Skip to main content
Log in

Performance Analysis and Gains Tuning Procedure for a Controlled Space Manipulator Used for Non-cooperative Target Capture Operations

  • Published:
Aerotecnica Missili & Spazio Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the near future robotic systems will be playing an increasingly important role in space applications such as repairing, refuelling, re-orbiting spacecraft and cleaning up the increasing amount of space debris. Space Manipulator Systems (SMSs) are robotic systems made of a bus (which has its own actuators such as thrusters and reaction wheels) equipped with one or more deployable arms. The present paper focuses on the issue of maintaining a stable first contact between the arms terminal parts (i.e. the end-effectors) and a non-cooperative target satellite, before the actual grasp is accomplished. The selected approach is a modified version of the Impedance Control algorithm, in which the end-effector is commanded in order to make it behave like a mass-spring-damper system regardless of the reaction motion of the base, so to absorb the impact energy. A very important aspect in the analysis of the control performance is the evaluation of the field of applicability of the controller itself. In the present work the influence of this issue on the effectiveness of the proposed control architecture will be analysed, together with the control gains tuning which allows for a robust achievement of the mission requirements. Several numerical results will be presented and discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. D. King, Space Servicing: Past, Present and Future, Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium on Artificial Intelligence and Robotics & Automation in Space, Montreal, Canada. 2001.

  2. A. Flores-Abad, O. Ma, K. Pham, S. Ulrich, A review of space robotics technologies for on-orbit servicing, Progress Aerosp. Sci. 68 (2014), pp. 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. N. Hogan, Impedance Control: An Approach to Manipulation: Part III - Applications, Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement and Control, Vol. 107, Issue 1 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  4. M. Raibert, J. Craig, Hybrid Position/Force Control of Manipulators, ASME Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement and Control, Vol. 102, No. 2, 1981, pp. 126–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. K. Kosuge, H. Yoshida, T. Fukuda, M. Sakai, K. Kanitani, K. Hariki, Unified control for dynamic cooperative manipulation, Intelligent Robots and Systems’ 94. Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ/GI International Conference on, Vol. 2, 1994, pp. 1042–1047.

    Google Scholar 

  6. H. Sadeghian, F. Ficuciello, L. Villani, M. Keshmiri, Global Impedance Control of Dual-Arm Manipulation for Safe Interaction, IFAC Proceedings Volumes, Vol. 45, Issue 22, 2012, pp. 767–772.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. P. Gasbarri, A. Pisculli, Dynamic/control interactions between flexible orbiting space-robot during grasping, docking and post-docking maneuvers, Acta Astronautica, Vol. 110, May-June 2015, pp. 225–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. A. Stolfi, P. Gasbarri, M. Sabatini, A Combined Impedance-PD Approach for Controlling a Dual-Arm Space Manipulator in the Capture of a Non-Cooperative Target, Acta Astronautica, Vol. 139, October 2017, pp. 243–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. N. Uyama, T. Narumi, Hybrid Impedance/Position Control of a Free-Flying Space Robot for Detumbling a Noncoop-erative Satellite, IFAC-Papers On Line, Vol. 49, Issue 17, 2016, pp. 230–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. P. Santini, P. Gasbarri, Dynamics of Multibody Systems in Space Environment; Lagrangian vs. Eulerian Approach, Acta Astronautica, Vol. 54, Issue 1, Jan. 2004, pp. 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. A. Pisculli, P. Gasbarri, A Minimum State Multibody/FEM Approach for Modeling Flexible Orbiting Space Systems, Acta Astronautica, Vol. 110, May June 2015, pp. 324–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. A. Pisculli, L. Felicetti, P Gasbarri, G.B. Palmerini, M. Sabatini, A reaction-null/Jacobian transpose control strategy with gravity gradient compensation for on-orbit space manipulators, Aerospace Science and Technology, Vol. 38, October 2014, pp. 30–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. T. Kane, D. Levinson, The use of Kane’s dynamical equations in robotics, International Journal of Robotics Research, Vol. 2, No. 3, 1983, pp. 3–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. H. Nakanishi, K. Yoshida, Impedance control for free-flying space robots - basic equations and applications, IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems, Beijing, China, 2006, pp. 3137–42.

    Google Scholar 

  15. N. Uyama, H. Nakanishi, K. Nagaoka, K. Yoshida, Impedance-Based Contact Control of a Free-Flying Space Robot with a Compliant Wrist for Non-Cooperative Satellite Capture, 2012 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, October 7–12, 2012, Vil-amoura, Algarve, Portugal.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Stolfi, A., Gasbarri, P. & Sabatini, M. Performance Analysis and Gains Tuning Procedure for a Controlled Space Manipulator Used for Non-cooperative Target Capture Operations. Aerotec. Missili Spaz. 97, 3–12 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03404759

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03404759

Navigation