Skip to main content

Spatial Analysis of Soil Organic Carbon in the Thuckalay Block of the Kanyakumari District

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Recent Advances in Civil Engineering (ICC IDEA 2023)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering ((LNCE,volume 398))

  • 101 Accesses

Abstract

The soil has organic and inorganic matter, which helps the plants to grow. The main component of organic matter is soil organic carbon (SOC). SOC is studied in the Thuckalay block of the Kanyakumari district with Sentinel-2 data. The following indices, Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), Bare Soil Index (BSI), and Soil Adjusted Vegetation Index (SAVI), are analyzed using linear regression, and R2 values were compared. The linear regression values for NDVI are R2 = 0.5146; for BSI, R2 = 0.7608; and for SAVI, R2 = 0.7493. Then 15 soil samples were collected, and the Walkley-Black technique was used for the analysis of soil organic carbon for validation. The relationship between SOC and BSI is high, while the relationship between SOC and NDVI is very low, and the relationship between SOC and SAVI is medium. When BSI is high, the SOC will also be increased, and vice versa, and the SOC has a low impact due to the vegetation content. Land degradation causes nutrient depletion and soil erosion which can be reduced by analyzing the relationship between LULC and land degradation. The identification of SOC helps in precision farming and good yield for agriculture. Increasing SOC levels in degraded soils helps to restore soil health, improve soil fertility, and enhance the capacity of the soil to support healthy ecosystems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Jandl et al (2014) Current status, uncertainty and future needs in soil organic carbon monitoring. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.08.026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Lal R (2010) Beyond Copenhagen: Mitigating climate change and achieving food security through soil carbon sequestration. Food Secur 2(2):169–177. https://doi.org/10.1007/S12571-010-0060-9/TABLES/3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Schlesinger WHA, Jeffrey A (2000) Soil respiration and the global carbon cycle. Biogeochemistry 48:7–20

    Google Scholar 

  4. Verchot et al (2007) Climate change: linking adaptation and mitigation through agroforestry. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 12(5):901–918. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-007-9105-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lal R (2006) Carbon management in agricultural soils. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-006-9036-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Driss H, John M, Elizabeth RP, Zarco-Tejada, Strachan PJ, Ian B (2003) Hyperspectral vegetation indices and novel algorithms for predicting green LAI of crop canopies: Modeling and validation in the context of precision agriculture. Remote Sens Environ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2003.12.013

  7. Post WM, Kwon KC (2000) Soil carbon sequestration and land-use change: processes and potential. Glob Chang Biol 6:317–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gunnar VT, Lal R, Singh BR (2005) Soil carbon sequestration in sub-Saharan Africa: a review. Land Degrad Dev 16(1):53–71, Jan 2005. https://doi.org/10.1002/LDR.644.

  9. Lal R (2003) Offsetting global CO2 emissions by restoration of degraded soils and intensification of world agriculture and forestry. Land Degrad Dev 14(3):309–322. https://doi.org/10.1002/LDR.562

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Pimentel D, Kounang N (1998) Ecology of soil erosion in ecosystems. Ecosystem

    Google Scholar 

  11. Vågen TGW, Leigh A (2013) Mapping of soil organic carbon stocks for spatially explicit assessments of climate change mitigation potential. Environ Res Lett 8(1):015011, Feb 20130. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/8/1/015011

  12. Amundson R (2001) The carbon budget in soils. Earth Planet Sci

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jobbagy EGJ, Jobba J, Robert B (2000) April 2000 423 Belowground processes and global change 423 the vertical distribution of soil organic carbon and its relation to climate and vegetation. Ecol Appl 10(2):423–436

    Google Scholar 

  14. Guo LB, Gifford RM (2002) Soil carbon stocks and land use change: a meta analysis. Glob Chang Biol 8(4):345–360. https://doi.org/10.1046/J.1354-1013.2002.00486.X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Haboudane DM, Pattey JR, Zarco-Tejada E, Strachan PJ, Ian B (2004) Hyperspectral vegetation indices and novel algorithms for predicting green LAI of crop canopies: Modeling and validation in the context of precision agriculture. Remote Sens Environ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2003.12.013.

  16. Berthrong ST, Jobbagy EG, Jackson RB (2009) A global meta-analysis of soil exchangeable cations, pH, carbon, and nitrogen with afforestation. Ecol Appl 19(8):2228. https://doi.org/10.1890/08-1730.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Noreen B et al. (2002) Linkages between climate change and sustainable development. Clim Policy 2:129–144, Accessed: 02 Feb 2023. [Online]. Available: www.oecd.org

  18. Mark J, Tim W (2007) A framework for assessing climate change vulnerability of the Canadian forest sector. Forest Chronicle 83

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lal R (2004) Soil carbon sequestration to mitigate climate change. Geoderma 123(1–2):1–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.GEODERMA.2004.01.032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kirschbaum MUF (2000) Will changes in soil organic carbon act as a positive or negative feedback on global warming? Biogeochemistry 48:21–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Scharlemann JPW, Tanner EVJ, Hiederer R, Kapos V (2014) Global soil carbon: understanding and managing the largest terrestrial carbon pool. Carbon Manag 5(1):81–91. https://doi.org/10.4155/CMT.13.77/SUPPL_FILE/TCMT_A_10816421_SM0001.DOC

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Keshavarzi A, Sarmadian F, Shiri J, Iqbal M, Tirado-Corbalá R, Omran ESE (2017) Application of ANFIS-based subtractive clustering algorithm in soil cation exchange capacity estimation using soil and remotely sensed data. Measurement 95:173–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MEASUREMENT.2016.10.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Jandl R et al (2013) Current status, uncertainty and future needs in soil organic carbon monitoring ☆. Sci Total Environ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.08.026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Vaudour E, Gilliot JM, Bel L, Lefevre J, Chehdi K (2016) Regional prediction of soil organic carbon content over temperate croplands using visible near-infrared airborne hyperspectral imagery and synchronous field spectra. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf 49:24–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JAG.2016.01.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Zeng Y, Huang W, Zhan F, Zhang H, Liu H (2010) Study on the urban heat island effects and its relationship with surface biophysical characteristics using MODIS imageries. Geo-Spat Inf Sci 13(1):1–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11806-010-0204-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Saei Jamalabad M, Abkar AA (2004) Forest canopy density monitoring, using satellite images. Int Soc Photogrammetry Remote Sens

    Google Scholar 

  27. Huete AR (1988) A soil-adjusted vegetation index (SAVI). Remote Sens Environ 25(3):295–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/0034-4257(88)90106-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Umrit G, Ng Cheong R, Gillabel J, Merckx R (2014) Effect of conventional versus mechanized sugarcane cropping systems on soil organic carbon stocks and labile carbon pools in Mauritius as revealed by 13C natural abundance. Plant Soil 379(1–2):177–192, Jun 2014. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11104-014-2053-5/FIGURES/4

  29. Jandl R et al (2014) Current status, uncertainty and future needs in soil organic carbon monitoring. Sci Total Environ 468–469:376–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.08.026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Wei X, Shao M, Gale W, Li L (2014) Global pattern of soil carbon losses due to the conversion of forests to agricultural land. Sci Rep. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep04062

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. ShunHua Y et al (2015) The spatial variability of soil organic carbon in plain-hills transition belt and its environmental impact. China Environ Sci 35(12):3728–3736

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. P. Arthi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Arthi, A.P., Kumar, J.S. (2024). Spatial Analysis of Soil Organic Carbon in the Thuckalay Block of the Kanyakumari District. In: Reddy, K.R., Ravichandran, P.T., Ayothiraman, R., Joseph, A. (eds) Recent Advances in Civil Engineering. ICC IDEA 2023. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 398. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-6229-7_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-6229-7_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-99-6228-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-99-6229-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics