Skip to main content

Overview of Uncertainty Propagation Methods

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Uncertainty Analyses in Environmental Sciences and Hydrogeology

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Applied Sciences and Technology ((BRIEFSAPPLSCIENCES))

  • 98 Accesses

Abstract

This section presents, first, a summarized overview of approaches and concepts, before going into specific methods later in more detail (probabilistic approaches, fuzzy approaches, Monte-Carlo procedures, Metamodeling, etc.).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. A. Papoulis, S.U. (Unnikrishna) Pillai, Probability, Random Variables, and Stochastic Processes (16 Chaps.), 4th edn. (Mc-Graw Hill, 2002), 852pp.

    Google Scholar 

  2. E. Vanmarcke, Random Fields: Analysis and Synthesis (Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press, Cambridge, 1983), p.382

    Google Scholar 

  3. S.E. Serrano, Engineering Uncertainty and Risk Analysis: Balanced Approach to probability, Statistics, Stochastic Modeling, and Stochastic Differential Equations (HydroScience Inc., Ambler, USA, 2011). ISBN 978-0-9655643-1-1, 462pp.

    Google Scholar 

  4. G. De Marsily, Quantitative Hydrogeology (Academic, New York, 1986), p.440

    Google Scholar 

  5. R.A. Freeze, J.A. Cherry, Groundwater (Prentice-Hall, USA, 1979)

    Google Scholar 

  6. G.F. Pinder, W.G. Gray, Essentials of Multiphase Flow and Transport in Porous Media (Wiley, 2008), 257p.

    Google Scholar 

  7. L.A. Zadeh, Fuzzy sets. Inf. Control 8(3), 338–353 (1965)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. L.A. Zadeh, Outline of a new approach to the analysis of complex systems and decision processes. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. SMC-3, 28–44 (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  9. O. Roustant, D. Ginsbourger, Y. Deville, DiceKriging, DiceOptim: Two R packages for the analysis of computer experiments by kriging-based metamodeling and optimization (2012). <hal-00495766v3>

    Google Scholar 

  10. L. Ding, X. Zhang, Sample and computationally efficient stochastic kriging in high dimensions. Oper. Res. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.2022.2367, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/363878439

  11. M. Baudin, A. Dutfoy, B. Iooss, A.-L. Popelin, OpenTURNS: an industrial software for uncertainty quantification in simulation, in Handbook of Uncertainty Quantification, eds. by R. Ghanem, D. Higdon, H. Owhadi (Springer, 2017), 46p. HAL-01107849v2

    Google Scholar 

  12. L. Le Gratiet, S. Marelli, B. Sudret, Metamodel-based sensitivity analysis: Polynomial chaos expansions and Gaussian processes, in Handbook of Uncertainty Quantification, eds. by R. Ghanem, D. Higdon, H. Owhadi (2016). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1606.04273

  13. S. Poles, A. Lovison, A polynomial chaos approach to robust multiobjective optimization, in Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings 09041: Hybrid & Robust Approaches to Multiobjective Optimization, ed. by K. Deb et al., Dagstuhl, Germany (2009), 15p. ISSN : 1862-4405, http://drops.dagstuhl.de/opus/volltexte/2009/2000/

  14. D.C.-F. Shih, G.-F. Lin, Uncertainty and importance assessment using differential analysis: an illustration of corrosion depth of spent nuclear fuel canister. Stoch. Environ. Res. Risk Assess. (SERRA) 20, 291–295 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-005-0028-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. B. Diekkrüger, Upscaling of hydrological models by means of parameter aggregation technique, in Dynamics of Multiscale Earth Systems. ed. by P.H.J. Neugebauer, C. Simmer. Lecture Notes in Earth Sciences. (Springer, Berlin, 2003), pp.145–165

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. K. Christiaens, J. Feyen, Use of sensitivity and uncertainty measures in distributed hydrological modeling with an application to the MIKE SHE model. Water Resour. Res. 38, 1169 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1029/2001WR000

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. O. Richter, B. Diekkrüger, P. Nörtersheuser, Environmental Fate Modelling of Pesticides (Wiley, 1996)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  18. K. Beven, J. Freer, Equifinality, data assimilation, and uncertainty estimation in mechanistic modelling of complex environmental systems using the GLUE methodology. J. Hydrol. 249, 11–29 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(01)00421-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. S. Finsterle, iTOUGH2 Universal Optimization Using the PEST Protocol: User’s Guide, August 2011. Report LBNL-3698E (revised). Earth Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  20. S. Finsterle, iTOUGH2 V7.0 Command Reference, May 2015. Report LBNL-40041 (Revised). Earth Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  21. S. Finsterle, Y. Zhang, Solving iTOUGH2 simulation and optimization problems using the PEST protocol. Environ. Model. Softw. 26(2011), 959–968 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wikipedia article, Copula (probability theory). Web page last edited on 3 October 2021 (Consulted in November 2021) (2021), https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copula_(probability_theory)

  23. R.E. Melchers, Importance sampling in structural systems. Struct. Saf. 6(1), 3–10 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  24. V. Picheny, D. Ginsbourger, O. Roustant, R.T. Haftka, N.-H. Kim, Adaptive Designs of Experiments for Accurate Approximation of a Target Region (2010), 13p. HAL-00319385v2, https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00319385v2

  25. A. Bardossy, I. Bogardi, W.E. Kelly, Kriging with imprecise (fuzzy) variograms. I: theory. Math. Geol. 22(1), 63–79 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  26. A. Bardossy, I. Bogardi, W.E. Kelly, Kriging with imprecise (fuzzy) variograms. II: application. Math. Geol. 22(1), 81–94 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  27. A. Celmins, A practical approach to nonlinear fuzzy regression. SIAM J. Sci. Stat. Comput. 12(1991), 521–546 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. R. Ababou, B. Sagar, G. Wittmeyer, Testing procedures for spatially distributed flow models. Adv. Water Resour. 15, 181–198 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  29. A.S. Klugman, H.H. Panjer, G.E. Willmot, Loss Models (From Data to Decisions). Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics, 5th edn. (Wiley & Society of Actuaries, 2019), 536pp.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ababou, R., Côme, JM., Chastanet, J., Marcoux, M., Quintard, M. (2023). Overview of Uncertainty Propagation Methods. In: Uncertainty Analyses in Environmental Sciences and Hydrogeology . SpringerBriefs in Applied Sciences and Technology. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-6241-9_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics