Abstract
The focus of this special edition is students’ literacy development over the school years. Drawing on data that includes classroom interactions, analyses of texts, and interviews with students, this edition builds on the seminal treatment of the question of literacy transitions provided in Christie and Derewianka (2008). This paper aims to contribute to this effort by documenting how particular versions of students’ progress in literacy appear in a selection of interviews with teachers of Preschool through to Year 7: How do these teachers variously characterise teaching and learning literacy in terms of skill, knowledge, and disposition? How does each teacher describe the pressing literacy demands that their students need to meet if they are to be ready for what lies immediately ahead of them? The discussion also takes account of two consequential features of the setting: literacy in the institution of schooling, and the ways in which that connection is made into research data via the apparatus of the interview. Some implications and ways forward for teaching and researching are outlined: how teachers can apply practical theorising to literacy as it is set in, and moves through, the school years, and how the interview can be productively understood as a data-collection apparatus.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Atkinson, P., & Silverman, D. (1997). Kundera’s Immortality: The interview society and the invention of the self. Qualitative Inquiry, 3, 304–325.
Christie, F., & Derewianka, B. (2008). School discourse. Continuum.
Desrosières, A. (1998) The politics of large numbers: A history of statistical reasoning. (trans. C. Nash). Harvard University Press.
Fischer, S. R. (2001). A history of writing. Reaktion.
Freebody, P. (2003). Qualitative research in education: Interaction and practice. SAGE Publications.
Heap, J. L. (1977). Toward a phenomenology of reading. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 8, 103–113.
Heap, J. L. (1985). Discourse in the production of classroom knowledge: Reading lessons. Curriculum Inquiry, 15, 245–279.
Holstein J. A., & Gubrium, J. F. (2016). Narrative practice and the active interview. In D. Silverman (Ed.) Qualitative data analysis, (pp. 67–82). Sage.
Jayyusi, L. (1984). Categorisation and the moral order. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Jefferson, G. (1984). Transcript notation. In J.M. Atkinson and J. Heritage (Eds.) Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis, (pp. ix-xvi). Cambridge University Press.
Jefferson, G. (1990). List construction as a task and interactional resource. In G. Psathas, (Ed.), Interactional competence, (pp. 63–92). University Press of America.
Jones, P. T., Matruglio, E. & Edwards-Groves, C. (Eds.) (forthcoming). Transition and continuity in school literacy development. Continuum Press.
Lerner, G. H. (1994). Responsive list construction: A conversational resource for accomplishing multifaceted social action. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 13, 20–33.
Potter, J., & Hepburn, A. (2012). Eight challenges for interview researchers. In J.F. Gubrium, J.A. Holstein, A. Marvasti & K. McKinney (Eds.) The Sage handbook of interview research, 2nd edition, (pp. 555–570). Sage.
Schegloff, E. A. (2007). Sequence organisation in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis (Vol. 1). Cambridge University Press.
Selting, M. (2007). Lists as embedded structures and the prosody of list construction as an interactional resource. Journal of Pragmatics, 39, 483–526.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Freebody, P. Portraits of ’learning on the move’: Teachers’ accounts of literacy’s trajectories. AJLL 44, 26–36 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03652070
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03652070