Skip to main content
Log in

High resolution mapping and classification of oyster habitats in nearshore Louisiana using sidescan sonar

  • Published:
Estuaries Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sidescan sonar holds great promise as a tool to quantitatively depict the distribution and extent of benthic habitats in Louisiana’s turbid estuaries. In this study, we describe an effective protocol for acoustic sampling in this environment. We also compared three methods of classification in detail: mean-based thresholding, supervised, and unsupervised techniques to classify sidescan imagery into categories of mud and shell. Classification results were compared to ground truth results using quadrat and dredge sampling. Supervised classification gave the best overall result (kappa=75%) when compared to quadrat results. Classification accuracy was less robust when compared to all dredge samples (kappa=21–56%), but increased greatly (90–100%) when only dredge samples taken from acoustically homogeneous areas were considered. Sidescan sonar when combined with ground truth sampling at an appropriate scale can be effectively used to establish an accurate substrate base map for both research applications and shellfish management. The sidescan imagery presented here also provides, for the first time, a detailed presentation of oyster habitat patchiness and scale in a productive oyster growing area.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Able, K. W., D. C. Twichell, C. B. Grimes, andR. S. Jones. 1987. Sidescan sonar as a tool for detection of demersal fish habitats.Fishery Bulletin 85:725–736.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. R., E. E. Hardy, J. T. Roach, and R. E. Witmer. 1976. A land use and land cover classification system for use with remote sensor data. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper, No. P 0964. Reston, Virginia.

  • Berrigan, M. 1988. Management of oyster resources in Apalachicola Bay following Hurricane Elena.Journal of Shellfish Research 7:281–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brodtmann, N. V. 1991. Engineering and biological studies of reconstructed oyster habitat.Journal of Shellfish Research 10:399–403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Call, K. A., J. T. Hardy, andD. O. Wallin. 2003. Coral reef habitat discrimination using multivariate spectral analysis and satellite remote sensing.International Journal of Remote Sensing 24:2627–2639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Congalton, R. G. 1991. A review of assessing the accuracy of classification of remotely sensed data.Remote Sensing of Environment 37:35–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foody, G. M. 2002. Status of land cover classification accuracy assessment.Remote Sensing of Environment 80:185–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, J. V., L. A. Mayer, J. E. Hughes Clarke, andA. Kleiner. 1998. High-resolution multibeam bathymetry of east and west Flower Gardens and Stetson Banks, Gulf of Mexico.Gulf of Mexico Science XVI 16:131–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haltuch, M. A. andP. A. Berkman. 2000. Geographic information system (GIS) analysis of ecosystem invasion: Exotic mussels in Lake Erie.Limnology and Oceanography 45:1778–1787.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harding, J. M. andR. Mann. 2003. Influence of habitat on diet and distribution of striped bass (Morone saxatilis) in a temperate estuary.Bulletin of Marine Science 72:841–851.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huvenne, V. A. I., P. Blondel, andJ.-P. Henriet. 2002. Textural analyses of sidescan sonar imagery from two mound provinces in the Porcupine Seabight.Marine Geology 189:323–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, V. S. 1996. Biology of larvae and spat, p. 371–421.In V. S. Kennedy, R. I. E. Newell, and A. F. Eble (eds.), The Eastern Oyster,Crassostrea virginica. Maryland Sea Grant College, College Park, Maryland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenny, A. J., I. Cato, M. Desprez, G. Fader, R. T. E. Schüttenhelm, andJ. Side. 2003. An overview of seabed-mapping technologies in the context of marine habitat classification.ICES Journal of Marine Science 60:411–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehnert, R. L. andD. M. Allen. 2002. Nekton use of subtidal oyster shell habitat in a southeastern U.S. estuary.Estuaries 25:1015–1024.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mather, P. M. 1999. Computer Processing of Remotely Sensed Images. Wiley and Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melancon, E., T. Soniat, V. Cheramie, R. Duga, J. Barras, andM. Lagarde. 1998. Oyster resource zones of the Barataria and Terrebone estuaries of Louisiana.Journal of Shellfish Research 17:1143–1148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ojeda, G. Y., P. T. Gayes, R. F. Van Dolah, andW. C. Schwab. 2004. Spatially quatitative seafloor habitat mapping: An example from the northern South Carolina inner continental shelf.Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 59:399–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, C. H., J. H. Grabowski, andS. P. Powers. 2003. Estimated enhancement of fish production resulting from restoring oyster reef habitat: Quantitative valuation.Marine Ecology-Progress Series 264:249–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, H. R., C. A. Wilson, J. Supan, andW. Winans. 1999. New technology for characterizing Louisiana’s shallow coastal bottom and predicting future changes.Gulf Coast Association of Geological Societies Transactions XLIX:452–460.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, G. F. andK. N. Greenhawk. 1998. Shellfish benthic habitat assessment in the Chesapeake Bay: Progress toward integrated technologies for mapping and analysis.Journal of Shellfish Research 17:1433–1437.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, G. F., K. N. Greenhawk, D. G. Bruce, E. B. Roach, andS. J. Jordan. 2001. A digital presentation of the Maryland oyster habitat and associated bottom types in the Chesapeake Bay (1974–1983).Journal of Shellfish Research 20:197–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soniat, T. M. andM. S. Brody. 1988. Field validation of a habitat suitability index model for the American oyster.Estuaries 11:87–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tou, J. T. andR. C. Gonzales. 1974. Pattern Recognition Principles. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Reading, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tso, B. andP. M. Mather. 2001. Classification Methods for Remotely Sensed Data. Taylor and Francis, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, R. E., E. M. Swenson, M. Kasprzak, and T. Remaire. 1998. Water chemistry.In C. E. Sasser and J. M. Visser (eds.), LOOP marine and estuarine monitoring program, 1978–95, Coastal Ecology Institute, Louisiana State University, Volume 2. Prepared for Louisiana Transportation Research Center Research Report Number 316, LTRC Project No. 97-3IMP, State Project No. 736-99-0449. Baton Rouge, Louisiana.

  • White, W. H., A. R. Harborne, I. S. Sotheran, R. Walton, andR. L. Foster-Smith. 2003. Using an acoustic ground discrimination system to map coral reef benthic classes.International Journal of Remote Sensing 24:2641–2660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wildish, D. J., G. B. J. Fader, P. Lawton, andA. J. MacDonald. 1998. The acoustic detection and characteristics of sublittoral bivalve reefs in the bay of Fundy.Continental Shelf Research 18:105–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Sources of Unpublished Materials

  • National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS). 2004. Annual Commercial Landing Statistics. http://www.st.nmfs.gov/stl/ commercial/landings/annual_landings.html

  • Pausina, R. Personal Communication. 6551 Louisville Street, New Orleans, LA 70124.

  • Roberts, H. Personal Communication. Coastal Studies Institute, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70803.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yvonne C. Allen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Allen, Y.C., Wilson, C.A., Roberts, H.H. et al. High resolution mapping and classification of oyster habitats in nearshore Louisiana using sidescan sonar. Estuaries 28, 435–446 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02693925

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02693925

Keywords

Navigation