Abstract
We consider the O(3) or ℂP1 nonlinear sigma model as an effective field theory in a derivative expansion, with the most general Lagrangian that obeys O(3), parity and Lorentz symmetry. We work out the complete list of possible operators (terms) in the Lagrangian and eliminate as many as possible using integrations by parts. We further show at the four-derivative level, that the theory can be shown to avoid the Ostrogradsky instability, because the dependence on the d’Alembertian operator or so-called box, can be eliminated by a field redefinition. Going to the six-derivative order in the derivative expansion, we show that this can no longer be done, unless we are willing to sacrifice Lorentz invariance. By doing so, we can eliminate all dependence on double time derivatives and hence the Ostrogradsky instability or ghost, however, we unveil a remaining dynamical instability that takes the form either as a spiral instability or a runaway instability and estimate the critical field norm, at which the instability sets off.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
A.V. Manohar, Introduction to effective field theories, arXiv:1804.05863 [INSPIRE].
I. Brivio and M. Trott, The Standard Model as an effective field theory, Phys. Rept. 793 (2019) 1 [arXiv:1706.08945] [INSPIRE].
S. Scherer, Introduction to chiral perturbation theory, Adv. Nucl. Phys. 27 (2003) 277 [hep-ph/0210398] [INSPIRE].
E. Epelbaum, H.-W. Hammer and U.-G. Meissner, Modern theory of nuclear forces, Rev. Mod. Phys. 81 (2009) 1773 [arXiv:0811.1338] [INSPIRE].
R. Machleidt and D.R. Entem, Chiral effective field theory and nuclear forces, Phys. Rept. 503 (2011) 1 [arXiv:1105.2919] [INSPIRE].
S. Weinberg, Phenomenological lagrangians, Physica A 96 (1979) 327 [INSPIRE].
M. Ostrogradsky, Mémoires sur les équations différentielles, relatives au problème des isopérimètres (in French), Mem. Acad. St. Petersbourg 6 (1850) 385 [INSPIRE].
R.P. Woodard, Ostrogradsky’s theorem on Hamiltonian instability, Scholarpedia 10 (2015) 32243 [arXiv:1506.02210] [INSPIRE].
A.R. Solomon and M. Trodden, Higher-derivative operators and effective field theory for general scalar-tensor theories, JCAP 02 (2018) 031 [arXiv:1709.09695] [INSPIRE].
M. Asorey, F. Falceto and L. Rachwał, Asymptotic freedom and higher derivative gauge theories, JHEP 05 (2021) 075 [arXiv:2012.15693] [INSPIRE].
A. Nicolis, R. Rattazzi and E. Trincherini, The Galileon as a local modification of gravity, Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 064036 [arXiv:0811.2197] [INSPIRE].
G.W. Horndeski, Second-order scalar-tensor field equations in a four-dimensional space, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 10 (1974) 363 [INSPIRE].
T.H.R. Skyrme, A nonlinear field theory, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A 260 (1961) 127 [INSPIRE].
S.B. Gudnason and M. Nitta, A higher-order Skyrme model, JHEP 09 (2017) 028 [arXiv:1705.03438] [INSPIRE].
L.D. Faddeev and A.J. Niemi, Partially dual variables in SU(2) Yang-Mills theory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82 (1999) 1624 [hep-th/9807069] [INSPIRE].
B.M.A.G. Piette, W.J. Zakrzewski, H.J.W. Mueller-Kirsten and D.H. Tchrakian, A modified Mottola-Wipf model with sphaleron and instanton fields, Phys. Lett. B 320 (1994) 294 [INSPIRE].
B.M.A.G. Piette, B.J. Schroers and W.J. Zakrzewski, Multi-solitons in a two-dimensional Skyrme model, Z. Phys. C 65 (1995) 165 [hep-th/9406160] [INSPIRE].
D. Anselmi and M. Piva, Perturbative unitarity of Lee-Wick quantum field theory, Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 045009 [arXiv:1703.05563] [INSPIRE].
D. Anselmi and M. Piva, Quantum gravity, fakeons and microcausality, JHEP 11 (2018) 021 [arXiv:1806.03605] [INSPIRE].
D. Anselmi and A. Marino, Fakeons and microcausality: light cones, gravitational waves and the Hubble constant, Class. Quant. Grav. 37 (2020) 095003 [arXiv:1909.12873] [INSPIRE].
I. Antoniadis, E. Dudas and D.M. Ghilencea, Supersymmetric models with higher dimensional operators, JHEP 03 (2008) 045 [arXiv:0708.0383] [INSPIRE].
E. Dudas and D.M. Ghilencea, Effective operators in SUSY, superfield constraints and searches for a UV completion, JHEP 06 (2015) 124 [arXiv:1503.08319] [INSPIRE].
T. Fujimori, M. Nitta and Y. Yamada, Ghostbusters in higher derivative supersymmetric theories: who is afraid of propagating auxiliary fields?, JHEP 09 (2016) 106 [arXiv:1608.01843] [INSPIRE].
T. Fujimori, M. Nitta, K. Ohashi and Y. Yamada, Ghostbusters in f(R) supergravity, JHEP 05 (2018) 102 [arXiv:1712.05017] [INSPIRE].
J.F. Donoghue and G. Menezes, Ostrogradsky instability can be overcome by quantum physics, Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021) 045010 [arXiv:2105.00898] [INSPIRE].
F. Arici, D. Becker, C. Ripken, F. Saueressig and W.D. van Suijlekom, Reflection positivity in higher derivative scalar theories, J. Math. Phys. 59 (2018) 082302 [arXiv:1712.04308] [INSPIRE].
J. Gomis and S. Weinberg, Are nonrenormalizable gauge theories renormalizable?, Nucl. Phys. B 469 (1996) 473 [hep-th/9510087] [INSPIRE].
D. Anselmi, Renormalization of gauge theories without cohomology, Eur. Phys. J. C 73 (2013) 2508 [arXiv:1301.7577] [INSPIRE].
A. Quadri, Background field method and generalized field redefinitions in effective field theories, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 136 (2021) 695 [arXiv:2102.10656] [INSPIRE].
G.H. Derrick, Comments on nonlinear wave equations as models for elementary particles, J. Math. Phys. 5 (1964) 1252 [INSPIRE].
J. Gasser and H. Leutwyler, Chiral perturbation theory to one loop, Annals Phys. 158 (1984) 142 [INSPIRE].
J. Bijnens, G. Colangelo and G. Ecker, The mesonic chiral Lagrangian of order p6, JHEP 02 (1999) 020 [hep-ph/9902437] [INSPIRE].
J. Bijnens, N. Hermansson-Truedsson and S. Wang, The order p8 mesonic chiral Lagrangian, JHEP 01 (2019) 102 [arXiv:1810.06834] [INSPIRE].
L. Graf, B. Henning, X. Lu, T. Melia and H. Murayama, 2, 12, 117, 1959, 45171, 1170086, . . .: a Hilbert series for the QCD chiral Lagrangian, JHEP 01 (2021) 142 [arXiv:2009.01239] [INSPIRE].
H. Motohashi and T. Suyama, Third order equations of motion and the Ostrogradsky instability, Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015) 085009 [arXiv:1411.3721] [INSPIRE].
H. Motohashi, K. Noui, T. Suyama, M. Yamaguchi and D. Langlois, Healthy degenerate theories with higher derivatives, JCAP 07 (2016) 033 [arXiv:1603.09355] [INSPIRE].
M. Crisostomi, R. Klein and D. Roest, Higher derivative field theories: degeneracy conditions and classes, JHEP 06 (2017) 124 [arXiv:1703.01623] [INSPIRE].
H. Motohashi, T. Suyama and M. Yamaguchi, Ghost-free theory with third-order time derivatives, J. Phys. Soc. Jap. 87 (2018) 063401 [arXiv:1711.08125] [INSPIRE].
H. Motohashi, T. Suyama and M. Yamaguchi, Ghost-free theories with arbitrary higher-order time derivatives, JHEP 06 (2018) 133 [arXiv:1804.07990] [INSPIRE].
A. Ganz and K. Noui, Reconsidering the Ostrogradsky theorem: higher-derivatives Lagrangians, ghosts and degeneracy, Class. Quant. Grav. 38 (2021) 075005 [arXiv:2007.01063] [INSPIRE].
C. Grosse-Knetter, Effective Lagrangians with higher derivatives and equations of motion, Phys. Rev. D 49 (1994) 6709 [hep-ph/9306321] [INSPIRE].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
ArXiv ePrint: 2110.15038
Rights and permissions
Open Access . This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
About this article
Cite this article
Gudnason, S.B., Nitta, M. Reducing the O(3) model as an effective field theory. J. High Energ. Phys. 2022, 30 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP03(2022)030
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP03(2022)030