Skip to main content

Autonomy-Supportive Teaching on Teacher Social-Emotional Competencies

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Self-Determination Theory and Socioemotional Learning

Abstract

Autonomy-supportive teaching has been associated with a variety of positive student outcomes, such as psychological need satisfaction, self-efficacy, and classroom engagement (Ng et al., 2016; Olivier et al., 2020). Nevertheless, there is significantly less research attention on the teacher benefits of autonomy-supportive teaching. With the complex emotional and social demands of the teaching profession, it is important to understand the ways to cultivate teacher social-emotional competencies (SECs). The social and emotional well-being of teachers affects their classroom functioning, and eventually student outcomes. Furthermore, the teacher SECs are linked to teacher well-being. As autonomy-supportive teaching focuses on building a pleasant and supportive learning environment for the students, it is a plausible idea to investigate how such teaching practices may cultivate teacher SECs as well. As expected, the findings suggest that the five SECs were demonstrated by the teachers while being autonomy supportive. Out of the five SECs, self-awareness and relationship management seem to be most frequently demonstrated by the teachers, while self-management seems to be least presented, during autonomy-supportive teaching.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Change history

  • 08 March 2024

    A correction has been published.

References

  • Aldrup, K., Carstensen, B., Köller, M. M., & Klusmann, U. (2020). Measuring teachers’ social-emotional competence: Development and validation of a situational judgment test. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 892. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00892

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Aldrup, K., Klusmann, U., & Lüdtke, O. (2017). Does basic need satisfaction mediate the link between stress exposure and well-being? A diary study among beginning teachers. Learning and Instruction, 50, 21–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.11.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, M. L. (2009). An appraisal perspective of teacher burnout: Examining the emotional work of teachers. Educational Psychology Review, 21, 193–218. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-009-9106-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheon, S. H., Reeve, J., & Vansteenkiste, M. (2020). When teachers learn how to provide classroom structure in an autonomy-supportive way: Benefits to teachers and their students. Teacher and Teaching Education, 90, 103004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.103004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheon, S. H., Reeve, J., Yu, T. H., & Jang, H. R. (2014). The teacher benefits from giving autonomy support during physical education instruction. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 36(4), 331–346. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.2013-0231

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clunies-Ross, P., Little, E., & Kienhuis, M. (2008). Self-reported and actual use of proactive and reactive classroom management strategies and their relationship with teacher stress and student behavior. Educational Psychology, 28(6), 693–710. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410802206700

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning [CASEL]. (2008). SEL assessment, tools, needs and outcome assessments. Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collaborative for Academic, Social and Emotional Learning [CASEL]. (2013). The 2013 CASEL guide: Effective social and emotional learning programs-preschool and elementary school edition. Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collie, R. J. (2017). Teachers’ social and emotional competence: Links with social and emotional learning and positive workplace outcomes. In E. Frydenberg, A. Martin, & R. Collie (Eds.), Social and emotional learning in Australia and the Asia-Pacific (pp. 167–184). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Collie, R. J., Shapka, J. D., & Perry, N. E. (2012). School climate and social–emotional learning: Predicting teacher stress, job satisfaction, and teaching efficacy. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 1189–1204. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornelius-White, J. (2007). Learner-centered teacher-student relationships are effective: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 113–143. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654302985

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, H. A. (2003). Conceptualizing the role and influence of student-teacher relationships on children’s social and cognitive development. Educational Psychologist, 38(4), 207–234. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3804_2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2012). Self-determination theory. In P. A. M. Van Lange, A. W. Kruglanski, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (pp. 416–436). Sage Publications Ltd.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Domitrovich, C. E., Bradshaw, C. P., Berg, J. K., Pas, E. T., Becker, K. D., Musci, R., Embry, D. D., & Lalango, N. (2016). How do school-based prevention programs impact teachers? Findings from a randomized trial of an integrated classroom management and social-emotional program. Prevention Science, 17, 325–337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-015-0618-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Emmer, E. T., & Stough, L. M. (2001). Classroom management: A critical part of educational psychology, with implications for teacher education. Educational Psychologist, 36(2), 103–112. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3602_5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, T. S. (2013). Teacher self-awareness through journal writing. Reflective Practice, 14(4), 465–471. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2013.806300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, I. A. (2006). Classroom management and teacher stress and burnout. In C. M. Evertson & C. S. Weinstein (Eds.), Handbook of classroom management: Research, practice, and contemporary issues (pp. 925–944). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jang, H., Reeve, J., Ryan, R. M., & Kim, A. (2009). Can self-determination theory explain what underlies the productive, satisfying learning experiences of collectivistically-oriented South Korean adolescents? Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 644–661. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jennings, P. A., & Greenberg, M. T. (2009). The prosocial classroom: Teacher social and emotional competence in relation to student and classroom outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 79(1), 491–525. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654308325693

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klusmann, U., Kunter, M., Trautwein, U., Lüdtke, O., & Baumert, J. (2008). Engagement and emotional exhaustion in teachers: Does the school context make a difference? Applied Psychology: An International Review, 57, 127–151. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2008.00358.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ladd, G. W., Birch, S. H., & Buhs, E. S. (1999). Children’s social and scholastic lives in kindergarten: Related spheres of influence? Child Development, 70(6), 1373–1400. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00101

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J. S. (2012). The effects of the teacher–student relationship and academic press on student engagement and academic performance. International Journal of Educational Research, 53, 330–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2012.04.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lei, H., Wang, X., Chiu, M. M., Du, M., & Xie, T. (2023). Teacher-student relationship and academic achievement in China: Evidence from a three-level meta-analysis. School Psychology International, 44(1), 68–101. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034322112245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLean, L., & Connor, C. M. (2015). Depressive symptoms in third-grade teachers: Relations to classroom quality and student achievement. Child Development, 86(3), 945–954. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12344

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Ng, B., Liu, W. C., & Wang, C. K. (2015). A preliminary examination of teachers’ and students’ perspectives on autonomy-supportive instructional behaviors. Qualitative Research in Education, 4(2), 192–221. https://doi.org/10.17583/qre.2015.1463

  • Ng, B. L., Liu, W. C., & Wang, J. C. (2016). Student motivation and learning in mathematics and science: A cluster analysis. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 14(7), 1359–1376. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-015-9654-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olivier, E., Galand, B., Hospel, V., & Dellisse, S. (2020). Understanding behavioral engagement and achievement: The roles of teaching practices and student sense of competence and task value. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(4), 887–909. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12342

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, S. A., Vaughn, M., Scales, R. Q., Gallagher, M. A., Parsons, A. W., Davis, S. G., Pierczynski, M., & Allen, M. (2018). Teachers’ instructional adaptations: A research synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 88(2), 205–242. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654317743198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reeve, J. (2016). Autonomy-supportive teaching: What it is, how to do it. In W. C. Liu, J. Wang, & R. Ryan (Eds.), Building autonomous learners (pp. 129–152). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Reeve, J., & Cheon, S. H. (2021). Autonomy-supportive teaching: Its malleability, benefits, and potential to improve educational practice. Educational Psychologist, 56(1), 54–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2020.1862657

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reeve, J., & Shin, S. H. (2020). How teachers can support students’ agentic engagement. Theory into Practice, 59(2), 150–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2019.1702451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, A. M., Kuusinen, C. M., & Bedoya-Skoog, A. (2015). Managing peer relations: A dimension of teacher self-efficacy that varies between elementary and middle school teachers and is associated with observed classroom quality. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 41, 147–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2015.01.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schonert-Reichl, K. A. (2017). Social and emotional learning and teachers. The Future of Children, 27(1), 137–155. http://www.jstor.org/stable/44219025

  • Shen, B., McCaughtry, N., Martin, J., Garn, A., Kulik, N., & Fahlman, M. (2015). The relationship between teacher burnout and student motivation. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(4), 519–532. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12089

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shenton, A. K. (2004). Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Education for Information, 22(2), 63–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spilt, J. L., Koomen, H. M., & Thijs, J. T. (2011). Teacher wellbeing: The importance of teacher–student relationships. Educational Psychology Review, 23, 457–477. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-011-9170-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toussi, M. T. M., Boori, A. A., & Ghanizadeh, A. (2011). The role of EFL teachers’ self-regulation in effective teaching. World Journal of Education, 1(2), 39–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vansteenkiste, M., Aelterman, N., De Muynck, G. J., Haerens, L., Patall, E., & Reeve, J. (2018). Fostering personal meaning and self-relevance: A self-determination theory perspective on internalization. The Journal of Experimental Education, 86(1), 30–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2017.1381067

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wink, M. N., LaRusso, M. D., & Smith, R. L. (2021). Teacher empathy and students with problem behaviors: Examining teachers’ perceptions, responses, relationships, and burnout. Psychology in the Schools, 58(8), 1575–1596. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, M., & Ee, J. (2012). Development and validation of the social emotional competence questionnaire (SECQ). The International Journal of Emotional Education, 4(2), 27–42.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was funded by Singapore Ministry of Education (MOE) under the Education Research Funding Program (OER 12/19 LWC) and conducted by the National Institute of Education (NIE), Nanyang Technological University (NTU), Singapore. The results, opinions, conclusions, or recommendations presented in this paper are of those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Singapore MOE, NIE, and NTU.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kimberly Hannah Siacor .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Siacor, K.H., Ng, B., Liu, W.C. (2023). Autonomy-Supportive Teaching on Teacher Social-Emotional Competencies. In: Ng, B. (eds) Self-Determination Theory and Socioemotional Learning . Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-7897-7_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics