Skip to main content

Reflexive Performance in Digital Spaces as Cultural Agency Among the Manobo-Pulanguiyen

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Indigenous Media and Popular Culture in the Philippines
  • 40 Accesses

Abstract

What constitutes a reflexive performance? Does reflexive performance embody cultural indigeneity in everyday life, particularly in the digital space? This chapter elaborates on what constitutes a reflexive performance from the lived experiences of the Manobo-Pulanguiyen, an Indigenous ethnolinguistic group in the province of Bukidnon, Southern Philippines. Drawing on performance anthropology and various ethnographic methods, such as in-depth interviews, photo-video documentation, participant observation, and the creative voice method, I discuss the contexts and mechanisms of what counts as reflexive performances in the everyday life of the Manobo-Pulanguiyen in the digital space. My ethnographic material reveals that Manobos, especially the youth, have engaged in social media platforms, such as Facebook and TikTok, to magnify their political voices and showcase various Indigenous traditional and cultural performances. My interlocutors perceive social media as a platform to articulate Indigenous creativity, reflexivity, and necessity as a counternarrative to the changing landscapes, socio-political and cultural ruptures, and negative stereotypes originating from colonialism, development aggression, and capitalist regimes. Overall, I argue that using social media as a space for cultural performances encapsulates the following: (a) creative resistance in everyday life and (b) cultural continuity and reflexivity in times of ecological changes and social ruptures (open moments).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Pulanguihon combines the suffix “-hon” (from) with “Pulangi”, a river found in the towns of Maramag and Quezon in Bukidnon. Manobo-Pulanguiyen/ Pulanguihon, therefore means people of Pulangui (Suminguit and Celeste 2015; see also Celeste 2017).

  2. 2.

    Bukidnon is a combination of the term “bukid” (mountain) and non (people) which means mountain people (NCIP 2003).

  3. 3.

    Talaandig people are known to be dwellers of the steep places (NCIP 2003).

  4. 4.

    Higaunons are coastal dwellers who moved to the uplands (NCIP 2003).

  5. 5.

    Matigsalugs means people along the Salug River.

  6. 6.

    Tigwahanon may have been derived from the Tigwa River.

  7. 7.

    Umayamnon lives within the boundaries of Pulangui River in Bukidnon and Umayam River in Agusan del Sur.

  8. 8.

    Ulaging is an epic cycle that is associated with relationship of the Manobos with their sacred sites and deities. This is usually performed through series of chants within the community. Today, Ulaging has been shown in the digital space as a form of Indigenous expressions focusing on their daily life.

  9. 9.

    Ulaging is an epic cycle that is associated with relationship of the Manobos with their sacred sites and deities. This is usually performed through series of chants within the community. Today, Ulaging has been shown in the digital space as a form of Indigenous expressions focusing on their daily life.

References

  • Aquino, David Robert C. 2020. The Indigenous Peoples Republic Act of 1997. Manila: Central Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barth, Fredrik. 1969. Ethnic Groups and Boundaries: The Social Organization of Culture Difference. Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandeis, Hans. 2008. “Music and Dance of the Bukidnon of Mindanao: A Short Introduction.” Kinaadman: A Journal of Southern Philippines 30 (1): 67–120. https://ejournals.ph/article.php?id=9053.

  • Brently, Alexander and Michael J. O’Brien. 2017. The Acceleration of Change: From Ancestors to Algorithms. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calabias, Jose Kervin. 2022. “Reclaiming the Indigenous Body: Discourse, Social Media and the Aesthetic of Igorot Activism.” Kritika Kultura (39): 520–544. https://ajol.ateneo.edu/index.php/kk/authors/1631.

  • Carlson, Browyn and Jef Berglund. Indigenous Peoples Rise Up: The Global Ascendancy of Social Media Activism. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, Bronwyn and Tanja Dreher. 2018. “Introduction: Indigenous Innovation in Social Media.” Media International Australia 169 (1): 16–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878X18803798.

  • Carlson, Bronwyn and Ryan Frazer. 2021. Indigenous Digital Life: The Practice and Politics of Being Indigenous on Social Media. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave MacMillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, Bronwyn, Ryan Frazer, and Terri Farrelly. 2021. “That Makes All the Difference: Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health‐Seeking on Social Media.” Health Promotion Journal of Australia 32 (3): 523–531. https://doi.org/10.1002/hpja.366.

  • Cassel, Susana Heldt and Teresa Maureira. 2017. “Performing Identity and Culture in Indigenous Tourism: A Study of Indigenous Communities in Québec, Canada.” Journal of Tourism and Cultural Change 15 (1): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/14766825.2015.1125910.

  • Celeste, Bryan Lee. 2017. Dancing Amidst Displacement: Binanog Dance as Cultural Adaptation and Resistance. Philippine Sociological Review 65: 97–120. https://www.jstor.org/stable/45014300.

  • Celeste, Bryan Lee. 2020. “Indigenous Youths and Cultural Performances.” In Rethinking Filipino Millenials: Alternative Perspectives on a Misunderstood Generation, edited by Jayeel Cornelio, 122–137. Manila: The University of Santo Tomas Publishing House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coronel, Sheila. 2012. Memory of Dances. Quezon City: Philippine Center for Investigative Journalism.

    Google Scholar 

  • Croose, Jonathan. 2020. “Performing Places: Carnival, Culture and the Performance of Contested National Identities.” Developing a Sense of Place: The Role of the Arts in Regenerating Communities, edited by Tamara Ashley and Alexis Weedon, 139–161. London: UCL Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniels, Jessie and Karen Gregory (eds.). 2016. Digital sociologies. Bristol, UK: Bristol University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duarte, Maria Elena. 2017. “Connected Activism: Indigenous Uses of Social Media for Shaping Political Change.” Australasian Journal of Information Systems 21: 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3127/ajis.v21i0.1525.

  • Fong, Jimmy. 2014. “Media Production Literacy as a Form of Intercultural Communication Competence: Demystifying Indigenous Peoples.” In Intercultural Communication Competence: Conceptualization and its Development in Cultural Contexts and Interactions, edited by Xiaodong Dai and Guo-Ming Chen, 275‒292. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fransen-Taylor, Pamela, and Bhuva Narayan. 2018, September. “Challenging Prevailing Narratives with Twitter: An# AustraliaDay Case Study of Participation, Representation and Elimination of Voice in an Archive.” Journal of Librarianship and Information Science 50 (3): 310‒321. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961000618769981.

  • Garvan, John M. 1931. The Manobos of Mindanao. Washington: USA Government Printing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaspar, Karl M. 2017. Panagkutay: Anthropology and Theology Interfacing in Mindanao Uplands (The Lumad Homeland). Quezon City: Institute of Spirituality in Asia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gegeo, David Welchman. 2020 (2001). “Cultural Rupture and Indigeneity: The Challenge of (Re)visioning ‘Place’ in the Pacific.” The Contemporary Pacific 13 (2): 491‒507. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23717601.

  • Giddens, Anthony. 1984. The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, Anthony. 1980. The Consequences of Modernity. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, Anthony. 1990. The Consequences of Modernity. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, Anthony. 1991. Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginsburg, Faye. 1991, February. “Indigenous Media: Faustian Contract of Global Village?” Cultural Anthropology 6 (1): 92‒112. https://doi.org/10.1525/can.1991.6.1.02a00040.

  • Goffman, Erving. 1959. The Presentation of the Self in the Everyday Life. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, Laura and Penny, H. Glenn. 2014. “Performing Indigeneity: Emergent Identity, Self-Determination and Sovereignty.” In Performing Indigeneity: Global Histories and Contemporary Experiences, edited by Laura R. Graham, 1–31. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, Marvin. 2003. Cultural Anthropology (6th ed.). London: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobsbawm, Eric. 2012. “Introduction: Inventing Traditions.” In The Invention of Tradition, edited by Eric Hobsbawm and Terence Ranger, 1–14. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kottak, Conrad Phillip. 2004. Anthropology: Explorations of Human Diversity. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Longboan, Liezel C. 2012. “E-Gorots: Exploring Indigenous Identity in Translocal Spaces.” South East Asia Research 19 (2): 319–341. https://doi.org/10.5367/sear.2011.0042.

  • Lund, Christian. 2016. “Rule and Rupture: State Formation through the Production of Property and Citizenship.” Development and Change 47 (6): 1199–1228.https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.12274.

  • Masendo, Abraham. 2015. The Manobo Tribe Then and Now: An Ethnography. International Journal of Scientific and Engineering Research (6) 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCallum, Kerry and Waller, Lisa. 2017. “Indigenous Media Studies in Australia: Traditions, Theories and Contemporary Practices.” In Minorities and Media, edited by John Budarick, Gil-Soo Han, 105–124. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meethan, Kevin. 2001. Tourism in Global Society: Place, Culture, Consumption. New York: Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Medina, Cecilia. 2011. “Social and Environmental Factors in a Manobo Ancestral Domain Claim in Bukidnon.” Saint Paul University Journal 4 (1): 87–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moralli, Melissa, Musaro, P., Paltrinieri, R. and Parmiggiani, P. 2021. “Creative Resistance Cultural Practices, Artistic Activism and Counter-Hegemonic Narratives on Diversity.” Studi culturali (28) 1: 163–179. https://doi.org/10.1405/101880.

  • Nanda, Serena and Richard L. Warms. 1998. Cultural Anthropology (6th ed.). Belmont: Wadsworth Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Commission on Culture and Arts. 2015. “The Manobo.” http://ncca.gov.ph/about-culture-and-arts/culture-profile/manobo/.

  • Ness, Sally. 1995. “When Seeing is Believing: The Changing Role of Visuality in a Philippine Dance.” Anthropological Quarterly 68 (1): 1–13.https://doi.org/10.2307/3317460.

  • Ndlovu, Morgan. 2019. Performing Indigeneity: Spectacles of Culture and Identity in Coloniality. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Obusan, Ramon. 1992. Sayaw: An Essay in Philippine Ethnic Dance. Manila: Cultural Center of the Philippines.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orlido-Sevilla, Ester. 1979. A Study of Structure and Style of Two Manuvu Epic Songs in English Translation. Manila: National Library of the Philippines.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paredes, Oona. 2017. Projecting order in the pericolonial Philippines. Anthropology of Catholicism beyond Catholics. The Australian Journal of Anthropology (28) 1. https://doi.org/10.1111/taja.12234.

  • Paredes, Oona. 2019. “Preserving ‘Tradition’: The Business of Indigeneity in the Modern Philippine Context.” Journal of Southeast Asian Studies 50 (1): 86–106. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022463419000055

  • Perley, Bernard. 2014. “Living Traditions: A Manifesto for Critical Indigeneity.” In Performing Indigeneity: Global Histories and Contemporary Experiences, edited by Laura R. Graham and H. Glenn Penny. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phipps, Peter. 2010. “Performances of Power: Indigenous Cultural Festivals as Globally Engaged Cultural Strategy.” Alternatives: Global, Local, Political (35) 3: 217–40. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41319258.

  • Presto, Athena and Nicole Curato. 2021. “Amplifying the Deliberative Agency of Indigenous Communities in the Philippine News Media.” In The Routledge Companion to Media and Poverty, edited by Sandra L. Borden, 391–400. New York: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosaldo, Renato. 1988. “Ideology, Place and People Without Culture.” Cultural Anthropology 3 (1): 77–87.https://doi.org/10.1525/can.1988.3.1.02a00070.

  • Shimizu, Hiromu. 2019. Grassroots Globalization: Reforestation and Cultural Revitalization in the Philippine Cordilleras. Quezon City: Ateneo de Manila University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sissons, Jeffrey. 2015. First Peoples: Indigenous Peoples and their Future. London: Reaktion Books Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soriano, Cheryll Ruth. 2012. “The Arts of Indigenous Online Dissent: Negotiating Technology, Indigeneity, and Activism in the Cordillera.” Telematics and Informatics 29 (1): 33–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2011.04.004.

  • Suminguit, Vellorimo and Bryan Lee Celeste. 2015. Sunggod Ta Kamanga Festival: Symbolism and Functions of Rituals, Songs, and Dances: Terminal Report. Bukidnon: Central Mindanao University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tindaan, Ruth M. 2020. Recreating Igorot Identity in Diaspora. South East Asia Research 28 (4): 465–485. https://doi.org/10.1080/0967828X.2020.1858151.

  • Yamut, Veberlino T. 2008. “Ritual Dances of the T’boli.” Liceo Journal of Higher Education Research 5 (2): 1–18. https://ejournals.ph/article.php?id=1528. Liceo de Cagayan University.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author expresses profound gratitude to several individuals and organizations who have supported the research—the Manobo-Pulanguiyen Tribal Council of Elders, Bae Vivian Escoto, Datu Elmer Lilawan, Datu Andong Agdahan, and Bae Ling Agdahan, as well as the National Commission on Indigenous Peoples-Malaybalay City. The author would also like to acknowledge the University of Newcastle Research HDR for awarding a full scholarship to pursue the Ph.D. research project in Bukidnon Province, Mindanao, Philippines, and Central Mindanao University for granting the author a study leave to pursue doctoral studies at the University of Newcastle, Australia.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bryan Lee Celeste .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Celeste, B.L. (2024). Reflexive Performance in Digital Spaces as Cultural Agency Among the Manobo-Pulanguiyen. In: Telles, J.P. (eds) Indigenous Media and Popular Culture in the Philippines. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-9101-3_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics