Abstract
The individual identification of animals by means of tagging is a common methodological approach in ornithology. However, several studies suggest that specific colors may affect animal behavior and disrupt sexual selection processes. Thus, methods to choose color tagging combinations should be carefully evaluated. However, reporting of this information is usually neglected. Here, we introduce the GenTag, an R package developed to support biologists in creating color tag sequence combinations using a random process. First, a single-color tag sequence is created from an algorithm selected by the user, followed by verification of the combination. We provide three methods to produce color tag sequences. GenTag provides accessible and simple methods to generate color tag sequences. The use of a random process to define the color tags to be applied to each animal is the best way to deal with the influence of tag color upon behavior and life history parameters.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Alisauskas R.T. & Lindberg M.S. 2002. Effects of neckbands on survival and fidelity of White-fronted and Canada Geese captured as non-breeding adults. Journal of Applied Statistics 29: 521–537.
Broughton R.K. 2015. Low incidence of leg and foot injuries in colour-ringed Marsh Tits Poecile palustris. Ringing and Migration 30: 37–42.
Burley N. 1986. Sex-ratio manipulation in color-banded populations of Zebra Finches. Evolution 40: 1191–1206.
Burley N., Krantzberg G. & Radman P. 1982. Influence of colourbanding on the conspecific preferences of Zebra Finches. Animal Behaviour 30: 444–455.
Calvo B. & Furness R.W. 1992. A review of the use and the effects of marks and devices on birds. Ringing and Migration 13: 129–151.
Cresswell W., Lind J., Quinn J.L., Minderman J. & Whitfield D.P. 2007. Ringing or colour-banding does not increase predation mortality in Redshanks Tringa totanus. Journal of Avian Biology 38: 309–316.
Cuthill I.C., Hunt S., Cleary C. & Clark C. 1997. Colour bands, dominance, and body mass regulation in male Zebra Finches (Taeniopygia guttata). Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences 264: 1093–1099.
Fiske P. & Amundsen T. 1997. Female Bluethroats prefer males with symmetric colour bands. Animal Behaviour 54: 81–87.
Gil D., Graves J., Hazon N. & Wells A. 1999. Male attractiveness and differential testosterone investment in Zebra Finch eggs. Science 286: 126–128.
Griesser M., Schneider N.A., Collis M.-A., Overs A., Guppy M., Guppy S., Takeuchi N., Collins P., Peters A. & Hall M.L. 2012. Causes of ring-related leg injuries in birds: evidence and recommendations from four field studies. PLoS ONE 7: e51891.
Jennions M.D. 1998. The effect of leg band symmetry on female-male association in Zebra Finches. Animal Behaviour 55: 61–67.
Johnsen A., Lifjeld J.T. & Rohde P.A. 1997. Coloured leg bands affect male mate-guarding behaviour in the Bluethroat. Animal Behaviour 54: 121–130.
Johnsen A., Fiske P., Amundsen T., Lifjeld J.T. & Rohde P.A. 2000. Colour bands, mate choice and paternity in the Bluethroat. Animal Behaviour 59: 111–119.
Johnson K., Dalton R. & Burley D.N. 1993. Preferences of female American Goldfinches (Carduelis tristis) for natural and artificial male traits. Behavioral Ecology 4: 138–143.
Kosinski Z. 2004. The removal of colour rings by Greenfinches Carduelis chloris. Ringing and Migration 22: 4–6.
McCrea R.S. & Morgan B.J. 2014. Analysis of capture-recapture data. Boca Raton: Chapman and Hall/CRC.
Nietmann L. & Ha R.R. 2018. Site-specific incidence of ring-related injuries in Rufous Fantails Rhipidura rufifrons. Ringing and Migration 33: 23–30.
Pierce A.J., Stevens D.K., Mulder R. & Salewski V. 2007. Plastic colour rings and the incidence of leg injury in flycatchers (Muscicapidae, Monarchidae). Ringing and Migration 23: 205–210.
Schlicht E. & Kempenaers B. 2018. The immediate impact of ringing, blood sampling and PIT-tag implanting on the behaviour of Blue Tits Cyanistes caeruleus. Ardea 106: 39–98.
Sedgwick J.A. & Klus R. 1997. Injury due to leg bands in Willow Flycatchers. Journal of Field Ornithology 68: 622–629.
Song Z., Liu Y., Booksmythe I. & Ding C. 2017. Effects of individualbased preferences for colour-banded mates on sex allocation in Zebra Finches. Behavioral Ecology 28: 1228–1235.
Sutherland W.J. 2006. Ecological census techniques: a handbook. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Weiser E.L., Lanctot R.B., Brown S.C., River-Gates H., Bentzen R.L., Boldenow M.L., Cunningham J.A., Doll A., Donnelly T.F., English W.B., Franks S.E., Grond K., Herzog P., Hill B.L., Kendall S., Kwon E., Lank D.B., Liebezeit J.R., Rausch J., Saalfeld S.T., Taylor A.R., Ward D.H., Woodard P.F. & Sandercock B.K. 2018. Effects of leg flags on nest survival of four species of Arcticbreeding shorebirds. Journal of Field Ornithology 89: 287–297.
Zann R. 1994. Effects of band color on survivorship, body condition and reproductive effort of free-living Australian Zebra Finches. Auk 111: 131–142.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Biagolini, C., Macedo, R.H. GenTag: a package to improve animal color tagging protocol. Rev. Bras. Ornitol. 27, 253–260 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03546071
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03546071