Abstract
We construct the T-dual of the Klebanov-Strassler solution on a small region at the tip of the deformed conifold. The isometry coordinate we choose is the correct one to obtain an NS5 brane wrapping a holomorphic curve in Type IIA, as shown by a thorough analysis of the deformed conifold geometry. The shape of the locus wrapped by the NS5 brane matches the predictions from the Type IIA brane engineering construction dual to the SU(N + M) × SU(N) cascading gauge theory. The same isometry is then used to T-dualize the solution obtained by adding backreacted D3 branes to the Klebanov-Strassler solution. Our construction is the first step in a program to test the stability of antibranes in Type IIA backgrounds.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
S. Kachru, R. Kallosh, A.D. Linde and S.P. Trivedi, de Sitter vacua in string theory, Phys. Rev. D 68 (2003) 046005 [hep-th/0301240] [INSPIRE].
I.R. Klebanov and M.J. Strassler, Supergravity and a confining gauge theory: Duality cascades and χSB resolution of naked singularities, JHEP 08 (2000) 052 [hep-th/0007191] [INSPIRE].
S. Kachru, J. Pearson and H.L. Verlinde, Brane/flux annihilation and the string dual of a nonsupersymmetric field theory, JHEP 06 (2002) 021 [hep-th/0112197] [INSPIRE].
I. Bena, M. Graña and N. Halmagyi, On the Existence of Meta-stable Vacua in Klebanov-Strassler, JHEP 09 (2010) 087 [arXiv:0912.3519] [INSPIRE].
I. Bena, G. Giecold, M. Graña, N. Halmagyi and S. Massai, The backreaction of anti-D3 branes on the Klebanov-Strassler geometry, JHEP 06 (2013) 060 [arXiv:1106.6165] [INSPIRE].
I. Bena, M. Graña, S. Kuperstein and S. Massai, Anti-D3 Branes: Singular to the bitter end, Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) 106010 [arXiv:1206.6369] [INSPIRE].
I. Bena, G. Giecold, M. Graña, N. Halmagyi and S. Massai, On Metastable Vacua and the Warped Deformed Conifold: Analytic Results, Class. Quant. Grav. 30 (2013) 015003 [arXiv:1102.2403] [INSPIRE].
I. Bena, A. Buchel and O.J.C. Dias, Horizons cannot save the Landscape, Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) 063012 [arXiv:1212.5162] [INSPIRE].
J. Blåbäck, U.H. Danielsson, D. Junghans, T. Van Riet and S.C. Vargas, Localised anti-branes in non-compact throats at zero and finite T, JHEP 02 (2015) 018 [arXiv:1409.0534] [INSPIRE].
S.S. Gubser, Curvature singularities: The Good, the bad and the naked, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 4 (2000) 679 [hep-th/0002160] [INSPIRE].
I. Bena, M. Graña, S. Kuperstein and S. Massai, Tachyonic Anti-M2 Branes, JHEP 06 (2014) 173 [arXiv:1402.2294] [INSPIRE].
J. Blåbäck, U.H. Danielsson, D. Junghans, T. Van Riet, T. Wrase and M. Zagermann, Smeared versus localised sources in flux compactifications, JHEP 12 (2010) 043 [arXiv:1009.1877] [INSPIRE].
J. Blåbäck, U.H. Danielsson, D. Junghans, T. Van Riet, T. Wrase and M. Zagermann, The problematic backreaction of SUSY-breaking branes, JHEP 08 (2011) 105 [arXiv:1105.4879] [INSPIRE].
D. Cohen-Maldonado, J. Diaz, T. van Riet and B. Vercnocke, Observations on fluxes near anti-branes, JHEP 01 (2016) 126 [arXiv:1507.01022] [INSPIRE].
U.H. Danielsson and T. Van Riet, Fatal attraction: more on decaying anti-branes, JHEP 03 (2015) 087 [arXiv:1410.8476] [INSPIRE].
B. Michel, E. Mintun, J. Polchinski, A. Puhm and P. Saad, Remarks on brane and antibrane dynamics, JHEP 09 (2015) 021 [arXiv:1412.5702] [INSPIRE].
R. Minasian and D. Tsimpis, Hopf reductions, fluxes and branes, Nucl. Phys. B 613 (2001) 127 [hep-th/0106266] [INSPIRE].
K. Dasgupta, K.-h. Oh, J. Park and R. Tatar, Geometric transition versus cascading solution, JHEP 01 (2002) 031 [hep-th/0110050] [INSPIRE].
I.R. Klebanov and A.A. Tseytlin, Gravity duals of supersymmetric SU(N) × SU(N + M) gauge theories, Nucl. Phys. B 578 (2000) 123 [hep-th/0002159] [INSPIRE].
K. Ohta and T. Yokono, Deformation of conifold and intersecting branes, JHEP 02 (2000) 023 [hep-th/9912266] [INSPIRE].
D. Kutasov and A. Wissanji, IIA Perspective On Cascading Gauge Theory, JHEP 09 (2012) 080 [arXiv:1206.0747] [INSPIRE].
S. Elitzur, A. Giveon and D. Kutasov, Branes and N = 1 duality in string theory, Phys. Lett. B 400 (1997) 269 [hep-th/9702014] [INSPIRE].
A. Giveon and D. Kutasov, Brane dynamics and gauge theory, Rev. Mod. Phys. 71 (1999) 983 [hep-th/9802067] [INSPIRE].
K. Dasgupta and S. Mukhi, Brane constructions, fractional branes and Anti-de Sitter domain walls, JHEP 07 (1999) 008 [hep-th/9904131] [INSPIRE].
K. Dasgupta and S. Mukhi, Brane constructions, conifolds and M-theory, Nucl. Phys. B 551 (1999) 204 [hep-th/9811139] [INSPIRE].
S.S. Gubser and I.R. Klebanov, Baryons and domain walls in an N = 1 superconformal gauge theory, Phys. Rev. D 58 (1998) 125025 [hep-th/9808075] [INSPIRE].
M. Bershadsky, C. Vafa and V. Sadov, D strings on D manifolds, Nucl. Phys. B 463 (1996) 398 [hep-th/9510225] [INSPIRE].
A.M. Uranga, Brane configurations for branes at conifolds, JHEP 01 (1999) 022 [hep-th/9811004] [INSPIRE].
J. McOrist and A.B. Royston, Relating Conifold Geometries to NS5-branes, Nucl. Phys. B 849 (2011) 573 [arXiv:1101.3552] [INSPIRE].
J. McOrist and A.B. Royston, T-dualising the Deformed and Resolved Conifold, Class. Quant. Grav. 29 (2012) 055014 [arXiv:1107.5895] [INSPIRE].
P. Candelas and X.C. de la Ossa, Comments on Conifolds, Nucl. Phys. B 342 (1990) 246 [INSPIRE].
R. Minasian and D. Tsimpis, On the geometry of nontrivially embedded branes, Nucl. Phys. B 572 (2000) 499 [hep-th/9911042] [INSPIRE].
N. Seiberg, Electric-magnetic duality in supersymmetric nonAbelian gauge theories, Nucl. Phys. B 435 (1995) 129 [hep-th/9411149] [INSPIRE].
E. Witten, Branes and the dynamics of QCD, Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl. 68 (1998) 216 [INSPIRE].
C.P. Herzog, I.R. Klebanov and P. Ouyang, Remarks on the warped deformed conifold, in proceedings of the Modern Trends in String Theory: 2nd Lisbon School on g Theory Superstrings, Lisbon, Portugal, July 13–17 2001 [hep-th/0108101] [INSPIRE].
I. Bena, M. Graña, S. Kuperstein and S. Massai, Giant Tachyons in the Landscape, JHEP 02 (2015) 146 [arXiv:1410.7776] [INSPIRE].
C. Krishnan and S. Kuperstein, The Mesonic Branch of the Deformed Conifold, JHEP 05 (2008) 072 [arXiv:0802.3674] [INSPIRE].
Open Access
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
ArXiv ePrint: 1511.06686
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits use, duplication, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
Pasini, G. Type IIA Klebanov-Strassler: the hard way. J. High Energ. Phys. 2016, 178 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP03(2016)178
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP03(2016)178