INSPIRE].
HPS collaboration, The heavy photon search experiment at Jefferson laboratory, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 556 (2014) 012064 [arXiv:1505.02025] [INSPIRE].
HPS collaboration, The heavy photon search experiment, arXiv:1910.04886 [INSPIRE].
G. Giesen et al., AMS-02 antiprotons, at last! Secondary astrophysical component and immediate implications for Dark Matter, JCAP 09 (2015) 023 [arXiv:1504.04276] [INSPIRE].
A. Cuoco, J. Heisig, L. Klamt, M. Korsmeier and M. Krämer, Scrutinizing the evidence for dark matter in cosmic-ray antiprotons, Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) 103014 [arXiv:1903.01472] [INSPIRE].
I. Cholis, T. Linden and D. Hooper, A robust excess in the cosmic-ray antiproton spectrum: implications for annihilating dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) 103026 [arXiv:1903.02549] [INSPIRE].
J.F. Navarro, C.S. Frenk and S.D.M. White, The structure of cold dark matter halos, Astrophys. J. 462 (1996) 563 [astro-ph/9508025] [INSPIRE].
J.F. Navarro, C.S. Frenk and S.D.M. White, A universal density profile from hierarchical clustering, Astrophys. J. 490 (1997) 493 [astro-ph/9611107] [INSPIRE].
D. Feldman, Z. Liu and P. Nath, PAMELA positron excess as a signal from the hidden sector, Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 063509 [arXiv:0810.5762] [INSPIRE].
M. Cirelli, M. Kadastik, M. Raidal and A. Strumia, Model-independent implications of the e±, anti-proton cosmic ray spectra on properties of Dark Matter, Nucl. Phys. B 813 (2009) 1 [Addendum ibid. 873 (2013) 530] [arXiv:0809.2409] [INSPIRE].
AMS collaboration, Electron and positron fluxes in primary cosmic rays measured with the Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer on the International Space Station, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113 (2014) 121102 [arXiv:1701.07305] [INSPIRE].
M. Cirelli et al., PPPC 4 DM ID: a Poor Particle Physicist Cookbook for Dark Matter Indirect Detection, JCAP 03 (2011) 051 [Erratum ibid. 10 (2012) E01] [arXiv:1012.4515] [INSPIRE].
O. Kalashev, Constraining dark matter and ultra-high energy cosmic ray sources with Fermi-LAT diffuse gamma ray background, EPJ Web Conf. 125 (2016) 02012 [arXiv:1608.07530] [INSPIRE].
W. Liu, X.-J. Bi, S.-J. Lin and P.-F. Yin, Constraints on dark matter annihilation and decay from the isotropic gamma-ray background, Chin. Phys. C 41 (2017) 045104 [arXiv:1602.01012] [INSPIRE].
W. Chao and Q. Yuan, The electron-flavored Z′-portal dark matter and the DAMPE cosmic ray excess, arXiv:1711.11182 [INSPIRE].
Planck collaboration, Planck 2015 results. XIII. Cosmological parameters, Astropn. Astrophys. 594 (2016) A13.
T.R. Slatyer, N. Padmanabhan and D.P. Finkbeiner, CMB constraints on WIMP annihilation: energy absorption during the recombination epoch, Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 043526 [arXiv:0906.1197] [INSPIRE].
T.R. Slatyer, Indirect dark matter signatures in the cosmic dark ages. I. Generalizing the bound on s-wave dark matter annihilation from Planck results, Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 023527 [arXiv:1506.03811] [INSPIRE].
Planck collaboration, Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters, Astron. Astrophys. 641 (2020) A6 [arXiv:1807.06209] [INSPIRE].
M. Kuhlen and D. Malyshev, ATIC, PAMELA, HESS, Fermi and nearby Dark Matter subhalos, Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 123517 [arXiv:0904.3378] [INSPIRE].
Fermi-LAT collaboration, The spectrum of isotropic diffuse gamma-ray emission between 100 MeV and 820 GeV, Astrophys. J. 799 (2015) 86 [arXiv:1410.3696] [INSPIRE].
P. Meade, M. Papucci, A. Strumia and T. Volansky, Dark matter interpretations of the e± excesses after FERMI, Nucl. Phys. B 831 (2010) 178 [arXiv:0905.0480] [INSPIRE].
R. Essig, E. Kuflik, S.D. McDermott, T. Volansky and K.M. Zurek, Constraining light dark matter with diffuse X-ray and gamma-ray observations, JHEP 11 (2013) 193 [arXiv:1309.4091] [INSPIRE].
M. Tavakoli, I. Cholis, C. Evoli and P. Ullio, Constraints on dark matter annihilations from diffuse gamma-ray emission in the galaxy, JCAP 01 (2014) 017 [arXiv:1308.4135] [INSPIRE].
M. Di Mauro, M. Stref and F. Calore, Investigating the detection of dark matter subhalos as extended sources with Fermi-LAT, Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020) 103010 [arXiv:2007.08535] [INSPIRE].
A.V. Macciò, A.A. Dutton and F.C.v.d. Bosch, Concentration, spin and shape of dark matter haloes as a function of the cosmological model: WMAP1, WMAP3 and WMAP5 results, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 391 (2008) 1940 [arXiv:0805.1926] [INSPIRE].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
ArXiv ePrint: 2008.02994
Rights and permissions
Open Access . This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
About this article
Cite this article
Sun, X., Dai, BZ. Dark matter annihilation into leptons through gravity portals. J. High Energ. Phys. 2021, 108 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP04(2021)108
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP04(2021)108