Abstract
The search for renewable and efficient energy sources has been increasingly comprehensive. In this sense, biological hydrogen production outstands as a promising alternative. Studies have evaluated biomasses rich in organic matter that can be converted into hydrogen, the gaseous fuel with the highest energy content per unit of weight and which still has water as a by-product in its combustion. Agricultural waste from harvesting (grains, cereals, straw, husks, and bagasse), livestock (manure and dairy products), industrial processing (fruits, vegetables, vinasse, and cassava wastewater), and domestic activities (leftover food) has a high potential to produce biohydrogen, mainly from anaerobic digestion. Therefore, this chapter presents relevant aspects of biological hydrogen production by dark fermentation using agricultural residues. The objective is to highlight the main interfering factors such as methods of pretreatment of lignocellulosic residues, anaerobic bioreactor configurations, temperature and pH of the medium, type of inoculum and its pretreatment, concentration of the feed, and possible combinations of substrates to increase the production efficiency.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Abubackar HN et al (2019a) Effects of size and autoclavation of fruit and vegetable wastes on biohydrogen production by dark dry anaerobic fermentation under mesophilic condition. Int J Hydrog Energy 44:17767–17780. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.05.106
Abubackar HN et al (2019b) Biohydrogen production from autoclaved fruit and vegetable wastes by dry fermentation under thermophilic condition. Int J Hydrog Energy 44:18776–18784. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.12.068
Akhlaghi N, Najafpour-Darzi G (2020) A comprehensive review on biological hydrogen production. Int J Hydrog Energy 45:22492–22512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.06.182
Amorim NCS et al (2018) The effect of methanogenesis inhibition, inoculum and substrate concentration on hydrogen and carboxylic acids production from cassava wastewater. Biodegradation 29(1):41–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10532-017-9812-y
Areepak C et al (2022) Improvement of lignocellulosic pretreatment efficiency by combined chemo-mechanical pretreatment for energy consumption reduction and biofuel production. Renew Energy 182:1094–1102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.11.002
Awogbemi O, Von Kallon DV (2022) Pretreatment techniques for agricultural waste. Case Stud Chem Environ Eng 6:100229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscee.2022.100229
Babu S et al (2022) Exploring agricultural waste biomass for energy, food and feed production and pollution mitigation: a review. Bioresour Technol 360:127566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2022.127566
Banu RJ et al (2021) Integrated biorefinery routes of biohydrogen: possible utilization of acidogenic fermentative effluent. Bioresour Technol 319:124241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2020.124241
Battista F et al (2016) Selection of the best pretreatment for hydrogen and bioethanol production from olive oil waste products. Renew Energy 88:401–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2015.11.055
Braz Romão B et al (2018) Influence of heat pre-treated inoculum and pH control on the hydrogen production by microbial consortium. Environ Prog Sustain Energy 37(1):505–512. https://doi.org/10.1002/ep.12672
Bu J et al (2021) Enhanced enzymatic hydrolysis and hydrogen production of sugarcane bagasse pretreated by peroxyformic acid. Bioresour Technol 326:124751. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2021.124751
Castelló E et al (2020) Stability problems in the hydrogen production by dark fermentation: possible causes and solutions. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 119:109602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.109602
Chaves TC et al (2021) Biohydrogen production in an AFBR using sugarcane molasses. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 44(2):307–316. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-020-02443-0
Chen Y, Yin Y, Wang J (2021) Recent advance in inhibition of dark fermentative hydrogen production. Int J Hydrog Energy 46(7):5053–5073. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.11.096
Chen H et al (2022) Effects of temperature and total solid content on biohydrogen production from dark fermentation of rice straw: performance and microbial community characteristics. Chemosphere 286:131655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.131655
Cremonez PA et al (2021) Two-stage anaerobic digestion in agroindustrial waste treatment: a review. J Environ Manage 281:111854. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111854
Dahiya S et al (2021) Renewable hydrogen production by dark-fermentation: current status, challenges and perspectives. Bioresour Technol 321:124354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2020.124354
Freitas IBF, de Menezes CA, Silva EL (2020) An alternative for value aggregation to the sugarcane chain: biohydrogen and volatile fatty acids production from sugarcane molasses in mesophilic expanded granular sludge bed reactors. Fuel 260:116419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2019.116419
Fuess LT, Zaiat M, do Nascimento CAO (2019) Novel insights on the versatility of biohydrogen production from sugarcane vinasse via thermophilic dark fermentation: impacts of pH-driven operating strategies on acidogenesis metabolite profiles. Bioresour Technol 286:121379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2019.121379
Gavazza S et al (2021) Caproic acid formation by carbon chain elongation during fermentative hydrogen production of cassava wastewater. Waste Biomass Valoriz 12(5):2365–2373. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-020-01174-3
Gois GNSB et al (2021) Evaluation of biohydrogen production from sugarcane vinasse in an anaerobic fluidized bed reactor without pH control. Latin Am Appl Res 51(1):63–69. https://doi.org/10.52292/j.laar.2021.504
Hu X et al (2022) Comparative study on the hydrogenolysis performance of solid residues from different bamboo pretreatments. Bioresour Technol 352:127095. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2022.127095
Karki R et al (2021) Anaerobic co-digestion: current status and perspectives. Bioresour Technol 330:125001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2021.125001
Khanal KS et al (2021) Anaerobic digestion beyond biogas. Bioresour Technol 337:125378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2021.125378
Kumar AN, Mohan SV (2018) Acidogenic valorization of vegetable waste for short chain carboxylic acids and biohydrogen production: influence of pretreatment and pH. J Clean Prod 203:1055–1066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.198
Lee J-Y, Wee D, Cho K-S (2014) Effects of volatile solid concentration and mixing ratio on hydrogen production by co-digesting molasses wastewater and sewage sludge. J Microbiol Biotechnol 24(11):1542–1550. https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.1402.02025
Lertsriwong S, Glinwong C (2020) Newly-isolated hydrogen-producing bacteria and biohydrogen production by Bacillus coagulans MO11 and Clostridium beijerinckii CN on molasses and agricultural wastewater. Int J Hydrog Energy 45(51):26812–26821. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.07.032
Lovato G et al (2018) Hydrogen production by co-digesting cheese whey and glycerin in an AnSBBR: temperature effect. Biochem Eng J 138:81–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2018.07.007
Lovato G et al (2021) Reactor start-up strategy as key for high and stable hydrogen production from cheese whey thermophilic dark fermentation. Int J Hydrog Energy 46(54):27364–27379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.06.010
Luo L et al (2022) Effect of inoculum pretreatment on the microbial and metabolic dynamics of food waste dark fermentation. Bioresour Technol 358:127404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2022.127404
Marques TD et al (2019) Influence of hydraulic retention time on hydrogen production by treating cheese whey wastewater in anaerobic fluidized bed bioreactor—an approach for developing countries. Braz J Chem Eng 36(3):1109–1117. https://doi.org/10.1590/0104-6632.20190363s20190075
Nair LG, Agrawal K, Verma P (2022) An overview of sustainable approaches for bioenergy production from agro-industrial wastes. Energy Nexus 6:100086. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nexus.2022.100086
Oliveira CA et al (2020) Thermophilic biohydrogen production from sugarcane molasses under low pH: metabolic and microbial aspects. Int J Hydrog Energy 45(7):4182–4192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.12.013
Pakarinen O, Lehtomäki A, Rintala J (2008) Batch dark fermentation hydrogen production from grass silage: the effect of inoculum, pH, temperature and VS ratio. Int J Hydrog Energy 33:594–601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2007.10.008
Piffer MA et al (2021) Dynamics of sulfate reduction in the thermophilic dark fermentation of sugarcane vinasse: a biohydrogen-independent approach targeting enhanced bioenergy production. J Environ Chem Eng 9(5):105956. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2021.105956
Piffer MA et al (2022) Sulfate- and pH-driven metabolic flexibility in sugarcane vinasse dark fermentation stimulates biohydrogen evolution, sulfidogenesis or homoacetogenesis. Int J Hydrog Energy 47:31202–31222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.07.039
Prabakar D et al (2018) Advanced biohydrogen production using pretreated industrial waste: outlook and prospects. Renew Sust Energ Rev 96:306–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.08.006
Pu Y et al (2019) Hydrogen production from acidogenic food waste fermentation using untreated inoculum: effect of substrate concentratins. Int J Hydrog Energy 44:27272–27284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.08.230
Rabelo CABS et al (2022) Dilution strategy to obtain H2 in the 2nd acidogenic phase from enzymatically pre-treated sugarcane bagasse. Int J Hydrog Energy 47:32455–32472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.07.131
Ramos LR, Silva EL (2018) Continuous hydrogen production from cofermentation of sugarcane vinasse and cheese whey in a thermophilic anaerobic fluidized bed reactor. Int J Hydrogen Energy 43(29):13081–13089. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.05.070
Ramos LR et al (2021) Anaerobic digestion of vinasse in fluidized bed reactors: process robustness between two-stage thermophilic-thermophilic and thermophilic-mesophilic systems. J Cleaner Product 314:128066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128066
Ramprakash B et al (2022) Current strategies and future perspectives in biological hydrogen production: a rewiew. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 168:112773. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112773
Ribeiro JC et al (2022) Hydrogen and organic acid production from dark fermentation of cheese whey without buffers under mesophilic condition. J Environ Manage 304:114253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.114253
Sá LRV et al (2020) Biohydrogen production using xylose or xylooligosaccharides derived from sugarcane bagasse obtained by hydrothermal and acid pretreatments. Renew Energy 146:2408–2415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.08.089
Saravanan A et al (2021) Biohydrogen from organic wastes as a clean and environment-friendly energy source: production pathways, feedstock types, and future prospects. Bioresour Technol 324:126021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2021.126021
Saravanan A et al (2022) A review on bioconversion processes for hydrogen production from agro-industrial residues. Int J Hydrogen Energy 47:37302–37320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.08.055
Sattar A et al (2016) Quantification of temperature effect on batch production of bio-hydrogen from rice crop wastes in an anaerobic bio reactor. Int J Hydrog Energy 41:11050–11061. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.04.087
Shen M-Y et al (2022) Green biohydrogen production in a co-digestion process from mixture of high carbohydrate food waste and cattle/chicken manure digestate. Int J Hydrog Energy 47:40696–40703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.09.104
Shi Z et al (2021) Oyster shells improve anaerobic dark fermentation performances of food waste: hydrogen production, acidification performances, and microbial community characteristics. Bioresour Technol 335:125268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2021.125268
Sillero L, Solera R, Perez M (2022) Anaerobic co-digestion of sewage sludge, wine vinasse and poultry manure for bio-hydrogen production. Int J Hydrog Energy 47(6):3667–3678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.11.032
Silva AFR et al (2021) Resource recovery from sugarcane vinasse by anaerobic digestion—a review. J Environ Manage 295:113137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113137
Tavares TDGA et al (2022) Effect of thermophilic temperatures on hydrogen and ethanol production in anaerobic fluidized bed reactor from cassava wastewater. Braz J Chem Eng 40:115–127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43153-022-00222-w
Tawfik A et al (2022) Sustainable fermentation approach for biogenic hydrogen productivity from delignified sugarcane bagasse. Int J Hydrog Energy 47(88):37343–37358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.09.200
Tena M et al (2020) Enhanced hydrogen production from sewage sludge by cofermentation with wine vinasse. Int J Hydrog Energy 45:15977–15984. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.04.075
Vilela R et al (2019) Hydrogen production in reactors: the influence of organic loading rate, inoculum and support material. Int J Hydrogen Energy 44(50):27259–27271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.08.180
Wainaina S et al (2019) Bioengineering of anaerobic digestion for volatile fatty acids, hydrogen or methane production: a critical review. Bioengineered 10(1):437–458. https://doi.org/10.1080/21655979.2019.1673937
Wu D et al (2021) Commercial biogas plants: review on operational parameters and guide for performance optimization. Fuel 303:121282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2021.121282
Yaashikaa PR, Devi MK, Kumar PS (2022) Biohydrogen production: an outlook on methods, constraints, economic analysis and future prospect. Int J Hydrog Energy 47:41488–41506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.07.082
Yang G, Wang J (2019) Biohydrogen production by co-fermentation of sewage sludge and grass residue: effect of various substrate concentrations. Fuel 237:1203–1208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2018.10.026
Zainal B et al (2022) Effect of temperature and hydraulic retention time on hydrogen production from palm oil mill effluent (POME) in an integrated up-flow anaerobic sludge fixed-filme (UASFF) bioreactor. Environ Technol Innov 28:102903. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2022.102903
Zhang K, Ren N-Q, Wang A-J (2015) Fermentative hydrogen production from corn Stover hydrolyzate by two typical seed sludge: effect of temperature. Int J Hydrog Energy 40:3838–3848. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.01.120
Zhu J et al (2023) Integrated process to produce biohydrogen from wheat straw by enzymatic saccharification and dark fermentation. Int J Hydrog Energy 48(30):11153–11161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.05.056
Ziara RMM et al (2019) Lactate wastewater dark fermentation: the effect of temperature and initial pH on biohydrogen production and microbial community. Int J Hydrgen Energy 44:661–673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.11.045
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Chaves, T.C., Peiter, F.S., de Amorim, E.L.C. (2024). Biohydrogen from Agricultural Waste. In: Singh, P. (eds) Emerging Trends and Techniques in Biofuel Production from Agricultural Waste. Clean Energy Production Technologies. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-8244-8_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-8244-8_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-99-8243-1
Online ISBN: 978-981-99-8244-8
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)