Abstract
This qualitative case study examines how a preservice English as an Additional Language (EAL) teacher from the Faculty of Education at a large Melbourne-based university learned to scaffold EAL learning during a two-week practicum in a secondary school and the factors shaping his cognition. The data sources include individual interviews, oral reflections on lessons and recordings of those same lessons. The study was underpinned by a sociocultural perspective on scaffolding and van de Pol, Volman and Beishuizen’s (2010) framework for analysing scaffolding, which is based on a synthesis of previous models and findings. The findings indicate that the preservice teacher implemented a number of scaffolding strategies during the EAL practicum. The use of these strategies was shaped by the preservice teacher’s theoretical knowledge of scaffolding and belief about its importance, which he gained from the teacher education coursework and his prior practicum experience. Learning within practice was also found to be important in his cognition of scaffolding as through the practicum he developed knowledge about his students’ abilities and their difficulties in learning EAL, which are the basis for his contingent scaffolding strategies. Based on the findings, the paper suggests that instructional scaffolding is an important area of professional learning, especially for teachers working with EAL students, and needs to be explicitly built into teacher education in both coursework and the teaching practicum.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Antón, M., & Dicamilla, F.J. (1999). Socio-cognitive functions of L1 collaborative interaction in the L2 classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 83(2), 233–247.
Barnard, R. (2002). Peer tutoring in the primary classroom: A sociocultural interpretation of classroom interaction. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 37(1), 57–72.
Boon, H.J., & Lewthwaite, B. (2015). Development of an instrument to measure a facet of quality teaching: Culturally responsive pedagogy. International Journal of Educational Research, 72, 38–58. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2015.05.002
Borg, S. (2011). Language teacher education. In J. Simpson (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of applied linguistics (pp. 215–228). New York: Routledge.
Carmichael-Wong, S., & Vine, E.W. (2004). Peer-scaffolding or collaborative problem-solving?: A data-based study of three learners’ experience. New Zealand Studies in Applied Linguistics, 10(2), 39–60.
Chaiklin, S. (2003). The zone of proximal development in Vygotsky’s analysis of learning and instruction. In A. Kozulin, B. Gindis, V.S. Ageyev, & S.M. Miller (Eds.), Vygotsky’s educational theory in cultural context (pp. 39–64). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dang, T.K.A. (2013). Identity in activity: Examining teacher professional identity formation in the paired-placement of student teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 30, 47–59. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2012.10.006
Davis, E.A., & Miyake, N. (2004). Explorations of scaffolding in complex classroom systems. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(3), 265–272.
De Guerrero, M.C.M., & Villamil, O.S. (2000). Activating the ZPD: Mutual scaffolding in L2 peer revision. The Modern Language Journal, 84(1), 51–68.
Department of Education and Training. (2015). The EAL handbook: Advice to schools on programs for supporting students learning English as an additional language. Melbourne: Victoria State Government.
Department of Education and Training. (2018). EAL Annual reports. Retrieved from http://www.education.vic.gov.au/school/teachers/support/diversity/eal/Pages/ealonlinereports.aspx
Farrell, T.S.C. (2008). ‘Here’s the book, go teach the class’: ELT practicum support. RELC Journal, 39(2), 226–241. doi:10.1177/0033688208092186
Gao, X., & Benson, P. (2012). ‘Unruly pupils’ in pre-service English language teachers’ teaching practicum experiences. Journal of Education for Teaching, 38(2), 127–140. doi:10.1080/02607476.2012.656440
Gibbons, P. (2009). English language learners, academic literacy and thinking: Learning in the challenge zone. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Golombek, P.R., & Doran, M. (2014). Unifying cognition, emotion, and activity in language teacher professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 39, 102–111. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2014.01.002
Grossman, P.L., Smagorinsky, P., & Valencia, S. (1999). Appropriating tools for teaching English: A theoretical framework for research on learning to teach. American Journal of Education, 108(1), 1–29. doi:10.2307/1085633
Hammond, J., & Gibbons, P. (2005). Putting scaffolding to work: The contribution of scaffolding in articulating ESL education. Prospect, 20(1), 6–30.
Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S.E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. doi:10.1177/1049732305276687
Johnson, K.E. (2009). Second language teacher education: A sociocultural perspective. New York: Routledge.
Kinginger, C. (2002). Defining the zone of proximal development in US foreign language education. Applied Linguistics, 23(2), 240–261.
Kohlbacher, F. (2006). The use of qualitative content analysis in case study research. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 7(1). Retrieved from http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/75/153
Lantolf, J.P. (2000a). Introducing sociocultural theory. In J.P. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 1–26). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lantolf, J.P. (2000b). Second language learning as a mediated process. Language Teaching, 33(2), 79–96.
Lantolf, J.P. (2006). Sociocultual theory and L2: State of the art. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28(1), 67–109. doi:10.1017/S0272263106060037
Lantolf, J.P., & Aljaafreh, A. (1995). Second language learning in the zone of proximal development: A revolutionary experience. International Journal of Educational Research, 23(7), 619–632.
Lantolf, J.P., & Appel, G. (1994). Theoretical framework: An introduction to Vygotskian approaches to second language research. In J.P. Lantolf & G. Appel (Eds.), Vygotskian approaches to second language research (pp. 1–32). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Lantolf, J.P., & Beckett, T.G. (2009). Research timeline for sociocultural theory and second language acquisition. Language Teaching, 42(4), 459–475. doi:10.1017/S0261444809990048
Lantolf, J.P., & Thorne, S.L. (2007). Sociocultural theory and second language learning. In B. van Patten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition (pp. 201–224). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Le, V.C. (2018). Remapping the teacher knowledge-base of language teacher education: A Vietnamese perspective. Language Teaching Research, (Online first). doi:10.1177/1362168818777525
Leontiev, A.N. (1981). Problems of the development of the mind. Moscow: Progress.
Many, J.E., Dewberry, D., Taylor, D.L., & Coady, K. (2009). Profiles of three preservice ESOL teachers’ development of instructional scaffolding. Reading Psychology, 30(2), 148–174. doi:10.1080/02702710802275256
Many, J.E., Taylor, D.L., Wang, Y., Sachs, G.T., & Schreiber, H. (2007). An examination of preservice literacy teachers’ initial attempts to provide instructional scaffolding. Reading Horizons, 48(1), 19–40.
Mariani, L. (1997). Teacher support and teacher challenge in promoting learner autonomy. Perspectives, a Journal of TESOL-Italy, 23(2).
McCormick, D., & Donato, R. (2000). Teacher questions as scaffolded assistance in an ESL classroom. In J.K. Hall & L.S. Verplaetse (Eds.), Second and foreign language learning through classroom interaction (pp. 183–202). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Merriam, S.B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Nassaji, H., & Cumming, A. (2000). What’s in a ZPD? A case study of a young ESL student and teacher interacting through dialogue journals. Language Teaching Research, 4(2), 95–121.
Nassaji, H., & Swain, M. (2000). A Vygotskian perspective on corrective feedback in L2: The effect of random versus negotiated help on the learning of English articles. Language Awareness, 9(1), 34–51.
Nation, I.S.P. (1990). Teaching and learning vocabulary. New York: Newbury House.
Nation, I.S.P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nation, I.S.P., & Gu, P.Y. (2007). Focus on vocabulary. Sydney: NCELTR, Macquarie University.
Nation, I.S.P., & Laufer, B. (2012). Vocabulary. In S.G. a. A. Mackey (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 163–176). New York: Routledge.
Neuman, W.L. (2011). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Newell, G.E., & Connors, S.P. (2011). ‘Why do you think that?’ A supervisor’s mediation of a preservice English teacher’s understanding of instructional scaffolding. English Education, 43 (3), 225–261.
Newell, G.E., Gingrich, R.S., & Johnson, A.B. (2001). Considering the contexts for appropriating theoretical and practical tools for teaching middle and secondary English. Research in the Teaching of English, 35 (3), 302–343.
Nguyen, M.H. (2013). EFL students’ reflections on peer scaffolding in making a collaborative oral presentation. English Language Teaching, 6 (4), 64–73.
Nguyen, M.H. (2014). Preservice EAL teaching as emotional experiences: Practicum experience in an Australian secondary school. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 39 (8), 63–84. doi:10.14221/ajte.2014v39n8.5
Nguyen, M.H. (2017). Negotiating contradictions in developing teacher identity during the EAL practicum in Australia. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 45 (4), 399–415. doi:10.1080/1359866x.2017.1295132
Nguyen, M.H., & Brown, J. (2016). Influences on preservice writing instruction during the secondary English as an Additional Language practicum in Australia. Australian Journal of Teacher Education (Online), 41 (8), 84–101. doi:10.14221/ajte.2016v41n8.5
Nguyen, M.H., & Parr, G. (2018). Mentoring practices and relationships during the EAL practicum in Australia: Contrasting narratives. In A. Fitzgerald, G. Parr, & J. Williams (Eds.), Narratives of learning through professional experience (pp. 87–105). Singapore: Springer.
Ohta, A.S. (2000). Rethinking interaction in SLA: Developmentally appropriate assistance in the zone of proximal development and the acquisition of L2 grammar. In J.P. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 51–78). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ohta, A.S. (2005). Interlanguage pragmatics in the zone of proximal development. System, 33 (3), 503–517.
Pea, R.D. (2004). The social and technical dimensions of scaffolding and related theoretical concepts for learning, education and human activity. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13 (3), 423–451.
Rambe, P. (2012). Activity theory and technology mediated interaction: Cognitive scaffolding using question-based consultation on Facebook. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28 (8), 1333–1361.
Riazi, M., & Rezaii, M. (2011). Teacher- and peer-scaffolding behaviors: Effects on EFL students’ writing improvement. Paper presented at the CLESOL 2010: Proceedings of the 12th National Conference for Community Languages and ESOL, Retrieved from http://www.tesolanz.org.nz/.
Richards, J.C. (1976). The role of vocabulary teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 10 (1), 77–89. doi:10.2307/3585941
Sherin, B., Reiser, B.J., & Edelson, D. (2004). Scaffolding analysis: Extending the scaffolding metaphor to learning artifacts. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13 (3), 387–421.
Storch, N. (2017). Sociocultural theory in the L2 classroom. In S. Loewen & M. Sato (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of instructed second language acquisition (pp. 69–83). London: Routledge.
Tabak, I. (2004). Synergy: A complement to emerging patterns of distributed scaffolding. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13 (3), 305–335.
Tharp, R.G., & Gallimore, R. (1988). Rousing minds to life: Teaching, learning, and schooling in social context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Trent, J. (2013). From learner to teacher: Practice, language, and identity in a teaching practicum. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 41 (4), 426–440. doi:10.1080/1359866X.2013.838621
Urzúa, A., & Vásquez, C. (2008). Reflection and professional identity in teachers’ future-oriented discourse. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24 (7), 1935–1946. doi:10.1016/j. tate.2008.04.008
van de Pol, J., Volman, M., & Beishuizen, J. (2010). Scaffolding in teacher-student interaction: A decade of research. Educational Psychology Review, 22 (3), 271–296. doi:10.1007/s10648-010-9127-6
Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Vygotsky, L.S. (1987). The collected works of L.S. Vygotsky (Vol. 1). New York: Plenum Press.
Walqui, A. (2006). Scaffolding instruction for English language learners: A conceptual framework. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 9 (2), 159–180.
Wells, G. (1999). Using L1 to master L2: A response to Antón and DiCamilla’s ‘Socio-cognitive functions of L1 collaborative interaction in the L2 classroom’. The Modern Language Journal, 83 (2), 248–254.
Wertsch, J.V. (1991). Voices of the mind: A sociocultural approach to mediated action. Cambridge, MA: Havard University Press.
Wilkins, D. (1972). Linguistics in language teaching. London: Edward Arnold.
Wood, D., Bruner, J.S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17, 89–100.
Yin, R.K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). California: SAGE.
Yuan, R., & Lee, I. (2015). The cognitive, social and emotional processes of teacher identity construction in a pre-service teacher education programme. Research Papers in Education, 30 (4), 1–23. doi:10.1080/02671522.2014.932830
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nguyen, M.H., Williams, C.P. A preservice teacher’s learning of instructional scaffolding in the EAL practicum. AJLL 42, 156–166 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03652035
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03652035