Skip to main content

Influence of Relative Stiffness on Integral Bridge Design

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Climate Change Adaptation from Geotechnical Perspectives (CREST 2023 2023)

Abstract

Integral bridges are a low-maintenance form of bridge construction used worldwide. Their jointless structure eliminates bearing and expansion joint replacement bringing a reduction in lifecycle cost, carbon emissions, and socio-economic impact from road and rail disruption, therefore offering a resilient infrastructure solution in the face of a changing climate. By better understanding earth pressure ratcheting in the backfill due to repeated thermal movements of the deck, integral bridge use can increase to greater spans and skews while excessive design conservatism can be reduced. This paper explores the integral bridge problem and design code prescriptions before using analytical, numerical, and centrifuge modeling to show that soil-structure interaction, especially the relative stiffness of soil and structure, can reduce abutment bending moments by 30% and that this is largely unaccounted for in the current U.K. design code PD 6694–1. Preliminary results showed a similar influence of stiffness on seismic response.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sakulich AR, Bentz DP (2012) Increasing the service life of bridge decks by incorporating phase-change materials to reduce freeze-thaw cycles. J Mater Civ Eng 24(8):1034–1042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Office of Rail and Road (2019) Annual assessment of Highways England’s performance

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hambly EC (1997) Integral bridges. Proc Instn Civ Engrs Transp 123, 30–38

    Google Scholar 

  4. Mitoulis SA (2020) Challenges and opportunities for the application of integral abutment bridges in earthquake-prone areas: a review. Soil Dynam Earthquake Eng 135

    Google Scholar 

  5. Choine MN, Oconnor AJ, Padgett JE (2015) Comparison between the seismic performance of integral and Jointed concrete bridges. J Earthquake Eng 19(1):172–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. British Standards Institute (2020) PD 6694–1:2011+A1:2020—Recommendations for the design of structures subject to traffic loading to BS EN 1997–1:2004+A1:2013. London

    Google Scholar 

  7. Wood DM (2004) Geotechnical modelling. Spon Press, Abingdon

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. Sandberg J, Magnino L, Nowak P, Wiechecki M, Thusyanthan I (2020) The integral bridge design concept for the third runway at Heathrow, UK. Proceed Inst Civil Eng Bridge Eng 173(2):112–120

    Google Scholar 

  9. Idaho Transportation Department (2008) Load resistance factor design (LRFD) bridge manua—chapter 11. Retrieved from https://itd.idaho.gov/bridge/

  10. England GL, Tsang NCM, Bush DI (2000) Integral bridges—a fundamental approach to the time-temperature loading problem. Crown Copyright and Thomas Telford Limited, London

    Google Scholar 

  11. Denton S, Riches O, Christie T, Kidd A (2011) Developments in integral bridge design. Bridge Design to Eurocodes, UK Implementation

    Google Scholar 

  12. Tapper L, Lehane B (2004) Lateral stress development on integral bridge abutments. In: Australasian conference on the mechanics of structures and materials

    Google Scholar 

  13. Tan EL, Lehane BM (2007) Lateral stress development on integral bridge abutments. Perth

    Google Scholar 

  14. Springman SM, Norrish A, Ng CWW (1996) Cyclic loading of sand behind integral bridge abutments. Crowthorne

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bloodworth AG, Xu M, Banks JR, Clayton CRI (2012) Predicting the earth pressure on integral bridge abutments. J Bridge Eng 371–381

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ng C, Springman S, Norrish A (1998) Soil-structure interaction of spread-base integral bridge abutments. Soils Found 38(1):145–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Chan AHC (1988) A unified finite element solution to static and dynamic problems of geotechnics. University College of Swansea

    Google Scholar 

  18. Schofield AN (1980) Cambridge geotechnical centrifuge operations. Geotechnique 30(3):227–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This project was supported by National Highways, GDG Ltd. and the EPSRC CDT in Future Infrastructure and Built Environment (FIBE2 CDT).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Douglas G. Morley .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Morley, D.G., Asia, Y.B., Madabhushi, G.S.P., Thusyanthan, I., Sakufiwa, D. (2024). Influence of Relative Stiffness on Integral Bridge Design. In: Hazarika, H., Haigh, S.K., Chaudhary, B., Murai, M., Manandhar, S. (eds) Climate Change Adaptation from Geotechnical Perspectives. CREST 2023 2023. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 447. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-9215-7_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-9215-7_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-99-9214-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-99-9215-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics