Abstract
The circular economy is often seen as a solution to waste and overconsumption and a way to achieve sustainable living. When discussing the implementation of the circular economy, manufacturers tend to be perceived as gatekeepers to more sustainable and circular products and as the main polluters. They also are identified as the primary beneficiaries of new circular business models. However, many circular activities result in the growth of the secondary products market without affecting the primary product market and lead to an increase in overall consumption, production, and environmental impact. This unintended increase in consumption is referred to as the circular economy rebound effect and has parallels with energy efficiency measures. This chapter analyses an energy efficiency campaign at the level of a middle-sized manufacturing company in the middle of the supply chain. This chapter discusses the drivers and challenges manufacturers face while implementing efficiency measures. A brief review of the business model impact is also presented. The limitation in manufacturers’ power to change the design of the products is highlighted. The chapter concludes with recommendations for designers and a warning that the proposed solutions may not be suitable for profit-making manufacturers in the growth economy.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Aramendia E, Brockway PE, Pizzol M, Heun MK (2021) Moving from final to useful stage in energy-economy analysis: a critical assessment. Appl Energy 283:116194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.116194
Basiago AD (1998) Economic, social, and environmental sustainability in development theory and urban planning practice. Environ 19:145–161. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006697118620
Bauer D, Papp K, Polimeni J, Mayumi K, Giampietro M, Alcott B (2009) John Polimeni, Kozo Mayumi, Mario Giampietro & Blake Alcott, the Jevons Paradox and the myth of resource efficiency improvements. Sustain Sci Pract Policy 5:48–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2009.11908028
Bocken NMP, Short SW (2016) Towards a sufficiency-driven business model: experiences and opportunities. Environ Innov Soc Transitions 18:41–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2015.07.010
Bocken NMP, Niessen L, Short SW (2022) The sufficiency-based circular economy—an analysis of 150 companies. Front Sustain 3:1–18. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsus.2022.899289
Buch-Hansen H, Carstensen MB (2021) Paradigms and the political economy of ecopolitical projects: green growth and degrowth compared. Compet & Chang 25:308–327. https://doi.org/10.1177/1024529420987528
Burke MJ (2020) Energy-suffciency for a just transition: a systematic review. Energies. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13102444
Castro CG, Trevisan AH, Pigosso DCA, Mascarenhas J (2022) The rebound effect of circular economy: definitions, mechanisms and a research agenda. J Clean Prod 345:131136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131136
Chiao RY, Cohen ML, Leggett AJ, Harper CLJ, Phillips WDP (eds) (2011) Visions of discovery: new light on physics, cosmology, and consciousness. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Cosmea I, Santosa R, O’Neill WD (2017) Assessing the degrowth discourse: a review and analysis of academic degrowth policy proposals. J Clean Prod 49:321–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.016
European Commission (2020) Communication from the commission to the European parliament, the council, the European economic and social committee and the committee of the regions a new circular economy action plan for a cleaner and more competitive Europe. Brussels
Ellen MacArthur Foundation, McKinsey Center for Business and Environment, Stiftungsfonds Für Umweltökonomie und Nachhaltigkeit (SUN) (2015) Growth within: a circular economy vision for a competitive europe. Ellen MacArthur Foundation
Enerdata (2021) Total energy consumption [WWW Document]. Glob Energy Stat Yearb 2021
Freire-González J (2021) Governing Jevons’ Paradox: policies and systemic alternatives to avoid the rebound effect. Energy Res Soc Sci 72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101893
Fusion (2014) How to shift towards the circular economy from a small and medium business perspective: a guide for policy makers. 1–23.
Gillingham K (2016) Rebound effects. In: The new Palgrave dictionary of economics. Palgrave Macmillan UK, London, pp 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5_2875-1
Grosse F (2010) Is recycling “part of the solution”? The role of recycling in an expanding society and a world of finite resources. Sapiens 3
Guldmann E, Huulgaard RD (2020) Barriers to circular business model innovation: a multiple-case study. J Clean Prod 243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118160
Hagnell MK, Åkermo M (2019) The economic and mechanical potential of closed loop material usage and recycling of fibre-reinforced composite materials. J Clean Prod 223:957−968. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.156
Hedberg A, Šipka S, Bjerkem J (2019) Creating a digital roadmap for a circular economy. Discuss Pap-Sustain Prosper Eur Program 24
Hens L, Block C, Cabello-Eras JJ, Sagastume-Gutierez A, Garcia-Lorenzo D, Chamorro C, Herrera Mendoza K, Haeseldonckx D, Vandecasteele C (2018) On the evolution of “cleaner production” as a concept and a practice. J Clean Prod 172:3323–3333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.082
Kearns D, Liu H, Consoli C (2021) Technology readiness and costs of CCS. Global CCS Institute
Konash A, Nasr N (2022) The circular economy and resource use reduction: a case study of long-term resource efficiency measures in a medium manufacturing company. Clean Prod Lett 3:100025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clpl.2022.100025
Korhonen J, Honkasalo A, Seppälä J (2018) Circular economy: the concept and its limitations. Ecol Econ 143:37–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.06.041
Krier JE, Gillette CP (1985) The un-easy case for technological optimism. Mich Law Rev 84:405. https://doi.org/10.2307/1289008
Kristoffersen E, Blomsma F, Mikalef P, Li J (2020) The smart circular economy: a digital-enabled circular strategies framework for manufacturing companies. J Bus Res 120:241–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.07.044
Lacy P, Keeble J, McNamara R, Rutqvist J, Haglund T, Cui M, Cooper A, Pettersson C, Eckerle K, Buddemeier P, Sharma A, Senior T (2014) Circular advantage: innovative business models and technologies to create value in a world without limits to growth. Accenture Strategy
Lang PA, Gregory KB (2019) Economic impact of energy consumption change caused by global warming. Energies 12:1–29. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12183575
Lewandowski M (2016) Designing the business models for circular economy-towards the conceptual framework. Sustain 8:1–28. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8010043
Lindgreen ER, Salomone R, Reyes T (2020) A critical review of academic approaches, methods and tools to assess circular economy at the micro level. Sustain 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12124973
Lizarraldea I, Tyl B (2018) A framework for the integration of the conviviality concept in the design process. J Clean Prod 197:1766–1777. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.108
Moreau V, Sahakian M, van Griethuysen P, Vuille F (2017) Coming full circle: why social and institutional dimensions matter for the circular economy. J Ind Ecol 21:497–506. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12598
Muller A (2009) Sufficiency–does energy consumption become a moral issue? IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci 6:262003. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1307/6/6/262003
Nesterova I (2021) Small firms as agents of sustainable change. Futures 127:102705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2021.102705
Osterwalder A, Pigneur Y (2010) Business model generation: a handbook for visionaries, game changers, and challengers. Strategyze. ed. Wiley-VCH Verlag.
Schröder P, Bengtsson M, Cohen M, Dewick P, Hoffstetter J, Sarkis J (2019) Degrowth within–aligning circular economy and strong sustainability narratives. Resour Conserv Recycl 146:190–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.03.038
Simons H (2009) Listen, look, document: methods in case study research. In: Case study research in practice. pp 43–67. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446268322.n3
Smil V (2010) Science, energy, ethics, and civilization. In: Visions of discovery: new light on physics, cosmology, and consciousness. pp 709–729
Spengler L (2016) Two types of ‘enough’: sufficiency as minimum and maximum. Env Polit 25:921–940. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2016.1164355
Thomas S, Thema J, Brischke LA, Leuser L, Kopatz M, Spitzner M (2019) Energy sufficiency policy for residential electricity use and per-capita dwelling size. Energy Effic 12:1123–1149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-018-9727-4
Toulouse E, Bohnenberger K, Bierwirth A, Leuser L, Sahakian M, Lorek S (2019) Energy sufficiency: how can research better help and inform policy-making?. In: Eceee summer study proceedings. pp 331–339
Trigkas M, Karagouni G, Mpyrou K, Papadopoulos I (2020) Circular economy. The Greek industry leaders’ way towards a transformational shift. Resour Conserv Recycl 163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105092
UN Security Council (2021) Climate change ‘biggest threat modern humans have ever faced’,world-renowned naturalist tells security council, calls for greater global cooperati
Victorian Department of Environment Land Water and Planning (2020) Recycling Victoria: a new economy
Webb B (2022) Early majority: fashion’s first degrowth brand [WWW Document]. Vogue
Zink T, Geyer R (2017) Circular economy rebound. J Ind Ecol 21:593–602. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12545
Acknowledgments
Anastassija Konash gratefully acknowledges financial support for this research by the Fulbright U.S. Scholar Program, which the U.S. Department of State and the Australian-American Fulbright Commission sponsors. This chapter is solely the author’s responsibility and does not necessarily represent the official views of the Fulbright Program, the Government of the United States, or the Australian-American Fulbright Commission. The author thanks Professor Nabil Nasr for his support during the fellowship and the case study data collection.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Konash, A. (2024). Can a Circular Economy Lead to Resource Conservation? A Case Study of Long-Term Resource Efficiency Measures in the Small Manufacturing Company. In: Melles, G.B., Wölfel, C. (eds) Design for a Sustainable Circular Economy . Design Science and Innovation. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-7532-7_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-7532-7_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-99-7531-0
Online ISBN: 978-981-99-7532-7
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)