Abstract
The classic method for mass determination in a SUSY-like cascade decay chain relies on measurements of the kinematic endpoints in the invariant mass distributions of suitable collections of visible decay products. However, the procedure is complicated by combinatorial ambiguities: e.g., the visible final state particles may be indistinguishable (as in the case of QCD jets), or one may not know the exact order in which they are emitted along the decay chain. In order to avoid such combinatorial ambiguities, we propose to treat the final state particles fully democratically and consider the sorted set of the invariant masses of all possible partitions of the visible particles in the decay chain. In particular, for a decay to N visible particles, one considers the sorted sets of all possible n-body invariant mass combinations (2 ≤ n ≤ N) and determines the kinematic endpoint m max(n,r) of the distribution of the r-th largest n-body invariant mass m (n,r) for each possible value of n and r. For the classic example of a squark decay in supersymmetry, we provide analytical formulas for the interpretation of these endpoints in terms of the underlying physical masses. We point out that these measurements can be used to determine the structure of the decay topology, e.g., the number and position of intermediate on-shell resonances.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
CMS collaboration, Study of the mass and spin-parity of the Higgs boson candidate via its decays to Z boson pairs, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 (2013) 081803 [arXiv:1212.6639] [INSPIRE].
ATLAS collaboration, Evidence for the spin-0 nature of the Higgs boson using ATLAS data, Phys. Lett. B 726 (2013) 120 [arXiv:1307.1432] [INSPIRE].
CMS collaboration, Measurement of the properties of a Higgs boson in the four-lepton final state, Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 092007 [arXiv:1312.5353] [INSPIRE].
S. Arrenberg et al., Dark matter in the coming decade: complementary paths to discovery and beyond, arXiv:1310.8621 [INSPIRE].
A. Bartl, H. Fraas and W. Majerotto, Production and decay of neutralinos in e + e − annihilation, Nucl. Phys. B 278 (1986) 1 [INSPIRE].
A. Birkedal, K. Matchev and M. Perelstein, Dark matter at colliders: a model independent approach, Phys. Rev. D 70 (2004) 077701 [hep-ph/0403004] [INSPIRE].
J.L. Feng, S. Su and F. Takayama, Lower limit on dark matter production at the CERN Large Hadron Collider, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 (2006) 151802 [hep-ph/0503117] [INSPIRE].
T. Appelquist, H.-C. Cheng and B.A. Dobrescu, Bounds on universal extra dimensions, Phys. Rev. D 64 (2001) 035002 [hep-ph/0012100] [INSPIRE].
H.-C. Cheng, K.T. Matchev and M. Schmaltz, Bosonic supersymmetry? Getting fooled at the CERN LHC, Phys. Rev. D 66 (2002) 056006 [hep-ph/0205314] [INSPIRE].
A.J. Barr and C.G. Lester, A review of the mass measurement techniques proposed for the Large Hadron Collider, J. Phys. G 37 (2010) 123001 [arXiv:1004.2732] [INSPIRE].
L.-T. Wang and I. Yavin, A review of spin determination at the LHC, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 23 (2008) 4647 [arXiv:0802.2726] [INSPIRE].
B.C. Allanach, C.G. Lester, M.A. Parker and B.R. Webber, Measuring sparticle masses in nonuniversal string inspired models at the LHC, JHEP 09 (2000) 004 [hep-ph/0007009] [INSPIRE].
B.K. Gjelsten, D.J. Miller and P. Osland, Measurement of SUSY masses via cascade decays for SPS 1a, JHEP 12 (2004) 003 [hep-ph/0410303] [INSPIRE].
M. Burns, K.T. Matchev and M. Park, Using kinematic boundary lines for particle mass measurements and disambiguation in SUSY-like events with missing energy, JHEP 05 (2009) 094 [arXiv:0903.4371] [INSPIRE].
CMS collaboration, Hemisphere algorithm for separation of decay chains, in CMS technical design report. Volume II: Physics performance, CERN-LHCC-2006-021, pg. 410 [J. Phys. G 34 (2007) 995] [INSPIRE].
S. Matsumoto, M.M. Nojiri and D. Nomura, Hunting for the top partner in the littlest Higgs model with T-parity at the CERN LHC, Phys. Rev. D 75 (2007) 055006 [hep-ph/0612249] [INSPIRE].
A. Rajaraman and F. Yu, A new method for resolving combinatorial ambiguities at hadron colliders, Phys. Lett. B 700 (2011) 126 [arXiv:1009.2751] [INSPIRE].
Y. Bai and H.-C. Cheng, Identifying dark matter event topologies at the LHC, JHEP 06 (2011) 021 [arXiv:1012.1863] [INSPIRE].
P. Baringer, K. Kong, M. McCaskey and D. Noonan, Revisiting combinatorial ambiguities at hadron colliders with M T2, JHEP 10 (2011) 101 [arXiv:1109.1563] [INSPIRE].
K. Choi, D. Guadagnoli and C.B. Park, Reducing combinatorial uncertainties: a new technique based on M T2 variables, JHEP 11 (2011) 117 [arXiv:1109.2201] [INSPIRE].
J.H. Shim and H.S. Lee, Improving combinatorial ambiguities of tt events using neural networks, Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 114023 [arXiv:1402.3907] [INSPIRE].
H. Baer, D.D. Karatas and X. Tata, Gluino and squark production in association with gauginos at hadron supercolliders, Phys. Rev. D 42 (1990) 2259 [INSPIRE].
P. Agrawal, C. Kilic, C. White and J.-H. Yu, Improved mass measurement using the boundary of many-body phase space, Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 015021 [arXiv:1308.6560] [INSPIRE].
K.T. Matchev, F. Moortgat, L. Pape and M. Park, Precise reconstruction of sparticle masses without ambiguities, JHEP 08 (2009) 104 [arXiv:0906.2417] [INSPIRE].
W.S. Cho, D. Kim, K.T. Matchev and M. Park, Probing resonance decays to two visible and multiple invisible particles, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 (2014) 211801 [arXiv:1206.1546] [INSPIRE].
E. Byckling and K. Kajantie, Particle kinematics, John Wiley & Sons (1973).
G.F. Giudice, B. Gripaios and R. Mahbubani, Counting dark matter particles in LHC events, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 075019 [arXiv:1108.1800] [INSPIRE].
C.G. Lester, Constrained invariant mass distributions in cascade decays. The shape of the “m qll -threshold” and similar distributions, Phys. Lett. B 655 (2007) 39 [hep-ph/0603171] [INSPIRE].
D. Costanzo and D.R. Tovey, Supersymmetric particle mass measurement with invariant mass correlations, JHEP 04 (2009) 084 [arXiv:0902.2331] [INSPIRE].
C.G. Lester, Mass and spin measurement techniques (for the LHC), in The Dark Secrets of the Terascale. Proceedings of TASI 2011, T. Tait and K. Matchev eds., Boulder U.S.A., 6 Jun–11 Jul 2011.
C.G. Lester, M.A. Parker and M.J. White, Three body kinematic endpoints in SUSY models with non-universal Higgs masses, JHEP 10 (2007) 051 [hep-ph/0609298] [INSPIRE].
M. Burns, K. Kong, K.T. Matchev and M. Park, Using subsystem M T2 for complete mass determinations in decay chains with missing energy at hadron colliders, JHEP 03 (2009) 143 [arXiv:0810.5576] [INSPIRE].
CMS collaboration, Measurement of masses in the \( t\overline{t} \) system by kinematic endpoints in pp collisions at \( \sqrt{s}=7 \) TeV, Eur. Phys. J. C 73 (2013) 2494 [arXiv:1304.5783] [INSPIRE].
Open Access
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
ArXiv ePrint: 1512.02222
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits use, duplication, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
Kim, D., Matchev, K.T. & Park, M. Using sorted invariant mass variables to evade combinatorial ambiguities in cascade decays. J. High Energ. Phys. 2016, 129 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP02(2016)129
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP02(2016)129