Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic showed how vulnerable contemporary education systems are to change and disruption to their operational models. The fact that entire education systems globally had to shut down their learning and teaching operations during the pandemic, or move on to a minimalist form of it, requires a critical re-examination of our core business models. Educational provision globally has been under stress long before COVID-19 struck. While the demand for education and re-education grows exponentially, resources and opportunities for the provision of these opportunities are under strain globally. Preliminary assessments of the readiness and resilience of existing models, reports that contemporary education systems are unfit and unsuited to lead learning for tomorrow, and that a re-imagination and re-engineering of institutional choreographies is required. Such a rethink and re-imagination requires greater levels of openness and flexibility in its modus operandi in order to be more resilient to change and disruption. This will involve a rethink and re-imagination of everything from how students access learning opportunities, to how they are taught, assessed and supported by teachers and educational institutions, and importantly, how technology can be used to inform and support pedagogical practices.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
CISCO: The tipping point for digitization of education campuses. https://www.cisco.com/c/en_au/solutions/industries/tipping-point-report.html (2020)
Clark, R.E.: Media will never influence learning. Educ. Technol. Res. Dev. 42, 21–29 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02299088
Dede, C., Lidwell, W.: Developing a next-generation model for massive digital learning. Educ. Sci. 13, 845 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13080845
Dron, J.: Technology, teaching, and the many distances of distance learning. J. Open, Flex. Distance Learn. 26(2), 7–17 (2022)
Ernest & Young: Can the universities of today lead learning for tomorrow? The University of the Future. https://go.ey.com/3w0HsCV (2018)
Fobes, C., Kaufman, P.: Critical pedagogy in the sociology classroom: challenges and concerns. Teach. Sociol. 36(January), 26–33 (2008)
Glassman, M.: Dewey and Vygotsky: society, experience, and inquiry in educational practice. Educ. Rese. 30(4), 3–14 (2001). https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X030004003
Gredler, M., Shields, C.: Does no one read Vygotsky’s words? commentary on glassman. Educ. Res. 33(2), 21–25 (2004). https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X033002021
Hartshorne, R., Ferdig, R.E., Bull, G.: What Journal Editors Wish Authors Knew About Academic Publishing. Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/219093/ (2021). Retrieved 3 Oct 2021
JISC: Student digital experience insights survey 2020/21. Findings from UK higher education (pulse 1: October–December 2020). https://repository.jisc.ac.uk/8318/1/DEI-P1-HE-student-briefing-2021-FINAL.pdf (2021)
Kolodner, J.L.: Learning engineering: what it is, why I’m involved, and why I think more of you should be. J. Learn. Sci. 32(2), 305–323 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2023.2190717
Lee, V.R.: Learning sciences and learning engineering: a natural or artificial distinction? J. Learn. Sci. 32(2), 288–304 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2022.2100705
Mishra, S., Sahoo, S., Pandey, S.: Research trends in online distance learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. Distance Educ. 42(4), 494–519 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2021.1986373
Myers, J., Adams-Budde, M.: Creative schools: the grassroots revolution that’s transforming education. Int. Rev. Educ. 62, 375–378 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-016-9539-8
Naidu, S.: How flexible is flexible learning, who is to decide and what are its implications? Distance Educ. 38(3), 269–272 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2017.1371831
Naidu, S.: The fate of a submission is sealed long before its consideration for publication! In: Hartshorne, R., Ferdig, R.E., Bull, G. (eds.) What Journal Editors Wish Authors Knew About Academic Publishing, pp. 29–36, Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). https://www.learntechlib.org/p/219093/ (2021)
Naidu, S.: Lessons we are not learning or choosing to ignore! Distance Educ. 36(3), 291–294 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2015.1083645
Naidu, S.: Methodological issues in educational research. Distance Educ. 36(1), 1–4 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2015.1030097
Peters, M.A., et al.: Reimagining the new pedagogical possibilities for universities post-Covid-19. Educ. Philos. Theory 54(6), 717–760 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2020.1777655
Robinson, K., Aronica, L.: Creative Schools: The Grassroots Revolution That’s Transforming Education. Viking, New York (2015)
UNESCO: Futures of education. https://en.unesco.org/futuresofeducation/initiative (2020)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Naidu, S. (2024). Reimagining Education Systems: How Research on Digital Learning Can Inform Pedagogical Practice. In: Cheung, S.K.S., Wang, F.L., Paoprasert, N., Charnsethikul, P., Li, K.C., Phusavat, K. (eds) Technology in Education. Innovative Practices for the New Normal. ICTE 2023. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1974. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-8255-4_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-8255-4_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-99-8254-7
Online ISBN: 978-981-99-8255-4
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)