Abstract
An overview of the Pondicherry interpretation of quantum mechanics is presented. This interpretation proceeds from the recognition that the fundamental theoretical framework of physics is a probability algorithm, which serves to describe an objective fuzziness (the literal meaning of Heisenberg’s term ‘Unschärfe’, usually mistranslated as ‘uncertainty’) by assigning objective probabilities to the possible outcomes of unperformed measurements. Although it rejects attempts to construe quantum states as evolving ontological states, it arrives at an objective description of the quantum world that owes nothing to observers or the goings-on in physics laboratories. In fact, unless such attempts are rejected, quantum theory’s true ontological implications cannot be seen. Among these are the radically relational nature of space, the numerical identity of the corresponding relata, the incomplete spatio-temporal differentiation of the physical world, and the consequent top-down structure of reality, which defies attempts to model it from the bottom up, whether on the basis of an intrinsically differentiated space-time manifold or out of a multitude of individual building blocks.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
U Mohrhoff,Am. J. Phys. 68, 728 (2000)
U Mohrhoff,Am. J. Phys. 69, 864 (2001)
U Mohrhoff, inConsciousness and its transformation edited by M Cornelissen (Sri Aurobindo International Centre of Education, Pondicherry, 2001) p. 333
U Mohrhoff,Found. Phys. 32, 217 (2002)
U Mohrhoff,Mod. Phys. Lett. A17, 1107 (2002)
U Mohrhoff,Found. Phys. 32, 1295 (2002)
U Mohrhoff,Found. Phys. 32, 1313 (2002)
L Marchildon,Found. Phys. 34, 59 (2004)
U Mohrhoff,Found. Phys. 34, 75 (2004)
U Mohrhoff,Int. J. Quantum Inf. 2, 201 (2004)
U Mohrhoff, to appear in Progress in quantum physics research edited by V Krasnoholovets (Nova Science, New York), quant-ph/0305095
C A Fuchs and A Peres,Phys. Today 53 (March), 70 (2000);53 (September), 14 (2000)
Y Aharonov and L Vaidman,J. Phys. A24, 2315 (1991)
N D Mermin,Phys. Today 49 (March), 11 (1996)
J S Bell, in62 Years of uncertainty edited by A I Miller (Plenum, New York, 1990) p. 17
F London and E Bauer, inQuantum theory and measurement edited by J A Wheeler and W H Zurek (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ), 1983 p. 217
E P Wigner, inThe scientist speculates edited by I J Good (Heinemann, London, 1961) p. 284
B d’Espagnat,Veiled reality: An analysis of present-day quantum mechanical concepts (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1995)
O Ulfbeck and A Bohr,Found. Phys. 31, 757 (2001)
A Petersen, quoted in A Pais, Niels Bohr’s Times, inPhysics, philosophy, and polity (Clarendon, Oxford, 1991) p. 426
R Peierls,Phys. World 4 (January), 19 (1991)
C A Fuchs, inDecoherence and its implications in quantum computation and information transfer edited by A Gonis and PEA Turchi (IOS Press, Amsterdam, 2001) p. 38
E H Lieb,Rev. Mod. Phys. 48, 553 (1976)
C A Fuchs, inQuantum theory: Reconsideration of foundations edited by A Khrennikov (Växjö University Press, Växjö, 2002) p. 463
D Bohm,Phys. Rev. 85, 166 (1952)
G C Ghirardi, A Rimini and T Weber,Phys. Rev. D34, 470 (1986)
P Pearle,Phys. Rev. A39, 2277 (1989)
B C van Fraassen,Quantum mechanics: An empiricist view (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1991) pp. 241, 247, 280, 314
D Dieks,Phys. Rev. A49, 2290 (1994)
J A Wheeler, inQuantum theory and measurement edited by J A Wheeler and W H Zurek (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1983) p. 182
D M Greenberger, M Horne and A Zeilinger, inBell’s theorem, quantum theory, and conceptions of the universe edited by M Kafatos (Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1989) p. 73
Y Aharonov, P G Bergmann and J L Lebowitz,Phys. Rev. B134, 1410 (1964)
A Einstein,Dialectica 2, 320 (1948)
J von Neumann,Mathematical foundations of quantum mechanics (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1955)
J Hilgevoord,Am. J. Phys. 66, 396 (1998)
R Audi,The Cambridge dictionary of philosophy (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1995) p. 803
W H Zurek,Rev. Mod. Phys. 75, 715 (2003)
P Blanchard, D J W Giulini, E Joos, C Kiefer and I-O Stamatescu,Decoherence: Theoretical, experimental, and conceptual problems (Springer, Berlin, 2000)
E Joos, H D Zeh, C Kiefer, D J W Giulini, J Kupsch and I-O Stamatescu,Decoherence and the appearance of a classical world in quantum theory (Springer, New York, 2003)
S Treiman,The odd quantum (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1999) p. 188
E Joos and H D Zeh,Z. Phys. B59, 223 (1985)
P Pearle,Int. J. Theor. Phys. 18, 489 (1979)
K R Popper, inQuantum theory and the schism in physics edited by W W Bartley, III (Rowan & Littlefield, Totowa, NJ, 1982)
W Heisenberg,Physics and philosophy (Harper and Row, New York, 1958)
A Shimony, inThe new physics edited by P Davies (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1989) p. 373
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mohrhoff, U. The Pondicherry interpretation of quantum mechanics: An overview. Pramana - J Phys 64, 171–185 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02704872
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02704872
Keywords
- Interpretation of quantum mechanics
- Pondicherry interpretation
- objective probabilities
- fuzziness
- space
- time