Skip to main content

Semi-active Control for Seismic Vibration Mitigation of Building System with Magnetorheological Damping Device

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Emerging Electronics and Automation (E2A 2022)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering ((LNEE,volume 1088))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 95 Accesses

Abstract

Semi-active control is considered to be very interesting in view of its similarity with the active control, however, requiring significantly lesser control-effort/input. Indeed, semi-active control strategies have been used quite widely in many vibration control applications over the past years. In the present study, a magnetorheological (MR) damper is taken as the damping device, which is used to produce the control force (through modulating its damping coefficient with the help of an external input voltage) in the semi-active framework to mitigate seismic vibration. The MR damper is well-known for its mechanical simplicity, lower power consumption, and large force capacity. The Bouc–Wen hysteresis model is taken into account for understanding the mechanical behaviour of MR damper and to calculate the control force. The widely used control strategy, viz. linear quadratic Gaussian (LQG) control, is incorporated in this semi-active control problem to generate the desired control force. The seismic vibration may cause considerable damage to a structure. In the present investigation, a three-storey building structure is considered for the demonstration of control-performance. It is observed that the semi-active control strategy has been able to perform quite satisfactorily (in mitigating the seismic vibration) with quite insignificant control-effort (in terms of supplying the electrical voltage of an insignificant range from 0 to 5 V).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Soong TT, Dargush GF (1997) Passive energy dissipation systems in structural engineering. John Wiley Sons, New York, NY, USA

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hunt JB, Nissen JC (1982) The broadband dynamic vibration absorber. J Sound Vib 83:573–578. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-460X(82)80108-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Walsh PL, Lamancusa JS (1992) A variable stiffness vibration absorber for minimization of transient vibrations. J Sound Vib 158:195–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-460X(92)90045-Y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chang JCH, Soong TT (1980) Structural control using active tuned mass dampers. ASCE J Eng Mech Div 106:1091–1098. https://doi.org/10.1061/jmcea3.0002652

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dyke SJ, Spencer BF, Sain MK, Carlson JD (1996) Modeling and control of magnetorheological dampers for seismic response reduction. Smart Mater Struct 5:565–575. https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/5/5/006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Demetriou D, Nikitas N (2016) A novel hybrid semi-active mass damper configuration for structural applications. Appl Sci 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/app6120397

  7. Pinkaew T, Fujino Y (2001) Effectiveness of semi-active tuned mass dampers under harmonic excitation. Eng Struct 23:850–856. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(00)00091-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Peng Y, Zhang Z (2020) Optimal MR damper–based semiactive control scheme for strengthening seismic capacity and structural reliability. J Eng Mech 146. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)em.1943-7889.0001768

  9. Oliveira F, Morais P, Suleman A (2014) Predictive control for earthquake response mitigation of buildings using semiactive fluid dampers. Shock Vib (2014). https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/670683

  10. Pei P, Peng Y, Qiu C (2022) An improved semi-active structural control combining optimized fuzzy controller with inverse modeling technique of MR damper. Struct Multidiscip Optim 65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-022-03365-z

  11. Yang R, Zhou X, Liu X (2002) Seismic structural control using semi-active tuned mass dampers. Earthq Eng Eng Vib 1:111–118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-002-0014-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Demetriou D, Nikitas N, Tsavdaridis KD (2015) Semi active tuned mass dampers of buildings: a simple control option. Am J Eng Appl Sci 8:620–632. https://doi.org/10.3844/ajeassp.2015.620.632

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Javanbakht M, Cheng S, Ghrib F (2022) Semi-active adaptive control of stay cable vibrations using MR dampers. Struct Control Heal Monit. https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.3121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sun C, Nagarajaiah S (2014) Study on semi-active tuned mass damper with variable damping and stiffness under seismic excitations. Struct Control Heal Monit 21:890–906. https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.1620

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Oliveira F, Botto MA, Morais P, Suleman A (2018) Semi-active structural vibration control of base-isolated buildings using magnetorheological dampers. J Low Freq Noise Vib Act Control 37:565–576. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461348417725959

  16. Mohammed M, Alktranee MHR (2021) Parametric analysis of vehicle suspension based on air spring and MR damper with semi-active control. J Phys Conf Ser 1773. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1773/1/012022

  17. Rosli R, Mohamed Z, Priyandoko G (2021) Simulation of active force control using MR damper in semi active seat suspension system. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng 1062. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/1062/1/012005

  18. Oliveira F, Morais P, Suleman A (2015) A comparative study of semi-active control strategies for base isolated buildings. Earthq Eng Eng Vib 14:487–502. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-015-0039-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Duriez T, Brunton SL, Noack BR (2013) Machine learning dynamics and taming nonlinear control—turbulence

    Google Scholar 

  20. Soong TT (1990) Active structural control: theory and practice. John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kalman RE (1960) A new approach to linear filtering and prediction problems. J Fluids Eng Trans ASME 82:35–45. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3662552

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Spencer BF Jr, Dyke SJ, Sain MK, Carlson JD (1996) Phenomenological model of a magnetorheological damper. J Eng Mech 230–238:1–23

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kamalesh Bhowmik .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Bhowmik, K., Debnath, N. (2024). Semi-active Control for Seismic Vibration Mitigation of Building System with Magnetorheological Damping Device. In: Gabbouj, M., Pandey, S.S., Garg, H.K., Hazra, R. (eds) Emerging Electronics and Automation. E2A 2022. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 1088. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-6855-8_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics