Skip to main content
Log in

New Word Hunters: A family engagement strategy to extend Year 1 children’s vocabulary

  • Published:
The Australian Journal of Language and Literacy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The New Word Hunter project sought to engage families of Year 1 children with the aim of extending their vocabularies beyond everyday language. Early vocabulary development has been linked to later performance in reading comprehension, as well as to socio-economic status. This project sought to recruit families from two diverse school communities as partners in encouraging their children to increase their lexical repertoires by providing them with vocabulary rich books, supplementary resources and advice. Utilising a pre-and post-test design with a treatment group and comparison group in each of two contrastive schools, the study investigated both receptive and expressive vocabulary performance, with a focus on words in the Tier-2 category, drawing on the work of Beck and McKeown. Initial assessment found unanticipated similarities in the performance of children from low and middle SES backgrounds, but differences related to language background and gender. Based on this assessment, we suggest that educators may be underestimating young children’s receptive and expressive language competence. Findings of the comparative analysis of pre- and post-test results indicate that the intervention was effective in improving children’s understanding of challenging words included in fictional and nonfiction texts provided in resource packs. However, this was only the case in one school, Pleasant Rise, which had a socially and culturally diverse community with a moderate level of disadvantage; it was not the case in Pelican Point, a school serving a highly disadvantaged community. In discussing the findings, we suggest there may be an interaction between teacher attitudes, family interventions and child outcomes, even when educators’ pedagogy is not the focus of the interventions. Acknowledging limitations of the project, we propose that directly encouraging parents and carers to engage in vocabulary extension with their children, and providing high quality and engaging materials, is worth further attention.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adelson, J., Dickinson, E.R. & Cunningham, B. (2016). A multigrade, multiyear statewide examination of reading achievement: Examining variability between districts, schools and students. Educational Researcher, 45 (4), 258–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, M., Harrison, C. & Brooks, G. (2002). The Boots Books for Babies project: Impact on library registrations and book loans. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 2 (1), 45–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, I. & McKeown, M. (1985). Teaching vocabulary: Making the instruction fit the goal. Educational Perspectives, 11–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, I.L. & McKeown, M.G. (2007). Increasing young low-income children’s oral vocabulary repertoires through rich and focused instruction. The Elementary School Journal, 107(3), 251–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, I., McKeown, M. & Kucan, L. (2013). Bringing words to life: Robust vocabulary instruction. New York & London: The Guildford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biemiller, A. (2003). Vocabulary: Needed if more children are to read well. Reading Psychology, 24(3-4), 323–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bingham, G.E., Jeon, H.J., Kwon, K.A. & Lim, C. (2016). Parenting styles and home literacy opportunities: Associations with children’s oral language skills. Infant and Child Development, 26 (5), 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, L. (1974). Talking, understanding and thinking: Developmental relationship between receptive and expressive language. In R. Schiefelbusch & L. Lloyd (Eds.), Language perspectives: Acquisition, retardation, and intervention. Baltimore MD: University Park Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonifacci, P., Barbieri, M. & Tomassini, M. (2018). In few words: Linguistic gap but adequate narrative structure in preschool bilingual children. Journal of Child Language, 45, 120–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bornstein, M., Haynes, M. & Painter, K.M. (1998). Sources of child vocabulary competence: A multivariate model. Journal of Child Language, 25, 367–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daly, A. (2015). Relating students’ spoken language and reading comprehension. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 38 (3), 193–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Agostino, J. & Rodgers, E. (2017). Literacy achievement trends at entry to first grade. Educational Researcher, 46 (2), 78–89. doi:10.3102/0013189X17697274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Damhuis, R. & Van Der Zalm, E. (2017). A provocative approach for communication with low-proficient children: Examining how the interactive role of teachers and children changes. Language and Literacy, 19 (2), 51–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickinson, D.K. & Porche, M.V. (2011). Relation between language experiences in preschool classrooms and children’s kindergarten and fourth-grade language and reading abilities. Child Development, 82 (3), 870–886.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, L. & Dunn, M. (2007). Peabody picture vocabulary test. (4th ed.). Minneapolis, MN: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graves, M. Elmore, J. & Fitzgerald, J. (2019). The vocabulary of core reading programs, The Elementary School Journal, 119, 386–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, C. & Jones, S. (2016). Making sense in the city: Dolly Parton, early reading and educational policy-making. Literacy, 50(1), 40–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, B. & Risley, T. (2003). The early catastrophe: The 30 million word gap by age 3. American Educator, Spring, 4–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, S. & Launder, N. (2010). Oral language and beginning to read. Australian Journal of Language & Literacy, 33 (3), 240–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Justice, L.M., Meier, J. & Walpole, S. (2005). Learning new words from storybooks: An efficacy study with at-risk kindergartners. Language, Speech and Hearing Services in Schools, 36, 17–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, E.S., Goldstein, H., Spencer, T. & Sherman, A. (2015). Effects of automated Tier 2 storybook intervention on vocabulary and comprehension learning in preschool children with limited oral language skills. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 31, 47–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawhon, T. & Cobb, J.B. (2002). Routines that build emergent literacy skills in infants, toddlers, and preschoolers. Early Childhood Education Journal, 30 (2), 113–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J.S. & Bowen, N.K. (2006). Parent involvement, cultural capital and the achievement gap among elementary school children. American Educational Research Journal, 43 (2), 193–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manz, P.H., Eisenberg, R., Gernhart, A., Faison, J., Laracy, S., Ridgard, T. & Pinho, T. (2017). Engaging Early Head Start parents in a collaborative inquiry: The co-construction of Little Talks. Early Child Development and Care, 187(8), 1311–1334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massaro, D. (2015). Two different communication genres and implications for vocabulary development and learning to read. Journal of Literacy Research, 47 (4), 505–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDowall, S. & Boyd, S. (2005). Messages about reading: What do parents and teachers hear, share, do and need when engaging in literacy partnerships? Wellington: New Zealand Council for Educational Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKeown, M.G. & Beck, I.L. (2014). Effects of vocabulary instruction on measures of language processing: Comparing two approaches. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 29, 520–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mesmer, H. (2015). Text matters: Exploring the lexical reservoirs of books in preschool rooms. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 34 (1), 67–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nation, K., Clarke, P., Marshall, C.M. & Durand, M. (2004). Hidden language impairments in children: Parallels between poor reading comprehension and specific language impairment? Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 47, 199–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neuman, S.B. & Dwyer, J. (2009). Missing in action: Vocabulary instruction in Pre-K. The Reading Teacher, 62 (5), 384–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neuman, S.B., Kaefer, T. & Pinkham, A.M. (2018). A double dose of disadvantage: Language experiences for low-income children in home and school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 110 (1), 102–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niklas, F. & Schneider, W. (2015). With a little help: Improving kindergarten children’s vocabulary by enhancing the home literacy environment. Reading and Writing, 28, 491–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, H. (2008). Home literacy environments and children’s reading performance: A comparative study of 25 countries. Educational Research and Evaluation: An International Journal on Theory and Practice, 14 (6), 489–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paris, S. (2005). Reinterpreting the development of reading skills. Reading Research Quarterly, 40 (2), 184–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, P.D., Hiebert, E.H. & Kamil, M.L. (2007). Vocabulary assessment: What we know and what we need to learn. Reading Research Quarterly, 42 (2), 282–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riley, J. & Burrell, A. (2007). Assessing children’s oral storytelling in their first year of school. International Journal of Early Years Education, 15 (2), 181–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaughency, E., Suggate, S. & Reese, E. (2017). Links between early oral narrative and decoding skills and later reading in a New Zealand sample. Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties, 22 (2), 109–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Senechal, M. (1997). The differential effect of storybook reading on preschoolers’ acquisition of expressive and receptive vocabulary. Journal of Child Language, 24, 123–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snow, C. & Matthews, T. (2016). Reading and language in the early grades, The Future of Children, 26 (1), 57–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stahl, S.A. (2003). Vocabulary and readability: How knowing word meanings affects comprehension Topics in Language Disorders, 23 (3), 241–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thwaite, A. & McKay, G. (2013). Five-year-olds doing science and technology: How teachers shape the conversation. Australian Journal of Language & Literacy, 36 (1), 28–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasik, B.A. & Iannone-Campbell, C. (2013). Developing vocabulary through purposeful, strategic conversations. The Reading Teacher, 66 (4), 321–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wesseling, P., Christmann, C. & Lachmann, T. (2017). Shared book reading promotes not only language development, but also grapheme awareness in German kindergarten children. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westgate, D. & Hughes, M. (2018). Mind the gap: Vocabulary development in the primary curriculum. Education 3-13, 46(5), 587–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westerveld, M.F. & Moran, C.A. (2011). Expository language skills of young school-age children. Language, Speech and Hearing Services in Schools, 42, 182–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nichols, S., Hill, S. New Word Hunters: A family engagement strategy to extend Year 1 children’s vocabulary. AJLL 43, 129–140 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03652049

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03652049

Navigation