Skip to main content
Log in

Antihypertensive activity of once daily metoprolol alone and with chlorthalidone and comparison with a twice daily regimen

  • Originals
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

In a multicentre, double-blind (DB), within-patient study, the antihypertensive effectiveness and tolerability of two oral administration schedules of metoprolol (M) 100 mg b.i.d. versus 200 mg once daily (o.d.), were investigated in 103 outpatients with mild to moderate essential hypertension. The study lasted 14 weeks and was divided into 3 periods: a) 2 weeks of single-blind (SB) placebo wash-out; b) 4 weeks of SB administration of M 100 mg b.i.d.; at the end of the second week of this period, chlorthalidone (C) 25 mg was added in patients with a recumbent diastolic blood pressure (BP) still >95 mmHg and was continued throughout the following period; and c) DB cross-over administration of M 200 mg/d for 4 weeks on a b.i.d. schedule and 4 weeks on a once daily schedule. In comparison with pretreatment values, heart rate and systolic and diastolic BP were reduced (p<0.001) by both M administration schedules; there was no differences between the once and twice daily treatment regimens. During M once daily, betablockade was still maintained over 24 hours or longer, as the heart rate remained significantly lower than the basal value. In 57 patients, C was added at the end of the second week of SB M administration, and a further decrease in BP was observed; again, there was no significant change during once and twice daily M administration. Unwanted effects during M treatment were of minor severity, and the majority occurred when C, too, was added.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ablad B, Carlsson E, Ek L (1973) Pharmacological studies of two new cardioselective adrenergic beta-receptor antagonists. Life Sci 12: 107

    Google Scholar 

  2. Muiesan G, Agabiti-Rosei E, Alicandri C, Motolese M (1978) Antihypertensive activity of alpha-methyldopa on a twice daily regimen in comparison to metoprolol. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol (Suppl 4): 35

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lederballe Pedersen O (1976) Comparison of metoprolol and hydrochlorotiazide as antihypertensive agents. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 10: 381

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bengtsson C (1976) Comparison between metoprolol and propranolol as antihypertensive agents: a double-blind cross-over study. Acta Med Scand 199: 71

    Google Scholar 

  5. McNeil JJ, Louis WJ, Doyle AE, Vajde FJ (1979) Comparison of metoprolol and pindolol in the treatment of mild to moderate hypertension: a double-blind, cross-over study. Med J Aust 461: 431

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lehtonen A, Sundqvist H (1978) Comparison of antihypertensive activity of sotalol and metoprolol administered once daily and every other day. Curr Ther Res 23: 131

    Google Scholar 

  7. Karlberg BE, Nilsson O, Tolagen K, Nitelius E, Waern U (1979) Once daily treatment with metoprolol in primary hypertension. Clin Pharmacol Ther 25: 399

    Google Scholar 

  8. Johansson SR, McCall M, Wilhelmsson C, Vedin JA (1980) Duration of action of beta blockers. Clin Pharmacol Ther 27: 593

    Google Scholar 

  9. Harron DW, Balnave K, Kinney CD, Wilson R, Russell CJ, Shanks RG (1981) Effects on exercise tachycardia during forty-eight hours of a series of doses of atenolol, sotalol and metoprolol. Clin Pharmacol Ther 29: 295

    Google Scholar 

  10. Erikssen J, Mundal R, Thaulow E, Nitter-Hange S (1980) Dosing intervals in beta-blocker therapy. Lancet 2: 800

    Google Scholar 

  11. Snedecor GW, Cochran WG (1967) Statistical methods. 8th ed. Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa

    Google Scholar 

  12. Harry JD, Cruikshank JM, Young JM (1980) The relative activities of atenolol and metoprolol on the cardiovascular system of man. Br J Clin Pharmacol 9: 296P

  13. Folgering H, van Bussel M (1980) Maximal exercise power after a single dose of metoprolol and of slowrelease metoprolol. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 18: 225

    Google Scholar 

  14. Reybrouck T, Amery A, Fagard R, Jousten P, Lijnen P, Menlepas E (1978) Beta-blockers: once or three times a day? Br Med J 1: 1386

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bengtsson C (1981) Seven years on a selective beta-blocker metoprolol. A long-term study of women with arterial hypertension. Ann Clin Res 13 (Suppl 30): 7

    Google Scholar 

  16. Watson RDS, Stellard IJ, Littler WA (1979) Influence of once daily administration of beta-adrenoreceptor antagonists on arterial pressure and its variability. Lancet 1: 1210

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lyngstam O, Rydén L (1979) Metoprolol or atenolol for mild-to-moderate hypertension. Lancet 2: 634

    Google Scholar 

  18. Rasmussen S, Arnung K, Eskildsen PC, Nielsen PE (1981) A comparative study of atenolol and metoprolol in the treatment of hypertension. Br J Clin Pharmacol 12: 887

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kincaid-Smith PS (1976) General discussion on the place of beta-adrenoceptor blockers in hypertension. Drugs 11 (Suppl 1): 196

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Muiesan, G., Agabiti-Rosei, E., Carotti, A. et al. Antihypertensive activity of once daily metoprolol alone and with chlorthalidone and comparison with a twice daily regimen. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 23, 209–213 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00547555

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00547555

Key words

Navigation