Skip to main content

Modal Analysis of a Flow Past a Cylinder

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Fluid Mechanics and Fluid Power, Volume 3 (FMFP 2022)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering ((LNME))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 230 Accesses

Abstract

As the computational fluid mechanics community is advancing rapidly, the need to assimilate and compress the high-fidelity data is increasing simultaneously. Modal decomposition techniques like proper orthogonal decomposition and dynamic mode decomposition are widely used to capture important features (modes) of the flow field to facilitate reduced-order modeling. The frequency-domain equivalent of POD known as spectral proper orthogonal decomposition (SPOD) is currently emerging as a competitive alternative to these techniques. The present work analyzes the efficacy of SPOD compared to POD and DMD in obtaining effective latent space representations that enable accurate low-rank flow field reconstructions of unsteady flows. Suitability and shortcomings of the methods are highlighted for a canonical case of unsteady flow across a stationary cylinder at a Reynolds number of 100, based on the error metrics for low-rank reconstructions. It was observed that first two SPOD modes alone have constituted more than 90% of the energy in the flow. With just four SPOD modes, the flow field was reconstructed with less than 1% error, while it took six modes of POD and DMD to achieve the same accuracy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

Re:

Reynolds number

fs:

Vortex shedding frequency (Hz)

\(X^{\dag }\):

Moore–Penrose pseudoinverse

\(\underline{q}\):

Mean flow field

References

  1. Taira K, Brunton SL, Dawson STM, Rowley CW, Colonius T, McKeon BJ, Schmidt OT, Gordeyev S, Theofilis V, Ukeiley LS (2017) Modal analysis of fluid flows: an overview. AIAA J 55(12):4013–4041

    Google Scholar 

  2. Rowley CW, Dawson STM (2017) Model reduction for flow analysis and control. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 49(1):387–417

    Google Scholar 

  3. Taira K, Hemati MS, Brunton SL, Sun Y, Duraisamy K, Bagheri S, Dawson STM, Yeh C-A (2020) Modal analysis of fluid flows: applications and outlook. AIAA J 58(3):998–1022

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lumley JL (1967) The structure of inhomogeneous turbulent flows. In: Atmospheric turbulence and radio wave propagation

    Google Scholar 

  5. Noack BR, Afanasiev K, Morzyński M, Tadmor G, Thiele F (2003) A hierarchy of low-dimensional models for the transient and post-transient cylinder wake. J Fluid Mech 497:335–363

    Google Scholar 

  6. Rowley CW, Mezić I, Bagheri S, Schlatter P, Henningson DS (2009) Spectral analysis of nonlinear flows. J Fluid Mech 641:115–127

    Google Scholar 

  7. Tu J, Rowley C, Luchtenburg D, Brunton S, Kutz J (2013) On dynamic mode decomposition: theory and applications. J Comput Dyn 1:11

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kou J, Zhang W (2017) An improved criterion to select dominant modes from dynamic mode decomposition. Eur J Mech B Fluids 62:109–129

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Krake T, Reinhardt S, Hlawatsch M, Eberhardt B, Weiskopf D (2021) Visualization and selection of dynamic mode decomposition components for unsteady flow. Visual Inf 5(3):15–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Towne A, Schmidt OT, Colonius T (2018) Spectral proper orthogonal decomposition and its relationship to dynamic mode decomposition and resolvent analysis. J Fluid Mech 847:821–867

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hellström LHO, Smits AJ (2017) Structure identification in pipe flow using proper orthogonal decomposition. Philos Trans Roy Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci 375(2089):20160086

    Google Scholar 

  12. Schmidt OT, Towne A, Rigas G, Colonius T, Brès GA (2018) Spectral analysis of jet turbulence. J Fluid Mech 855:953–982

    Google Scholar 

  13. Pickering E, Rigas G, Nogueira PAS, Cavalieri AVG, Schmidt OT, Colonius T (2020) Lift-up, Kelvin-Helmholtz and Orr mechanisms in turbulent jets. J Fluid Mech 896

    Google Scholar 

  14. Muralidhar SD, Podvin B, Mathelin L, Fraigneau Y (2019) Spatio-temporal proper orthogonal decomposition of turbulent channel flow. J Fluid Mech 864:614–639

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ghate AS, Towne A, Lele SK (2020) Broadband reconstruction of inhomogeneous turbulence using spectral proper orthogonal decomposition and Gabor modes. J Fluid Mech 888

    Google Scholar 

  16. Nidhan S, Chongsiripinyo K, Schmidt OT, Sarkar S (2020) Spectral proper orthogonal decomposition analysis of the turbulent wake of a disk at Re = 50,000. Phys Rev Fluids 5(12):124606

    Google Scholar 

  17. Weiss J (2019) A tutorial on the proper orthogonal decomposition. In: AIAA aviation 2019 forum, p 3333

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sirovich L (1987) Turbulence and the dynamics of coherent structures. I. Coherent structures. Quart Appl Math 45(3):561–571

    Google Scholar 

  19. Krake T, Weiskopf D, Eberhardt B (2019) Dynamic mode decomposition: theory and data reconstruction. arXiv preprint arXiv:1909.10466

  20. Schmidt OT, Colonius T (2020) Guide to spectral proper orthogonal decomposition. AIAA J 58(3):1023–1033

    Google Scholar 

  21. Nekkanti A, Schmidt OT (2021) Frequency-time analysis, low-rank reconstruction and denoising of turbulent flows using SPOD. J Fluid Mech 926

    Google Scholar 

  22. Majumdar D, Bose C, Sarkar S (2020) Capturing the dynamical transitions in the flow-field of a flapping foil using immersed boundary method. J Fluids Struct 95:102999

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Xu S, Wang ZJ (2006) An immersed interface method for simulating the interaction of a fluid with moving boundaries. J Comput Phys 216(2):454–493

    Google Scholar 

  24. Zhang H-Q, Fey U, Noack BR, König M, Eckelmann H (1995) On the transition of the cylinder wake. Phys Fluids 7(4):779–794

    Google Scholar 

  25. Lai M-C, Peskin CS (2000) An immersed boundary method with formal second-order accuracy and reduced numerical viscosity. J Comput Phys 160(2):705–719

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We sincerely thank P.G Senapathy HPCE, IIT Madras, for providing the necessary computational resources to conduct this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arvind Thirunavukkarasu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Thirunavukkarasu, A., Sundar, R., Sarkar, S. (2024). Modal Analysis of a Flow Past a Cylinder. In: Singh, K.M., Dutta, S., Subudhi, S., Singh, N.K. (eds) Fluid Mechanics and Fluid Power, Volume 3. FMFP 2022. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-6343-0_55

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-6343-0_55

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-99-6342-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-99-6343-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics