Abstract
A statistically significant excess of gamma rays has been reported and robustly confirmed in the Galactic Center over the past decade. Large local dark matter densities suggest that this Galactic Center Excess (GCE) may be attributable to new physics, and indeed it has been shown that this signal is well-modelled by annihilations dominantly into \( b\overline{b} \) with a WIMP-scale cross section. In this paper, we consider Majorana dark matter annihilating through a Higgs portal as a candidate source for this signal, where a large CP-violation in the Higgs coupling may serve to severely suppress scattering rates. In particular, we explore the phenomenology of two UV completions, a singlet-doublet model and a doublet-triplet model, and map out the available parameter space which can give a viable signal while respecting current experimental constraints.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Find the latest articles, discoveries, and news in related topics.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Fermi-LAT collaboration, Fermi-LAT Observations of High-Energy γ-Ray Emission Toward the Galactic Center, Astrophys. J. 819 (2016) 44 [arXiv:1511.02938] [INSPIRE].
L. Goodenough and D. Hooper, Possible Evidence For Dark Matter Annihilation In The Inner Milky Way From The Fermi Gamma Ray Space Telescope, arXiv:0910.2998 [INSPIRE].
D. Hooper and L. Goodenough, Dark Matter Annihilation in The Galactic Center As Seen by the Fermi Gamma Ray Space Telescope, Phys. Lett. B 697 (2011) 412 [arXiv:1010.2752] [INSPIRE].
D. Hooper and T. Linden, On The Origin Of The Gamma Rays From The Galactic Center, Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011) 123005 [arXiv:1110.0006] [INSPIRE].
C. Gordon and O. Macias, Dark Matter and Pulsar Model Constraints from Galactic Center Fermi-LAT Gamma Ray Observations, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 083521 [Erratum ibid. 89 (2014) 049901] [arXiv:1306.5725] [INSPIRE].
K. N. Abazajian, N. Canac, S. Horiuchi and M. Kaplinghat, Astrophysical and Dark Matter Interpretations of Extended Gamma-Ray Emission from the Galactic Center, Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 023526 [arXiv:1402.4090] [INSPIRE].
T. Daylan et al., The characterization of the gamma-ray signal from the central Milky Way: A case for annihilating dark matter, Phys. Dark Univ. 12 (2016) 1 [arXiv:1402.6703] [INSPIRE].
F. Calore, I. Cholis and C. Weniger, Background Model Systematics for the Fermi GeV Excess, JCAP 03 (2015) 038 [arXiv:1409.0042] [INSPIRE].
AMS collaboration, Antiproton Flux, Antiproton-to-Proton Flux Ratio, and Properties of Elementary Particle Fluxes in Primary Cosmic Rays Measured with the Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer on the International Space Station, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 (2016) 091103 [INSPIRE].
A. Cuoco, J. Heisig, M. Korsmeier and M. Krämer, Probing dark matter annihilation in the Galaxy with antiprotons and gamma rays, JCAP 10 (2017) 053 [arXiv:1704.08258] [INSPIRE].
A. Cuoco, J. Heisig, L. Klamt, M. Korsmeier and M. Krämer, Scrutinizing the evidence for dark matter in cosmic-ray antiprotons, Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) 103014 [arXiv:1903.01472] [INSPIRE].
I. Cholis, T. Linden and D. Hooper, A Robust Excess in the Cosmic-Ray Antiproton Spectrum: Implications for Annihilating Dark Matter, Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) 103026 [arXiv:1903.02549] [INSPIRE].
D. Hooper, R. K. Leane, Y.-D. Tsai, S. Wegsman and S. J. Witte, A systematic study of hidden sector dark matter:application to the gamma-ray and antiproton excesses, JHEP 07 (2020) 163 [arXiv:1912.08821] [INSPIRE].
M. Boudaud et al., AMS-02 antiprotons’ consistency with a secondary astrophysical origin, Phys. Rev. Res. 2 (2020) 023022 [arXiv:1906.07119] [INSPIRE].
J. Heisig, M. Korsmeier and M. W. Winkler, Dark matter or correlated errors: Systematics of the AMS-02 antiproton excess, Phys. Rev. Res. 2 (2020) 043017 [arXiv:2005.04237] [INSPIRE].
I. Cholis, D. Hooper and T. Linden, A New Determination of the Spectra and Luminosity Function of Gamma-Ray Millisecond Pulsars, arXiv:1407.5583 [INSPIRE].
I. Cholis, D. Hooper and T. Linden, Challenges in Explaining the Galactic Center Gamma-Ray Excess with Millisecond Pulsars, JCAP 06 (2015) 043 [arXiv:1407.5625] [INSPIRE].
S. K. Lee, M. Lisanti and B. R. Safdi, Distinguishing Dark Matter from Unresolved Point Sources in the Inner Galaxy with Photon Statistics, JCAP 05 (2015) 056 [arXiv:1412.6099] [INSPIRE].
R. Bartels, S. Krishnamurthy and C. Weniger, Strong support for the millisecond pulsar origin of the Galactic center GeV excess, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 (2016) 051102 [arXiv:1506.05104] [INSPIRE].
S. K. Lee, M. Lisanti, B. R. Safdi, T. R. Slatyer and W. Xue, Evidence for Unresolved γ-Ray Point Sources in the Inner Galaxy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 (2016) 051103 [arXiv:1506.05124] [INSPIRE].
O. Macias et al., Galactic bulge preferred over dark matter for the Galactic centre gamma-ray excess, Nature Astron. 2 (2018) 387 [arXiv:1611.06644] [INSPIRE].
D. Haggard, C. Heinke, D. Hooper and T. Linden, Low Mass X-Ray Binaries in the Inner Galaxy: Implications for Millisecond Pulsars and the GeV Excess, JCAP 05 (2017) 056 [arXiv:1701.02726] [INSPIRE].
R. Bartels, E. Storm, C. Weniger and F. Calore, The Fermi-LAT GeV excess as a tracer of stellar mass in the Galactic bulge, Nature Astron. 2 (2018) 819 [arXiv:1711.04778] [INSPIRE].
O. Macias, S. Horiuchi, M. Kaplinghat, C. Gordon, R. M. Crocker and D. M. Nataf, Strong Evidence that the Galactic Bulge is Shining in Gamma Rays, JCAP 09 (2019) 042 [arXiv:1901.03822] [INSPIRE].
R. K. Leane and T. R. Slatyer, Revival of the Dark Matter Hypothesis for the Galactic Center Gamma-Ray Excess, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123 (2019) 241101 [arXiv:1904.08430] [INSPIRE].
Y.-M. Zhong, S. D. McDermott, I. Cholis and P. J. Fox, Testing the Sensitivity of the Galactic Center Excess to the Point Source Mask, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124 (2020) 231103 [arXiv:1911.12369] [INSPIRE].
R. K. Leane and T. R. Slatyer, Spurious Point Source Signals in the Galactic Center Excess, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 (2020) 121105 [arXiv:2002.12370] [INSPIRE].
R. K. Leane and T. R. Slatyer, The enigmatic Galactic Center excess: Spurious point sources and signal mismodeling, Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020) 063019 [arXiv:2002.12371] [INSPIRE].
M. Buschmann et al., Foreground Mismodeling and the Point Source Explanation of the Fermi Galactic Center Excess, Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020) 023023 [arXiv:2002.12373] [INSPIRE].
K. N. Abazajian, S. Horiuchi, M. Kaplinghat, R. E. Keeley and O. Macias, Strong constraints on thermal relic dark matter from Fermi-LAT observations of the Galactic Center, Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020) 043012 [arXiv:2003.10416] [INSPIRE].
F. List, N. L. Rodd, G. F. Lewis and I. Bhat, The GCE in a New Light: Disentangling the γ-ray Sky with Bayesian Graph Convolutional Neural Networks, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 (2020) 241102 [arXiv:2006.12504] [INSPIRE].
S. Mishra-Sharma and K. Cranmer, Semi-parametric γ-ray modeling with Gaussian processes and variational inference, in 34th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, (2020) [arXiv:2010.10450] [INSPIRE].
C. Karwin, S. Murgia, T. M. P. Tait, T. A. Porter and P. Tanedo, Dark Matter Interpretation of the Fermi-LAT Observation Toward the Galactic Center, Phys. Rev. D 95 (2017) 103005 [arXiv:1612.05687] [INSPIRE].
G. Arcadi et al., The waning of the WIMP? A review of models, searches, and constraints, Eur. Phys. J. C 78 (2018) 203 [arXiv:1703.07364] [INSPIRE].
W.-C. Huang, A. Urbano and W. Xue, Fermi Bubbles under Dark Matter Scrutiny Part II: Particle Physics Analysis, JCAP 04 (2014) 020 [arXiv:1310.7609] [INSPIRE].
C. Boehm, M. J. Dolan, C. McCabe, M. Spannowsky and C. J. Wallace, Extended gamma-ray emission from Coy Dark Matter, JCAP 05 (2014) 009 [arXiv:1401.6458] [INSPIRE].
C. Cheung, M. Papucci, D. Sanford, N. R. Shah and K. M. Zurek, NMSSM Interpretation of the Galactic Center Excess, Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 075011 [arXiv:1406.6372] [INSPIRE].
J. Guo, J. Li, T. Li and A. G. Williams, NMSSM explanations of the Galactic center gamma ray excess and promising LHC searches, Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015) 095003 [arXiv:1409.7864] [INSPIRE].
J. Cao, L. Shang, P. Wu, J. M. Yang and Y. Zhang, Supersymmetry explanation of the Fermi Galactic Center excess and its test at LHC run II, Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015) 055005 [arXiv:1410.3239] [INSPIRE].
A. Berlin, S. Gori, T. Lin and L.-T. Wang, Pseudoscalar Portal Dark Matter, Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015) 015005 [arXiv:1502.06000] [INSPIRE].
T. Gherghetta, B. von Harling, A. D. Medina, M. A. Schmidt and T. Trott, SUSY implications from WIMP annihilation into scalars at the Galactic Center, Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015) 105004 [arXiv:1502.07173] [INSPIRE].
M. Duerr, P. Fileviez Pérez and J. Smirnov, Gamma-Ray Excess and the Minimal Dark Matter Model, JHEP 06 (2016) 008 [arXiv:1510.07562] [INSPIRE].
M. Carena, J. Osborne, N. R. Shah and C. E. M. Wagner, Return of the WIMP: Missing energy signals and the Galactic Center excess, Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 055002 [arXiv:1905.03768] [INSPIRE].
R. Mahbubani and L. Senatore, The Minimal model for dark matter and unification, Phys. Rev. D 73 (2006) 043510 [hep-ph/0510064] [INSPIRE].
F. D’Eramo, Dark matter and Higgs boson physics, Phys. Rev. D 76 (2007) 083522 [arXiv:0705.4493] [INSPIRE].
R. Enberg, P. J. Fox, L. J. Hall, A. Y. Papaioannou and M. Papucci, LHC and dark matter signals of improved naturalness, JHEP 11 (2007) 014 [arXiv:0706.0918] [INSPIRE].
T. Cohen, J. Kearney, A. Pierce and D. Tucker-Smith, Singlet-Doublet Dark Matter, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 075003 [arXiv:1109.2604] [INSPIRE].
C. Cheung and D. Sanford, Simplified Models of Mixed Dark Matter, JCAP 02 (2014) 011 [arXiv:1311.5896] [INSPIRE].
T. Abe, R. Kitano and R. Sato, Discrimination of dark matter models in future experiments, Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015) 095004 [Erratum ibid. 96 (2017) 019902] [arXiv:1411.1335] [INSPIRE].
L. Calibbi, A. Mariotti and P. Tziveloglou, Singlet-Doublet Model: Dark matter searches and LHC constraints, JHEP 10 (2015) 116 [arXiv:1505.03867] [INSPIRE].
A. Freitas, S. Westhoff and J. Zupan, Integrating in the Higgs Portal to Fermion Dark Matter, JHEP 09 (2015) 015 [arXiv:1506.04149] [INSPIRE].
S. Banerjee, S. Matsumoto, K. Mukaida and Y.-L.S. Tsai, WIMP Dark Matter in a Well-Tempered Regime: A case study on Singlet-Doublets Fermionic WIMP, JHEP 11 (2016) 070 [arXiv:1603.07387] [INSPIRE].
C. Cai, Z.-H. Yu and H.-H. Zhang, CEPC Precision of Electroweak Oblique Parameters and Weakly Interacting Dark Matter: the Fermionic Case, Nucl. Phys. B 921 (2017) 181 [arXiv:1611.02186] [INSPIRE].
L. Lopez Honorez, M. H. G. Tytgat, P. Tziveloglou and B. Zaldivar, On Minimal Dark Matter coupled to the Higgs, JHEP 04 (2018) 011 [arXiv:1711.08619] [INSPIRE].
A. Dedes and D. Karamitros, Doublet-Triplet Fermionic Dark Matter, Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 115002 [arXiv:1403.7744] [INSPIRE].
Y. b. Zeldovich, Survey of Modern Cosmology, Adv. Astron. Astrophys. 3 (1965) 241 [INSPIRE].
H.-Y. Chiu, Symmetry between particle and anti-particle populations in the universe, Phys. Rev. Lett. 17 (1966) 712 [INSPIRE].
B. W. Lee and S. Weinberg, Cosmological Lower Bound on Heavy Neutrino Masses, Phys. Rev. Lett. 39 (1977) 165 [INSPIRE].
P. Hut, Limits on Masses and Number of Neutral Weakly Interacting Particles, Phys. Lett. B 69 (1977) 85 [INSPIRE].
S. Wolfram, Abundances of Stable Particles Produced in the Early Universe, Phys. Lett. B 82 (1979) 65 [INSPIRE].
G. Steigman, Cosmology Confronts Particle Physics, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 29 (1979) 313 [INSPIRE].
R. J. Scherrer and M. S. Turner, On the Relic, Cosmic Abundance of Stable Weakly Interacting Massive Particles, Phys. Rev. D 33 (1986) 1585 [Erratum ibid. 34 (1986) 3263] [INSPIRE].
J. Bernstein, L. S. Brown and G. Feinberg, The Cosmological Heavy Neutrino Problem Revisited, Phys. Rev. D 32 (1985) 3261 [INSPIRE].
M. Srednicki, R. Watkins and K. A. Olive, Calculations of Relic Densities in the Early Universe, Nucl. Phys. B 310 (1988) 693 [INSPIRE].
K. Griest and D. Seckel, Three exceptions in the calculation of relic abundances, Phys. Rev. D 43 (1991) 3191 [INSPIRE].
P. Gondolo and G. Gelmini, Cosmic abundances of stable particles: Improved analysis, Nucl. Phys. B 360 (1991) 145 [INSPIRE].
G. Steigman, B. Dasgupta and J. F. Beacom, Precise Relic WIMP Abundance and its Impact on Searches for Dark Matter Annihilation, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 023506 [arXiv:1204.3622] [INSPIRE].
T. Binder, T. Bringmann, M. Gustafsson and A. Hryczuk, Early kinetic decoupling of dark matter: when the standard way of calculating the thermal relic density fails, Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 115010 [Erratum ibid. 101 (2020) 099901] [arXiv:1706.07433] [INSPIRE].
T. Abe, Effect of the early kinetic decoupling in a fermionic dark matter model, Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020) 035018 [arXiv:2004.10041] [INSPIRE].
M. Di Mauro, The characteristics of the Galactic center excess measured with 11 years of Fermi-LAT data, arXiv:2101.04694 [INSPIRE].
T. Lin, Dark matter models and direct detection, PoS 333 (2019) 009 [arXiv:1904.07915] [INSPIRE].
M. Cirelli, E. Del Nobile and P. Panci, Tools for model-independent bounds in direct dark matter searches, JCAP 10 (2013) 019 [arXiv:1307.5955] [INSPIRE].
R. J. Hill and M. P. Solon, Standard Model anatomy of WIMP dark matter direct detection II: QCD analysis and hadronic matrix elements, Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015) 043505 [arXiv:1409.8290] [INSPIRE].
F. Bishara, J. Brod, B. Grinstein and J. Zupan, From quarks to nucleons in dark matter direct detection, JHEP 11 (2017) 059 [arXiv:1707.06998] [INSPIRE].
J. Ellis, N. Nagata and K. A. Olive, Uncertainties in WIMP Dark Matter Scattering Revisited, Eur. Phys. J. C 78 (2018) 569 [arXiv:1805.09795] [INSPIRE].
XENON collaboration, First Dark Matter Search Results from the XENON1T Experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 (2017) 181301 [arXiv:1705.06655] [INSPIRE].
XENON collaboration, Dark Matter Search Results from a One Ton-Year Exposure of XENON1T, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 (2018) 111302 [arXiv:1805.12562] [INSPIRE].
LUX-ZEPLIN collaboration, Projected WIMP sensitivity of the LUX-ZEPLIN dark matter experiment, Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 052002 [arXiv:1802.06039] [INSPIRE].
XENON collaboration, Constraining the spin-dependent WIMP-nucleon cross sections with XENON1T, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 (2019) 141301 [arXiv:1902.03234] [INSPIRE].
PICO collaboration, Dark Matter Search Results from the PICO-60 C3F8 Bubble Chamber, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 (2017) 251301 [arXiv:1702.07666] [INSPIRE].
PICO collaboration, Dark Matter Search Results from the Complete Exposure of the PICO-60 C3F8 Bubble Chamber, Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 022001 [arXiv:1902.04031] [INSPIRE].
XENON collaboration, Projected WIMP sensitivity of the XENONnT dark matter experiment, JCAP 11 (2020) 031 [arXiv:2007.08796] [INSPIRE].
IceCube collaboration, Search for annihilating dark matter in the Sun with 3 years of IceCube data, Eur. Phys. J. C 77 (2017) 146 [Erratum ibid. 79 (2019) 214] [arXiv:1612.05949] [INSPIRE].
LUX collaboration, Results on the Spin-Dependent Scattering of Weakly Interacting Massive Particles on Nucleons from the Run 3 Data of the LUX Experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 (2016) 161302 [arXiv:1602.03489] [INSPIRE].
LUX collaboration, Results from a search for dark matter in the complete LUX exposure, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 (2017) 021303 [arXiv:1608.07648] [INSPIRE].
PandaX-II collaboration, Dark Matter Results From 54-Ton-Day Exposure of PandaX-II Experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 (2017) 181302 [arXiv:1708.06917] [INSPIRE].
M. Carena, J. Osborne, N. R. Shah and C. E. M. Wagner, Supersymmetry and LHC Missing Energy Signals, Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 115010 [arXiv:1809.11082] [INSPIRE].
LEPSUSYWG, ALEPH, DELPHI, L3 and OPAL collaborations, Combined lep chargino results, up to 208 GeV for large m0, http://lepsusy.web.cern.ch/lepsusy/www/inos_moriond01/charginos_pub.html.
LEPSUSYWG, ALEPH, DELPHI, L3 and OPAL collaborations, Combined lep chargino results, up to 208 GeV for low DM, http://lepsusy.web.cern.ch/lepsusy/www/inoslowdmsummer02/charginolowdm_pub.html.
ACME collaboration, Improved limit on the electric dipole moment of the electron, Nature 562 (2018) 355 [INSPIRE].
S. M. Barr and A. Zee, Electric Dipole Moment of the Electron and of the Neutron, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65 (1990) 21 [Erratum ibid. 65 (1990) 2920] [INSPIRE].
D. Atwood, C. P. Burgess, C. Hamazaou, B. Irwin and J. A. Robinson, One loop P and T odd W+- electromagnetic moments, Phys. Rev. D 42 (1990) 3770 [INSPIRE].
M. E. Peskin and T. Takeuchi, Estimation of oblique electroweak corrections, Phys. Rev. D 46 (1992) 381 [INSPIRE].
G. Cacciapaglia, C. Csáki, G. Marandella and A. Strumia, The Minimal Set of Electroweak Precision Parameters, Phys. Rev. D 74 (2006) 033011 [hep-ph/0604111] [INSPIRE].
Particle Data Group collaboration, Review of Particle Physics, PTEP 2020 (2020) 083C01.
R. Barbieri, A. Pomarol, R. Rattazzi and A. Strumia, Electroweak symmetry breaking after LEP-1 and LEP-2, Nucl. Phys. B 703 (2004) 127 [hep-ph/0405040] [INSPIRE].
C. K. Khosa, S. Kraml, A. Lessa, P. Neuhuber and W. Waltenberger, SModelS database update v1.2.3, LHEP (2020) LHEP [arXiv:2005.00555] [INSPIRE].
F. Ambrogi et al., SModelS v1.2: long-lived particles, combination of signal regions, and other novelties, Comput. Phys. Commun. 251 (2020) 106848 [arXiv:1811.10624] [INSPIRE].
J. Dutta, S. Kraml, A. Lessa and W. Waltenberger, SModelS extension with the CMS supersymmetry search results from Run 2, LHEP 1 (2018) 5 [arXiv:1803.02204] [INSPIRE].
F. Ambrogi et al., SModelS v1.1 user manual: Improving simplified model constraints with efficiency maps, Comput. Phys. Commun. 227 (2018) 72 [arXiv:1701.06586] [INSPIRE].
S. Kraml et al., SModelS: a tool for interpreting simplified-model results from the LHC and its application to supersymmetry, Eur. Phys. J. C 74 (2014) 2868 [arXiv:1312.4175] [INSPIRE].
ATLAS collaboration, Reproducing searches for new physics with the ATLAS experiment through publication of full statistical likelihoods, Tech. Rep. ATL-PHYS-PUB-2019-029 (2019).
P. Z. Skands et al., SUSY Les Houches accord: Interfacing SUSY spectrum calculators, decay packages, and event generators, JHEP 07 (2004) 036 [hep-ph/0311123] [INSPIRE].
J. Alwall et al., A Standard format for Les Houches event files, Comput. Phys. Commun. 176 (2007) 300 [hep-ph/0609017] [INSPIRE].
A. Buckley, PySLHA: a Pythonic interface to SUSY Les Houches Accord data, Eur. Phys. J. C 75 (2015) 467 [arXiv:1305.4194] [INSPIRE].
F. Staub, SARAH, arXiv:0806.0538 [INSPIRE].
F. Staub, SARAH 4: A tool for (not only SUSY) model builders, Comput. Phys. Commun. 185 (2014) 1773 [arXiv:1309.7223] [INSPIRE].
F. Staub, Exploring new models in all detail with SARAH, Adv. High Energy Phys. 2015 (2015) 840780 [arXiv:1503.04200] [INSPIRE].
W. Porod, SPheno, a program for calculating supersymmetric spectra, SUSY particle decays and SUSY particle production at e+ e− colliders, Comput. Phys. Commun. 153 (2003) 275 [hep-ph/0301101] [INSPIRE].
W. Porod and F. Staub, SPheno 3.1: Extensions including flavour, CP-phases and models beyond the MSSM, Comput. Phys. Commun. 183 (2012) 2458 [arXiv:1104.1573] [INSPIRE].
J. Alwall et al., The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations, JHEP 07 (2014) 079 [arXiv:1405.0301] [INSPIRE].
J. Alwall, M. Herquet, F. Maltoni, O. Mattelaer and T. Stelzer, MadGraph 5: Going Beyond, JHEP 06 (2011) 128 [arXiv:1106.0522] [INSPIRE].
CMS collaboration, Measurements of the Higgs boson width and anomalous HVV couplings from on-shell and off-shell production in the four-lepton final state, Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) 112003 [arXiv:1901.00174] [INSPIRE].
Y. Nakai and M. Reece, Electric Dipole Moments in Natural Supersymmetry, JHEP 08 (2017) 031 [arXiv:1612.08090] [INSPIRE].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
ArXiv ePrint: 2010.15129
Rights and permissions
Open Access . This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
About this article
Cite this article
Fraser, K., Parikh, A. & Xu, W.L. A closer look at CP-violating Higgs portal dark matter as a candidate for the GCE. J. High Energ. Phys. 2021, 123 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP03(2021)123
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP03(2021)123