Skip to main content
Log in

Collaborative knowledge building: A case study

  • Development
  • Published:
Educational Technology Research and Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

What learning conditions are necessary to effectively support the knowledge-building enterprise in a learning community? To answer this question, the case-study method was employed to investigate collaborative knowledge building in a graduate level course designed to incorporate specific constructivist learning principles. These principles included (a) having a collective and authentic community goal to facilitate collaboration and engagement in the community, (b) using cooperative groups to provide for social negotiation and to promote multiple perspectives, (c) personally selecting of course readings and group decision-making to encourage ownership in learning, and (d) employing an integrated set of technology tools to archive the work of the community and facilitate communication. Results indicated that the instructional strategies designed into the course promoted collaborative knowledge building and the acquisition of key concepts through self-directed learning strategies. Results also pointed out the types of technological support required to implement an effective community of learners. A proposed set of guidelines is discussed to assist instructional designers in the design and development of collaborative, knowledge-building environments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bell, P., Davis, E.A., & Linn, M.C. (1995). The knowledge integration environment: Theory and design. In: J.L. Schnase & E.L. Cunnius (Eds.),Proceedings of CSCL '95: The first international comference on computer support for collaborative learning. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, P., & Winn, W. (2000). Distributed cognitions, by nature and by design. In D.H. Jonassen & S.M. Land (Eds.),Theoretical foundations of learning environments (pp. 123–146). Mahweh, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bereiter, C. (1995). Constructivism, socioculturalism, and Popper's world 3.Educational Researcher, 23(7), pp. 21–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1996). Rethinking learning. In D. Olson & N. Torrance (Eds.),Handbook of education and human development: new models of learning, teaching, and schooling. Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, B., Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M., (1992). Computer-supported Intentional Learning Environments. In F.Y. Phillips (Ed.), Thinkwork:Working, learning, and managing in a computer interactive society. Praeger: Westport, Conn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A.L. (1994). The advancement of learning.Educational Researcher, 23(8), 4–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A.L., & Campione, J.C. (1990). Communities of learning and thinking, or a context by any other name. In D. Kuhn (Ed.),Developmental Perspectives on Teaching and Learning Thinking Skills. Contributions to human development, vol, 21, 108–126.

  • Derry, S.J., & LaJoie, S.P., (1993). A middle camp for (un)intelligent instructional computing: An introduction. In S.P., LaJoie and S.J. Derry (Eds.),Computers as Cognitive Tools. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drucker, P.F. (1994, November). The age of social transformation.Atlantic Monthyly,274(5).

  • Duffy, T.M. & Cunningham, D.J. (1996). Constructivism: Implications for the design and delivery of instruction. In D.H. Jonassen (Ed.),Handbook of research for educational communications and technology. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edelson, D.C., Pea, R.D., & Gomez, L. (1996). Constructivism in the collaboratory. In B.G. Wilson (Ed.),Constructivist learning environments: Case studies in instructional design. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannafin, M., Land, S., & Oliver, K. (1999) Open learning environments: Foundations, methods, and models. In C.M. Reigeluth (Ed.),Instructional-design theories and models (Vol. II). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonassen, D.H. (1995). Supporting communities of learners with technology: A vision for integrating technology with learning in schools.Educational Technology, 35(4) 60–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonassen, D.H. (1999). Designing constructivist learning environments. In C.M. Reigeluth (Ed.),Instructional-design theories and models (Vol. II), Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, R., & Grise, P. (1995).Auditing your educational strategic plan: Making good things better. Thousand Oaks, CA. Corwin Press, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, J.M. (1987). The systematic process of motivational design.Performance and Instruction Quarterly, 26(9), 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lebow, D. (1995).Constructivist values for instructional design: A case study of a graduate-level learning environment. An unpublished doctoral dissertation, Florida State University, Tallahassee.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lebow, D., & Wager, W. (1994). Authentic activity as a model for appropriate learning activity: Implications for emerging instructional technologies.Canadian Journal of Educational Communication, 23(3), 231–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lebow, D., Wager, W., Marks, P., & Gilbert, N. (1996, June).Construe: Software for collaborative learning over the World Wide Web. Paper presented at the AECT/FSU Conference on Distance Learning, Tallahassee, FL.

  • Leinhardt, G. (1992). What research on learning tells us about teaching.Educational Leadership, 4, 20–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M.B., & Huberman, A.M. (1994).An Expanded Sourcebook: Qualitative Data Analysis (second edition). Sage Publications. Thousand Oaks, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pea, R.D. (1994). Seeing what we build together: Distributed multimedia learning environments for transformative communications.The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3(3), 285–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perkins, D.N. (1991). Technology meets constructivism: Do they make a marriage?Educational Technology, 31(5), 18–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Resnick, L. B. (1989). Introduction. In L.B. Resnick (Ed.),Knowing, learning and instruction. (pp. 1–24). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenshine, B., & Meister, C., (1992). The use of scaffolds for teaching higher-level cognitive strategies.Educational Leadership, 4, 26–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1992). An architecture for collaborative knowledge-building. In E. De Corte, M. Linn, H. Mandl, & L. Verschaffel (Eds.),Computer-based learning environments and problem solving. [NATO-ASI Series F: Computer and Systems Science] (pp. 41–46). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1994). Computer support for knowledge-building communities.The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3(3) 265–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1996). Adaptation and understanding: A case for new cultures of schooling. In S. Vosniadou, E. deCorte, R. Glaser, & H. Mandl (Eds.),International perspectives on the design of technology-supported learning environments. Mahweh, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senge, P., Kleiner, A., Roberts, C., Ross, R.B., & Smith, B.J. (1994).The Fifth Discipline Fieldbook: Strategies and Tools for Building Learning Organizations. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slatin, J.M. (1992). Is there a class in this Text? Creating knowledge in the electronic classroom. In E. Barrett (Ed.), Sociomedia: Multimedia, hypemedia, and the social construction of knowledge. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slavin, R.E. (1991). Synthesis of research on cooperative learning.Educational Leadership, 2, 71–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. (1998).Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R.W. (1989).Case study research: Design and methods. (rev. ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This study was conducted by the first author as a dissertation at Florida State University. She would like to thank Marcy Driscoll for her patience and guidance, Walt Wager for his mentoring, and Bob Reiser and George Weaver for their support.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gilbert, N.J., Driscoll, M.P. Collaborative knowledge building: A case study. ETR&D 50, 59–79 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504961

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504961

Keywords

Navigation